The general ventilation multipliers calculated by using a standard Near-Field/Far-Field model

References

• Hemeon, W.C.: Plant and Process Ventilation. 2nd ed. New York: Industrial Press, 1963. pp. 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Jayjock, M.A., T. Armstrong, and M. Taylor: The Daubert standard as applied to exposure assessment modeling using the two-zone (NF/FF) model estimation of indoor air breathing zone concentration as an example. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 8:D114–D122 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffenmanager: Online exposure and risk tool. Available at https://stoffenmanager.nl/ (accessed December 7, 2017), 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Marquart, H., H. Heussen, M. Le Feber, et al.: ‘Stoffenmanager’, a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 52:429–441 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinazzè, A., F. Lunghini, D. Campagnolo, et al.: Accuracy evaluation of three modelling tools for occupational exposure assessment. Ann. Work Expo. Health. 61:284–298 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Duuren-Stuurman, B., S.R. Vink, K.J. Verbist, et al.: Stoffenmanager Nano version 1.0: A web-based tool for risk prioritization of airborne manufactured nano objects. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 56:525–541 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Advanced Reach Tool (ART): Online exposure tool. Available at https://www.advancedreachtool.com/ (accessed December 7, 2017), 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fransman, W., J.W. Cherrie, M. van Tongeren, et al.: Development of a mechanistic model for the Advanced REACH Tool (ART) Version 1.0, TNO report V9009, Zeist, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fransman, W., J.W. Cherrie, M. van Tongeren, et al.: Development of a mechanistic model for the Advanced REACH Tool (ART) Version 1.5, TNO report V9009. Zeist, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Fransman, W., M. Van Tongeren, J.W. Cherrie, et al.: Advanced REACH Tool (ART): Development of the mechanistic model. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 55:957–979 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tielemans, E., N. Warren, W. Fransman, et al.: Advanced REACH Tool (ART): Overview of Version 1.0 and research needs. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 55:979–956 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel, J., N. Warren, W. Fransman, et al.: Advanced REACH Tool (ART): Calibration of the mechanistic model. J. Environ. Monit. 13:1374 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinkel, J., P. Ritchie, H. Goede, et al.: The Advanced REACH Tool (ART) – Incorporation of an exposure measurement database. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 57:717–727 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNally, K., N. Warren, W. Fransman, et al.: Advanced REACH Tool: a Bayesian model for occupational exposure assessment. Ann Occup Hyg. 58:551–565 (2014).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherrie, J.W.: The effect of room size and general ventilation on the relationship between near and far-field concentrations. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 14:539–546 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherrie, J.W., L. Maccalman, W. Fransman, E. Tielemans, M. Tischer, and M. Van Tongeren: Revisiting the effect of room size and general ventilation on the relationship between near- and far-field air concentrations. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 55:1006–1015 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Chemicals Agency: Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment. Chapter R.14: Occupational exposure assessment. Version 3.0. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13632/information_requirements_r14_en.pdf (accessed August 21, 2017), 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Nicas, M.: Estimating exposure intensity in an imperfectly mixed room. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 57:542–550 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., S. Banerjee, Yang, C. Lungu, and G. Ramachandran: Bayesian modeling of exposure and airflow using two-zone models. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 53:409–424 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganser, G.H., and P. Hewett: Models for nearly every occasion: Part II – Two box models. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 14:58–71 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drolet, D., T. Armstrong, and M. Jayjock: Exposure Assessment Strategies Committee: IH MOD Excel Exposure Models Suite. Available at https://www.aiha.org/get-involved/VolunteerGroups/Documents/IHMOD_Korean-AIHA-MathModel209.xls (accessed January 11, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• van Tongeren, M., J. Lamb, J.W. Cherrie, L. MacCalman, I. Basinas, and S. Hesse: Validation of lower tier exposure tools used for REACH: Comparison of tools estimates with available exposure measurements. Ann. Work Expo. Health 61:921–938 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinkel, J., W. Fransman, H. Heussen, H. Kromhout, H. Marquart, and E. Tielemans: Cross-validation and refinement of the Stoffenmanager as a first tier exposure assessment tool for REACH. Occup. Environ. Med. 2:125 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Lamb J., S. Hesse, B.G. Miller, et al.: Evaluation of Tier 1 Exposure Assessment Models under REACH (eteam) Project. www.baua.de/dok/6914104 (accessed December 7, 2017), 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Landberg H.E., P. Berg, L. Andersson, U., et al.: Comparison and evaluation of multiple users' usage of the exposure and risk tool: Stoffenmanager 5.1. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 59:821–835 (2015).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landberg, H.E., A. Axmon, H. Westberg, and H. Tinnerberg: A study of the validity of two exposure assessment tools: Stoffenmanager and the Advanced REACH Tool. Ann. Work. Expo. Health. 61:575–588 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedmann, R.A., B. Gasic, and D. Vernez: Sensitivity analysis, dominant factors, and robustness of the ECETOC TRA v3, Stoffenmanager 4.5, and ART 1.5 Occup. Expos. Mod. Risk Anal. 35:211–225 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto, A.J., A.C.Ø. Jensen, M. Levin, et al.: Testing a Near Field/Far Field model performance for prediction of particulate matter emissions in a paint factory. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 17:62 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Donnell, P.E., J.M. Schinkel, M.A. Coggins, et al.: Validation of the inhalable dust algorithm of the Advanced REACH Tool using a dataset from the pharmaceutical industry. J. Environ. Monit. 13:1597–1606 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bekker, C., E. Voogd, W. Fransman, and R. Vermeulen: The validity and applicability of using a generic exposure assessment model for occupational exposure to nano-objects and their aggregates and agglomerates. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 60:1039–1048 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savic, N., D. Racordon, D. Buchs, B. Gasic, and D. Vernez: TREXMO: A translation tool to support the use of regulatory occupational exposure models. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 60:991–1008 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savic N., B. Gasic, and D. Vernez: Stoffenmanager® algorithm within Version 6 differs from the published algorithm within old versions and TREXMO. Ann. Work Expos. Health. 61:607–610 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heussen, H., and A. Hollander: Stoffenmanager® exposure model algorithms within TREXMO and Stoffenmanager® lead to different outcomes. Ann. Work Expos. Health 61:604–606 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, V., E. Semenzin, D. Hristozov, et al.: Sustainable nanotechnology decision support system: Bridging risk management, sustainable innovation and risk governance. J. Nanopart. Res. 18:89 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU H2020 NMP30-2015 caLIBRAte (nr: 686239): www.nanocalibrate.eu/home, (accessed December 7, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Nazaroff, W.W., and Cass G.R.: Mathematical modeling of indoor aerosol dynamics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 23:157–165 (1989).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar