Occupational exposure to gaseous and particulate contaminants originating from additive manufacturing of liquid, powdered, and filament plastic materials and related post-processes

References

• Wohlers, T., I. Campbell, O. Diegel, J. Kowen, and J. Caffrey: Wohlers Report; 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry: Annual Worldwide Progress Report. Ft. Collins, CO: Wohlers Associates, Inc., 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, L., A, Kangas, and K. Kukko: Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer. J. Indust. Ecol. 14:94–106 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Azimi, P., Zhao, D., Pouzet, C., Crain, N. E., and B. Stephens: Emissions of ultrafine particles and volatile organic compounds from commercially available desktop three-dimensional printers with multiple filaments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50(3):1260–1268 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance, M. E., V. Pegues, S. Van Montfrans, W. Leng, and L. C. Marr: Aerosol emissions from fuse-deposition modeling 3D printers in a chamber and in real indoor environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51(17): 9516–9523 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, A. B., L.N. Bowers, A.K. Knepp, et al.: Three-dimensional printing with nano-enabled filaments releases polymer particles containing carbon nanotubes into air. Indoor Air 28(6):840–851 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, E. L., Wang, J., and J. L. Regens: Fume emissions from a low-cost 3-D printer with various filaments. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 14(7):523–533 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., J.P.S. Wong, A.Y. Davis, M.S. Black, and R. J. Weber: Characterization of particle emissions from consumer fused deposition modeling 3D printers. Aer. Sci. Technol. 51(11):1275–1286 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Rejeski D., F. Zhao, and Y. Huang: Research needs and recommendations on environmental implications of additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 19:21–28 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Steinle: Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer and indoor air measurements in office settings. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 13(2):121–132 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, A. B., R.F. LeBouf, J. Yi, et al.: Characterization of chemical contaminants generated by a desktop fused deposition modeling 3-dimensional printer. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 14(7):540–550 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., C. Yoon, S. Ham, et al.: Emissions of nanoparticles and gaseous material from 3D printer operation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49(20):12044–12053 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, B., P. Azimi, Z. El Orch, and T. Ramos: Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers. Atmos. Environ. 79:334–339 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unwin, J., M.R. Coldwell, C. Keen, and J.J. McAlinden: Airborne emissions of carcinogens and respiratory sensitizers during thermal processing of plastics. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 57(3):399–406 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pope, C.A., and D.W. Dockery: Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 56(6):709–742 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Win-Shwe, T-T., H. Fujimaki, K. Arashidani, and N. Kunugita: Indoor volatile organic compounds and chemical sensitivity reactions. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 623812 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization: Hazard Prevention and Control in the Work Environment: Airborne Dust. Occupational and Environmental Health Department of Protection of the Human Environment, August 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Tarvainen, K., R. Jolanki, L. Forsman-Grönholm, et al.: Exposure, skin protection and occupational skin diseases in the glass-fibre-reinforced plastics industry. Contact Dermatitis 29(3):119–127 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warheit, D.B., K.L. Reed, T.R. Webb, and G.L. Kennedy: A four-week inhalation toxicity study with nylon RFPs in rats: preliminary findings six months after exposure. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 46:173–175 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Savonius, B., H. Keskinen, M. Tuppurainen, and L. Kanerva: Occupational respiratory disease caused by acrylates. Clin. Exp. Allergy 23(5):416–424 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosavi, S. S., S.Y. Gosavi, and R.K. Alla: Local and systemic effects of unpolymerised monomers. Dent. Res. J. 7(2):82–87 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuomi, T., and S. Vainiotalo: The guideline and target values for total volatile organic compound concentrations in industrial indoor environments in Finland. Ind. Built Env. 25(2):434–434 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaden, D. A., C. Mandin, G. D. Nielsen, and P. Wolkoff: WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants. World Health Organization, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z-M., J. Wagner, and S. Wall: Characterization of laser printer nanoparticle and VOC emissions, formation mechanisms, and strategies to reduce airborne exposures. Aer. Sci. Technol. 45(9):1060–1068 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., J.B. Kim, J.H. Ji, S.B. Lee, and G. N. Bae: Nanoparticle formation in a chemical storage room as a new incidental nanoaerosol source at a nanomaterial workplace. J. Hazard. Mater. 298:36–45 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherrie, J. W., L.M. Brosseau, A. Hay, and K. Donaldson: Low-toxicity dusts: current exposure guidelines are not sufficiently protective. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 57(6):685–691 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang, X., P.K. Misztal, W.W. Nazaroff, and A. H. Goldstein: Siloxanes are the most abundant volatile organic compound emitted from engineering students in a classroom. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2:303–307 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, J., R.F. LeBouf, M.G. Duling, et al.: Emission of particulate matter from a desktop three-dimensional (3D) printer. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A. 79(11):453–465 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekhuizen, P., W. van Veelen, W-H. Streekstra, P. Schulte, and L. Reijnders: Exposure limits for nanoparticles: Report of an International Workshop of Nano Reference Values. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 56(5):515–524 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, T., J. Hurraß, R. Gminski, and V. Mersch-Sundermann: Fine and ultrafine particles emitted from laser printers as indoor air contaminants in German offices. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 19(9):3840–3849 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzyzanowski, M., J.J. Quackenboss, and M. D. Lebowitz: Chronic respiratory effects of indoor formaldehyde exposure. Environ. Res. 52(2):117–125 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, J. H., M.A. Rennen, and C. de Heer: Inhaled formaldehyde: evaluation of sensory irritation in relation to carcinogenicity. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 44(2):144–160 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurmatov, U. B., N. Tagiyeva, S. Semple, G. Devereux, and A. Sheikh: Volatile organic compounds and risk of asthma and allergy: a systematic review. Eur. Respir. Rev. 24(135):92–101 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECHA (European Chemicals Agency): “The brief profile for formaldehyde.” (2016) Available at http://echa.europa.eu/ brief-profile/-/briefprofile/100.000.002 (accessed August 8, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, C. L., and R. L. Maynard: Effects on health of prolonged exposure to low concentrations of carbon monoxide. Occup. Environ. Med. 59(10):708–711 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossman, B. T., P.J. Borm, V. Castranova, D.L. Costa, K. Donaldson, and S. R. Kleeberger: Mechanisms of action of inhaled fibers, particles and nanoparticles in lung and cardiovascular diseases. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 4:4 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maroni, M., B. Seifert, and T. Lindvall: Indoor Air Quality: A Comprehensive Reference Book. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Grzesik, K., and T. Terefeńko: Life cycle assessment of an inkjet printer. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 21(5A):95–105 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Buruaga, L., and J. A. Pomposo: Metal-free polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) nanoparticles by Enamine “Click” chemistry at room temperature. Polymers 3(4):1673–1683 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altintas, O., and C. Barner-Kowollik: Single chain folding of synthetic polymers by covalent and non-covalent interactions: current status and future perspectives. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 33(11):958–971 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, R., N. Rajaram, and S. M. Tarlo: Case report of asthma associated with 3D printing. Occup. Med. 67(8):652–654 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Chan, F.L., R. House, I. Kudla, J.C. Lipszyc, N. Rajaram, and S.M. Tarlo: Health survey of employees regularly using 3D printers. Occup. Med. 68(3):211–214 (2018).
   Google Scholar