Achieving Control of Occupational Exposures to Engineered Nanomaterials

REFERENCES

• Abbott, L.C., and A.D. Maynard: Exposure assessment approaches for engineered nanomaterials. Risk Anal. 30(11):1634–1644 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, H., F. Herzberg, A. Schulte, and M. Kolossa-Gehring: The carcinogenic potential of nanomaterials, their release from products and options for regulating them. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 214(3):231–238 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeman, C.D., L. Baumgartner, B.M. Carr, et al.: The hierarchy of environmental health and safety practices in the U.S. nanotechnology workplace. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 10(9):487–495 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD: Report of the OECD Workshop on the Safety of Manufactured Nanomaterials Building Co-operation, Co-ordination and Communication. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Washington, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, G., M. Ostraat, D.E. Evans, et al.: A strategy for assessing workplace exposures to nanomaterials. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 8(11):673–685 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Royal Society: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. London, England: Science Policy Section, The Royal Society, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ostiguy, C.: Engineered Nanoparticles: Current Knowledge about OHS Risks and Prevention Measures. Queébec, Canada: IRSST, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Canadian Academies: Small is Different a Scientific Perspective on the Regulatory Challenges of the Nanoscale. Ottawa, Ontario: Council of Canadian Academies/ Conseil des académies canadiennes, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Engeman, C.D., L. Baumgartner, B.M. Carr, et al.: Governance implications of nanomaterials companies' inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices. J. Nanopart. Res. 14(3):1 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, J.W., D.C. Zeldin, J.C. Bonner, and E.R. Nestmann: Pulmonary applications and toxicity of engineered nanoparticles. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Molec. Physiol. 295(3):L400–411 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murashov, V., P. Schulte, and J. Howard: Progression of occupational risk management with advances in nanomaterials. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 9(1):D12–D22 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallock, M.F., P. Greenley, L. DiBerardinis, and D. Kallin: Potential risks of nanomaterials and how to safely handle materials of uncertain toxicity. J. Chem. Health Safety 16(1):16–23 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Grieger, K.D., A. Baun, and R. Owen: Redefining risk research priorities for nanomaterials. J. Nanopart. Res. 12(2):383–392 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, D., M. Berges, M.A. Virji, et al.: Harmonization of measurement strategies for exposure to manufactured nano-objects; report of a workshop. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 56(1):1–9 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster, G.: Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. 74(1):1 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, K., X.Y. Li, and W. MacNee: Ultrafine (nanometre) particle mediated lung injury. J. Aerosol Sci. 29(5):553–560 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster, G., D. Lai, S. Olin, et al.: ILSI Research Foundation/Risk Science Institute Nanomaterial Toxicity Screening Working Group. Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: Elements of a screening strategy. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2(1):8–8 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostiguy, C., B. Soucy, G. Lapointe, C. Woods, L. Menard, and M. Trottier: Health Effects of Nanoparticles: Second Edition. (No. R-589). Montreal, Canada: Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauve en Sante et en Securite du Travail (IRSST), 2008.
   Google Scholar
• ISO: ISO/TR 12885:2008 Nanotechnologies -Health and Safety Practices in Occupational Settings Relevant to Nanotechnologies. (No. ISO/TR 12885:2008). Switzerland: ISO, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, D. Exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in different workplaces. Toxicology 269(2–3):120–127 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSI: Guide to Safe Handling and Disposal of Manufactured Nanomaterials. (No. PD6699–2). British Standards Institute, . PD6699–2, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, S.C., J. West, J.H. Butala, et al.: Workshop report: Strategies for setting occupational exposure limits for engineered nanomaterials. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 68(3):305–311 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuempel, E.D., V. Castranova, C.L. Geraci, and P.A. Schulte: Development of risk-based nanomaterial groups for occupational exposure control. J. Nanopart. Res. 14(9):1–15 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, A.D.: Nanotechnology: The next big thing, or much ado about nothing? Ann. Occup. Hyg. 51(1):1–12 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, M.L.: Anticipation of risks and benefits of emerging technologies: A prospective analysis method. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 13(5):1042–1052 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIOSH: Current Intelligence Bulletin 63: Occupational Exposure to Titanium Dioxide. Cincinnati, Ohio: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publ. Num. 2011–160:1–119 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH: Current Intelligence Bulletin 65: Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers. Cincinnati, Ohio: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publ. No. 2013–145:1–156 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Schulte, P.A., V. Murashov, R. Zumwalde, E.D. Kuempel, and C.L. Geraci: Occupational exposure limits for nanomaterials: State of the art. J. Nanopart. Res. 12(6):1971–1987 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warheit, D.B., C.M. Sayes, K.L. Reed, and K.A. Swain: Health effects related to nanoparticle exposures: Environmental, health and safety considerations for assessing hazards and risks. Pharmacol. Therapeut. 120(1):35–42 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, D.H.: Control banding approaches for nanomaterials. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 56(5):506–514 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methner, M., L. Hodson, and C. Geraci: Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials—part A. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 7(3):127–132 (2009a).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton, E.K., J. Finkelstein, G. Oberdörster, et al.: Concept of assessing nanoparticle hazards considering nanoparticle dosemetric and chemical/biological response metrics. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 73(5):445–461 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO.: ISO/TR 12802 nanotechnologies - model taxonomic framework for use in developing vocabularies - core concepts. (No. ISO/TR 12802:2010(E)). Switzerland: ISO.(2010)
   Google Scholar
• van Broekhuizen, P., and B. Dorbeck-Jung: Exposure limit values for nanomaterials—Capacity and willingness of users to apply a precautionary approach. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 10(1):46–53 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffin, R., C.L. Tran, A. Clouter, et al.: The importance of surface area and specific reactivity in the acute pulmonary inflammatory response to particles. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 46(Suppl. 1):242–245 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• van Broekhuizen, P.F. van Broekhuizen, R. Cornelissen, and L. Reijnders: Workplace exposure to nanoparticles and the application of provisional nanoreference values in times of uncertain risks. J. Nanopart. Res. 14(4):1–25 (2012a).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morimoto, Y., N. Kobayashi, N. Shinohara, T. Myojo, I. Tanaka, and J. Nakanishi: Hazard assessments of manufactured nanomaterials. J. Occup. Health 52(6):325–334 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke, I. A UK scheme to help small firms control health risks from chemicals: toxicological considerations. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 42(6):377–390 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, I.: The chemical industries association guidance on allocating occupatioal exposure bands. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 42(6):407–411 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, R.M., S.C. Maidment, I. Brooke, and M.D. Topping: An introduction to a UK scheme to help small firms control health risks from chemicals. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 42(6):367–376 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maidment, S.C.: Occupational hygiene considerations in the development of a structured approach to select chemical control strategies. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 42(6):391–400 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalk, D.M., S.Y. Paik, and P. Swuste: Evaluating the control banding nanotool: A qualitative risk assessment method for controlling nanoparticle exposures. J. Nanopart. Res. Interdiscipl. Forum Nanoscale Sci. Technol. 11(7):1685 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte, P., C. Geraci, R. Zumwalde, M. Hoover, and E. Kuempel: Occupational risk management of engineered nanoparticles. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 5(4):239–249 (2008b).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalk, D.M., and D.I. Nelson: History and evolution of control banding: A review. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 5(5):330–346 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik, S.Y., D.M. Zalk, and P. Swuste: Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 52(6):419–428 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen, K., L. Pylkkänen, H. Norppa, et al.: Nanotechnologies, engineered nanomaterials and occupational health and safety – A review. Safety Sci. 48(8):957–963 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casuccio, G., R. Ogle, K. Bunker, et al.: Worker and Environmental Assessment of Potential Unbound Engineered Nanoparticle Releases- Phase III Final Report: Validation of Preliminary Control Band Assignments. RJ Lee Goup Inc & E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2010. Available at http://www2.lbl.gov/ehs/esg/Reports/assets/Phase%20III%20Final%20Report2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Casuccio, G., R. Ogle, L. Wahl, and R. Pauer: Worker and Environmental Assessment of Potential Unbound Engineered Nanoparticle Releases- Phase II Final Report: Preliminary Control Band Development. RJ Lee Goup Inc & E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2009. Available at http://www2.lbl.gov/ehs/esg/Reports/assets/Phase%20II%20Final%20Report2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IFA: “Criteria for assessment of the effectiveness of protective measures. institut fur arbeitsschutz der deutschen gesetzlichen unfallversicherung,” 2009. Available at http://www.dguv.de/ifa/Fachinfos/Nanopartikel-am-Arbeitsplatz/Beurteilung-von-Schutzma%C3%9Fnahmen/index-2.jsp . (Retrieved March 6, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Van Broekhuizen, P., W. Van Veelen, W. Streekstra, P. Schulte, and L. Reijnders: Exposure limits for nanoparticles: Report of an international workshop on nano reference values. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 56(5):515–524 (2012b).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helland, A., H. Kastenholz, A. Thidell, P. Arnfalk, and K. Deppert: Special activities (research centres, institutes etc.), Internationella miljöinstitutet. Nanoparticulate materials and regulatory policy in Europe: An analysis of stakeholder perspectives. J. Nanopart. Res. 8(5):709–719 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignes, A., F. Muñoz, J. Bouillard, et al.: Risk assessment of the ignitability and explosivity of aluminum nanopowders. Process Safety Environ. Protect. 90(4):304–310 (2012). Available at http://dx.doi.org.proxy.bib.uottawa.ca/10.1016/j.psep.2011.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casuccio, G., R. Ogle, and L. Wahl: Environmental Monitoring Plan for Unbound Engineered Nanoparticles. RJ Lee Goup Inc & E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2011. Available at http://www2.lbl.gov/ehs/esg/Reports/assets/Phase%20IV%20EnvNanoMonitoringPlan10-5-11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eastlake, A.L. Hodson, C. Geraci, and C. Crawford: A critical evaluation of material safety data sheets (MSDSs) for engineered nanomaterials. J. Chem. Health Safety 19(5):1–8 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, J.H., W.K. Kuk, M. Kwon, J.H. Lee, K.S. Lee, and I.J. Yu: Evaluation of information in nanomaterial safety data sheets and development of international standard for guidance on preparation of nanomaterial safety data sheets. Nanotoxicology 7(3):338–345 (2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte, P.A., D. Trout, R.D. Zumwalde, et al.: Options for occupational health surveillance of workers potentially exposed to engineered nanoparticles: State of the science. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 50(5):517–526 (2008a).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social and Economic Council of The Netherlands (SER): Provisional Nano Reference Values for Engineered Nanomaterials: Advisory Report. (No. 12/01). Den Haag, The Netherlands, 2012. Available at http://www.ser.nl/~/media/Files/Internet/Talen/Engels/2012/2012_01/2012_01.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Songmene, V., J. Masounave, M. Viens, S. Hallé, and F. Morency: “Procedure for measuring and controlling manufactured nanoparticles,” 2010. Available at http://www.irsst.qc.ca/en/-project-procedure-for-measuring-and-controlling-manufactured-nanoparticles-0099-7860.html . (accessed October 25, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Methner, M., L. Hodson, A. Dames, and C. Geraci: Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials—part B: Results from 12 field studies. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 7(3):163–176 (2009b).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte, P.A., M.K. Schubauer-Berigan, C. Mayweather, C.L. Geraci, R. Zumwalde, and J.L. McKernan: Issues in the development of epidemiologic studies of workers exposed to engineered nanoparticles. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 51(3):323–335 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methner, M., C. Beaucham, C. Crawford, L. Hodson, and C. Geraci: Field application of the nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT): Task-based air monitoring during the processing of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) at four facilities. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 9(9):543–555 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helland, A., M. Scheringer, M. Siegrist, H.G. Kastenholz, A. Wiek, and R.W. Scholz: Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: A survey of industrial approaches. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42(2):640–646 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO: ISO/TR 13329:2012 - Nanomaterials - Preparation of Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), 2012. Switzerland. Available at http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=53705
   Google Scholar