Modeling occupational exposure to solvent vapors using the Two-Zone (near-field/far-field) model: a literature review

References

• Armstrong TW, Haas CN. 2007. Quantitative microbial risk assessment model for Legionnaires' disease: assessment of human exposures for selected spa outbreaks. J Occup Environ Hyg. 4(8):634–646. doi:10.1080/15459620701487539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold SF, Shao Y, Ramachandran G. 2017a. Evaluating well-mixed room and near-field-far-field model performance under highly controlled conditions. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(6):427–437. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1285492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold SF, Shao Y, Ramachandran G. 2017b. Evaluation of the well mixed room and near-field far-field models in occupational settings. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(9):694–702. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1321843
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ASTM. 1997. Standard guide for statistical evaluation of indoor air quality models (D5157–97). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin PE, Maynard AD. 1998. A survey of wind speeds in indoor workplaces. Ann Occup Hyg. 42(5):303–313. doi:10.1016/s0003-4878(98)00031-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelter FW, Simmons CE, Berman L, Scheff P. 2009. Two-zone model application to breathing zone and area welding fume concentration data. J Occup Environ Hyg. 6(5):298–306. doi:10.1080/15459620902809895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherrie JW, Schneider T. 1999. Validation of a new method for structured subjective assessment of past concentrations. Ann Occup Hyg. 43(4):235–245. doi:10.1016/S0003-4878(99)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earnest CM, Corsi RL. 2013. Inhalation exposure to cleaning products: application of a two-zone model. J Occup Environ Hyg. 10(6):328–335. doi:10.1080/15459624.2013.782198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtaw EJ, Pandian MD, Nelson DR, Behar JV. 1996. Modeling indoor air concentrations near emission sources in imperfectly mixed rooms. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 46(9):861–868. doi:10.1080/10473289.1996.10467522
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaffney S, Moody E, McKinley M, Knutsen J, Madl A, Paustenbach D. 2008. Worker exposure to methanol vapors during cleaning of semiconductor wafers in a manufacturing setting. J Occup Environ Hyg. 5(5):313–324. doi:10.1080/15459620801988014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganser GH, Hewett P. 2017. Models for nearly every occasion: Part II - two box models. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(1):58–71. doi:10.1080/15459624.2016.1213393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemeon W. 1955. Convection ventilation rate. In: Plant and process ventilation. New York: Industrial Press; p. 236–238.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstetter E, Spencer JW, Hiteshew K, Coutu M, Nealley M. 2013. Evaluation of recommended REACH exposure modeling tools and near-field, far-field model in assessing occupational exposure to toluene from spray paint. Ann Occup Hyg. 57(2):210–220. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mes062
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jayjock M, Logan P, Mader B, Owens J, Eldridge J, Costello M, Morken M, Lieder P. 2011. Modeled comparisons of health risks posed by fluorinated solvents in a workplace spill scenario. Ann Occup Hyg. 55(2):202–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayjock MA, Armstrong T, Taylor M. 2011. The Daubert standard as applied to exposure assessment modeling using the Two-Zone (NF/FF) model estimation of indoor air breathing zone concentration as an example. J Occup Environ Hyg. 8(11):D114–D122. doi:10.1080/15459624.2011.624387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil C. 1998. The development and evaluation of an emission factor for a toluene parts-washing process. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 59(1):14–19. doi:10.1080/15428119891010280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil C. 2000. A tiered approach to deterministic models for indoor air exposures. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 15(1):145–151. doi:10.1080/104732200301962
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keil C. 2009. General principles of physical-chemical models. Chapter 2. In: Keil C, Simmons C, Anthony T, editors. Mathematical models for estimating occupationnal exposure to chemicals. 2nd ed. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association; p. 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Keil C, Murphy R. 2006. An application of exposure modeling in exposure assessments for a university chemistry teaching laboratory. J Occup Environ Hyg. 3(2):99–106. doi:10.1080/15459620500498109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil C, Nicas M. 2003. Predicting room vapor concentrations due to spills of organic solvents. AIHA J (Fairfax, VA). 64(4):445–454. doi:10.1202/341.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keil C, Simmons C, Anthony T, Keil CB, Simmons CE, Anthony TR, editors. 2009. Mathematical models for estimating occupational exposure to chemicals. 2nd ed. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association.
