Direct-reading instruments for aerosols: A review for occupational health and safety professionals part 2: Applications

References

• Andersson I-M, Rosén G. 2014. Research note: video exposure monitoring for transfer of knowledge in chemical hazards to small enterprises. Small Enterp Res. 21(2):223–228. doi:10.1080/13215906.2014.11082090
   Google Scholar
• Ando H, Sekoguchi S, Ikegami K, Yoshitake H, Baba H, Myojo T, Ogami A. 2021. Combining indoor positioning using Wi-Fi round trip time with dust measurement in the field of occupational health. Sensors. 21(21):7261. doi:10.3390/s21217261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute/Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (ANSI/AHAM). 2015. Method for measuring performance of portable household electric room air cleaners. Washington (DC): ANSI-AHAM. Report No.: AC-1-2015.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute/American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ANSI/ASAE). 2003. Agricultural cabs—engineering control of environmental air quality. Part 1: definitions, test methods, and safety practices. Mississauga (ON): Canadian Standards Association. Report No.: M676-06 ANSI/ASAE S525-1.2.
   Google Scholar
• Bächler P, Meyer J, Dittler A. 2022. Measurement of transient nanoparticle emissions of pulse-jet cleaned filters applying an engine exhaust particle sizer. Aerosol Sci Tech. 56(4):394–402. doi:10.1080/02786826.2022.2027335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron PA. 1994. Direct-reading instruments for aerosols. A review. Analyst. 119(1):35–40. doi:10.1039/AN9941900035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bau S, Rousset D, Payet R, Keller F-X. 2020. Characterizing particle emissions from a direct energy deposition additive manufacturing process and associated occupational exposure to airborne particles. J Occup Environ Hyg. 17(2-3):59–72. doi:10.1080/15459624.2019.1696969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beamer BR, Topmiller JL, Crouch KG. 2004. Development of evaluation procedures for local exhaust ventilation for united states postal service mail-processing equipment. J Occup Environ Hyg. 1(7):423–429. doi:10.1080/15459620490458486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman JD, Peters TM, Koehler KA. 2018. Optimizing a sensor network with data from hazard mapping demonstrated in a heavy-vehicle manufacturing facility. Ann Work Expo Health. 62(5):547–558. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxy020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisesi MS. 2004. Bisesi and Kohn’s industrial hygiene evaluation methods. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackford DB, Harris GW. 1978. Field experience with SIMSLIN II—a continuously recording dust sampling instrument. Ann Occup Hyg. 21(3):301–313. doi:10.1093/annhyg/21.3.301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blackley BH, Anderson KR, Panagakos F, Chipps T, Virji MA. 2022. Efficacy of dental evacuation systems for aerosol exposure mitigation in dental clinic settings. J Occup Environ Hyg. 19(5):281–294. doi:10.1080/15459624.2022.2053140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner SA, Neu-Baker NM, Eastlake AC, Beaucham CC, Geraci CL. 2016. NIOSH field studies team assessment: worker exposure to aerosolized metal oxide nanoparticles in a semiconductor fabrication facility. J Occup Environ Hyg. 13(11):871–880. doi:10.1080/15459624.2016.1183015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer C, Harrower M. 2021. ColorBrewer: color advice for cartography. State College (PA): The Pennsylvania State University; [accessed 2022 Feb 3]. https://colorbrewer2.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Bugarski AD, Hummer JA. 2020. Contribution of various types and categories of diesel-powered vehicles to aerosols in an underground mine. J Occup Environ Hyg. 17(4):121–134. doi:10.1080/15459624.2020.1718157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugarski AD, Hummer JA, Vanderslice S. 2016. Effects of hydrotreated vegetable oil on emissions of aerosols and gases from light-duty and medium-duty older technology engines. J Occup Environ Hyg. 13(4):293–302. doi:10.1080/15459624.2015.1116695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugarski AD, Schnakenberg GH, Hummer IA, Cauda E, Janisko SI, Patts LD. 2009. Effects of diesel exhaust after treatment devices on concentrations and size distribution of aerosols in underground mine air. Environ Sci Technol. 43(17):6737–6743. doi:10.1021/es9006355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecala AB, Cole GP, Reed WR, Britton J. 2014. EVADE Software—2.2. Pittsburgh (PA): NIOSH; [accessed 2022 Feb 9]. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/works/coversheet1867.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cecala AB, Organiscak JA, Zimmer JA, Heitbrink WA, Moyer ES, Schmitz M, Ahrenholtz E, Coppock CC, Andrews EH. 2005. Reducing enclosed cab drill operator’s respirable dust exposure with effective filtration and pressurization techniques. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2(1):54–63. doi:10.1080/15459620590903444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecala AB, Patts JR, Louk AK, Haas EJ, Colinet JF. 2020. Forty years of NIOSH/USBM-developed control technology. Min Eng. 72(6):28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cecala AB, Reed WR, Joy GJ, Westmoreland SC, O'Brien AD. 2013. Helmet-Cam: tool for assessing miners’ respirable dust exposure. Min Eng. 65(9):78–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cena LG, Peters TM. 2011. Characterization and control of airborne particles emitted during production of epoxy/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. J Occup Environ Hyg. 8(2):86–92. doi:10.1080/15459624.2011.545943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesard V, Belut E, Prevost C, Taniere A, Rimbert N. 2013. Assessing the containment efficiency of a microbiological safety cabinet during the simultaneous generation of a nanoaerosol and a tracer gas. Ann Occup Hyg. 57(3):345–359. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mes076.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen R, Yin H, Cole IS, Shen S, Zhou X, Wang Y, Tang S. 2020. Exposure, assessment and health hazards of particulate matter in metal additive manufacturing: a review. Chemosphere. 259:127452. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choe KT, Trunov M, Grinshpun SA, Willeke K, Harney J, Trakumas S, Mainelis G, Bornschein R, Clark S, Friedman W. 2000. Particle settling after lead-based paint abatement work and clearance waiting period. AIHAJ. 61(6):798–807. doi:10.1080/15298660008984589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choi K-M, Lee S-J. 2022. Physicochemical characteristics and occupational exposure of silica particles as byproducts in a semiconductor sub fab. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 19(3):1791. doi:10.3390/ijerph19031791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary S, Durkin MJ, Stoeckel DC, Steinkamp HM, Thornhill MH, Lockhart PB, Babcock HM, Kwon JH, Liang SY, Biswas P. 2021. A comparison of aerosol mitigation strategies and aerosol persistence in dental environments. St. Louis (MO); [accessed 2022 Jul 27]. 10.1101/2021.07.30.21261399Collingwood
   Google Scholar
• Collingwood S, Heitbrink WA. 2007. Field evaluation of an engineering control for respirable crystalline silica exposures during mortar removal. J Occup Environ Hyg. 4(11):875–887. doi:10.1080/15459620701665720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper MR, West GH, Burrelli LG, Dresser D, Griffin KN, Segrave AM, Perrenoud J, Lippy BE. 2017. Inhalation exposure during spray application and subsequent sanding of a wood sealant containing zinc oxide nanoparticles. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(7):510–522. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1296237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croteau GA, Flanagan ME, Camp JE, Seixas NS. 2004. The efficacy of local exhaust ventilation for controlling dust exposures during concrete surface grinding. Ann Occup Hyg. 48(6):509–518. doi:10.1093/annhyg/meh050.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Antonio N, Newnum J, Kanellis M, Howe B, Anthony TR. 2022. Assessment of respirable aerosol concentrations using local ventilation controls in an open multi-chair dental clinic. J Occup Environ Hyg. 19(5):1–14. doi:10.1080/15459624.2022.2050738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Arcy JB, Dasch JM, Gundrum AB, Rivera JL, Johnson JH, Carlson DH, Sutherland JW. 2016. Characterization of process air emissions in automotive production plants. J Occup Environ Hyg. 13(1):9–18. doi:10.1080/15459624.2015.1076161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Porto R, Kunz MN, Pistochini T, Corsi RL, Cappa CD. 2022. Characterizing the performance of a do-it-yourself (DIY) box fan air filter. Aerosol Sci Technol. 56(6):564–572. doi:10.1080/02786826.2022.2054674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasch J, D'Arcy J, Gundrum A, Sutherland J, Johnson J, Carlson D. 2005. Characterization of fine particles from machining in automotive plants. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2(12):609–625. doi:10.1080/15459620500377659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debia M, Bakhiyi B, Ostiguy C, Verbeek JH, Brouwer DH, Murashov V. 2016. A systematic review of reported exposure to engineered nanomaterials. ANNHYG. 60(8):916–935. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mew041
   Google Scholar
• Debia M, Weichenthal S, Dufresne A. 2014. Case study: ultrafine particles exposure in apprentice welders. J Occup Environ Hyg. 11(1):D1–D9. doi:10.1080/15459624.2013.836280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douwes J, Cheung K, Prezant B, Sharp M, Corbin M, McLean D, ‘t Mannetje A, Schlunssen V, Sigsgaard T, Kromhout H, et al. 2017. Wood dust in joineries and furniture manufacturing: an exposure determinant and intervention study. Ann Work Expo Health. 61(4):416–428. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxx020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBois CK, Murphy MJ, Kramer AJ, Quam JD, Fox AR, Oberlin TJ, Logan PW. 2022. Use of portable air purifiers as local exhaust ventilation during COVID-19. J Occup Environ Hyg. 19(5):310–317. doi:10.1080/15459624.2022.2053141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn KH, Tsai CS-J, Woskie SR, Bennett JS, Garcia A, Ellenbecker MJ. 2014. Evaluation of leakage from fume hoods using tracer gas, tracer nanoparticles and nanopowder handling test methodologies. J Occup Environ Hyg. 11(10):D164–D173. doi:10.1080/15459624.2014.933959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn KL, Hammond D, Menchaca K, Roth G, Dunn KH. 2020. Reducing ultrafine particulate emission from multiple 3D printers in an office environment using a prototype engineering control. J Nanopart Res. 22(5):112. doi:10.1007/s11051-020-04844-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastlake AC, Beaucham C, Martinez KF, Dahm MM, Sparks C, Hodson LL, Geraci CL. 2016. Refinement of the nanoparticle emission assessment technique into the nanomaterial exposure assessment technique (NEAT 2.0). J Occup Environ Hyg. 13(9):708–717. doi:10.1080/15459624.2016.1167278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echt A, Sieber W, Jones A, Jones E. 2002. Control of silica exposure in construction: scabbling concrete. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 17(12):809–813. doi:10.1080/10473220290107110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edmonds MA, Gressel MG, O'Brien DM, Clark NJ. 1993. Reducing exposures during the pouring operations of a brass foundry. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 54(5):260–266. doi:10.1080/15298669391354649.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellis D, Tatum M, Wang C, Thomas G, Peters TM. 2022. Combining physics-based and Kriging models to improve the estimation of noise exposure. J Occup Environ Hyg. 19(6):343–352. doi:10.1080/15459624.2022.2052081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteban Florez FL, Thibodeau T, Oni T, Floyd E, Khajotia SS, Cai C. 2021. Size-resolved spatial distribution analysis of aerosols with or without the utilization of a novel aerosol containment device in dental settings. Phys Fluids. 33(8):085102. doi:10.1063/5.0056229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans DE, Heitbrink WA, Slavin TJ, Peters TM. 2008. Ultrafine and respirable particles in an automotive grey iron foundry. Ann Occup Hyg. 52(1):9–21. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mem056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennelly M, Gallagher C, Harding M, Hellebust S, Wenger J, O'Sullivan N, O'Connor D, Prentice M. 2022. Real-time monitoring of aerosol generating dental procedures. J Dent. 120:104092. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galey L, Audignon S, Witschger O, Bau S, Judon N, Lacourt A, Garrigou A. 2020. What does ergonomics have to do with nanotechnologies? A case study. Appl Ergon. 87:103116. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia A, Eastlake A, Topmiller JL, Sparks C, Martinez K, Geraci CL. 2017. Nano-metal oxides: exposure and engineering control assessment. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(9):727–737. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1326699.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcia A, Jones E, Echt AS, Hall RM. 2014. An evaluation of an aftermarket local exhaust ventilation device for suppressing respirable dust and respirable crystalline silica dust from powered saws. J Occup Environ Hyg. 11(11):D200–D207. doi:10.1080/15459624.2014.955182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbey SE, Selvey LA, Mead-Hunter R, Mullins B, Netto K, Zhao Y, Rumchev KB. 2018. Occupational exposures to agricultural dust by Western Australian wheat-belt farmers during seeding operations. J Occup Environ Hyg. 15(12):824–832. doi:10.1080/15459624.2018.1521973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginestet A. 2012. Development and evaluation of a new test method for portable air cleaners. Brussels (Belgium): CETIAT. Report No.: 15.
   Google Scholar
• Goede H, Kuijpers E, Krone T, le Feber M, Franken R, Fransman W, Duyzer J, Pronk A. 2021. Future prospects of occupational exposure modelling of substances in the context of time-resolved sensor data. Ann Work Expo Health. 65(3):246–254. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxaa102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabinski CM, Methner MM, Jackson JM, Moore AL, Flory LE, Tilly T, Hussain SM, Ott DK. 2017. Characterization of exposure to byproducts from firing lead-free frangible ammunition in an enclosed, ventilated firing range. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(6):461–472. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1296232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray MI, Unwin J, Walsh PT, Worsell N. 1992. Factors influencing personal exposure to gas and dust in workplace air: application of a visualisation technique. Saf Sci. 15(4-6):273–282. doi:10.1016/0925-7535(92)90020-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gressel MG. 1997. An evaluation of a local exhaust ventilation control system for a foundry casting-cleaning operation. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 58(5):354–358. doi:10.1080/15428119791012711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gressel MG, Heitbrink WA, Jensen PA. 1993. Video exposure monitoring—a means of studying sources of occupational air contaminant exposure, part I—video exposure monitoring techniques. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 8(4):334–338. doi:10.1080/1047322X.1993.10389215
   Google Scholar
• Gressel MG, Heitbrink WA, Jensen PA, Cooper TC, O’Brien DM, McGlothlin JD, Fischbach TJ, Topmiller JL. 1992. Analyzing workplace exposures using direct reading instruments and video exposure monitoring techniques. Cincinnati (OH): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Physical Sciences and Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Gressel MG, Heitbrink WA, McGlothlin JD, Fischbach TJ. 1985. In-depth survey report: control technology for manual transfer of chemical powders at the B.F. Goodrich Company, Marietta Ohio. Cincinnati (OH): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Report No.: 149-33.
   Google Scholar
• Gressel MG, Heitbrink WA, McGlothlin JD, Fischbach TJ. 1987. Real-time, integrated, and ergonomic analysis of dust exposure during manual materials handling. Appl Ind Hyg. 2(3):108–113. doi:10.1080/08828032.1987.10389817
   Google Scholar
• Gressel MG, Heitbrink WA, McGlothlin JD, Fischbach TJ. 1988. Advantages of real-time data acquisition for exposure assessment. Appl Ind Hyg. 3(11):316–320. doi:10.1080/08828032.1988.10389864
   Google Scholar
• Gu J, Uhde E, Wensing M, Xia F, Salthammer T. 2019. Emission control of desktop 3D printing: the effects of a filter cover and an air purifier. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 6(8):499–503. doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gummesson K, Andersson I-M, Rosén G. 2015. Short-term variation in occupational exposure to air contaminants. J Occup Environ Hyg. 12(5):294–301. doi:10.1080/15459624.2014.987386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas E, Cecala A, Glowacki A, Schall J, Connor B. 2018. How health & safety professionals can use EVADE software to assess worker exposure. Cincinnati (OH): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; [accessed 2021 Mar 22]. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/works/coversheet2028.html.
   Google Scholar
• Haas E, Cecala A, Hoebbel C. 2016a. Using dust assessment technology to leverage mine site manager-worker communication and health behavior: a longitudinal case study. J Profess Res Soc Sci. 3(1):154–167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haas E, Willmer D, Cecala A. 2016b. Formative research to reduce mine worker respirable silica dust exposure: a feasibility study to integrate technology into behavioral interventions. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2(1):6–16. doi:10.1186/s40814-016-0047-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haas EJ, Cecala AB. 2015. Beyond assessment: helmet-cam technology influencing dust exposure awareness and response. Rock Prod. 118(11):28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Haas EJ, Cecala AB. 2017. Quick fixes to improve workers’ health: results using engineering assessment technology. Min Eng. 69(7):105–109. doi:10.19150/me.7622.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall RM, Heitbrink WA, Reed LD. 2002. Evaluation of a tractor cab using real-time aerosol counting instrumentation. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 17(1):47–54. doi:10.1080/104732202753306159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrower M, Brewer CA. 2003. ColorBrewer.org: an online tool for selecting colour schemes for maps. Cartogr J. 40(1):27–37. doi:10.1179/000870403235002042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Z, Gao Q, Henley A, Der Khatchadourian Z, Somerville W, Wiseman M, Mongeau L, Tamimi F. 2022. Efficacy of aerosol reduction measures for dental aerosol generating procedures. Aerosol Sci Technol. 56(5):413–424. doi:10.1080/02786826.2022.2040729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedlund A, Andersson I-M, Rosén G, Fleyeh H. 2015. Implementation of video monitoring in aluminium industry. Sweden: Högskolan Dalarna; [accessed 2021 Mar 19]. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:du-20472.
   Google Scholar
• Hedmer M, Loven K, Martinsson J, Messing ME, Gudmundsson A, Pagels J. 2022. Real-time emission and exposure measurements of multi-walled carbon nanotubes during production, power sawing, and testing of epoxy-based nanocomposites. Ann Work Expos Health. 66(7):878–894. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxac015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitbrink WA, Collingwood S. 2005. Aerosol generation by blower motors as a bias in assessing aerosol penetration into cabin filtration. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2(1):45–53. doi:10.1080/15459620590903020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitbrink WA, Cooper TC, Edmonds MA. 1994. Evaluation of ventilated sanders in the autobody repair industry. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 55(8):756–759. doi:10.1080/15428119491018664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitbrink WA, DʼArcy JB, Yacher JM. 2000a. Mist generation at a machining center. AIHAJ. 61(1):22–30. doi:10.1080/15298660008984511
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heitbrink WA, Evans DE, Peters TM, Slavin TJ. 2007. Characterization and mapping of very fine particles in an engine machining and assembly facility. J Occup Environ Hyg. 4(5):341–351. doi:10.1080/15459620701290081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitbrink WA, Gressel MG, Cooper TC, Fischbach T, O'brien DM, Jensen PA. 1993. Video exposure monitoring—a means of studying sources of occupational air contaminant exposure, Part 2—data interpretation. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 8(4):339–343. doi:10.1080/1047322X.1993.10389216
   Google Scholar
• Heitbrink WA, Hall RM, Reed LD, Gibb D. 1998. Review of ambient aerosol test procedures in ASAE Standard S525. J Agric Saf Health. 4(4):255–266. doi:10.13031/2013.15359
   Google Scholar
• Heitbrink WA, Lo L-M, Dunn KH. 2015. Exposure controls for nanomaterials at three manufacturing sites. J Occup Environ Hyg. 12(1):16–28. doi:10.1080/15459624.2014.930559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitbrink WA, Moyer ES, Jensen PA, Watkins DS, Martin SB. 2003. Environmental agricultural tractor cab filter efficiency and field evaluation. AIHA J. 64(3):394–400. doi:10.1080/15428110308984832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitbrink WA, Yacher JM, Deye GJ, Spencer AB. 2000b. Mist control at a machining center, Part 1: mist characterization. AIHAJ. 61(2):275–281. doi:10.1080/15298660008984537.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Council on Mining & Metals. 2022. Considerations for the adoption of real-time particulate monitoring. [accessed 2022 Jul 27]. https://www.icmm.com/en-gb/research/health-safety/2022/real-time-particulate-monitoring.
   Google Scholar
• Ipiña JMLD, Vaquero C, Egizabal A, Patelli A, Moroni L. 2021. Safe-by-design strategies applied to scaffold hybrid manufacturing. J Phys Conf Ser. 1953(1):012009. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1953/1/012009
   Google Scholar
• Jacks ME. 2002. A laboratory comparison of evacuation devices on aerosol reduction. J Dent Hyg. 76(3):202–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenero K, Mapes-Riordan L. 1992. Electronic monitoring of employees and the elusive right to privacy. Empl Relat Law J. 18(1):71–102.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen ACØ, Harboe H, Brostrøm A, Jensen KA, Fonseca AS. 2020. Nanoparticle exposure and workplace measurements during processes related to 3D printing of a metal object. Front Public Health. 8:608718. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.608718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Luo Y, McQuerrey J. 2018. Experimental study on effects of drilling parameters on respirable dust production during roof bolting operations. J Occup Environ Hyg. 15(2):143–151. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1395960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz EF, Goetz JD, Wang C, Hart JL, Terranova B, Taheri ML, Waring MS, DeCarlo PF. 2020. Chemical and physical characterization of 3D printer aerosol emissions with and without a filter attachment. Environ Sci Technol. 54(2):947–954. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b04012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellens K, Baumers M, Gutowski TG, Flanagan W, Lifset R, Duflou JR. 2017. Environmental dimensions of additive manufacturing: mapping application domains and their environmental implications. J Ind Ecol. 21(S1):S49–S68. doi:10.1111/jiec.12629
   Google Scholar
• Keller F-X, Chata F. 2018. Characterization of wood dust emission from hand-held woodworking machines. J Occup Environ Hyg. 15(1):13–23. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1368526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B, Lee JS, Choi B-S, Park S-Y, Yoon J-H, Kim H. 2013. Ultrafine particle characteristics in a rubber manufacturing factory. Ann Occup Hyg. 57(6):728–739. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mes102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim B, Shin JH, Kim HP, Jo MS, Kim HS, Lee JS, Lee HK, Kwon HC, Han SG, Kang N, et al. 2021. Assessment and mitigation of exposure of 3-D printer emissions. Front Toxicol. 3:817454. doi:10.3389/ftox.2021.817454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koehler KA, Peters TM. 2013. Influence of analysis methods on interpretation of hazard maps. Ann Occup Hyg. 57(5):558–570. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mes094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler KA, Volckens J. 2011. Prospects and pitfalls of occupational hazard mapping: ‘between these lines there be dragons’. Ann Occup Hyg. 55(8):829–840. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mer063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler KA, Zhu J, Wang H, Peters TM. 2017. Sampling strategies for accurate hazard mapping of noise and other hazards using short-duration measurements. Ann Work Expo Health. 61(2):183–194. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxw025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl K, Dobernowsky M. 2011. Application of PIMEX method: employees are motivated to change their working conditions and optimise preventive measures. Work. 39(4):379–384. doi:10.3233/WOR-2011-1188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwon O, Yoon C, Ham S, Park J, Lee J, Yoo D, Kim Y. 2017. Characterization and control of nanoparticle emission during 3D printing. Environ Sci Technol. 51(18):10357–10368. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laskaris Z, Milando C, Batterman S, Mukherjee B, Basu N, O'neill MS, Robins TG, Fobil JN. 2019. Derivation of time-activity data using wearable cameras and measures of personal inhalation exposure among workers at an informal electronic-waste recovery site in Ghana. Ann Work Expo Health. 63(8):829–841. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxz056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• le Feber M, Jadoenathmisier T, Goede H, Kuijpers E, Pronk A. 2021. Ethics and privacy considerations before deploying sensor technologies for exposure assessment in the workplace: results of a structured discussion amongst Dutch stakeholders. Ann Work Expo Health. 65(1):3–10. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxaa093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee T, Soo J-C, LeBouf RF, Burns D, Schwegler-Berry D, Kashon M, Bowers J, Harper M. 2018. Surgical smoke control with local exhaust ventilation: experimental study. J Occup Environ Hyg. 15(4):341–350. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1422082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Ghassemlooy Z, Tang X, Lin B, Zhang Y. 2018. A VLC smartphone camera based indoor positioning system. IEEE Photon Technol Lett. 30(13):1171–1174. doi:10.1109/LPT.2018.2834930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang H, Zhou Q, Erkan N, Suzuki S. 2022. Effect of spray properties on aerosol scavenging efficiency with water mist. Aerosol Sci Tech. 56(1):29–45. doi:10.1080/02786826.2021.1966377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillienberg L, Burdorf A, Mathiasson L, Thörneby L. 2008. Exposure to metalworking fluid aerosols and determinants of exposure. Ann Occup Hyg. 52(7):597–605. doi:10.1093/annhyg/men043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Hammond SK. 2010. Mapping particulate matter at the body weld department in an automobile assembly plant. J Occup Environ Hyg. 7(10):593–604. doi:10.1080/15459624.2010.509844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo L-M, Dunn KH, Hammond D, Almaguer D, Bartholomew I, Topmiller J, Tsai CS-J, Ellenbecker M, Huang C-C. 2012a. In-depth survey report: evaluation of engineering controls for manufacturing nanofiber sheets and yarns. Cincinnati (OH): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; [accessed 2022 Jun 8]. doi:10.26616/NIOSHEPHB35611a
   Google Scholar
• Lo L-M, Dunn KH, Hammond D, Marlow D, Tsai CS-J, Ellenbecker M, Huang C-C. 2012b. In-depth survey report: evaluation of engineering controls in a manufacturing facility producing carbon nanotube-based products. Cincinnati (OH): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; [accessed 2021 Mar 19]. doi:10.26616/NIOSHEPHB35613a
   Google Scholar
• Lo L-M, Hocker B, Steltz AE, Kremer J, Feng HA. 2017. Performance evaluation of mobile downflow booths for reducing airborne particles in the workplace. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(11):839–852. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1335404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo L-M, Tsai CS-J, Dunn KH, Hammond D, Marlow D, Topmiller J, Ellenbecker M. 2015. Performance of particulate containment at nanotechnology workplaces. J Nanopart Res. 17(11):435. doi:10.1007/s11051-015-3238-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowther SD, Jones KC, Wang X, Whyatt JD, Wild O, Booker D. 2019. Particulate matter measurement indoors: a review of metrics, sensors, needs, and applications. Environ Sci Technol. 53(20):11644–11656. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b03425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin J, Demokritou P, Woskie S, Bello D. 2017. Indoor air quality in photocopy centers, nanoparticle exposures at photocopy workstations, and the need for exposure controls. Ann Work Expo Health. 61(1):110–122. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxw016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin SB, Beamer BR, Moyer ES. 2006. Evaluation of a high-efficiency, filter-bank system. J Occup Environ Hyg. 3(4):204–213; quiz D45. doi:10.1080/15459620600584378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzuckelli L, Golla V, Heitbrink W. 2004. Control technology for crystalline silica exposures in construction: wet abrasive blasting. J Occup Environ Hyg. 1(3):D26–D32. doi:10.1080/15459620490279665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarry P, Clifford S, Knibbs LD, He C, Morawska L. 2016. Application of multi-metric approach to characterization of particle emissions from nanotechnology and nonnanotechnology processes. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 13(10). D175–D197, DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1200194.
   Google Scholar
• McGarry P, Morawska L, Knibbs LD, Morris H. 2013. Excursion guidance criteria to guide control of peak emission and exposure to airborne engineered particles. J Occup Environ Hyg. 10(11):640–651. doi:10.1080/15459624.2013.831987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlothlin JD. 2005. Occupational exposure visualization comes of age. Ann Occup Hyg. 49(3):197–199. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mei008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGlothlin JD. 2009. Video exposure monitoring: the wow factor. Synergist. 20(9):35–37.
   Google Scholar
• McGovern V. 2004. Keeping an eye on exposure: video monitoring in the lab. Environ Health Perspect. 112(6):A364–A366. doi:10.1289/ehp.112-a364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methner M, Beaucham C, Crawford C, Hodson L, Geraci C. 2012a. Field application of the nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT): task-based air monitoring during the processing of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) at four facilities. J Occup Environ Hyg. 9(9):543–555. doi:10.1080/15459624.2012.699388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methner M, Crawford C, Geraci C. 2012b. Evaluation of the potential airborne release of carbon nanofibers during the preparation, grinding, and cutting of epoxy-based nanocomposite material. J Occup Environ Hyg. 9(5):308–318. doi:10.1080/15459624.2012.670790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methner M, Hodson L, Dames A, Geraci C. 2010a. Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials—part B: results from 12 field studies. J Occup Environ Hyg. 7(3):163–176. doi:10.1080/15459620903508066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methner M, Hodson L, Geraci C. 2010b. Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials—part A. J Occup Environ Hyg. 7(3):127–132. doi:10.1080/15459620903476355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller A, Drake PL, Hintz P, Habjan M. 2010. Characterizing exposures to airborne metals and nanoparticle emissions in a refinery. Ann Occup Hyg. 54(5):504–513. doi:10.1093/annhyg/meq032.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mischler SE, Tuchman DP, Cauda EG, Colinet JF, Rubinstein EN. 2019. Testing a revised inlet for the personal dust monitor. J Occup Environ Hyg. 16(3):242–249. doi:10.1080/15459624.2019.1566732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina B, Olivares E, Palau CE, Esteve M. 2018. A multimodal fingerprint-based indoor positioning system for airports. IEEE Access. 6:10092–10106. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2798918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer ES, Commodore MA, Hayes JL, Fotta SA, Berardinelli SP. 2007. Real-time evaluation of ventilation filter-bank systems. J Occup Environ Hyg. 4(1):58–69. doi:10.1080/15459620601079642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer ES, Heitbrink WA, Jensen PA. 2005. Test for the integrity of environmental tractor cab filtration systems. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2(10):516–523. doi:10.1080/15459620500297519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2021. Advanced Manufacturing; [accessed 2022 Jun 8]. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/advancedmnf/default.html.
   Google Scholar
• Newcomer DA, LaPuma P, Brandys R, Northcross A. 2018. Capture efficiency of portable high-efficiency air filtration devices used during building construction activities. J Occup Environ Hyg. 15(4):285–292. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1422869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien D, Froehlich PA, Gressel MG, Hall RM, Clark NJ, Bost P, Fischbach T. 1992. Silica exposure in hand grinding steel castings. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 53(1):42–48. doi:10.1080/15298669291359285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien DM. 2003. Aerosol mapping of a facility with multiple cases of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: demonstration of mist reduction and a possible dose/response relationship. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 18(11):947–952. doi:10.1080/10473220390237656
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Brien DM, Fischbach TJ, Cooper TC, Todd WF, Gressel MG, Martinez KF. 1989. Acquisition and spreadsheet analysis of real time dust exposure data: a case study. Appl Ind Hyg. 4(9):238–243. doi:10.1080/08828032.1989.10388570
   Google Scholar
• Old L, Methner MM. 2008. Engineering case reports: effectiveness of local exhaust ventilation (LEV) in controlling engineered nanomaterial emissions during reactor cleanout operations. J Occup Environ Hyg. 5(6):D63–D69. doi:10.1080/15459620802059393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organiscak JA, Cecala AB, Noll JD. 2013. Field assessment of enclosed cab filtration system performance using particle counting measurements. J Occup Environ Hyg. 10(9):468–477. doi:10.1080/15459624.2013.818240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Volkwein JC, Vinson RP, Joy GJ, Mischler SE, Tuchman DP, McWilliams LJ. 2008. Equivalency of a personal dust monitor to the current United States coal mine respirable dust sampler. J Environ Monit. 10(1):96–101. doi:10.1039/b714381h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paluchamy B, Mishra DP, Panigrahi DC, Klemes JJ. 2021. Airborne respirable dust in fully mechanised underground metalliferous mines—generation, health impacts and control measures for cleaner production. J Clean Prod. 296:126524. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JY, Ramachandran G, Raynor PC, Olson GM. 2010. Determination of particle concentration rankings by spatial mapping of particle surface area, number, and mass concentrations in a restaurant and a die casting plant. J Occup Environ Hyg. 7(8):466–476. doi:10.1080/15459624.2010.485263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker A, Wardall A, Duran C. 2022. Video exposure monitoring and position tracking for evaluating particulate and gas exposures in a fully enclosed small arms firing range. Ann Work Expo Health. 66(6):768–780. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxac007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patts JR, Cecala AB, Haas EJ. 2020. Helmet-CAM: strategically minimizing exposures to respirable dust through video exposure monitoring. Min Metall Explor. 37(2):727–732. doi:10.1007/s42461-019-00168-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters TM, Anthony TR, Taylor C, Altmaier R, Anderson K, O'Shaughnessy PT. 2012. Distribution of particle and gas concentrations in swine gestation confined animal feeding operations. Ann Occup Hyg. 56(9):1080–1090. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mes050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters TM, Heitbrink WA, Evans DE, Slavin TJ, Maynard AD. 2006. The mapping of fine and ultrafine particle concentrations in an engine machining and assembly facility. Ann Occup Hyg. 50(3):249–257. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mei061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters TM, Sawvel RA, Park JH, Anthony TR. 2015. Evaluation of a shaker dust collector for use in a recirculating ventilation system. J Occup Environ Hyg. 12(9):D201–D210. doi:10.1080/15459624.2015.1043056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prezant B. 2011. Use of video exposure monitoring to characterize peak exposures. In: AIOH 29th Annual Conference & Exhibition. Sofitel Brisbane Central – Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: Australian Institute of Occupational Hygienists; p. 59–61. www.aioh.org.au.
   Google Scholar
• Pui DYH. 1996. Direct-reading instrumentation for workplace aerosol measurements. A review. Analyst. 121(9):1215–1224. doi:10.1039/an9962101215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi J, Liu G-P. 2017. A robust high-accuracy ultrasound indoor positioning system based on a wireless sensor network. Sensors. 17(11):2554–2570. doi:10.3390/s17112554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran G. 2008. Toward better exposure assessment strategies—the new NIOSH initiative. Ann Occup Hyg. 52(5):297–301. doi:10.1093/annhyg/men025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran G, Ostraat M, Evans DE, Methner MM, O'Shaughnessy P, D'Arcy J, Geraci CL, Stevenson E, Maynard A, Rickabaugh K. 2011. A strategy for assessing workplace exposures to nanomaterials. J Occup Environ Hyg. 8(11):673–685. doi:10.1080/15459624.2011.623223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynor PC, Chae SJ. 2004. The long-term performance of electrically charged filters in a ventilation system. J Occup Environ Hyg. 1(7):463–471. doi:10.1080/15459620490467783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed WR, Kwitowski AJ, Helfrich WJ, Cecala AB, Joy GJ. 2014. Guidelines for performing a helmet-CAM respirable dust survey and conducting subsequent analysis with the Enhanced Video Analysis of Dust Exposures (EVADE) software. Pittsburgh (PA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; [accessed 2021 Mar 19]. doi:10.26616/NIOSHPUB2014133
   Google Scholar
• Reeve KA, Peters TM, Anthony TR. 2013. Wintertime factors affecting contaminant distribution in a swine farrowing room. J Occup Environ Hyg. 10(6):287–296. doi:10.1080/15459624.2013.777303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reponen T, Trakumas S, Willeke K, Grinshpun SA, Choe KT, Friedman W. 2002. Dynamic monitoring of the dust pickup efficiency of vacuum cleaners. AIHAJ. 63(6):689–697. doi:10.1080/15428110208984756
   Google Scholar
• Rosén G. 1993. PIMEX[rgrave]. Combined use of air sampling instruments and video filming: experience and results during six years of use. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 8(4):344–347. doi:10.1080/1047322X.1993.10389217
   Google Scholar
• Rosén G, Andersson I-M. 2009. Strategies for the use of PIMEX and other video exposure monitoring methods: final report from sub-project “implementation strategies” within the HERIVIS project. Sweden: Arbetsvetenskap. Högskolan Dalarna; [accessed 2021 Mar 19]. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:du-4489.
   Google Scholar
• Rosén G, Andersson I-M, Walsh PT, Clark RDR, Säämänen A, Heinonen K, Riipinen H, Pääkkönen R. 2005. A review of video exposure monitoring as an occupational hygiene tool. Ann Occup Hyg. 49(3):201–217. doi:10.1093/annhyg/meh110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosén G, Lundström S. 1987. Concurrent video filming and measuring for visualization of exposure. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 48(8):688–692. doi:10.1080/15298668791385426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth GA, Geraci CL, Stefaniak A, Murashov V, Howard J. 2019. Potential occupational hazards of additive manufacturing. J Occup Environ Hyg. 16(5):321–328. doi:10.1080/15459624.2019.1591627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runström Eden G, Tinnerberg H, Rosell L, Möller R, Almstrand A-C, Bredberg A. 2022. Exploring methods for surveillance of occupational exposure from additive manufacturing in four different industrial facilities. Ann Work Expo Health. 66(2):163–177. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxab070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saidi MN, Djebara A, Songmene V, Bahloul A. 2020. Experimental evaluation of three local exhaust ventilation systems designed to reduce ultrafine dust emission during a polishing process. Aerosol Sci Eng. 4(1):9–17. doi:10.1007/s41810-019-00050-5
   Google Scholar
• Saliakas S, Karayannis P, Kokkinopoulos I, Damilos S, Gkartzou E, Zouboulis P, Karatza A, Koumoulos EP. 2022. Fused filament fabrication 3D printing: quantification of exposure to airborne particles. J Compos Sci. 6(5):119. doi:10.3390/jcs6050119
   Google Scholar
• Santanachote P. 2020. Best and worst air purifiers of 2020. Consumer Reports; [accessed 2021 Jan 18]. https://www.consumerreports.org/air-purifiers/best-air-purifiers-of-the-year/.
   Google Scholar
• Santos RJ, Vieira MT. 2017. Assessment of airborne nanoparticles present in industry of aluminum surface treatments. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(3):D29–D36. doi:10.1080/15459624.2016.1254782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheeper B, Kromhout H, Boleij JSM. 1995. Wood-dust exposure during wood-working processes. Ann Occup Hyg. 39(2):141–154. doi:10.1093/annhyg/39.2.141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman CE, Shahan MR, Beck TW, Mischler SE. 2018. Comparison of the CAS-POL and IOM samplers for determining the knockdown efficiencies of water sprays on float coal dust. J Occup Environ Hyg. 15(3):214–225. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1411597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy RJ, Sextro RG. 2006. What is an effective portable air cleaning device? A review. J Occup Environ Hyg. 3(4):169–181; quiz D45. doi:10.1080/15459620600580129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan MJ, Hands D. 2007. Metalworking fluid mist—strategies to reduce exposure: a comparison of new and old transmission case transfer lines. J Occup Environ Hyg. 4(4):288–300. doi:10.1080/15459620701223884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaugset NP, Berlinger B, Radziuk B, Tørring H, Synnes O, Thomassen Y. 2014. Visualisation and identification of peak exposure events in aluminium smelter pot rooms using hydrogen fluoride and aerosol real-time portable spectrometers. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 16(5):1035–1040. doi:10.1039/c3em00640a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer DA, Autenrieth DA, Hart JF, Capoccia S. 2020. Control of wildfire-sourced PM2.5 in an office setting using a commercially available portable air cleaner. J Occup Environ Hyg. 17(4):109–120. doi:10.1080/15459624.2020.1722314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak AB, Johnson AR, du Preez S, Hammond DR, Wells JR, Ham JE, LeBouf RF, Menchaca KW, Martin SB, Duling MG, et al. 2019. Evaluation of emissions and exposures at workplaces using desktop 3-dimensional printers. J Chem Health Saf. 26(2):19–30. doi:10.1016/j.jchas.2018.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharr D, Zimmer AT. 1997. Case studies: comparative evaluation of dust control technologies on percussion rock-drilling rigs. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 12(12):782–788. doi:10.1080/1047322X.1997.10390610
   Google Scholar
• Thompson D, Leparoux M, Jaeggi C, Buha J, Pui DYH, Wang J. 2013. Aerosol emission monitoring in the production of silicon carbide nanoparticles by induction plasma synthesis. J Nanopart Res. 15(12):2103. doi:10.1007/s11051-013-2103-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe A, Brown RC. 1998. Measurement of the performance of free-standing filtering extraction units used in the woodworking industry. Ann Occup Hyg. 42(7):423–436. doi:10.1093/annhyg/38.3.279
   Google Scholar
• Trakumas S, Willeke K, Reponen T, Grinshpun SA, Friedman W. 2001. Comparison of filter bag, cyclonic, and wet dust collection methods in vacuum cleaners. AIHAJ. 62(5):573–583. doi:10.1080/15298660108984656.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unwin J, Walsh PT, Worsell N. 1993. Visualization of personal exposure to gases and dust using fast-response monitors and video filming. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 8(4):348–350. doi:10.1080/1047322X.1993.10389218
   Google Scholar
• Väisänen AJK, Hyttinen M, Ylönen S, Alonen L. 2019. Occupational exposure to gaseous and particulate contaminants originating from additive manufacturing of liquid, powdered, and filament plastic materials and related post-processes. J Occup Environ Hyg. 16(3):258–271. doi:10.1080/15459624.2018.1557784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan N, Chalmers C, Botham R. 1990. Field comparison of personal samplers for inhalable dust. Ann Occup Hyg. 34(6):553–73573. doi:10.1093/annhyg/34.6.553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VideoLogix. 2021. HD video overlay systems, devices & products. VideoLogix; [accessed 2021 Mar 31]. https://www.videologixinc.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Viitanen A, Kallonen K, Kukko K, Kanerva T, Saukko E, Hussein T, Hämeri K, Säämänen A. 2021. Technical control of nanoparticle emissions from desktop 3D printing. Indoor Air. 31(4):1061–1071. doi:10.1111/ina.12791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkwein JC, Tuchman DP, Vinson RP. 2002. Performance of a prototype personal dust monitor for coal mine use; [accessed 2021 Jan 16]. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/9175.
   Google Scholar
• Vosburgh DJH, Boysen DA, Oleson JJ, Peters TM. 2011. Airborne nanoparticle concentrations in the manufacturing of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) apparel. J Occup Environ Hyg. 8(3):139–146. doi:10.1080/15459624.2011.554317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh PT, Clark RDR, Flaherty S, Gentry SJ. 2000. Computer-aided video exposure monitoring. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 15(1):48–56. doi:10.1080/104732200301845.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh PT, Forth AR, Clark RDR, Dowker KP, Thorpe A. 2009. Real-time measurement of dust in the workplace using video exposure monitoring-farming to pharmaceuticals. J Phys Conf Ser. 151(012043):012043–012049. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/151/1/012043
   Google Scholar
• Walter J, Baumgärtel A, Hustedt M, Hebisch R, Kaierle S. 2018. Inhalation exposure to hazardous substances during powder-bed processes. Proc CIRP. 74:295–299. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.114
   Google Scholar
• Wei G, Chen B, Lai D, Chen Q. 2020. An improved displacement ventilation system for a machining plant. Atmos Environ. 228:117419. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welling I, Lehtimäki M, Rautio S, Lähde T, Enbom S, Hynynen P, Hämeri K. 2009. Wood dust particle and mass concentrations and filtration efficiency in sanding of wood materials. J Occup Environ Hyg. 6(2):90–98. doi:10.1080/15459620802623073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West GH, Cooper MR, Burrelli LG, Dresser D, Lippy BE. 2019. Exposure to airborne nano-titanium dioxide during airless spray painting and sanding. J Occup Environ Hyg. 16(3):218–228. doi:10.1080/15459624.2018.1550295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willeke K, Trakumas S, Grinshpun SA, Reponen T, Trunov M, Friedman W. 2001. Test methods for evaluating the filtration and particulate emission characteristics of vacuum cleaners. AIHAJ. 62(3):313–321. doi:10.1080/15298660108984633.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winkes A. 2015. Dutch design: PIMEX part of many different arbocatalogues in the Netherlands. Ann Occup Hyg. 59(suppl_1):45. doi:10.1093/annhyg/meu119[Mismatch
   Google Scholar
• Yacher JM, Heitbrink WA, Burroughs GE. 2000. Mist control at a machining center, Part 2: mist control following installation of air cleaners. AIHAJ. 61(2):282–289. doi:10.1080/15298660008984538.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yi J, LeBouf RF, Duling MG, Nurkiewicz T, Chen BT, Schwegler-Berry D, Virji MA, Stefaniak AB. 2016. Emission of particulate matter from a desktop three-dimensional (3D) printer. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 79(11):453–465. doi:10.1080/15287394.2016.1166467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yit JE, Chew BT, Yau YH. 2020. A review of air filter test standards for particulate matter of general ventilation. Build Serv Eng Res Technol. 41(6):758–771. doi:10.1177/0143624420915626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zontek TL, Ogle BR, Jankovic JT, Hollenbeck SM. 2017. An exposure assessment of desktop 3D printing. J Chem Health Saf. 24(2):15–25. doi:10.1016/j.jchas.2016.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuidema C, Sousan S, Stebounova LV, Gray A, Liu X, Tatum M, Stroh O, Thomas G, Peters T, Koehler K. 2019a. Mapping occupational hazards with a multi-sensor network in a heavy-vehicle manufacturing facility. Ann Work Expo Health. 63(3):280–293. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxy111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuidema C, Stebounova LV, Sousan S, Thomas G, Koehler K, Peters TM. 2019b. Sources of error and variability in particulate matter sensor network measurements. J Occup Environ Hyg. 16(8):564–574. doi:10.1080/15459624.2019.1628965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar