Refinement of the Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique into the Nanomaterial Exposure Assessment Technique (NEAT 2.0)

References

• Methner, M., L. Hodson, and C. Geraci: Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials—Part A. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 7(3): 127–132 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methner, M., L. Hodson, A. Dames, and C. Geraci: Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials—Part B: Results from 12 field studies. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 7(3):163–176 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Old, L., and M. Methner: Engineering case reports: effectiveness of local exhaust ventilation (LEV) in controlling engineered nanomaterial emissions during reactor cleanout operations. J. Ocup. Environ. Hyg. 5(6):D63–D69 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methner, M., C. Beaucham, C. Crawford, L. Hodson, and C. Geraci: Field application of the Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique (NEAT): task-based air monitoring during the processing of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) at four facilities. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 9(9):543–555 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methner, M., C. Crawford, and C. Geraci: Evaluation of the potential airborne release of carbon nanofibers during the preparation, grinding, and cutting of epoxy-based nanocomposite material. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 9(5):308–318 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIOSH: NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), 4th ed. P. Schect, P. O'Conner, (eds.). Cincinnati, OH: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. PHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94–113 (August 1994); 1st Supplement Publication 96–135, 2nd Suppliement Publication 98–119; 3rd Supplement 2003–154. [http:www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003–154/]. (2003).
   Google Scholar
• OSHA: ”OSHA Sampling and Analytical Methods.“ W. Hendricks (ed.). Salt Lake City, UT: U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Available at http://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/index/html (2014).
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH: ”Guidelines for Air Sampling and Analytical Method Development and Evaluation: A NIOSH Technical Report.“ Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Pub Num 95–117, 1995 May: 1–104, (1995).
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH: ”Current Intelligence Bulletin 63: Occupational Exposure to Titanium Dioxide.“ Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Pub Num 2011–160, 2011 Apr: 1–119. 63(2011).
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH: ”Current Intelligence Bulletin 65: Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers.“ Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2013–145, 2013 Apr: 1–156 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH: ”Approaches to safe nanotechnology: managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineered nanomaterials.“ National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH (DHHS) Publication 125(2009).
   Google Scholar
• Poland, C.A., R. Duffin, I. Kinloch, et al.: Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3(7):423–428 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassian, V.H., P.T. O'Shaughnessy, A. Adamcakova-Dodd, J.M. Pettibone, and P.S. Thorne: Inhalation exposure study of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with a primary particle size of 2 to 5 nm. Environ. Health Perspect. 397–402 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, C.-W., J.T. James, R. McCluskey, and R.L. Hunter: Pulmonary toxicity of single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice 7 and 90 days after intratracheal instillation. Toxicol. Sci. 77(1):126–134 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdorster, G.: Significance of particle parameters in the evaluation of exposure-dose response relationships of inhaled particles. Partic. Sci. Technol. 14(2):135–151 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shvedova, A.A., J.P. Fabisiak, E.R. Kisin, et al.: Sequential exposure to carbon nanotubes and bacteria enhances pulmonary inflammation and infectivity. Am. J. Respir. Cell Molec. Biol. 8(5):579–590 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shvedova, A.A., E. Kisin, A.R. Murray, et al.: Inhalation vs. aspiration of single-walled carbon nanotubes in C57BL/6 mice: inflammation, fibrosis, oxidative stress, and mutagenesis. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung Cell. Molec. Physiol. 295(4):L552–L565 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shvedova, A.A., E.R. Kisin, R. Mercer, et al.: Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung Cell. Molec. Physiol. 289(5):L698–L708 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warheit, D.B., B.R. Laurence, K.L. Reed, D.H. Roach, G.A. Reynolds, and T.R. Webb: Comparative pulmonary toxicity assessment of single-wall carbon nanotubes in rats. Toxicol. Sci. 77(1):117–125 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahm, M.M., D.E. Evans, M.K. Schubauer-Berigan, M.E. Birch, and J.E. Fernback: Occupational exposure assessment in carbon nanotube and nanofiber primary and secondary manufacturers. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 56(5):542–556 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahm, M.M., D.E. Evans, M.K. Schubauer-Berigan, M.E. Birch, and J.A. Deddens: Occupational exposure assessment in carbon nanotube and nanofiber primary and secondary manufacturers: mobile direct-reading sampling. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 57(3):328–344 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, M.: Elemental carbon monitoring of diesel exhaust particulate in the workplace. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM 5040) 2003–2154 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Birch, M.E., and J.D. Noll: Submicrometer elemental carbon as a selective measure of diesel particulate matter in coal mines. J. Environ. Monitor. 6(10):799–806 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramachandran, G., M. Ostraat, D.E. Evans, M.M. Methner, P. O'Shaughnessy, J. D 'Arcy et al.: A strategy for assessing workplace exposures to nanomaterials. J. Occup. Envrion. Hyg. 8(11):673–685 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahm, M.M., M.K. Schubauer-Berigan, D.E. Evans, M.E. Birch, J.E. Fernback, and J.A. Deddens: Carbon nanotube and nanofiber exposure assessments: an analysis of 14 site visits. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 59(6):705–723 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastlake, A., L. Hodson, C. Geraci, and C. Crawford: A critical evaluation of material safety data sheets (MSDSs) for engineered nanomaterials. J. Chem. Health Saf. 19(5):1–8 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters, T.M., S. Elzey, R. Johnson, et al.: Airborne monitoring to distinguish engineered nanomaterials from incidental particles for environmental health and safety. J. Occup. Envrion. Hyg. 6(2):73–81 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeganeh, B., C.M. Kull, M.S. Hull, and L.C. Marr: Characterization of airborne particles during production of carbonaceous nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42(12):4600–4606 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwasny, F., P. Madl, and W. Hofmann: Correlation of air quality data to ultrafine particles (ufp) concentration and size distribution in ambient air. Atmosphere 1(1):3–14 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D.E., B.K. Ku, M.E. Birch, and K.H. Dunn: Aerosol monitoring during carbon nanofiber production: mobile direct-reading sampling. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 54(5):514–531 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIOSH: Current Strategies for Engineering Controls in Nanomaterial Production and Downstream Handling Processes. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Servies, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Preventio, National Institute for Occupational Safetyand Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2014–102, 2013 Nov: 1–79 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, A., C. Sparks, K. Martinez, J. Topmiller, A. Eastlake, and C. Geraci: Nano-metal Oxides: Exposure and Engineering control Assessment. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D.E., L.A. Turkevich, C.T. Roettgers, G.J. Deye, and P.A. Baron: Dustiness of fine and nanoscale powders. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 57(2):261–277 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BNL: Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) surface Wipe Sampling Procedure, IH75190 Standard Operating Procedure. Available at http://www.bnl.gov/esh/shsd/sop/pdf/ih_sops/ih75190.pdf (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, S., N. Neu-Baker, A. Eastlake, C. Beaucham, and C. Geraci: NIOSH field studies team assessment: Worker exposure to aerosolized metal oxide nanoparticles in a semiconductor fabrication facility. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1183015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safe Work Australia: Measuring and Assessing Emissions of Nanomaterials from Processes. (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Collier, Z.A., A.J. Kennedy, A.R. Poda, et al.: Tiered guidance for risk-informed environmental health and safety testing of nanotechnologies. J. Nanopart. Res. 17(3) (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S.C., V. Boyko, G. Meyers, M. Voetz, and W. Wohlleben: Toward advancing nano-object count metrology: A best practice framework. Environ. Health Perspect. 121(11–12): 1282–1291 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oomen, A.G., P.M.J. Bos, T.F. Fernandes, et al.: Concern-driven integrated approaches to nanomaterial testing and assessment-report of the NanoSafety Cluster Working Group 10. Nanotoxicology 8(3):334–348 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asbach, C., T.A.J. Kuhlbusch, H. Kaminski, B. Stahlmecke, S. Plitzko, U. Götz, M. Voetz, H.J. Kiesling, and D. Dahmann: Standard Operation Procedures: For assessing exposure to nanomaterials, following a tiered approach. In NanoGEM. ACGIH.(1999). Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. (ISO, Vol. 7708, No. 1995, pp. 1006–1015). [Standard] Cincinnati, OH:ACGIH, (2012).
   Google Scholar
• OECD: “Harmonized Tiered Approach to Measure and Assess the Potential Exposure to Airborne Emissions of Engineered Nano-Objects and their Agglmoerates and Aggregates at Workplaces.” Available at https://nanotechnology.americanchemistry.com/Nanotechnology/Resources/OECD-Harmonized-Tiered-Approach.pdf (accessed April 22, 2016).
   Google Scholar