On site comparison of the OSHA 42, Asset EZ4-NCO, Iso-Chek, DAN and CIP10 methods for measuring toluene diisocyanate (TDI) at a polyurethane foam factory

References

• ACGIH. 2016. Toluene diisocyanate, 2,4- or 2,6- (or as a mixture). Cincinnati (OH): ACGIH.
   Google Scholar
• Allport DC, Gilbert DS, Outterside SM. 2003. Chapter 5.6, Occupational exposure limits, stack limits and community limits. In: Sons JW, editor. MDI and TDI: safety, health and the environment: a source book and practical guide. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• American Chemistry Council (ACC). Forthcoming 2014. Considerations for modifications to OSHA Method 42 air monitoring method: toluene diisocyanate (TDI). Washington (DC): Diisocyanate panel.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley KE, Streicher RP, Reh CM, Key-Schwartz R, Schlecht PC, Cassinelli ME, O’Connor PF. 2002. Selecting isocyanate sampling and analytical methods. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 17(3):157–162. doi:10.1080/104732202753438234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ASTM International. 2008. Determination of 2,4-toluene diisocyanate (2,4-TDI) and 2,6-toluene diisocyanate (2,6-TDI) in air (with 9-(n-methylaminomethyl) anthracene method) (MAMA) in the workplace. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM.
   Google Scholar
• Banks DE, Butcher BT, Salvaggio JE. 1986. Isocyanate-induced respiratory disease. Ann Allergy. 57(6):389–396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bello D, Nourian F, Ernst MK, Steinmetz MA, Streicher RP. 2013. Measuring total reactive isocyanate group using 1,8-diaminonaphthalene (DAN). Isocyanates and Health: Past, Present and Future; April 3-4; Bethesda (MD): Bolger Conference Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bello D, Streicher RP. 2013. Evaluation of the DAN method for the determination of total reactive isocyanate group: phase III-LC-MS/MS analytical finish & field testing. Manchester (UK): International Isocyanate Institute Inc. 11653.
   Google Scholar
• Bello D, Woskie SR, Streicher RP, Liu Y, Stowe MH, Eisen EA, Ellenbecker MJ, Sparer J, Youngs F, Cullen MR, et al. 2004. Polyisocyanates in occupational environments: a critical review of exposure limits and metrics. Am J Ind Med. 46(5):480–491. doi:10.1002/ajim.20076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin J, Spanne M, Dalene M, Karlsson D, Skarping G. 2008. Size-separated sampling and analysis of isocyanates in workplace aerosols-part II: aging of aerosols from thermal degradation of polyurethane. Ann Occup Hyg. 52(5):375–383. doi:10.1093/annhyg/men018
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahlin J, Spanne M, Karlsson D, Dalene M, Skarping G. 2008. Size-separated sampling and analysis of isocyanates in workplace aerosols. Part I. Denuder-cascade impactor sampler. Ann Occup Hyg. 52(5):361–374. doi:10.1093/annhyg/men017
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorner P, Fabries JF, Duquenne P, Witschger O, Wrobel R. 2006. Bioaerosol sampling by a personal rotating cup sampler CIP 10-M. JEM. 8(1):43–48. doi:10.1039/B508671J
   Google Scholar
• Guglya EB. 2000. Determination of isocyanates in air. J Anal Chem. 55(6):508–529. doi:10.1007/BF02757805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gui W, Wisnewski AV, Neamtiu I, Gurzau E, Sparer JA, Stowe MH, Liu J, Slade MD, Rusu OA, Redlich CA. 2014. Inception cohort study of workers exposed to toluene diisocyanate at a polyurethane foam factory: initial one-year follow-up. Am J Ind Med. 57(11):1207–1215. doi:10.1002/ajim.22385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gylestam D, Riddar JB, Karlsson D, Dahlin J, Dalene M, Skarping G. 2014. Dry sampling of gas-phase isocyanates and isocyanate aerosols from thermal degradation of polyurethane. Ann Occup Hyg. 58(1):28–49. doi:10.1093/annhyg/met046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpenny M, Brown J. 2013. ASSET EZ4-NCO dry sampler extraction procedure. Sigma-Aldrich. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/content/dam/sigma-aldrich/docs/Supelco/Instructions/1/ASSET_EZ4-NCO_Extraction.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins DM, Weckwerth C. 2016. Errors in variables regression with value-censored data. J Chemometrics. 30(6):332–335. doi:10.1002/cem.2797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health and Safety Laboratory (HSL). 2014. MDHS 25 - organic isocyanates in air. methods for the determination of hazardous substances. Sudbury, Suffolk (UK): Health and Safety Laboratory. p. 16. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mei036
   Google Scholar
• Henneken H, Vogel M, Karst U. 2007. Determination of airborne isocyanates. Anal Bioanal Chem. 387(1):219–236. doi:10.1007/s00216-006-0901-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornung RW, Reed LD. 1990. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 5(1):46–51. doi:10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389587
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 2008a. ISO 17734-1 - workplace atmospheres - determination of organonitrogen compounds in air using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry — part 1: isocyanates using dibutylamine derivatives.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2008b. ISO/TR 17737 - workplace atmospheres — guidelines for selecting analytical methods for sampling and analysing isocyanates in air.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2010. ISO 17736 - workplace air quality — determination of isocyanate in air using a double-filter sampling device and analysis by high pressure liquid chromatography.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2012. ISO 14382 - workplace atmospheres - determination of toluene diisocyanate vapours using 1-(2-pyridyl)piperazine-coated glass fibre filters and analysis by high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and fluorescence detectors.
   Google Scholar
• Kuck M, Ballé G, Slawyk W. 1999. Sampling of diisocyanates (HDI, TDI) in air by derivatisation with secondary amines as reagents. Analyst. 124(6):933–939. doi:10.1039/a808926d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesage J, Stanley J, Karoly WJ, Lichtenberg FW. 2007. Airborne methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) concentrations associated with the application of polyurethane spray foam in residential construction. J Occup Environ Hyg. 4(2):145–155. doi:10.1080/15459620601133779
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mapp CE, Butcher BT, Fabbri LM. 1999. Polyisocyanates and their prepolymers. In: Bernstein IL, Chan-Yeung M, Bernstein DI, editors. Asthma in the Workplace. New York (NY): Marcel Dekker, Inc. p. 457–478.
   Google Scholar
• Mapp CE, Corona PC, De Marzo N, Fabbri L. 1988. Persistent asthma due to isocyanates. A follow-up study of subjects with occupational asthma due to toluene diisocyanate (TDI). Am Rev Respir Dis. 137(6):1326–1329. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/137.6.1326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marand Å, Karlsson D, Dalene M, Skarping G. 2005. Solvent-free sampling with di-n-butylamine for monitoring of isocyanates in air. J Environ Monitor. 7(4):335–343. doi:10.1039/b414761h
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musk AW, Peters JM, Wegman DH. 1988. Isocyanates and respiratory disease: current status. Am J Ind Med. 13(3):331–349. doi:10.1002/ajim.4700130304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 1996. Preventing asthma and death from diisocyanate exposure DHHS. Vol. 1996-111. Cincinnati (OH): NIOSH. (NIOSH alert).
   Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA). 1992. Code of federal regulations: air contaminants, [29 CFR 1910.1000]. Washington (DC): GPO.
   Google Scholar
• Polymatrix Ltd. 2008. Isocyanate Index. http://www.polymatrix.co.uk/Assets/Cure%20Terms%20Glossary/Isocyanate%20Index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Puscasu S, Aubin S, Cloutier Y, Sarazin P, Van Tra H, Gagné S. 2015. CIP10 optimization for 4,4-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate aerosol sampling and field comparison with impinger method. Ann Occup Hyg. 59(3):347–357. doi:10.1093/annhyg/meu100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puscasu S, Aubin S, Cloutier Y, Sarazin P, Van Tra H, Gagné S. 2015. Comparison between the ASSET EZ4 NCO and impinger sampling devices for aerosol sampling of 4,4-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate in spray foam application. ANNHYG. 59(7):872–881. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mev025
   Google Scholar
• Puscasu S, Aubin S, Sarazin P, Richard L, Spence M, Gagné S. 2017. Use of the novel derivatizing agent 1,8-diaminonapthalene with the CIP10 sampler to measure 4,4′-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate atmospheres. Ann Work Expo Health. 61(5):566–574. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxx023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puscasu S, Aubin S, Spence M, Gagné S. 2016. Implementation and evaluation of an analytical method for a novel derivatizing agent to measure 4,4’-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate atmospheres. J Occup Environ Hyg. 13(8):598–603. doi:10.1080/15459624.2016.1159691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puscasu S, Aubin S, Van Tra H, Gagné S. 2014. Adaptation of CIP10 for the sampling of 4,4′-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate aerosols. Anal Methods. 6(4):1101–1107. doi:10.1039/c3ay41679h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quebec (Province) 2014. Regulation respecting occupational health and safety, [S-2.1, r.19.01]. Quebec (Canada): Publications du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Simon X, Bau S, Boivin A, Duquenne P, Witschger O, Görner P. 2016. Physical performances and kinetics of evaporation of the CIP 10-M personal sampler’s rotating cup containing aqueous or viscous collection fluid. Aerosol Sci Technol. 50(5):507–520. doi:10.1080/02786826.2016.1166173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanne M, Grzybowski P, Bohgard M. 1999. Collection efficiency for submicron particles of a commonly used impinger. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 60(4):540–544. doi:10.1080/00028899908984476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streicher RP, Kennedy ER, Lorberau CD. 1994. Strategies for the simultaneous collection of vapours and aerosols with emphasis on isocyanate sampling. Analyst. 119(1):89–97. doi:10.1039/an9941900089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streicher RP, Reh CM, Key-Schwartz RJ, Schlecht PC, Ellen M, Paula C, O’Connor F. 2000. Determination of airborne isocyanate exposure: considerations in method selection. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 61(4):544–556. doi:10.1080/15298660008984567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streicher RP, Bello D, Woskie SR, Grote AA, inventors; UMass Lowell Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (Department of Health and Human Services), assignee. 2006. Measurement of total reactive isocyanate groups in samples using bifunctional nucleophiles such as 1,8-diaminonaphthalene (DAN). United States patent US 2006/0130565 A1.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health (SNBOSH). 2000. Occupational exposure limit values. Vol. AFS 2000:3. Stockholm (Sweden): Arbetarskyddsstyrelsens Fösfattningssamling.
   Google Scholar
• Tinnerberg H, Dalene M, Skarping G. 1997. Air and biological monitoring of toluene diisocyanate in a flexible foam plant. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 58(3):229–235. doi:10.1080/15428119791012883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay P, Lesage J, Ostiguy C, Van Tra H. 2003. Investigation of the competitive rate of derivatization of several secondary amines with phenylisocyanate (PHI), hexamethylene-1,6-diisocyanate (HDI), 4,4′-methylenebis(phenyi isocyanate) (MDI) and toluene diisocyanate (TDI) in liquid medium. Analyst. 128(2):142–149. doi:10.1039/b209779f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenplas O, Cartier A, Lesage J, Perrault G, Grammer LC, Malo JL. 1992. Occupational asthma caused by a prepolymer but not the monomer of toluene diisocyanate (TDI). J Allergy Clinic Immunol. 89(6):1183–1188. doi:10.1016/0091-6749(92)90303-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenplas O, Malo JL, Saetta M, Mapp CE, Fabbri LM. 1993. Occupational asthma and extrinsic alveolitis due to isocyanates: current status and perspectives. BR J Ind Med. 50(3):213–228. doi:10.1136/oem.50.3.213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wierczyńska-Machura D, Brzeźnicki S, Nowakowska-Wirta E, Walusiak-Skorupa J, Wittczak T, Dudek W, Bonczarowska M, Wesołowski W, Czerczak S, Pałczyński C. 2015. Occupational exposure to diisocyanates in polyurethane foam factory workers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 28(6): 985–998. doi:10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar