Occupational exposure during metal additive manufacturing: A case study of laser powder bed fusion of aluminum alloy

References

• AFNOR. 2014. Technical specifications of powders for additive manufacturing applications. norme NF E 67-010. https://www.boutique.afnor.org/xml/1058972.
   Google Scholar
• Aizenberg V, Grinshpun SA, Willeke K, Smith J, Baron PA. 2000. Performance characteristics of the button personal inhalable aerosol sampler. AIHAJ. 61(3):398–404. doi:10.1080/15298660008984550
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• André J. 2018. From additive manufacturing to 3D/4D printing: from concepts to current achievements. ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education).
   Google Scholar
• Annexe du règlement (CE). 2014. Journal officiel de l’Union européenne (440/2008). http://www.aida.ineris.fr.
   Google Scholar
• Azimi P, Zhao D, Pouzet C, Crain N, Stephens B. 2016. Emissions of ultrafine particles and volatile organic compounds from commercially available desktop three-dimensional printers with multiple filaments. Environ Sci Technol. 50(3):1260–1268. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b04983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balesdent J, Pétraud J, Feller C. 1991. Effects of ultrasound on the particle size distribution of organic matter in grounds. IRD. 29(2):95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Bau S, Rousset D, Payet R, Keller FX. 2020. Characterizing particle emissions from a direct energy deposition additive manufacturing process and associated occupational exposure to airborne particles. J Occup Environ Hyg. 17(2-3):59–72. doi:10.1080/15459624.2019.1696969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bau S, Witschger O, Galland B, Martin P. 2015. [Real-time metrology of chemical substances at the workstation: advantages and limits]. HST (INRS). 5–239.
   Google Scholar
• Baumers M, Kellens K, Gutowski TG, Duflou J, Lifset R, Flanagan W. 2017. Environmental dimensions of additive manufacturing: mapping application domains and their environmental implications: environmental dimensions of additive manufacturing. J Ind Ecol. 48:50–68. doi:10.1111/jiec.12629
   Google Scholar
• Boisselier D, Sankaré S. 2012. Influence of powder characteristics in laser direct metal deposition of SS316L for metallic parts manufacturing. Sci Direct. 39:455–463. doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.061
   Google Scholar
• Broday DM, Rosenzweig R. 2011. Deposition of fractal-like soot aggregates in the human respiratory tract. Aerosol Sci. 42(6):372–386. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. 2018. Workplace exposure: assessment of inhalation exposure to nano-objects and their agglomerates and aggregates CEN.EN 17058.
   Google Scholar
• DEKATI. 2004. Physique des aerosols. Impacteur en cascade DLPI+ [cascade impactor DLPI+]. http://www.addair.fr/product/impacteur-en-cascade-dlpi/.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas ST, Stanley WJ. 2014. Costs and cost effectiveness of additive manufacturing. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Special publication 1176:35–47. doi:10.6028/NIST.SP.1176
   Google Scholar
• Dupasquier D. 2018. [What are the risks associated with metal additive manufacturing?]. A3DM Additive Manufacturing; [accessed 2018 Jan 30]. https://www.a3dm-magazine.fr/magazine/toutes-industries/risques-lies-fabrication-additive-metallique.
   Google Scholar
• Eddy L, Morèle Y. 2008. [Performance of individual sampling pumps] (France). Hygiène et sécurité du travail (HST). (8):213–2297.
   Google Scholar
• EOS. 2014. Prototypes & Manufacturing Services G. E.-E. Material data sheet - EOS Aluminum AlSi10Mg. https://gpiprototype.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Forschungsgemeinschaft D. 2015. List of MAK and BAT values. Permanent Senate Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area. DFG. Report No. 51.
   Google Scholar
• Gokuldoss KP, Kolla S, Eckert J. 2017. Additive manufacturing processes: selective laser melting, electron beam melting and binder jetting. Materials. 10(6):672. doi:10.3390/ma10060672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon SC, Butala JH, Carter JM, Elder A, Gordon T, Gray G, Sayre PG, Schulte PA, Tsai CS, West J. 2014. Workshop report: strategies for setting occupational exposure limits for engineered nanomaterials. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 68(3):305–311. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff P, Ståhlbom B, Nordenberg E, Graichen A, Johansson P, Karlsson H. 2017. Evaluating measuring techniques for occupational exposure during additive manufacturing of metals: a pilot study. J Ind Ecol. 21(S1):S120–S129. doi:10.1111/jiec.12498
   Google Scholar
• Henrik H, Keld A, Alexander J, Fonseca A, Brostrom A. 2020. Nanoparticle exposure and workplace measurements during processes related to 3D printing of a metal object. Frontiers and Public Health 8:2–11. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.608718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IARC. 2012. IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Geneva: WHO. Human Carcinogen. p. 465.
   Google Scholar
• IFA. 2019. GESTIS Substance Database. Information system on hazardous substances of the German Social Accident Insurance. Institut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung. www.dguv.de/ifa/gestis-database.
   Google Scholar
• INRS. 2014. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles. National Research and Security Institute. Health and Security at Work Branch, Division of Risks; [accessed 2020]. http://www.inrs.fr/risques/nanomateriaux/metrologie.html.
   Google Scholar
• INRS. 2015. Calibration method for the quantification of pollutants. MétroPol; [accessed 2015 Oct]. http://www.inrs.fr/dms/inrs/PDF/metropol-analyse-etalonnage.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2008. Health and safety practices in occupational settings relevant to nanotechnologies. Nanotechnologies. TR 12885:2018. p. 79.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2012. Determination of metals and metalloids in airborne particulate matter by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. (2), 47.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb T, Schmidt P, Beisser R, Tremel J, Schmidt M. 2017. Safety in additive manufacturing: fine dust measurements for a process chain in laser beam melting of metals. RTe Journal – Fachforum Für Rapid Technologie. 2017:458. https://www.rtejournal.de/ausgabe-14-2017/4626
   Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Gill KD. 2009. Aluminium neurotoxicity: neurobehavioural and oxidative aspects. Arch Toxicol. 83(11):965–978. doi:10.1007/s00204-009-0455-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois E, Morèle Y, Lhuillier F. 2008. Performances des pompes de prélèvement individuel. Hygiène et sécurité du travail HST. (213):5–14. ND 2297
   Google Scholar
• O’Shaughnessy P. 2013. Occupational health risk to nanoparticulate exposure. R Soc Chem. 15:49–62. doi:10.1039/C2EM30631J
   Google Scholar
• Rossbach B, Buchta M, Csanády GA, Filser JG, Hilla W, Windorfer K, Stork J, Zschiesche W, Gefeller O, Pfahlberg A, et al. 2006. Biological monitoring of welders exposed to aluminium. Toxicol Lett. 162(2-3):239–245. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.09.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Union European. 2008. Regulation (EC) of the European Parliament. Europe: EUR-Lex. Vol. 020.
   Google Scholar
• Walter J, Baumgartel A, Hustedt M, Hebisch R, Kaierle S. 2018. Inhalation exposure to hazardous substances during powder-bed processes. Sci Direct. (74):295–299. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.114
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Asbach C, Fissan H, Hülser T, Kuhlbusch TAJ, Thompson D, Pui DYH. 2011. How can nanobiotechnology oversight science and industry: examples from environmental, health, and safety studies of nanoparticles (Nano-EHS). J Nanopart Res. 13(4):1373–1387. doi:10.1007/s11051-011-0236-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won Kim S, Harper M, Slaven J, Chisholm P, Lee T. 2010. Performance of high flow rate samplers for respirable particle collection. Ann Occup Hyg. 54(6):697–709. doi:10.1093/annhyg/meq050
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wouter B, Bert VW. 2017. Influence of 3D printing on transport: a theory and experts judgment based conceptual model. Transp Rev. 38:556–575. doi:10.1080/01441647.2017.1370036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar