Measuring earplug noise attenuation: A comparison of laboratory and field methods

References

• Ahroon WA, Stefanson JR. 2021. Evaluation of hearing protector fit test systems. Fort Rucker (AL): U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory. Report no. USAARL-Tech-TR-2021-34.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2008. ANSI/ASA S12.6. American National Standard Methods for the measuring the real-ear attenuation of hearing protectors. New York (NY): ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2018. ANSI/ASA S12.71. American National Standard performance criteria for systems that estimate the attenuation of passive hearing protectors for individual users. New York (NY): ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Berger EH, Franks JR, Behar A, Casali JG, Dixon-Ernst C, Kieper RW, Merry CJ, Mozo BT, Nixon CW, Ohlin D, et al. 1998. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data. J Acoust Soc Am. 103(2):665–672. doi: 10.1121/1.423236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger EH, Voix J, Kieper RW, Le Cocq C. 2011. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation. Noise Health. 13(51):163–175. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.77214.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne DC, Murphy WJ, Krieg EF, Ghent RM, Michael KL, Stefanson EW, Ahroon WA. 2017. Inter-laboratory comparison of three earplug fit-test systems. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(4):294–305. PMID: 27786602. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1250002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R, Jerger JF. 1959. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord. 24(4):330–345. doi: 10.1044/jshd.2404.330.
   Google Scholar
• Casali JG, Talcott K, Keady JP, Killion MC. 2012. Warfighter auditory situation awareness: locating the shooter with and without hearing protection. Nav Eng J. 124(1):149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commandant of the Marine Corps. 2016. Marine Corps Hearing Conservation Program. Marine Corps Order (MCO) 6260.3A. Washington (DC): Headquarters United States Marine Corps; [accessed 2023 Apr 27]. https://www.marines.mil/portals/1/Publications/MCO%206260.3A.pdf?ver=2016-11-14-104534-533.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense (DOD). 2019. Department of Defense Instruction 6055.12, Hearing Conservation Program (HCP). Washington (DC): Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness; [accessed 2023 Apr 27]. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/605512p.pdf?ver=2017-10-25-110159-777.
   Google Scholar
• Dyrba P, Dantscher S, Augustin S, Frtisch T, Sickert P. 2014. Comparison of different measurement systems for the assessment of the individual noise attenuation of earplugs. Noise Abatement Ed. 6:225–265.
   Google Scholar
• Federman J, Duhon C. 2016. The viability of hearing protection device fit-testing at Navy and Marine Corps accession points. Noise Health. 18(85):303–311. PMID: 27991461. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.195806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federman J, Karch SJ, Duhon C. 2021. How hearing conservation training format impacts personal attenuation ratings in U.S. Marine Corps Training Recruits. Int J Audiol. 60(2):151–159. PMID: 32924674. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1811407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks JR, Murphy WJ, Harris DA, Johnson JL, Shaw PB. 2003. Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance. AIHA J. 64(4):501–509. doi: 10.1202/309.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsberg J, Federman J. 2019. NSMRL’s computer-controlled facility for real-ear-attenuation-at-threshold (REAT) testing of hearing protectors: re-verification to ANSI standard. Groton (CT): Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory. Report no. NSMRL/F1016/TM–2019-1328.
   Google Scholar
• Gong W, Zhang J, Liu X, Ding E, Zhu B. 2021. Verifying earplug attenuation and evaluating the effectiveness of one-on-one training along with earplug fit testing at nine facilities in China. Am J Ind Med. 64(9):771–780. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager LD. 2011. Fit-testing hearing protectors: an idea whose time has come. Noise Health. 13(51):147–151. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.77217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K, Casali JG. 2013. A computer-controlled facility for real-ear-attenuation-at-threshold (REAT) testing of hearing protectors: development and verification re ANSI S12.6-2008 as installed and calibrated at Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory (NSMRL). Blacksburg (VA): Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Audio Lab Report No. 8/19/13-1-T&E.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Wells L. 2020. Observations on the correlation of subjective and objective attenuation measurements on earplugs. J Acoust Soc Am. 147(2):941–946. doi: 10.1121/10.0000689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy WJ. 2013. Comparing personal attenuation ratings for hearing protector fit-test systems. Council Accred Occup Hearing Conserv. 25(3):6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy WJ, Davis RR, Byrne DC, Franks JR. 2006. Advanced hearing protector study – Conducted at: General Motors Metal Fabricating Division Flint Metal Center. – Flint, MI. Cincinnati (OH): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH EPHB Report No 312-11a.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy WJ, Gong W, Karch SJ, Federman J, Schulz TY. 2022. Personal attenuation ratings versus derated noise reduction ratings for hearing protection devices. J Acoust Soc Am. 152(2):1074–1089. doi: 10.1121/10.0013418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy WJ, Themann CL, Murata TK. 2016. Hearing protector fit-testing with off-shore oil-rig inspectors in Louisiana and Texas. Int J Audiol. 55(11):688–698. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1204470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 1998. Criteria for a recommended standard: Occupational noise exposure. Revised criteria; [accessed 2023 Apr 26]. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/98-126/default.html.
   Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2022. OSHA Technical Manual (OTM) Section III: Chapter 5 Noise; [accessed 2023 Sep 21]. https://www.osha.gov/otm/section-3-health-hazards/chapter-5.
   Google Scholar
• OSHA/NHCA/NIOSH Alliance. 2008. Best practice bulletin: hearing protection-emerging trends: individual fit-testing; [accessed 2023 Apr 27]. https://www.hearingconservation.org/assets/docs/AllianceRecommendationForFitTesting_Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sayler SK, Rabinowitz PM, Galusha D, Sun K, Neitzel RL. 2019. Hearing protector attenuation and noise exposure among metal manufacturing workers. Ear Hear. 40(3):680–689. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PS, Monaco BA, Lusk SL. 2014. Attitudes toward use of hearing protection devices and effects of an intervention on fit-testing results. Workplace Health Saf. 62(12):491–499. doi: 10.3928/21650799-20140902-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanson JRW, Ahroon WA. 2016. Computer-controlled audiometer’s application as an earplug fit-testing tool. J Acoust Soc Am. 140(4_Supplement):3274–3275. doi: 10.1121/1.4970399.
   Google Scholar
• Trompette N, Kusy A. 2013. Suitability of commercially available systems for individual fit tests of hearing protectors. INTER-NOISE. 247(7):1398–1407.
   Google Scholar
• Trompette N, Kusy A, Ducourneau J. 2015. Suitability of commercial systems for earplug individual fit testing. Appl Acoust. 90:88–94. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Navy (USN). 2019. Noise abatement and hearing conservation. In: Navy Safety and Occupational Health Program Manual for Forces Afloat, OPNAVINST 5100.19F; [accessed 2023 Apr 27]. https://www.secnav.navy.mil/doni/Directives/05000%20General%20Management%20Security%20and%20Safety%20Services/05-100%20Safety%20and%20Occupational%20Health%20Services/5100.19F.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Navy (USN). 2020. Hearing conservation. In Navy Safety and Occupational Health Manual. Hearing Conservation, OPNAV M-5100.23. Washington (DC): Office of the Chief of Naval Operations; [accessed 2023 Apr 27]. https://www.secnav.navy.mil/doni/SECNAV%20Manuals1/5100.23%20CH-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Voix J, Smith P, Berger EH. 2022. Field fit-testing and attenuation-estimation procedures. In: Meinke, DK, Berger, EH, Neitzel, RL, Driscoll, DP, Bright, K, editors. The Noise Manual. 6th ed. Falls Church (VA): American Industrial Hygiene Association. p. 309–328.
   Google Scholar
• Zaccardi TA, Portnuff CDF, Le Prell CG. 2022. Verification of attenuation for premolded hearing protection devices designed for music. Med Probl Perform Art. 37(2):78–88. doi: 10.21091/mppa.2022.2013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar