The Effect of Microbiological Containment Systems on Dexterity

REFERENCES

• Collins , C. 1983 . Laboratory Acquired Infections , London : Butterworth & Co. Ltd. .
   Google Scholar
• Bennett , A. , Parks , S. R. and Dennis , M. Containment testing of negative pressure isolators used to house laboratory animals infected with BL3 agents . Lab. Animals. , (In Press)
   Google Scholar
• Berridge , D. , Starky , G. , Jones , N. A.G. and Chamberlain , J. 1998 . A randomized controlled trial of double versus single gloving in vascular surgery . J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb. , 43 : 9 – 10 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimmond , T. , Rings , T. Taylor , C. 2003 . Sharps injury reduction using sharpsmart—A reusable sharps management system . J. Hosp. Infect. , 54 ( 3 ) : 232 – 238 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell , D. 1995 . Laboratory-associated infections and biosafety . Clin. Microbiol. Rev. , 8 ( 3 ) : 389 – 405 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herwald , B. 2001 . Laboratory-acquired parasitic infections from accidental exposures . Clin. Microbiol. Rev. , 14 ( 4 ) : 659 – 688 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch , J. 1994 . Can a simple test of visual-motor skill predict the performance of microsurgeons? . J. R. Coll. Edinb. , 39 ( 3 ) : 150 – 152 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Datta , V. 2002 . Relationship between skill and outcome in the laboratory-based model . Surgery , 131 ( 3 ) : 318 – 323 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer , J. and Bennett , A. M. 2006 . Comparing the level of dexterity offered by latex and nitrile Safeskin gloves . Ann. Occup. Hyg. , 50 ( 3 ) : 289 – 296 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiffin , J. 1948 . The Purdue Pegboard: Norms and studies of reliability and validity . J. Appl. Psychol. , 32 : 234 – 247 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines , M. and O'Connor , J. 1926 . A measure of finger dexterity . J. Personnel Res. , 4 : 379 – 382 .
   Google Scholar
• Fleishman , E. and Hempel , W. E. 1954 . A factor analysis of dexterity tests . Personnel Psychol. , 7 : 15 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green , H. and Berman , I. R. 1933 . A manual of selected occupational tasks for use in public employment offices . Employment Stabilization Res. Inst. , 2 : 59 – 75 .
   Google Scholar
• Darley , J. 1934 . The reliability of the tests in the standard battery . Employment Stabilization Res. Inst. , 3 : 194 – 199 .
   Google Scholar
• Bingham , W. 1937 . “ Tweezer dexterity test ” . In Aptitudes and Aptitude Testing , 281 – 286 . New York : Harper and Brothers .
   Google Scholar
• Reddon , J. , Gill , D. M. , Gauk , S. E. and Maerz , M. D. 1988 . Purdue Pegboard: Test-retest estimates . Percept. Motor Skills , 66 ( 2 ) : 503 – 506 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers , J. , Hebert , R. , Bravo , G. and Dutil , E. 1995 . The Purdue Pegboard Test: Normative data for people aged 60 and over . Disabil. Rehabil. , 17 ( 5 ) : 217 – 224 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buddenburg , L. and Davis , C. 2000 . Test-retest reliability of the Purdue Pegboard Test . Am. J. Occup. Ther. , 54 ( 5 ) : 555 – 558 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito , G. and Santos , T. R. 2002 . Morales Developmental norms for the Gardner Steadiness Test and the Purdue Pegboard: A study with children of a metropolitan school in Brazil . Brazil. J. Med. Biol. Res. , 35 : 931 – 949 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennathur , A. , Contrerasa , L. R. , Arcautea , K. and Dowling , W. 2003 . Manual dexterity of older Mexican American adults: A cross-sectional pilot experimental investigation . Int. J. Ind. Ergonom. , 32 : 419 – 431 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes , E. 1932 . Selecting women for shop work . Personnel J. , 11 ( 2 ) : 69 – 85 .
   Google Scholar
• Riley , M. , Cochran , D. J. and Schanbacher , C. A. 1985 . Force capability differences due to gloves . Ergonomics , 28 : 441 – 447 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers , B. and Goodno , L. 2000 . Evaluation of interventions to prevent needlestick injuries in health care occupations . Am. J. Prev. Med. , 18 ( 4S ) : 90 – 98 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson , J. and Mital , A. 1995 . An ergonomic evaluation of dexterity and tactility with increase in examination/surgical glove thickness . Ergonomics , 38 ( 4 ) : 723 – 733 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff , R. and Parker , S. B. 1993 . Gender- and age-specific changes in motor speed and eye-hand coordination in adults: Normative values for the finger tapping and grooved pegboard tests . Percept. Motor Skills , 76 : 1219 – 1230 . (3, Pt. 2)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters , M. , Servos , P. and Day , R. 1990 . Marked sex differences on a fine motor skill task disappear when finger size is used as covariate . J. Appl. Psychol. , 75 ( 1 ) : 87 – 90 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters , M. and Campagnaro , P. 1996 . Do women really excel over men in manual dexterity? . J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. , 22 ( 5 ) : 1107 – 1112 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchi , T. and Girelli , L. 1998 . Gender differences in visio-spatial processing: The importance of distinguishing between passive storage and active manipulation . Acta Psychologica , 99 : 1 – 16 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chipman , K. , Hampson , E. and Kimura , D. 2002 . A sex difference in reliance on vision during manual sequencing tasks . Neuropsychologia , 40 ( 7 ) : 910 – 916 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar