Factors influencing the filtration performance of homemade face masks

References

• Abd-Elsayed A, Karri J. 2020. Utility of substandard face mask options for health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anesth Analg. 131(1):4–6. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000004841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen JG, Marr LC. 2020. Recognizing and controlling airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in indoor environments. Indoor Air. 30(4):557–558. doi:10.1111/ina.12697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi S, Cappa CD, Barreda S, Wexler AS, Bouvier NM, Ristenpart WD. 2020. Efficacy of masks and face coverings in controlling outward aerosol particle emission from expiratory activities. Sci Rep. 10(1):1–13. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72798-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin O, Emon B, Cheng S, Hong L, Chamorro LP, Saif MTA. 2020. Performance of fabrics for home-made masks against the spread of COVID-19 through droplets: a quantitative mechanistic study. Extreme Mech Lett. 40:100924. doi:10.1016/j.eml.2020.100924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becquemin M, Swift D, Bouchikhi A, Roy M, Teillac A. 1991. Particle deposition and resistance in the noses of adults and children. Eur Respir J. 4(6):694–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen LE. 2010. Does that face mask really protect you? Appl Biosaf. 15(2):67–71. doi:10.1177/153567601001500204
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2020. Strategies for optimizing the supply of facemasks. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/ppe-strategy/face-masks.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chu DK, Akl EA, Duda S, Solo K, Yaacoub S, Schünemann HJ, Chu DK, Akl EA, El-Harakeh A, Bognanni A, et al. 2020. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 395(10242):1973–1987. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drewnick F, Pikmann J, Fachinger F, Moormann L, Sprang F, Borrmann S. 2021. Aerosol filtration efficiency of household materials for homemade face masks: influence of material properties, particle size, particle electrical charge, face velocity, and leaks. Aerosol Sci Technol. 55(1):63–79. doi:10.1080/02786826.2020.1817846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA U. 2011. Exposure factors handbook 2011 edition (final). Washington, DC: EPA.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer EP, Fischer MC, Grass D, Henrion I, Warren WS, Westman E. 2020. Low-cost measurement of face mask efficacy for filtering expelled droplets during speech. Sci Adv. 6(36):eabd3083. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd3083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick ER. 1986. Fibers, filtration and electrostatics: a review of the new technology. J Air Pollut Contr Assoc. 36(2):205–209. doi:10.1080/00022470.1986.10466060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinshpun SA, Haruta H, Eninger RM, Reponen T, McKay RT, Lee S-A. 2009. Performance of an N95 filtering facepiece particulate respirator and a surgical mask during human breathing: two pathways for particle penetration. J Occup Environ Hyg. 6(10):593–603. doi:10.1080/15459620903120086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao W, Parasch A, Williams S, Li J, Ma H, Burken J, Wang Y. 2020. Filtration performances of non-medical materials as candidates for manufacturing facemasks and respirators. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 229:113582. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds WC. 1999. Aerosol technology: properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen L, Anderson N, Cassidy P, Weber R, Nelson T. 2005. Interpretation of inhalation airflow measurements for respirator design and testing. J Int Soc Respir Protect. 22(3/4):122.
   Google Scholar
• Jung H, Kim JK, Lee S, Lee J, Kim J, Tsai P, Yoon C. 2014. Comparison of filtration efficiency and pressure drop in anti-yellow sand masks, quarantine masks, medical masks, general masks, and handkerchiefs. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 14(3):991–1002. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2013.06.0201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konda A, Prakash A, Moss GA, Schmoldt M, Grant GD, Guha S. 2020. Aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth masks. ACS Nano. 14(5):6339–6347. doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c03252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung WW-F, Hung C-H, Yuen P-T. 2010. Effect of face velocity, nanofiber packing density and thickness on filtration performance of filters with nanofibers coated on a substrate. Sep Purif Technol. 71(1):30–37. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2009.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Leavey A, Wang Y, O'Neil C, Wallace MA, Burnham C-AD, Boon AC, Babcock H, Biswas P. 2018. Comparing the performance of 3 bioaerosol samplers for influenza virus. J Aerosol Sci. 115:133–145. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Zuo Z, Japuntich DA, Pui DY. 2012. Evaluation of filter media for particle number, surface area and mass penetrations. Ann Occup Hyg. 56(5):581–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller AV, Eden MJ, Oakes JM, Bellini C, Fernandez LA. 2020. Quantitative method for comparative assessment of particle removal efficiency of fabric masks as alternatives to standard surgical masks for PPE. Matter. 3(3):950–962. doi:10.1016/j.matt.2020.07.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueller W, Horwell CJ, Apsley A, Steinle S, McPherson S, Cherrie JW, Galea KS. 2018. The effectiveness of respiratory protection worn by communities to protect from volcanic ash inhalation. Part I: filtration efficiency tests. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 221(6):967–976. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIOSH. 2007. Procedure no. TEB-APR-STP-0059, revision 2.0. Determination of particulate filter efficiency level for N95 series filters against solid particulates for non-powered, air purifying respirators standard testing procedure (STP). Pittsburgh (PA): DHHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dowd K, Nair KM, Forouzandeh P, Mathew S, Grant J, Moran R, Bartlett J, Bird J, Pillai SC. 2020. Face masks and respirators in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of current materials, advances and future perspectives. Materials. 13(15):3363. doi:10.3390/ma13153363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perumalraj R. 2015. Characterization of electrostatic discharge properties of woven fabrics. J Textile Sci Eng. 6:4172.
   Google Scholar
• Podgorski A, Bałazy A, Gradoń L. 2006. Application of nanofibers to improve the filtration efficiency of the most penetrating aerosol particles in fibrous filters. Chem Eng Sci. 61(20):6804–6815. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2006.07.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prather KA, Marr LC, Schooley RT, McDiarmid MA, Wilson ME, Milton DK. 2020. Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Science. 370(6514):303–304. doi:10.1126/science.abf0521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengasamy S, Eimer B, Shaffer RE. 2010. Simple respiratory protection—evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20–1000 nm size particles. Ann Occup Hyg. 54(7):789–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengasamy S, Eimer BC, Shaffer RE. 2012. Evaluation of the performance of the N95-companion: effects of filter penetration and comparison with other aerosol instruments. J Occup Environ Hyg. 9(7):417–426. doi:10.1080/15459624.2012.685838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling K, Gentner D, Wilen L, Medina A, Buehler C, Perez-Lorenzo LJ, Godri Pollitt KJ, Bergemann R, Bernardo N, Peccia J. 2020. An accessible method for screening aerosol filtration identifies poor-performing commercial masks and respirators. doi:10.1038/s41370-020-0258-7
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer RE, Rengasamy S. 2009. Respiratory protection against airborne nanoparticles: a review. J Nanopart Res. 11(7):1661–1672. doi:10.1007/s11051-009-9649-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakya KM, Noyes A, Kallin R, Peltier RE. 2017. Evaluating the efficacy of cloth facemasks in reducing particulate matter exposure. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 27(3):352–357. doi:10.1038/jes.2016.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford RG, Ettinger HJ. 1972. Filter efficiency as a function of particle size and velocity. Atmospheric Environment (1967). 6(5):353–362. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(72)90201-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tcharkhtchi A, Abbasnezhad N, Seydani MZ, Zirak N, Farzaneh S, Shirinbayan M. 2021. An overview of filtration efficiency through the masks: mechanisms of the aerosols penetration. Bioact Mater. 6(1):106–122. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Xu G, Huang Y-W. 2020. Modeling the load of SARS-CoV-2 virus in human expelled particles during coughing and speaking. Plos One. 15(10):e0241539. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund. 2020. Advice on the use of masks for children in the community in the context of COVID-19: annex to the advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19. August 21. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/333919.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2020. Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance. June 5. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332293.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Liao L, Xiao W, Yu X, Wang H, Wang Q, Lin YL, Kilinc-Balci FS, Price A, Chu L. 2020. Household materials selection for homemade cloth face coverings and their filtration efficiency enhancement with triboelectric charging. Nano Lett. 20(7):5544–5552.
   Google Scholar