586
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring virtual race participants’ perceptions of event mobile apps and behavioral intention: The stimulus-organism-response approach

&
Pages 365-383 | Received 03 Apr 2022, Accepted 30 Jun 2022, Published online: 26 Jul 2022

References

  • Akdim, K., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2022). The role of utilitarian and hedonic aspects in the continuance intention to use social mobile apps. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 66, 102888. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102888
  • Alalwan, A. A. (2020). Mobile food ordering apps: An empirical study of the factors affecting customer e-satisfaction and continued intention to reuse. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 28–44. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.008
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  • Armbrecht, J., & Andersson, T. D. (2020). The event experience, hedonic and eudaimonic satisfaction and subjective well-being among sport event participants. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 12(3), 457–477. doi:10.1080/19407963.2019.1695346
  • Assaker, G. (2020). Age and gender differences in online travel reviews and user-generated-content (UGC) adoption: Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) with credibility theory. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 29(4), 428–449. doi:10.1080/19368623.2019.1653807
  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. doi:10.1177/135910457000100301
  • Cao, X., & Sun, J. (2018). Exploring the effect of overload on the discontinuous intention of social media users: An SOR perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 10–18. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.035
  • Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217. doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
  • Choo, H., Ahn, K., & Petrick, J. F. (2016). An integrated model of festival revisit intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(4), 818–838. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-09-2014-0448
  • Coursaris, C. K., & Van Osch, W. (2016). A cognitive-affective model of perceived user satisfaction (CAMPUS): The complementary effects and interdependence of usability and aesthetics in IS design. Information & Management, 53(2), 252–264. doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.10.003
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
  • DMZ ggtour. (2020). Virtual peace road hiking. Retrieved from http://dmz.ggtour.or.kr/apply/index16.php
  • Fang, J., Zhao, Z., Wen, C., & Wang, R. (2017). Design and performance attributes driving mobile travel application engagement. International Journal of Information Management, 37(4), 269–283. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.03.003
  • Forbes. (2020). Ironman goes virtual, allowing athletes to train and compete during stay-at-home orders. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/andyfrye/2020/04/07/ironman-goes-virtual-allowing-athletes-train-and-compete-during-stay-at-home-orders/?sh=323c87b32e43.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. doi:10.1177/002224378101800313
  • Frisch, B., & Greene, C. (2020). What it takes to run a great virtual meeting. Harvard Business Review.
  • Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107. doi:10.1093/biomet/61.1.101
  • Getz, D., & McConnell, A. (2014). Comparing trail runners and mountain bikers: Motivation, involvement, portfolios, and event-tourist careers. Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 15(1), 69–100. doi:10.1080/15470148.2013.834807
  • Gössling, S., Scott, D., & Hall, C. M. (2021). Pandemics, tourism and global change: A rapid assessment of COVID-19. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(1), 1–20.
  • Gretzel, U., Fuchs, M., Baggio, R., Hoepken, W., Law, R., Neidhardt, J., … Xiang, Z. (2020). e-Tourism beyond COVID-19: A call for transformative research. Information Technology & Tourism, 22(2), 187–203. doi:10.1007/s40558-020-00181-3
  • Gursoy, D., Spangenberg, E. R., & Rutherford, D. G. (2006). The hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attendees’ attitudes toward festivals. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 30(3), 279–294. doi:10.1177/1096348006287162
  • Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. doi:10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  • Hall, C. M., Scott, D., & Gössling, S. (2020). Pandemics, transformations and tourism: Be careful what you wish for. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 577–598. doi:10.1080/14616688.2020.1759131
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  • Ho, C. I., & Lee, Y. L. (2007). The development of an e-travel service quality scale. Tourism Management, 28(6), 1434–1449. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2006.12.002
  • Islam, J. U., & Rahman, Z. (2017). The impact of online brand community characteristics on customer engagement: An application of stimulus-organism-response paradigm. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 96–109. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.004
  • Jang, W., Byon, K. K., & Yim, B. H. (2020). Sportscape, emotion, and behavioral intention: A case of the big four US-based major sport leagues. European Sport Management Quarterly, 20(3), 321–343. doi:10.1080/16184742.2019.1607521
  • Kim, M. J., & Hall, C. M. (2019). A hedonic motivation model in virtual reality tourism: Comparing visitors and non-visitors. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 236–249. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.016
  • Kim, M. J., Lee, C. K., & Jung, T. (2020). Exploring consumer behavior in virtual reality tourism using an extended stimulus-organism-response model. Journal of Travel Research, 59(1), 69–89. doi:10.1177/0047287518818915
  • Kim, S. E., Kim, H., & Yang, S. B. (2021). Why not this destination? The effects of travel constraints of independent travelers on destination image formation. International Journal of Tourism Research, 23(6), 1073–1085. doi:10.1002/jtr.2463
  • Kim, T. H., Ko, Y. J., & Park, C. M. (2013). The influence of event quality on revisit intention: Gender difference and segmentation strategy. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 23(3), 205–224.
  • Kucukusta, D., Law, R., Besbes, A., & Legohérel, P. (2015). Re-examining perceived usefulness and ease of use in online booking: The case of Hong Kong online users. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(2), 185–198. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-09-2013-0413
  • Laato, S., Islam, A. N., Farooq, A., & Dhir, A. (2020). Unusual purchasing behavior during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: The stimulus-organism-response approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102224. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102224
  • Lee, J. S., Lee, C. K., & Yoon, Y. (2009). Investigating differences in antecedents to value between first‐time and repeat festival‐goers. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 26(7), 688–702. doi:10.1080/10548400903284511
  • Lee, S., Ha, S., & Widdows, R. (2011). Consumer responses to high-technology products: Product attributes, cognition, and emotions. Journal of Business Research, 64(11), 1195–1200. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.022
  • Lee, Y., & Kim, H. Y. (2019). Consumer need for mobile app atmospherics and its relationships to shopper responses. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 437–442. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.10.016
  • Legner, C., Urbach, N., & Nolte, C. (2016). Mobile business application for service and maintenance processes: Using ex post evaluation by end-users as input for iterative design. Information & Management, 53(6), 817–831. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.03.001
  • Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Ming, J., Jianqiu, Z., Bilal, M., Akram, U., & Fan, M. (2021). How social presence influences impulse buying behavior in live streaming commerce? The role of SOR theory. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 17(4), 300–320. doi:10.1108/IJWIS-02-2021-0012
  • Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). Psychometric testing. New York, NY: McGraw.
  • Nunkoo, R., & Ramkissoon, H. (2013). Travelers’ e-purchase intent of tourism products and services. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 22(5), 505–529. doi:10.1080/19368623.2012.680240
  • Peng, C., & Kim, Y. G. (2014). Application of the stimuli-organism-response (SOR) framework to online shopping behavior. Journal of Internet Commerce, 13(3–4), 159–176. doi:10.1080/15332861.2014.944437
  • Perić, M., Dragičević, D., & Škorić, S. (2019). Determinants of active sport event tourists’ expenditure–the case of mountain bikers and trail runners. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 23(1), 19–39. doi:10.1080/14775085.2019.1623064
  • Shang, Q., Jin, J., & Qiu, J. (2020). Utilitarian or hedonic: Event-related potential evidence of purchase intention bias during online shopping festivals. Neuroscience Letters, 715, 134665. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134665
  • Sihvonen, J., & Turunen, L. L. M. (2022). Multisensory experiences at travel fairs: What evokes feelings of pleasure, arousal and dominance among visitors? Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 23(1), 63–85.
  • Stone, M. (1974). Cross‐validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111–133.
  • Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067–2077. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005
  • Talantis, S., Shin, Y. H., & Severt, K. (2020). Conference mobile application: Participant acceptance and the correlation with overall event satisfaction utilizing the technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 21(2), 100–122. doi:10.1080/15470148.2020.1719949
  • Tsai, T. H., Chang, Y. S., Chang, H. T., & Lin, Y. W. (2021). Running on a social exercise platform: Applying self-determination theory to increase motivation to participate in a sporting event. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106523. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106523
  • Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704. doi:10.2307/25148660
  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. doi:10.2307/41410412
  • Woyo, E., & Slabbert, E. (2022). Application of virtual reality technologies in the comrades’ marathon as a response to COVID-19 pandemic. Development Southern Africa, 39(1), 20–34. doi:10.1080/0376835X.2021.1977612
  • Yoon, Y. S., Lee, J. S., & Lee, C. K. (2010). Measuring festival quality and value affecting visitors’ satisfaction and loyalty using a structural approach. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(2), 335–342. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.10.002
  • Yung, R., Khoo-Lattimore, C., & Potter, L. E. (2021). VR the world: Experimenting with emotion and presence for tourism marketing. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 46, 160–171. doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.11.009
  • Zhao, Y., Wang, A., & Sun, Y. (2020). Technological environment, virtual experience, and MOOC continuance: A stimulus–organism–response perspective. Computers & Education, 144, 103721. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103721
  • Zhou, Z., Jin, X. L., & Fang, Y. (2014). Moderating role of gender in the relationships between perceived benefits and satisfaction in social virtual world continuance. Decision Support Systems, 65, 69–79. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2014.05.004

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.