Respiratory protective device: One size to fit them all?

References

• Bergman MS, He X, Joseph ME, Zhuang Z, Heimbuch BK, Shaffer RE, Choe M, Wander JD. 2015. Correlation of respirator fit measured on human subjects and a static advanced head form. J Occup Environ Hyg. 12(3):163–171. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2014.957832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman MS, Zhuang Z, Hanson D, Heimbuch BK, McDonald MJ, Palmiero AJ, Shaffer RE, Harnish D, Husband M, Wander JD. 2014. Development of an advanced respirator fit-test head form. J Occup Environ Hyg. 11(2):117–125. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2013.816434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown RC. 1993. Air filtration: an integrated approach to the theory and applications of fibrous filters. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Ruuskanen J, Pilacinski W, Willeke K. 1990. Filter and leak penetration characteristics of a dust and mist filtering facepiece. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 51(12):632–639. DOI: 10.1080/15298669091370275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Wang J, Yang Z. 2015. The human factors/ergonomics studies for respirators: a review and future work. Int J Cloth Sci Technol. 27(5):652–676. DOI: 10.1108/IJCST-06-2014-0077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton M, Vaughan N. 2005. Fit for purpose? The role of fit testing in respiratory protection. Ann Occup Hyg. 49(7):545–548. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mei046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey CC, Campbell DL, Myers WR, Zhuang Z. 1998. Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: part II—method comparison testing. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 59(12):862–870. DOI: 10.1080/15428119891011036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen HJ, Hecker LH, Mattheis DK, Johnson JS, Biermann AH, Foote KL. 2001. Simulated workplace protection factor study of powered air-purifying and supplied air respirators. AIHAJ. 62(5):595–604. DOI: 10.1080/15298660108984658.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crutchfield CD, Park DL, Hensel JL, Kvesic MK, Flack MD. 1995. Determinations of known respirator leakage using controlled negative pressure and ambient aerosol QNFT systems. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 56(1):16–23. DOI: 10.1080/15428119591017268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutchfield CD, Ruiz AM, Ruiz AM. 1994. A validation study of respirator fit testing by controlled negative pressure. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 9(5):362–366. DOI: 10.1080/1047322X.1994.10388328.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney LJ, McKay RT, Freeman A. 2003. Determination of known exhalation valve damage using a negative pressure user seal check method on full facepiece respirators. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 18(4):237–243. DOI: 10.1080/10473220301399.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EN 13274-7. 2019. Respiratory protective devices - methods of test - part 7: determination of particle filter penetration. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• EN 136. 1998. Respiratory protective device - full face masks - requirements, testing, marking. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• EN 140. 1998. Respiratory protective devices - half masks and quarter masks - requirements, testing, marking. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• EN 143. 2021. Respiratory protective devices - particle filters - requirements, testing, marking. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• EN 14387. 2021. Respiratory protective devices - gas filter(s) and combined filter(s) - Requirements, testing, marking. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1540. 2021. Workplace exposure - terminology. brussels: european committee for standardization. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• EN 529. 2006. Respiratory protective devices - recommendations for selection, use, care and maintenance - guidance document. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• EN ISO 8996. 2021. Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Determination of metabolic rate. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• European Council Directive 89/391/EEC. 1989. Introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work. European Union: Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Funke J. 2000. A comparison study of the overall fit factors between the portacount and the fit tester 3000 [MS Thesis]. Butte, Montana: Montana Tech of the University of Montana.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin K, Selvin S, Spear RC. 1990. Variability in protection afforded by half-mask respirators against styrene exposure in the field. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 51(12):625–631. DOI: 10.1080/15298669091370266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinshpun SA, Haruta H, Eninger RM, Reponen T, McKay RT, Lee S-A. 2009. Performance of an N95 filtering facepiece particulate respirator and a surgical mask during human breathing: two pathways for particle penetration. J Occup Environ Hyg. 6(10):593–603. DOI: 10.1080/15459620903120086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han D. 2000. Fit factors for quarter masks and facial size categories. Ann Occup Hyg. 44(3):227–234. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4878(99)00087-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han D-H. 2002. Correlations between workplace protection factors and fit factors for filtering facepieces in the welding workplace. Ind Health. 40(4):328–334. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.40.328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han D-H, Willeke K, Colton CE. 1997. Quantitative fit testing techniques and regulations for tight-fitting respirators: current methods measuring aerosol or air leakage, and new developments. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 58(3):219–228. DOI: 10.1080/15428119791012874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauge J, Roe M, Brosseau LM, Colton C. 2012. Real-time fit of a respirator during simulated health care tasks. J Occup Environ Hyg. 9(10):563–571. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2012.711699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Grinshpun SA, Reponen T, McKay R, Bergman MS, Zhuang Z. 2014. Effects of breathing frequency and flow rate on the total inward leakage of an elastomeric half-mask donned on an advanced manikin head form. Ann Occup Hyg. 58(2):182–194. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/met053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 16900-5. 2016. Respiratory protective devices - methods of test and test equipment - part 5: breathing machine, metabolic simulator, RPD head forms and torso, tools and verification tools. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 16975-3. 2018. Respiratory protective devices - selection, use and maintenance - part 3: fit-testing procedures. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 16976-1. 2017. Respiratory protective devices - human factors - part 1: metabolic rates and respiratory flow rates. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 17420-2. 2021. Respiratory protective devices - performance requirements - part 2: requirements for filtering RPD. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/TS 16976-2. 2015. Respiratory protective devices - human factors - part 2: anthropometrics. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen L, McKay R. 2017. Respirator performance terminology [Letter to the Editor]. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(12):D181–D183. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1359018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oestenstad R, Graffeo J. 1993. Determination of respirator fit by an aerosol method and a negative pressure method. J Int Soc Respir Prot. 11(3):6–14.
   Google Scholar
• OSHA. 2004. Controlled negative pressure REDON fit testing protocol. Washington, DC: Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Report No.: 1910.134.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez J, O’Shaughnessy P. 2017. Filter penetration and breathing resistance evaluation of respirators and dust masks. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(2):148–157. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1237027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regli A, Sommerfield A, Ungern‐Sternberg BS. 2021. The role of fit testing N95/FFP2/FFP3 masks: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 76(1):91–100. DOI: 10.1111/anae.15261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengasamy S, Eimer BC. 2011. Total inward leakage of nanoparticles through filtering facepiece respirators. Ann Occup Hyg. 55(3):253–263. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meq096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez AA, Escanilla DE, Caroca LA, Albornoz CE, Marshall PA, Molenbroek JFM, Castellucci HI. 2020. Level of match between facial dimensions of Chilean workers and respirator fit test panels proposed by LANL and NIOSH. Int J Ind Ergon. 80:103015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sietsema M, Brosseau LM. 2018. Are quantitative fit factors predictive of respirator fit during simulated healthcare activities? J Occup Environ Hyg. 15(12):803–809. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2018.1515490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spear TM, Hardgrove R, Norman JB, Wulf DT, Rossi RJ. 1999. The effects of strapped spectacles on the fit factors of three manufactured brands of full facepiece negative pressure respirators. Ann Occup Hyg. 43(3):193–199. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4878(99)00021-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willis RR. 2018. Determining leak percentage at known leak locations for full-mask respirators using TSI PortaCount and OHD Quantifit [MS thesis]. Morgantown: West Virginia University.
   Google Scholar
• Yang L, Shen H, Wu G. 2007. Racial differences in respirator fit testing: a pilot study of whether American fit panels are representative of Chinese faces. Ann Occup Hyg. 51(4):415–421. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mem005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu Y, Benson S, Cheng W, Hsiao J, Liu Y, Zhuang Z, Chen W. 2012. Digital 3-D head forms representative of Chinese workers. Ann Occup Hyg. 56(1):113–122. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mer074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, He X, Wang L, Liao X, Teng G, Jing P. 2022. Performance of N95 elastomeric respirators in high humidity and high coal dust concentration environment. Int J Min Sci Technol. 32(1):215–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang Z, Bradtmiller B. 2005. Head-and-face anthropometric survey of U.S. respirator users. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2(11):567–576. DOI: 10.1080/15459620500324727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang Z, Bradtmiller B, Shaffer RE. 2007. New respirator fit test panels representing the current U.S. civilian work force. J Occup Environ Hyg. 4(9):647–659. DOI: 10.1080/15459620701497538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang Z, Coffey CC, Jensen PA, Campbell DL, Lawrence RB, Myers WR. 2003. Correlation between quantitative fit factors and workplace protection factors measured in actual workplace environments at a steel foundry. Aiha J. 64(6):730–738. DOI: 10.1080/15428110308984867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang Z, Groce D, Ahlers HW, Iskander W, Landsittel D, Guffey S, Benson S, Viscusi D, Shaffer RE. 2008. Correlation between respirator fit and respirator fit test panel cells by respirator size. J Occup Environ Hyg. 5(10):617–628. DOI: 10.1080/15459620802293810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar