Total outward leakage of half-mask respirators and surgical masks used for source control

References

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2020a. COVID data tracker. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; [accessed 2023 May 1]. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2020b. Healthcare workers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; [accessed 2023 May 1]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-recommendations.html.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2020c. Healthcare workers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; [accessed 2023 May 1]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/respirator-use-faq.html.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2022. The evolution of elastomeric half-mask respirators and exhalation valves | Blogs | CDC; [accessed 2023 May 1]. https://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-blog/2022/10/13/ehmrs/.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang J, Hanna A, Lebowitz D, Ganti L. 2020. Elastomeric respirators are safer and more sustainable alternatives to disposable N95 masks during the coronavirus outbreak. Int J Emerg Med. 13(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12245-020-00296-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz KT, Smaldone GC. 2010. Quantifying exposure risk: surgical masks and respirators. Am J Infect Control. 38(7):501–508. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando R, Peterson J, Portnoff L. 2021. Advancements in elastomeric respirator technology for use as source control | Blogs | CDC; [accessed 2023 May 1]. https://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-blog/2021/03/01/elastomeric_source-control/.
   Google Scholar
• Harnish DA, Heimbuch BK, Husband M, Lumley AE, Kinney K, Shaffer RE, Wander JD. 2013. Challenge of N95 filtering facepiece respirators with viable H1N1 influenza aerosols. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 34(5):494–499. doi: 10.1086/670225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard BE. 2020. High-risk aerosol-generating procedures in COVID-19: respiratory protective equipment considerations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 163(1):98–103. doi: 10.1177/0194599820927335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2015. Respiratory protective devices—human factors—part 1: metabolic rates and respiratory flow rates.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaweera M, Perera H, Gunawardana B, Manatunge J. 2020. Transmission of COVID-19 virus by droplets and aerosols: a critical review on the unresolved dichotomy. Environ Res. 188:109819. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S-A, Grinshpun SA, Reponen T. 2008. Respiratory performance offered by N95 respirators and surgical masks: human subject evaluation with NaCl aerosol representing bacterial and viral particle size range. Ann Occup Hyg. 52(3):177–185. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsley WG, Blachere FM, Law BF, Beezhold DH, Noti JD. 2021. Efficacy of face masks, neck gaiters and face shields for reducing the expulsion of simulated cough-generated aerosols. Aerosol Sci Technol. 55(4):449–457. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2020.1862409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdavi A. 2013. [Efficiency measurement of N95 filtering facepiece respirators against ultrafine particles under cyclic and constant flows] [masters’ thesis]. Montreal (QC): Concordia University.
   Google Scholar
• Mansour MM, Smaldone GC. 2013. Respiratory source control versus receiver protection: impact of facemask fit. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 26(3):131–137. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2012.0998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. 2017. Design and analysis of experiments. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 1998. Fit testing procedures (Mandatory). [accessed 2023 May 1]. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.134AppA.
   Google Scholar
• Pompeii L, Hines SE. 2021. Reusable elastomeric respirators in health care. Workplace Health Saf. 69(6):291–292. doi: 10.1177/21650799211013796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portnoff L, Schall J, Brannen J, Suhon N, Strickland K, Meyers J. 2021. Filtering facepiece respirators with an exhalation valve: measurements of filtration efficiency to evaluate their potential for source control. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2021-107. doi: 10.26616/NIOSHPUB2021107.
   Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Willeke K, Grinshpun SA, Donnelly J, Coffey CC. 1998. Performance of N95 respirators: filtration efficiency for airborne microbial and inert particles. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 59(2):128–132. doi: 10.1080/15428119891010389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sall J, Stephens ML, Lehman A, Loring S. 2017. JMP start statistics: a guide to statistics and data analysis using JMP. 6th ed. Cary (NC): SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sietsema M, Radonovich L, Hearl FJ, Fisher EM, Brosseau LM, Shaffer RE, Koonin LM. 2019. A control banding framework for protecting the US workforce from aerosol transmissible infectious disease outbreaks with high public health consequences. Health Secur. 17(2):124–132. doi: 10.1089/hs.2018.0103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson SR. 2020. Respiratory flow characteristics of intensive care healthcare workers performing patient care activities [masters’ thesis]. Morgantown (WV): West Virginia University.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu J, He X, Bergman MS, Guffey S, Nimbarte AD, Zhuang Z. 2019. A pilot study of minimum operational flow for loose-fitting powered air-purifying respirators used in healthcare cleaning services. J Occup Environ Hyg. 16(7):440–445. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2019.1605241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar