Eggshells as a source for occupational exposure to airborne bacteria in hatcheries

References

• Lenhart, S., and S. Olenchock: Sources of respiratory insult in the poultry processing industry. Am. J. Ind. Med. 6(2):89–96 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey, J., and J. Dutkiewicz: Bioaerosols and occupational lung disease. J. Aerosol. Sci. 25(8):1371–1404 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donham, K., D. Cumro, S. Reynolds, and J. Merchant: Dose-response relationships between occupational aerosol exposures and cross-shift declines of lung function in poultry workers: recommendations for exposure limits. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 42(3):260–269 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radon, K., B. Danuser, M. Iversen, et al.: Respiratory symptoms in European animal farmers. Eur. Respir. J. 17(4):747–754 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rylander, R., and M.F. Carvalheiro: Airways inflammation among workers in poultry houses. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 79(6):487–490 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skorska, C., B. Mackiewicz, M. Golec, G. Cholewa, A. Chmielowiec-Korzeniowska, and J. Dutkiewicz: Health effects of exposure to organic dust in workers of a modern hatchery. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 14(2):341–345 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, E., and U. Jäckel: Characterization of bacterial contaminants in the air of a duck hatchery by cultivation based and molecular methods. J. Environ. Monit. 13(2):464–470 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin, E., S. Ernst, G. Lotz, G. Linsel, and U. Jäckel: Microbial exposure and respiratory dysfunction in poultry hatchery workers. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 15(2):478 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Board, R., and H. Tranter: The microbiology of eggs. In Egg Science and Technology, W. J. Stadelman, O. J. Cotterill (eds.). New York:Food Products Press - The Haworth Press, 1995. pp. 81–104.
   Google Scholar
• Berrang, M., N. Cox, J. Frank, and R. Buhr: Bacterial penetration of the eggshell and shell membranes of the chicken hatching egg: A review. J. Appl. Poultry Res. 8(4):499–504 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock, J.L., J. Dolman, and R. Board: Observations on the mode of bacterial infection of hens' eggs. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 100(1‐3):71–73 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, J., and E. Drysdale: Trans-shell transmission. In Microbiology of the Avian Egg, R. G. Board, R. Fuller (eds.). New York: Springer, 1994. pp. 63–91.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, N., and R. Board: Bacterial penetration of the recently oviposited shell of hens' eggs. Aust. Vet. J. 62(5): 169–70 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrang, M., N. Cox, J. Frank, R. Burh, and J. Bailey: Hatching egg sanitization for prevention or reduction of human enteropathogens: A review. J. Appl. Poultry Res. 9(2):279–284 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou, C., D. Dimitriou, S. Levidiotou, et al.: Bacterial strains isolated from eggs and their resistance to currently used antibiotics: Is there a health hazard for consumers? Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 20(1):35–40 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, K.G., and Y.S. Feig: The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora1. Limnol. Oceanogr. 25(5):943–948 (1980).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, E., P. Kämpfer, and U. Jäckel: Quantification and identification of culturable airborne bacteria from duck houses. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 54(2):217–227 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisburg, W., S. Barns, D. Pelletier, and D. Lane: 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 173(2):697–703 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucky, B.J.: SeqTrace: a graphical tool for rapidly processing DNA sequencing chromatograms. J. Biomol. Tech. 23(3):90 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tamura, K., J. Dudley, M. Nei, and S. Kumar: MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24(8):1596–1599 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura, K., D. Peterson, N. Peterson, G. Stecher, M. Nei, and S. Kumar: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28(10):2731–2739 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurlbert, S.H.: The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52(4):577–586 (1971).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck Jr, K.L., G. van Belle, and D. Simberloff: Explicit calculation of the rarefaction diversity measurement and the determination of sufficient sample size. Ecology 1459–1461 (1975).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simberloff, D.: Use of rarefaction and related methods in ecology. In Biological Data in Water Pollution Assessment: Quantitative and Statistical Analyses, K. L. Dickson, J. Cairns, R. J. Livingston (eds.). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 1978. pp. 150–165.
   Google Scholar
• Good, I.J.: The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 40(3-4):237–264 (1953).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, P.F., and J.Y. Aller: Bacterial diversity in aquatic and other environments: what 16S rDNA libraries can tell us. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 47(2):161–177 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, J.R., and J.T. Curtis: An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27(4):325–349 (1957).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyer, I., and K. Wesche: Multivariate Statistik in der Ökologie: Eine Einführung. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Crecchio, C., M. Curci, M.D. Pizzigallo, P. Ricciuti, and P. Ruggiero: Effects of municipal solid waste compost amendments on soil enzyme activities and bacterial genetic diversity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 36(10):1595–1605 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oravecz, O., D. Elhottová, V. Krištůfek, et al.: Application of ARDRA and PLFA analysis in characterizing the bacterial communities of the food, gut and excrement of saprophagous larvae of Penthetria holosericea (Diptera: Bibionidae): A pilot study. Folia Microbiol. 49(1):83–93 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rösch, C., and H. Bothe: Improved assessment of denitrifying, N2-fixing, and total-community bacteria by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis using multiple restriction enzymes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71(4):2026–2035 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakat, N., A. Westphal, S. Schmidt, and P. Scherer: Anaerobic digestion of renewable biomass: thermophilic temperature governs methanogen population dynamics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76(6):1842–1850 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, J., and W. Osborne: Effect of the egg shell membrane on bacteria. J. Food Sci. 21(2): 264–269 (1956).
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, L., and A. Brant: Effect of saline and egg shell membrane on bacterial growth. J. Food Sci. 22(3):241–250 (1957).
   Google Scholar
• Garibaldi, J., and J. Stokes: Protective role of shell membranes in bacterial spoilage of eggs. J. Food Sci. 23(3):283–290 (1958).
   Google Scholar
• Lifshitz, A., B.R. Baker, and H. Naylor: The exterior structures of the egg as nutrients for bacteria. J. Food Sci. 30(3):516–519 (1965).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wauters, G., V. Avesani, K. Laffineur, et al.: Brevibacterium lutescens sp. nov., from human and environmental samples. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 53(5):1321–1325 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onishi, J.C., J.-W. Park, M.M. Häggblom, M.J. Fennell, and M.N. Fugaro: Chronic laminitis is associated with potential bacterial pathogens in the laminae. Vet. Microbiol. 158(3):329–336 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devriese, L., J. Hommez, R. Wijfels, and F. Haesebrouck: Composition of the enterococcal and streptococcal intestinal flora of poultry. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 71(1):46–50 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjerrum, L., R. Engberg, T.D. Leser, B.B. Jensen, K. Finster, and K. Pedersen: Microbial community composition of the ileum and cecum of broiler chickens as revealed by molecular and culture-based techniques. Poult. Sci. 85(7):1151–1164 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, S., M. Morrison, and Z. Yu: Bacterial census of poultry intestinal microbiome. Poult. Sci. 92(3):671–683 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J., G. Kim, and C. Cha: Spatial heterogeneity and stability of bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tracts of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci.: PS3974 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Willinghan, E.M., J.E. Sander, S.G. Thayer, and J.L. Wilson: Investigation of bacterial resistance to hatchery disinfectants. Avian Dis. 510–515 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, K., and C. Phillips: The ecology, epidemiology and virulence of Enterococcus. Microbiology 155(6):1749–1757 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarestrup, F.M., Y. Agerso, P. Gerner–Smidt, M. Madsen, and L.B. Jensen: Comparison of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and resistance genes in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from humans in the community, broilers, and pigs in Denmark. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 37(2):127–137 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.F., T.D. Parrish, M. Akhtar, L. Zurek, and H. Hirt: Antibiotic resistance of enterococci in American bison (Bison bison) from a nature preserve compared to that of enterococci in pastured cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74(6):1726–1730 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diarra, M.S., H. Rempel, J. Champagne, L. Masson, J. Pritchard, and E. Topp: Distribution of antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes in Enterococcus spp. and characterization of isolates from broiler chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76(24):8033–8043 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, C.-L., A. Letellier, S. Quessy, M. Boulianne, D. Daignault, and M. Archambault: Multiple-antibiotic resistance of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from cecal contents in broiler chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Canada and plasmid colocalization of tetO and ermB genes. J. Food Prot. 74(10):1639–1648 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seputiene, V., and M. Ruzauskas: Antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis from diseased farm animals: pigs, cattle and poultry. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 15(3):431–438 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devriese, L., A. Van de Kerckhove, R. Kilpper-Bälz, and K. Schleifer: Characterization and identification of Enterococcus species isolated from the intestines of animals. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37(3):257–259 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Lemcke, R., and M. Bülte: Occurrence of the vancomycin-resistant genes vanA, vanB, vanC1, vanC2 and vanC3 in Enterococcus strains isolated from poultry and pork. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 60(2):185–194 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambarotto, K., M.-C. Ploy, F. Dupron, M. Giangiobbe, and F. Denis: Occurrence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in pork and poultry products from a cattle-rearing area of France. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39(6):2354–2355 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fracalanzza, S.A.P., E.M.D. Scheidegger, P.F.d. Santos, P.C. Leite, and L.M. Teixeira: Antimicrobial resistance profiles of enterococci isolated from poultry meat and pasteurized milk in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 102(7):853–859 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, K.C., F.R. Cockerill, and R. Patel: Clinical and epidemiological features of Enterococcus casseliflavus/flavescens and Enterococcus gallinarum bacteremia: a report of 20 cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32(11):1540–1546 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dargere, S., M. Vergnaud, R. Verdon, et al.: Enterococcus gallinarum endocarditis occurring on native heart valves. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40(6):2308–2310 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S.-H., S.-O. Lee, T.H. Kim, et al.: Clinical features and outcomes of bacteremia caused by Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus gallinarum: analysis of 56 cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38(1): 53–61 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tvrzová, L., P. Schumann, I. Sedláček, et al.: Reclassification of strain CCM 132, previously classified as Kocuria varians, as Kocuria carniphila sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55(1):139–142 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W.-Y., L.-L. Jiang, C.-J. Guo, and S.S. Yang: Jeotgalicoccus halophilus sp. nov., isolated from salt lakes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Micr. 61(7):1720–1724 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, M., J. Brown, and D. Jones: Brachybacterium faecium gen. nov., sp. nov., a coryneform bacterium from poultry deep litter. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 38(1):45–48 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Lu, J., and J. Santo Domingo: Turkey fecal microbial community structure and functional gene diversity revealed by 16S rRNA gene and metagenomic sequences. J. Microbiol. 46(5):469–477 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielowiec-Korzeniowska, A., L. Tymczyna, C. Skórska, J. Sitkowska, G. Cholewa, and J. Dutkiewicz: Efficacy of a novel biofilter in hatchery sanitation: I. Removal of airborne bacteria, dust and endotoxin. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 14(1):141–150 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, N., L. Richardson, R. Buhr, M. Musgrove, M. Berrang, and W. Bright: Bactericidal effect of several chemicals on hatching eggs inoculated with Salmonella serovar Typhimurium. J. Appl. Poultry Res. 16(4):623–627 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, J., N. Cox, L. Blankenship, and N. Stern: Hatchery contamination reduces the effectiveness of competitive exclusion treatments to control Salmonella colonization of broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 71(Suppl 1):6 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Cason, J., N. Cox, and J. Bailey: Transmission of Salmonella typhimurium during hatching of broiler chicks. Avian Dis. 583–588 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, J., R. Buhr, N. Cox, and M. Berrang: Effect of hatching cabinet sanitation treatments on Salmonella cross-contamination and hatchability of broiler eggs. Poult. Sci. 75(2):191–196 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander, J.E., J.L. Wilson, and G.L. Van Wicklen: Effect of formaldehyde exposure in the hatcher and of ventilation in confinement facilities on broiler performance. Avian Dis. 420–424 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, B., R. Buhr, M. Berrang, J. Bailey, and N. Cox: Reducing airborne pathogens, dust and Salmonella transmission in experimental hatching cabinets using an electrostatic space charge system. Poult. Sci. 81(1):49–55 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, B., and W. Waltman: Reducing airborne pathogens and dust in commercial hatching cabinets with an electrostatic space charge system. Avian Dis. 47(2):247–253 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthilselvan, A., Y. Zhang, J. Dosman, et al.: Positive human health effects of dust suppression with canola oil in swine barns. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 156(2):410–417 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tymczyna, L., A. Chmielowiec-Korzeniowska, and A. Drabik: The effectiveness of various biofiltration substrates in removing bacteria, endotoxins, and dust from ventilation system exhaust from a chicken hatchery. Poult. Sci. 86(10):2095–2100 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosman, J.A., A. Senthilselvan, S.P. Kirychuk, et al.: Positive human health effects of wearing a respirator in a swine barn. Chest 118(3):852–860 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmberg, L., B.M. Larsson, B.M. Sundblad, and K. Larsson: Partial protection by respirators on airways responses following exposure in a swine house. Am. J. Ind. Med. 46(4):363–370 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-A., A. Adhikari, S.A. Grinshpun, et al.: Respiratory protection provided by N95 filtering facepiece respirators against airborne dust and microorganisms in agricultural farms. J. Occup. Env. Hyg. 2(11):577–585 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovak, A., R. Orr, and E. Teasdale: Efficacy of the helmet respirator in occupational asthma due to laboratory animal allergy (LAA). Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 46(8):411–415 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuutinen, J., E. Terho, K. Husman, M. Kotimaa, R. Härkönen, and H. Nousiainen: Protective value of powered dust respirator helmet for farmers with farmer's lung. Eur. J. Respir. Dis. Suppl. 152:212–220 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Taivainen, A.I., H.O. Tukiainen, E.O. Terho, and K.R. Husman: Powered dust respirator helmets in the prevention of occupational asthma among farmers. Scand. J. Work Env. Hea. 24:503–507 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar