783
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An indoor air quality evaluation in a residential retrofit project using spray polyurethane foam

ORCID Icon, , , , &

References

  • Nazaroff, W.W.: Inhalation intake fraction of pollutants from episodic indoor emissions. Build. Environ. 43(3):269–277 (2008).
  • Ilacqua, V., O. Hänninen, N. Kuenzli, and M.F. Jantunen: Intake fraction distributions for indoor VOC sources in five European cities. Indoor Air 17(5):372–383 (2007).
  • Wolkoff, P.: Volatile organic compounds sources, measurements, emissions, and the impact on indoor air quality. Indoor Air 5(S3):5–73 (1995).
  • Yu, C., and D. Crump: A review of the emission of VOCs from polymeric materials used in buildings. Build. Environ. 33(6):357–374 (1998).
  • Gunschera, J., S. Mentese, T. Salthammer, and J.R. Andersen: Impact of building materials on indoor formaldehyde levels: Effect of ceiling tiles, mineral fiber insulation and gypsum board. Build. Environ. 64:138–145 (2013).
  • Batterman, S., and H. Burge: HVAC systems as emission sources affecting indoor air quality: A critical review. HVAC&R Res. 1(1):61–78 (1995).
  • Kemmlein, S., O. Hahn, and O. Jann: Emissions of organophosphate and brominated flame retardants from selected consumer products and building materials. Atmos. Environ. 37(39–40):5485–5493 (2003).
  • Uhde, E., and T. Salthammer: Impact of reaction products from building materials and furnishings on indoor air quality—A review of recent advances in indoor chemistry. Atmos. Environ. 41(15):3111–3128 (2007).
  • Liu, X., M.R. Allen, and N.F. Roache: Characterization of organophosphorus flame retardants' sorption on building materials and consumer products. Atmos. Environ. 140:333–341 (2016).
  • Wolkoff, P.: How to measure and evaluate volatile organic compound emissions from building products. A perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 227(2–3):197–213 (1999).
  • Meininghaus, R., L. Gunnarsen, and H.N. Knudsen: Diffusion and sorption of volatile organic compounds in building materials−Impact on indoor air quality. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34(15):3101–3108 (2000).
  • Sundell, J.: On the history of indoor air quality and health. Indoor Air 14(Suppl 7):51–58 (2004).
  • Bennett, D.H., M.D. Margni, T.E. McKone, and O. Jolliet: Intake fraction for multimedia pollutants: A tool for life cycle analysis and comparative risk assessment. Risk Anal. 22(5):905–918 (2002).
  • Collinge, W., A.E. Landis, A.K. Jones, L.A. Schaefer, and M.M. Bilec: Indoor environmental quality in a dynamic life cycle assessment framework for whole buildings: focus on human health chemical impacts. Build. Environ. 62(0):182–190 (2013).
  • Jolliet, O., A.S. Ernstoff, S.A. Csiszar, and P. Fantke: Defining product intake fraction to quantify and compare exposure to consumer products. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49(15):8924–8931 (2015).
  • Wenger, Y., D. Li, and O. Jolliet: Indoor intake fraction considering surface sorption of air organic compounds for life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 17(7):919–931 (2012).
  • Jones, A.P.: Indoor air quality and health. Atmos. Environ. 33(28):4535–4564 (1999).
  • American Chemistry Council: What Is Spray Foam. Available at https://www.whysprayfoam.org/what-is-spray-foam/ (Accessed June 7, 2017).
  • Spray Polyurethane Foam Alliance: Life Cycle Assessment of Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation for Residential & Commercial Building Applications, 2012. Available at http://www.sprayfoam.org/files/docs/SPFA%20LCA%20Long%20Summary%20New.pdf (Accessed July 31, 2017).
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency: Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) Insulation and How to Use It More Safely. Available at https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice/spray-polyurethane-foam-spf-insulation-and-how-use-it-more-safely (Accessed April 4, 2017).
  • Manuel, J.: Avoiding health pitfalls of home energy-efficiency retrofits. Environ. Health Perspect. 119(2):A76–79 (2011).
  • Ecoff, S., S. Tian, and J. Sebroski: Prioritizing Chemical Emissions from Closed-Cell Spray Polyurethane Foam: Utilizing Micro-Scale Chamber Emission Factors and Field Measurement Data. In Developing Consensus Standards for Measuring Chemical Emissions from Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) Insulation, J. Sebroski and M. Mason (eds.). Anaheim, CA: ASTM International, 2016. pp. 98–118.
  • Lesage, J., J. Stanley, W.J. Karoly, and F.W. Lichtenberg: Airborne methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) concentrations associated with the application of polyurethane spray foam in residential construction. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 4(2):145–155 (2007).
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology: Measuring Flame Retardant Emissions from Spray Polyurethane Foam in a Home, by D. Poppendieck and A. Connor. U.S. Department of Commerce, 2015.
  • Crespo, J., and J. Galan: Exposure to MDI during the process of insulating buildings with sprayed polyurethane foam. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 43(6):415–419 (1999).
  • Robert, W., R. Wood, and J. Andersen: Spray Polyurethane Foam Monitoring and Re-Occupancy of High Pressure Open Cell Applications to New Residential Constructions. Presented at the Polyurethanes Technical Conference, Dallas, TX, USA, September 22–24, 2014.
  • Wood, R.D.: Center for the Polyurethanes Industry summary of unpublished industrial hygiene studies related to the evaluation of emissions of spray polyurethane foam insulation. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 14(9):681–693 (2017).
  • Booth, K., B. Cummings, W.J. Karoly, et al.: Measurements of airborne methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) concentration in the U.S. workplace. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 6(4):228–238 (2009).
  • Poppendieck, D., M. Schlegel, A. Connor, and A. Blickley: Flame Retardant Emissions from Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation,” Developing Consensus Standards for Measuring Chemical Emissions from Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) Insulation. In Developing Consensus Standards for Measuring Chemical Emissions from Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation, J. Sebroski and M. Mason (eds.). Anaheim, CA: ASTM International, 2017. pp. 57–76.
  • Wood, R.: Estimating Re-Entry Times for Trade Workers Following the Application of Three Generic Spray Polyurethane Foam Formulations. In Developing Consensus Standards for Measuring Chemical Emissions from Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) Insulation, J. Sebroski and M. Mason (eds.). Anaheim, CA: ASTM International, 2017. pp. 148–166.
  • Sebroski, J., J.W. Miller, C.P. Thompson, and E. Roeske: Evaluation of Micro-Scale Chambers for Measuring Chemical Emissions from Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation. In Developing Consensus Standards for Measuring Chemical Emissions from Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) Insulation, J. Sebroski and M. Mason (eds.). Anaheim, CA: ASTM International, 2017. pp. 1–26.
  • Sebroski, J.: Developing ASTM Standards for Test Specimen Preparation and Measuring Emissions of Volatile and Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs and SVOCs) from Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) Insulation Products. Presented at the Polyurethanes Technical Conference, Phoenix, AZ, September 23–25, 2013.
  • Tian, S., S. Ecoff, and J. Sebroski: Predicting TCPP Emissions and Airborne Concentrations from Spray Polyurethane Foam Using USEPA i-SVOC Software: Parameter Estimation and Result Interpretation. In Developing Consensus Standards for Measuring Chemical Emissions from Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) Insulation, J. Sebroski and M. Mason (eds.). Anaheim, CA: ASTM International, 2016. pp. 167–198.
  • Bevington, C., Z. Guo, T. Hong, et al.: A Modeling Approach for Quantifying Exposures from Emissions of Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation in Indoor Environments. In Developing Consensus Standards for Measuring Chemical Emissions from Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) Insulation, J. Sebroski and M. Mason (eds.). Anaheim, CA: ASTM International, 2017. pp. 199–227.
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency: Potential Chemical Exposures From Spray Polyurethane Foam. Available at https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice/potential-chemical-exposures-spray-polyurethane-foam#curing (Accessed November 10, 2017).
  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Sampling and Analytical Method 47: Methylene Bisphenyl Isocyanate (MDI). [ Standard] Washington, D.C.: OSHA, 1989.
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency: Conditional Test Method 036: Method for Sampling Isocyanate Stack Emissions. [ Standard] Washington, D.C.: USEPA, 2005.
  • Schaeffer, J.W., L.M. Sargent, D.R. Sandfort, and W.J. Brazile: A comparison of two sampling methods for the detection of airborne methylene bisphenyl diisocyanate. J. Occup. Env. Hyg. 10(4):213–221 (2013).
  • ASTM International: ASTM D5197-09e1, Standard Test Method for Determination of Formaldehyde and Other Carbonyl Compounds in Air (Active Sampler Methodology). [ Standard] West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2009.
  • Liu, X., Z. Guo, K.A. Krebs, et al.: Laboratory study of PCB transport from primary sources to settled dust. Chemosphere 149:62–69 (2016).
  • Liu, Z., W. Ye, and J.C. Little: Predicting emissions of volatile and semivolatile organic compounds from building materials: A review. Build. Environ. 64:7–25 (2013).
  • Xu, Y., and J.C. Little: Predicting emissions of SVOCs from polymeric materials and their interaction with airborne particles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40(2):456–461 (2006).
  • Weschler, C.J., and W.W. Nazaroff: Semivolatile organic compounds in indoor environments. Atmos. Environ. 42(40):9018–9040 (2008).
  • Guo, Z.: A framework for modelling non-steady-state concentrations of semivolatile organic compounds indoors – II. Interactions with particulate matter. Indoor Built Environ. 23(1):26–43 (2013).
  • Weschler, C.J., and W.W. Nazaroff: SVOC partitioning between the gas phase and settled dust indoors. Atmos. Environ. 44(30):3609–3620 (2010).
  • Tisch Environmental Inc.: Marple Style Personal CascadeImpactors 290 Series Operators Manual. Tisch Environmental, Inc.: Cleves, Ohio. [ User Manual]
  • Xu, Y., and J. Zhang: Understanding SVOCs. ASHRA 53(12):121–125 (2011).
  • Guo, Z.: A framework for modelling non-steady-state concentrations of semivolatile organic compounds indoors – I: Emissions from diffusional sources and sorption by interior surfaces. Indoor Built Environ. 22(4):685–700 (2013).
  • Liu, C., G.C. Morrison, and Y. Zhang: Role of aerosols in enhancing SVOC flux between air and indoor surfaces and its influence on exposure. Atmos. Environ. 55:347–356 (2012).
  • Reysa, G.: Homemade Blower Door – Estimating Flow Rates, 50 Pa Flow, Natural Infiltration, Heat Loss, Fuel Costs, and Carbon Emissions. Available at http://www.builditsolar.com/Projects/Conservation/BlowerDoor/FlowRates.htm (Accessed March 5, 2017).
  • American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers: Standard 136–1993 (RA 2006) — A Method of Determining Air Change Rates in Detached Dwellings. [ Standard] Ann Arbor, MI: ASHRAE, 1993.
  • Center for the Polyurethanes Industry: Spray Polyurethane Foam Health and Safety – Reoccupancy. Available at https://spraypolyurethane.org/Reoccupancy (Accessed June 14, 2017).
  • Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment: OEHHA Acute, 8-hour and Chronic Reference Exposure Level (REL) Summary. Available at https://oehha.ca.gov/air/general-info/oehha-acute-8-hour-and-chronic-reference-exposure-level-rel-summary (Accessed February 28, 2017).
  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Permissible Exposure Limits – Annotated Tables. [ Standard] Washington, D.C.: Department of Labor, 1998.
  • The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: The NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. [ Standard] Cincinnati, Ohio: NIOSH Publications, 2007.
  • American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: 2016 TLVs and BEIs Based on the Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents & Biological Exposure Indices. [ Standard] Cininnati, OH: ACGIH, 2016.
  • U.S. Green Building Council: Indoor air quality assessment. [ Standard] Washington, D.C.: USGBC, 2015.
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency: Toxicological Review of Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate (monomeric MDI) and polymeric MDI (PMDI), by M.M. Greenberg. Office of Research and Development, February 1998.
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System Summary – Acetaldehyde, by Integrated Risk Information System. National Center for Environmental Assessment, October 1991.
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency: Toxicological Review of Propionaldehyde, by Stanek, J., S. Goldhaber, F. Stack and E. Zeiger ( EPA/635/R-08/003 F). National Center for Environmental Assessment, February 2008.
  • Occupational Alliance for Risk Science: Workplace Environmental Exposure Levels (WEELs) – Trans-1-Chloro-3,3,3-Trifluoropropene (1233zd(E)). [ Standard] Cincinnati, OH: Toxicology for Risk Assessment, 2013.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.