Comparison of Fine Particle Measurements from a Direct-Reading Instrument and a Gravimetric Sampling Method

REFERENCES

• Dockery , D. W. , Pope , C. A. III. and Xu , X. 1993 . An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities . N. Engl. J. Med. , 329 : 1753 – 1759 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope , C. A. III. 2000 . Epidemiology of fine particulate air pollution and human health: Biologic mechanisms and who's at risk? . Environ. Health Perspect. , 108 : 713 – 723 . Suppl 4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz , J. , Dockery , D. W. and Neas , L. M. 1996 . Is daily mortality associated specifically with fine particles? . J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. , 46 : 927 – 939 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Final Rule,” . Federal Register , 62 138, 38651 – 38701 . (18 July 1997)
   Google Scholar
• “Table Z-1. Limits for Air Contaminants” . 1997 . Code of Federal Regulations Title 29, Part 1910, Subpart Z
   Google Scholar
• American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH)® . 2003 . 2003 TLV®s and BEI®s, Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents , Cincinnati , Ohio : ACGIH .
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) . 2003 . NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards , Cincinnati , Ohio : DHHS (NIOSH) . (Pub. No. 97-140)
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) . 1984 . NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Fourth Edition , Cincinnati , Ohio : DHHS (NIOSH) . (Publication 94-113)
   Google Scholar
• Chang , L. T. , Koutrakis , P. , Catalano , P. J. and Suh , H. H. 2000 . Hourly personal exposures to fine particles and gaseous pollutants—Results from Baltimore, Maryland . J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. , 50 : 1223 – 1235 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard-Reed , C. , Rea , A. W. and Zufall , M. J. 2000 . Use of a continuous nephelometer to measure personal exposure to particles during the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Baltimore and Fresno Panel studies . J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. , 50 : 1125 – 1132 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson , T. , Long , T. and Ollison , W. 2000 . Prediction of hourly microenvironmental concentrations of fine particles based on measurements obtained from the Baltimore scripted activity study . J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. , 10 : 403 – 411 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehocky , A. H. and Williams , P. L. 1996 . Comparison of respirable samplers to direct-reading real-time aerosol monitors for measuring coal dust . Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. , 57 : 1013 – 1018 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magari , S. R. , Hauser , R. , Schwartz , J. , Williams , P. L. , Smith , T. J. and Christiani , D. C. 2001 . Association of heart rate variability with occupational and environmental exposure to particulate air pollution . Circulation , 104 : 986 – 991 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosmüller , H. , Arnott , W. P. and Rogers , C. F. 2001 . Time-resolved characterization of diesel particulate emissions. 2. Instruments for elemental and organic carbon measurements . Environ. Sci. Technol. , 35 : 1935 – 1942 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riediker , M. , Williams , R. , Devlin , R. , Griggs , T. and Bromberg , P. 2003 . Exposure to particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, and other air pollutants inside patrol cars . Environ. Sci. Technol. , 37 : 2084 – 2093 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang , L. T. , Suh , H. H. and Wolfson , J. M. 2001 . Laboratory and field evaluation of measurement methods for one-hour exposures to O3, PM2.5, and CO . J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. , 51 : 1414 – 1422 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung , A. , Chang , D. P. and Kleeman , M. J. 2001 . Comparison of real-time instruments used to monitor airborne particulate matter . J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. , 51 : 109 – 120 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran , G. , Adgate , J. L. , Hill , N. , Sexton , K. , Pratt , G. C. and Bock , D. 2000 . Comparison of short-term variations (15-minute averages) in outdoor and indoor PM2.5 concentrations . J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. , 50 : 1157 – 1166 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , R. , Suggs , J. and Rodes , C. 2000 . Comparison of PM2.5 and PM10 monitors . J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. , 10 : 497 – 505 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yanosky , J. D. , Williams , P. L. and MacIntosh , D. L. 2002 . A comparison of two direct-reading aerosol monitors with the federal reference method for PM2.5 in indoor air . Atmos. Environ. , 36 : 107 – 113 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TSI Incorporated . 2002 . Model 8520 DUSTTRAK Aerosol Monitor Operation and Service Manual , St. Paul , Minnesota : TSI Incorporated .
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO) . 1997 . Road Vehicles—Test Dust for Filter Evaluation—Part 1: Arizona Test Dust , Geneva : ISO . (ISO 12103-1) [Standard]
   Google Scholar
• Linak , W. P. , Miller , C. A. and Wendt , J. O. 2000 . Comparison of particle size distributions and elemental partitioning from the combustion of pulverized coal and residual fuel oil . J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. , 50 : 1532 – 1544 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glinsmann , P. W. and Rosenthal , F. S. 1985 . Evaluation of an aerosol photometer for monitoring welding fume levels in a shipyard . Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. , 46 : 391 – 395 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinds W. C. Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles, Second ed.
   Google Scholar