Derivation of internal dose-based thresholds of toxicological concern for occupational inhalation exposure to systemically acting organic chemicals

References

• Debia, M., D. Begin, and M. Gerin: Solvent substitution: An analysis of comprehensive hazard screening indices. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 8(6): 387–399 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popendorf, W.: Vapor pressure and solvent vapor hazards. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 45(10): 719–726 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, S.O., and C. Rudén: Evaluating the risk decision process. Toxicology 218(2–3): 100–111 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, N.P., and R. Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah: An assessment of the robustness of the COSHH-Essentials (C-E) target airborne concentration ranges 15 years on, and their usefulness for determining control measures. Ann. Work Expos. Health. 61(3): 270–283 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henschler, D.: The concept of occupational exposure limits. Sci. Total. Environ. 101(1–2): 9–16 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, M.W., R.M. Park, A.J. Bailer, and C. Whittaker: Historical context and recent advances in exposure-response estimation for deriving occupational exposure limits. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 12(sup1): S7–S17 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illing, H.P.A.: Extrapolating from toxicity data to occupational exposure limits: Some considerations. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 35(6): 569–580 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paustenbach, D.J., D.M. Cowan, and J. Sahmel: The History and Biological Basis of Occupational Exposure Limits for Chemical Agents. In Patty's Industrial Hygiene, V.E. Rose and B. Cohrssen (eds.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2011, pp. 865–955.
   Google Scholar
• Skowroń, J., and S. Czerczak: Rules and recent trends for setting health-based occupational exposure limits for chemicals. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 28(2): 243–252 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuempel, E.D., L.M. Sweeney, J.B. Morris, and A.M. Jarabek: Advances in inhalation dosimetry models and methods for occupational risk assessment and exposure limit derivation. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 12(sup1): S18–S40 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, M.S.V.: Setting occupational exposure limits for unstudied pharmaceutical intermediates using an in vitro parallelogram approach. Toxicol. Mech. Methods. 21(2): 76–85 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIOSH: CDC - NIOSH Docket: The Occupational Exposure Banding Process: Guidance for the Evaluation of Chemical Hazards. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, D.G., B.D. Naumann, E.V. Sargent, A. Maier, and M. Dourson: Application of the threshold of toxicological concern concept to pharmaceutical manufacturing operations. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 43(1): 1–9 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartung, T.: Thresholds of toxicological concern – Setting a threshold for testing below which there is little concern. ALTEX – Altern. Anim. Ex. 34(3): 331–351 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroes, R., J. Kleiner, and A. Renwick: The threshold of toxicological concern concept in risk assessment. Toxicol. Sci. 86(2): 226–230 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chebekoue, S.F., and K. Krishnan: Derivation of occupational thresholds of toxicological concern for systemically acting noncarcinogenic organic chemicals. Toxicol. Sci. 160(1): 47–56 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACGIH: 2016 TLVs and BEIs: Based on the documentation of the threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents & biological exposure indices. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH Publications, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, I.C., R.A. Ford, E. Kennepohl, and J.G. Sprenger: Correlation of structural class with no-observed-effect levels: A proposal for establishing a threshold of concern. Food Chem. Toxicol. 34(9): 829–867 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partosch, F., H. Mielke, R. Stahlmann, B. Kleuser, S. Barlow, and U. Gundert-Remy: Internal threshold of toxicological concern values: Enabling route-to-route extrapolation. Arch. Toxicol. 89(6): 941–948 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastino, G.M., A.A. Kousba, L.G. Sultatos, and E.J. Flynn: Derivation of occupational exposure limits based on target blood concentrations in humans. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 37(1): 66–72 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poet, T.S., P.M. Schlosser, C.E. Rodriguez, R.J. Parod, D.E. Rodwell, and C.R. Kirman: Using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and benchmark dose methods to derive an occupational exposure limit for N-methylpyrrolidone. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 76: 102–112 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, L.M., T.R. Tyler, C.R. Kirman, et al.: Proposed occupational exposure limits for select ethylene glycol ethers using PBPK models and Monte Carlo simulations. Toxicol. Sci. 62(1): 124–139 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poet, T.S., C.R. Kirman, M. Bader, C. van Thriel, M.L. Gargas, and P.M. Hinderliter: Quantitative risk analysis for N-methyl pyrrolidone using physiologically based pharmacokinetic and benchmark dose modeling. Toxicol. Sci. 113(2): 468–482 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chebekoue, S.F., and K. Krishnan: A framework for application of quantitative property-property relationships (QPPRs) in physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for high-throughput prediction of internal dose of inhaled organic chemicals. Chemosphere 215:634–646 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardif, R., P.-O. Droz, G. Charest-Tardif, G. Pierrehumbert, and G. Truchon: Impact of human variability on the biological monitoring of exposure to toluene: I. Physiologically based toxicokinetic modelling. Toxicol. Lett. 134(1): 155–163 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulin, P., and K. Krishnan: Molecular structure-based prediction of the partition coefficients of organic chemicals for physiological pharmacokinetic models. Toxicol. Meth. 6(3): 117–137 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buist, H.E., L.d. Wit-Bos, T. Bouwman, and W.H.J. Vaes: Predicting blood:air partition coefficients using basic physicochemical properties. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 62(1): 23–28 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debia, M., and K. Krishnan: Quantitative property–property relationships for computing Occupational Exposure Limits and Vapour Hazard Ratios of organic solvents. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 21(7-8): 583–601 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECETOC. Guidance for Setting Occupational Exposure Limits: Emphasis on Data-Poor Substances. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals. Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kroes, R., A.G. Renwick, M. Cheeseman, et al.: Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC): Guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42(1): 65–83 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar