637
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Department

Harmonization of NIOSH Sampling and Analytical Methods With Related International Voluntary Consensus Standards

(Reported By)

REFERENCES

  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nmam (accessed October 8, 2014).
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): Guidelines for Air Sampling and Analytical Development and Evaluation. NIOSH Publ. No. 95-117. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH, 1995. . http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/95-117 (accessed October 21, 2014).
  • ASTM International: Committee D22 on Air Quality, Subcommittee D22.04 on Workplace Air Quality. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, Available at http://www.astm.org (accessed October 21, 2014).
  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO Technical Committee 146 on Air Quality, Subcommittee 2 on Workplace Air Quality. Geneva: ISO, Available at http://www.iso.org (accessed August 31, 2014).
  • European Committee for Normalization (Comité Européen de Normalisation [CEN]): Technical Committee 137 on Assessment of Workplace Exposure to Chemical and Biological Agents. Brussels: CEN, Available at http://standards.cen.eu (accessed March 27, 2014).
  • “National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act” (NTTAA), Public Law 104–113. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office 1996.
  • European Committee for Normalization (Comité Européen de Normalisation [CEN]): General Requirements for the Performance of Procedures for the Measurement of Chemical Agents. EN 482. Brussels: CEN, 2012.
  • Bartley, D.L.: Reconciling traditional accuracy assessment with the ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in air quality measurements. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 1:D37–D41 (2004).
  • ASTM International: ASTM D7440, Standard Practice for Characterizing Uncertainty in Air Quality Measurements. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2008.
  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (ISO GUM). Geneva: ISO, 2011.
  • Institut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Geseltzlichen Unfallversicherung (IFA): GESTIS Analytical Methods Database. Sankt Augustin, Germany: IFA, Available at http://www.dguv.de/ifa (accessed December 12, 2013).
  • Breuer, D., M.J. Quintana, and A.M. Howe: Results of the EU project entitled, “Analytical Methods for Chemical Agents,” for the evaluation of methods for analysis of hazardous substances in workplace air. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 3:D126–D136 (2006).
  • Ashley, K., and M. Harper: Closed-face filter cassette (CFC) sampling—Guidance on procedures for inclusion of material adhering to internal sampler surfaces. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 10:D29–D33 (2013).
  • ASTM International: Standard Test Method for the Determination of Metals and Metalloids in Airborne Particulate Matter by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES). ASTM D7035, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2010.
  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Workplace Air —Determination of Metals and Metalloids by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). ISO 30011. Geneva: ISO, 2011.
  • ASTM International: Standard Practice for Evaluating the Performance of Diffusive Samplers. ASTM D6246. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2013.
  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Workplace Atmospheres —Protocol for Evaluating the Performance of Diffusive Samplers. ISO 16107. Geneva: ISO, 2007.
  • Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA): Sampling and Analytical Methods —Analytical Studies. Sandy, UT: OSHA, www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/studies.html (accessed December 12, 2014)
  • Harper, M.: Personal monitoring —Passive. In Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering J. Reedijk (ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press, 2012.
  • Guild, L.V., K.H. Myrmel, G. Myers, et al.: Bi-level passive monitor evaluation—A reliable way of assuring sampling accuracy for a larger number of related chemical hazards. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 7:310–317 (1992).
  • Harper, M., and L.V. Guild: Experience in the use of the NIOSH diffusive sampler evaluation protocol. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 57:1115–1123 (1996).
  • Song, R., P.C. Schlecht, and K. Ashley: Field screening test methods—Performance criteria and performance characteristics. J. Hazard. Mater. 83:29–39 (2001).
  • Harper, M., and P.N. Smith: Occupational Hygiene—Gas Chromatography. In Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering, J. Reedijk, (ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press, 2012.
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): Components for Evaluation of Direct-Reading Monitors for Gases and Vapors. NIOSH Publ. No. 2012-162. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH, 2012. . Available at http:// www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2012-162 (accessed October 21, 2014).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.