   Google Scholar
• Keil C, Zhao Y. 2017. Interzonal airflow rates for use in near-field far-field workplace concentration modeling. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(10):793–800. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1334903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kromhout H, Oostendorp Y, Heederik D, Boleij JS. 1987. Agreement between qualitative exposure estimates and quantitative exposure measurements. Am J Ind Med. 12(5):551–562. doi:10.1002/ajim.4700120509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kromhout H, Symanski E, Rappaport SM. 1993. A comprehensive evaluation of within- and between-worker components of occupational exposure to chemical agents. Ann Occup Hyg. 37(3):253–270. doi:10.1093/annhyg/37.3.253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBlanc M, Allen JG, Herrick RF, Stewart JH. 2018. Comparison of the near field/far field model and the advanced reach tool (ART) model V1.5: exposure estimates to benzene during parts washing with mineral spirits. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 221(2):231–238. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.10.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee E, Feigley CE, Khan J, Hussey JR. 2007. The effect of worker's location, orientation, and activity on exposure. J Occup Environ Hyg. 4(8):572–582. doi:10.1080/15459620701455197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicas M. 1996. Estimating exposure intensity in an imperfectly mixed room. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 57(6):542–550. doi:10.1080/15428119691014756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicas M. 2003. Using mathematical models to estimate exposure to workplace air contaminants. Chem Health Saf. 10(1):14–21. doi:10.1016/S1074-9098(02)00413-6
   Google Scholar
• Nicas M. 2009. The near field/far field (two-box) model with a constant contaminant emission rate. Chapter 6. In: Keil C, Simmons C, Anthony T, editors. Mathematical models for estimating occupational exposure to chemicals. 2nd ed. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association; p. 47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Nicas M. 2016. The near field/far field model with constant application of chemical mass and exponentially decreasing emission of the mass applied. J Occup Environ Hyg. 13(7):519–528. doi:10.1080/15459624.2016.1148268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicas M, Armstrong T. 2003. Using a spreadsheet to compute contaminant exposure concentrations given a variable emission rate. AIHA J (Fairfax, VA). 64(3):368–375. doi:10.1080/15428110308984829
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicas M, Jayjock M. 2002. Uncertainty in exposure estimates made by modeling versus monitoring. AIHA J (Fairfax, VA). 63(3):275–283. doi:10.1080/15428110208984714
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicas M, Neuhaus J. 2008. Predicting benzene vapor concentrations with a near field/far field model. J Occup Environ Hyg. 5(9):599–608. doi:10.1080/15459620802282375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicas M, Plisko MJ, Spencer JW. 2006. Estimating benzene exposure at a solvent parts washer. J Occup Environ Hyg. 3(5):284–291. doi:10.1080/15459620600637390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicas M, Simmons BP, Spear RC. 1991. Environmental versus analytical variability in exposure measurements. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 52(12):553–557. doi:10.1080/15298669191365199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persoons R, Maitre A, Bicout DJ. 2011. Modelling the time profiles of organic solvent concentrations for occupational exposure assessment purposes. Ann Occup Hyg. 55(4):421–435. doi:10.1093/annhyg/meq090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persoons R, Maitre A, Bicout DJ. 2012. Modelling occupational inhalation exposure to concentration peaks of chemicals and associated health risk assessment. Ann Occup Hyg. 56(8):934–947. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mes021
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plisko J, Spencer JW. 2008. Evaluation of a mathematical model for estimating solvent exposures in the workplace. Chem Health Saf. 15(3):14–21. doi:10.1016/j.jchas.2007.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Rappaport SM, Kromhout H, Symanski E. 1993. Variation of exposure between workers in homogeneous exposure groups. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 54(11):654–662. doi:10.1080/15298669391355198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport SM, Spear RC, Selvin S. 1988. The influence of exposure variability on dose-response relationships. Ann Occup Hyg. 32(Inhaled Particles VI):529–537.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins A, Krause MW, Atallah R, Plisko MJ. 2012. Comparison of exposure measurements to near field–far field modeled results for benzene and base solvents during a cleaning process using plain or 0.1% benzene spiked toluene and xylene. Chem Health Saf. 19(6):3–11. doi:10.1016/j.jchas.2012.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Sahmel J, Unice K, Scott P, Cowan D, Paustenbach D. 2009. The use of multizone models to estimate an airborne chemical contaminant generation and decay profile: occupational exposures of hairdressers to vinyl chloride in hairspray during the 1960s and 1970s. Risk Anal. 29(12):1699–1725. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01311.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinkel J, Warren N, Fransman W, van Tongeren M, McDonnell P, Voogd E, Cherrie JW, Tischer M, Kromhout H, Tielemans E. 2011. Advanced REACH Tool (ART): calibration of the mechanistic model. J Environ Monit. 13(5):1374–1382. doi:10.1039/c1em00007a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spear RC, Selvin S, Schulman J, Francis M. 1987. Benzene exposure in the petroleum refining industry. Appl Ind Hyg. 2(4):155–163. doi:10.1080/08828032.1987.10390543
   Google Scholar
• Spencer JW, Plisko MJ. 2007. A comparison study using a mathematical model and actual exposure monitoring for estimating solvent exposures during the disassembly of metal parts. J Occup Environ Hyg. 4(4):253–259. doi:10.1080/15459620701205253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinazze A, Lunghini F, Campagnolo D, Rovelli S, Locatelli M, Cattaneo A, Cavallo DM. 2017. Accuracy evaluation of three modelling tools for occupational exposure assessment. Ann Work Expo Health. 61(3):284–298. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxx004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tielemans E, Noy D, Schinkel J, Heussen H, Van Der Schaaf D, West J, Fransman W. 2008. Stoffenmanager exposure model: development of a quantitative algorithm. Ann Occup Hyg. 52(6):443–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Grote J, Hurlimann C, Scheringer M, Hungerbuhler K. 2003. Reduction of occupational exposure to perchloroethylene and trichloroethylene in metal degreasing over the last 30 years: influences of technology innovation and legislation. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 13(5):325–340. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Grote J, Hurlimann C, Scheringer M, Hungerbuhler K. 2006. Assessing occupational exposure to perchloroethylene in dry cleaning. J Occup Environ Hyg. 3(11):606–619. doi:10.1080/15459620600912173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waters M, McKernan L, Maier A, Jayjock M, Schaeffer V, Brosseau L. 2015. Exposure estimation and interpretation of occupational risk: enhanced information for the occupational risk manager. J Occup Environ Hyg. 12(Suppl 1):S99–S111. doi:10.1080/15459624.2015.1084421
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams P, Knutsen J, Atkinson C, Madl A, Paustenbach D. 2007. Airborne concentrations of benzene associated with the historical use of some formulations of Liquid Wrench. J Occup Environ Hyg. 4(8):547–561. doi:10.1080/15459620701446642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar