Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research

References

• Ala, M. V., Yang, H., & Rakha, H. (2016). Modeling evaluation of Eco—Cooperative adaptive cruise control in vicinity of signalized intersections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2559, 108–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoozadeh, M., Raghuramu, A., Chuah, C., Ghosal, D., Zhang, H. M., Rowe, J., & Levitt, K. (2015). Security vulnerabilities of connected vehicle streams and their impact on cooperative driving. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(6), 126–132.
   Google Scholar
• Arnaout, G., & Arnaout, J.-P. (2014). Exploring the effects of cooperative adaptive cruise control on highway traffic flow using microscopic traffic simulation. Transportation Planning and Technology, 37(2), 186–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaout, G., & Bowling, S. (2011). Towards reducing traffic congestion using cooperative adaptive cruise control on a freeway with a ramp. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(4), 699–717.
   Google Scholar
• Asadi, B., & Vahidi, A. (2011). Predictive cruise control: Utilizing upcoming traffic signal information for improving fuel economy and reducing trip time. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 19(3), 707–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsade, S. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 644–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, M. J. (1997). The effects of AHS on the environment. In P. A. Ioannou (Ed.), Automated highway systems (pp. 265–291). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellem, H., Schönenberg, T., Krems, J. F., & Schrauf, M. (2016). Objective metrics of comfort: Developing a driving style for highly automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 41, 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, J. G. (1991). An overview of systems studies of automated highway systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 40(1), 82–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, P. (1973). Analysis of urban dual mode transportation. In Personal Rapid Transit II: Progress, problems, potential (pp. 95–106). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Black, S. (2001). Computing ripple effect for software maintenance. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 13(4), 263–279.
   Google Scholar
• Boesch, P. M., Ciari, F., & Axhausen, K. W. (2016). Autonomous vehicle fleet sizes required to serve different levels of demand. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2542, 111–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose, A., & Ioannou, P. (2001). Evaluation of the environmental effects of intelligent cruise control vehicles. Transportation Research Record, 1774, 90–97.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhuis, K., de Waard, D., & Janssen, W. (2001). Behavioural impacts of advanced driver assistance systems—an overview. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 1(3), 245–253.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., Gonder, J., & Repac, B. (2014). An analysis of possible energy impacts of automated vehicle. In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds.), Road vehicle automation (pp. 137–153). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Buehler, R., & Pucher, J. (2012). Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: new evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes. Transportation, 39(2), 409–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, J., Godbole, D. N., & Sengupta, R. (1998). Safety and capacity analysis of automated and manual highway systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 6(1–2), 69–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Balieu, R., & Kringos, N. (2016). Potential influences on Long-Term service performance of road infrastructure by automated vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2550, 72–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Bell, M. G. H., & Bogenberger, K. (2010). Risk-Averse autonomous route guidance by a constrained A* search. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations, 14(3), 188–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T. D., Kockelman, K. M., & Hanna, J. P. (2016). Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: Implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transportation Research Part A, 94, 243–254.
   Google Scholar
• Childress, S., Nichols, B., & Coe, S. (2015). Using an activity-based model to explore possilbe impacts of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2493, 99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J.-E., & Bae, S.-H. (2013). Development of a methodology to demonstrate the environmental impact of connected vehicles under lane-changing conditions. Simulation, 89(8), 964–976.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, S. J., Taylor, M. A. P., & Yue, W. L. (2004). Simple platoon advancement: A model of automated vehicle movement at signalised intersections. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 12(3–4), 293–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, C., Orford, S., Webster, C., & Jones, C. B. (2013). Exploring the ripple effect and spatial volatility in house prices in England and Wales: regressing interaction domain cross-correlations against reactive statistics. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(5), 763–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, G. H., de, A., & van Arem, B. (2016). Solving the User Optimum Privately Owned Automated Vehicles Assignment Problem (UO-POAVAP): A model to explore the impacts of self-driving vehicles on urban mobility. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 87, 64–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyganski, R., Fraedrich, E., & Lenz, B. (2015). Travel time valuation for automated driving: a use-case-driven study. In 94th annual meeting of the transportation research board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Dang, R., Wang, J., Li, S. E., & Li, K. (2015). Coordinated adaptive cruise control system with Lane-Change assistance. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(5), 2373–2383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Winter, J., Happee, R., Martens, M. H., & Stanton, N. A. (2014). Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 196–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis, A. I., Nikolos, I. K., & Papageorgiou, M. (2015). Macroscopic traffic flow modeling with adaptive cruise control: Development and numerical solution. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 70(8), 1921–1947.
   Google Scholar
• Diakaki, C., Papageorgiou, M., Papamichail, I., & Nikolos, I. (2015). Overview and analysis of vehicle automation and communication systems from a motorway traffic management perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 75, 147–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diels, C., & Bos, J. E. (2016). Self-driving carsickness. 53, 374–382.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, J., & Carr, T. (2003). Bicycle commuting and facilities in major US cities if you build them, commuters will use them. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828(1), 116–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, V. V, Chand, S., & Nair, D. J. (2016). Autonomous vehicles: Disengagements, accidents and reaction times. PLoS ONE, 11(12), e0168054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresner, K., & Stone, P. (2008). A multiagent approach to autonomous intersection management. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 31, 591–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eben Li, S., Li, K., & Wang, J. (2013). Economy-oriented vehicle adaptive cruise control with coordinating multiple objectives function. Vehicle System Dynamics, 51(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eby, D. W., Molnar, L. J., Zhang, L., Louis, R. M. S., Zanier, N., Kostyniuk, L. P., & Stanciu, S. (2016). Use, perceptions, and benefits of automotive technologies among aging drivers. Injury Epidemiology, 3, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Elbanhawi, M., Simic, M., & Jazar, R. (2015). In the passenger seat: Investigating ride comfort measures in autonomous cars. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, Fall, 4–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. M. (2014). The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 40, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. M. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations for capitalizing on Self-Driven vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnant, J. D., & Kockelman, K. M. (2016). Dynamic ride-sharing and fleet sizing for a system of shared autonomous vehicles in Austin, Texas. Transportation. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9729-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajardo, D., Au, T. C., Waller, T., Stone, P., & Yang, D. (2012). Automated intersection control: Performance of a future innovation versus current traffic signal control. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2259, 223–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, D., Howard, T. M., & Likhachev, M. (2008). Motion planning in urban environments. Journal of Field Robotics, 25(11–12), 939–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, P., Nunes, U., & Member, S. (2015). Multiplatooning leaders positioning and cooperative behavior algorithms of communicant automated vehicles for high traffic capacity. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(3), 1172–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fifer, S., Rose, J., & Greaves, S. (2014). Hypothetical bias in Stated Choice Experiments: Is it a problem? And if so, how do we deal with it?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 61, 164–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frandsen, T., & Nicolaisen, J. (2013). The ripple effect: Citation chain reactions of a nobel prize. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(3), 437–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. C., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs To Computerisation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 114, 254–280.
   Google Scholar
• Gerdes, R. M., Winstead, C., & Heaslip, K. (2013). CPS: An Efficiency-motivated attack against autonomous vehicular transportation. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC), 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Gerónimo, D., López, A. M., Sappa, A. D., & Graf, T. (2010). Survey of Pedestrian detection for advanced driver assistance systems. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(7), 1239–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, S., Vanholme, B., Mammar, S., Gruyer, D., & Nouvelière, L. (2010). Maneuver-based trajectory planning for highly autonomous vehicles on real road with traffic and driver interaction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 11(3), 589–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, S., Shen, J., & Du, L. (2016). Constrained optimization and distributed computation based car following control of a connected and autonomous vehicle platoon. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 94, 314–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, D., Pérez, J., Milanés, V., & Nashashibi, F. (2016). A review of motion planning techniques for automated vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(4), 1135–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouy, M., Wiedemann, K., Stevens, A., Brunett, G., & Reed, N. (2014). Driving next to automated vehicle platoons: How do short time headways influence non-platoon drivers' longitudinal control?. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 264–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, J. B., & Saxena, S. (2015). Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles. Nature Climate Change, 5(September), 860–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grumert, E., Ma, X., & Tapani, A. (2015). Effects of a cooperative variable speed limit system on traffic performance and exhaust emissions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 52, 173–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gucwa, M. (2014). Mobility and energy impacts of automated cars (PhD Thesis). Stanford, CA: Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. W., Nowroozi, A., & Tsao, J. (2001). Entrance capacity of an automated highway system. Transportation Science, 35(1), 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C., Hendrickson, C. T., Mangones, S., & Samaras, C. (2016). Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 72, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, R., Isogai, J., Raksincharoensak, P., & Nagai, M. (2012). Autonomous collision avoidance system by combined control of steering and braking using geometrically optimised vehicular trajectory. Vehicle System Dynamics, 50, 151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, D. A., & Wiesenthal, D. L. (1997). The relationship between traffic congestion, driver stress and direct versus indirect coping behaviours. Ergonomics, 40(3), 348–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoedemaeker, M., & Brookhuis, K. A. (1998). Behavioural adaptation to driving with an adaptive cruise control (ACC). Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 1(2), 95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn, R., van Arem, B., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2014). Automated driving, traffic flow efficiency and human factors: A literature review. Transportation Research Record, 2422, 113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, Y., Edara, P., & Sun, C. (2015). Situation assessment and decision making for lane change assistance using ensemble learning methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(8), 3875–3882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsell, N. B., Shrestha, B. P., Piao, J., & McDonald, M. (2009). Review of urban traffic management and the impacts of new vehicle technologies. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 3(4), 419–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S., Ren, W., & Chan, S. C. (2000). Design and performance evaluation of mixed manual and automatedcontrol traffic. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(6), 661–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgin Guler, S., Menendez, M., & Meier, L. (2014). Using connected vehicle technology to improve the efficiency of intersections. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 46, 121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Transport Forum. (2015). Urban mobility: System upgrade. Paris: OECD/International Transport Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannou, P., & Stefanovic, M. (2005). Evaluation of the ACC vehicles in mixed traffic: Lane change effects and sensitivity analysis petros ioannou, margareta stefanovic. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 6(1), 79–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., & Dolgui, A. (2014). The Ripple effect in supply chains: trade-off “efficiency-flexibility-resilience” in disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 2154–2172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal, A. S., Imura, J., Hayakawa, T., Ohata, A., & Aihara, K. (2015). A Vehicle-Intersection coordination scheme for smooth flows of traffic without using traffic lights. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(3), 1136–1147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal, A. S., Taguchi, S., & Yoshimura, T. (2016). Efficient driving on multilane roads under a connected vehicle environment. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(9), 2541–2551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamalanathsharma, R. K., & Rakha, H. A. (2016). Leveraging connected vehicle technology and telematics to enhance vehicle fuel efficiency in the vicinity of signalized intersections. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20, 33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesting, A., Treiber, M., Schönhof, M., & Helbing, D. (2008). Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 16(6), 668–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khondaker, B., & Kattan, L. (2015). Variable speed limit: A microscopic analysis in a connected vehicle environment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 58, 146–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwata, Y., Teo, J., Fiore, G., Karaman, S., Frazzoli, E., & How, J. P. (2009). Real-time motion planning with applications to autonomous urban driving. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 17(5), 1105–1118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamondia, J. J., Fagnant, D. J., Qu, H., Barrett, J., & Kockelman, K. (2016). Shifts in Long-Distance travel mode due to automated vehicles and travel survey analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2566, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Vine, S., Zolfaghari, A., & Polak, J. (2015). Autonomous cars: The tension between occupant experience and intersection capacity. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 52, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Choi, J., Yi, K., Shin, M., & Ko, B. (2014). Lane-keeping assistance control algorithm using differential braking to prevent unintended lane departures. Control Engineering Practice, 23(1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre, S., Carvalho, A., & Borrelli, F. (2016). A Learning-Based framework for velocity control in autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 13(1), 32–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, M. W., & Boyles, S. D. (2015). Effects of autonomous vehicle ownership on trip, mode, and route choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2493, 29–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, M. W., Boyles, S. D., & Patel, R. (2016). Paradoxes of reservation-based intersection controls in traffic networks. Transportation Research Part A, 90, 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, M. W., Fritz, H., & Boyles, S. D. (2016). On optimizing Reservation-Based intersection controls. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2574948
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J. I., Buonocore, J. J., & von Stackelberg, K. (2010). Evaluation of the public health impacts of traffic congestion: a health risk assessment. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 9, 65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Evans, B., De Waard, D., & Brookhuis, K. A. (2010). That's close enough-A threshold effect of time headway on the experience of risk, task difficulty, effort, and comfort. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(6), 1926–1933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Chitturi, M. V, Zheng, D., Bill, A. R., & Noyce, D. A. (2013). Modeling Reservation-Based autonomous intersection control in VISSIM. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2381, 81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, K.-R., Juang, J.-C., & Lin, C.-F. (2014). Active collision avoidance system for steering control of autonomous vehicles. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 8(6), 550–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., Li, K., Rajamani, R., & Wang, J. (2011). Model predictive multi-objective vehicular adaptive cruise control. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 19(3), 556–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. E., Peng, H., Li, K., & Wang, J. (2012). Minimum fuel control strategy in automated car-following scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 61(3), 998–1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebner, M., Klanner, F., Baumann, M., Ruhhammer, C., & Stiller, C. (2013). Velocity-based driver intent inference at urban intersections in the presence of preceding vehicles. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 5(2), 10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, K., & Jones, P. (2012). Social impacts and equity issues in transport: An introduction. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., Chen, T., Zhang, S., & Li, K. (2015). Intelligent hybrid electric vehicle ACC with coordinated control of tracking ability, fuel economy, and ride comfort. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(4), 2303–2308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, L., Liu, H., Li, P., & Wang, H. (2010). Model predictive control for adaptive cruise control with multi-objectives: comfort, fuel-economy, safety and car-following. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A, 11(3), 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., Xiang, Y., Cao, K., & Li, K. (2016). A dynamic automated lane change maneuver based on vehicle-to-vehicle communication. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 62, 87–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malokin, A., Circella, G., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2015). How Do activities conducted while commuting influence mode choice? Testing public transportation advantage and autonomous vehicle scenarios. In 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Manzie, C., Watson, H., & Halgamuge, S. (2007). Fuel economy improvements for urban driving: Hybrid vs. intelligent vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 15(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markvollrath, Schleicher, S., & Gelau, C. (2011). The influence of cruise control and adaptive cruise control on driving behaviour—A driving simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(3), 1134–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, J.-J., & Canudas-de-Wit, C. (2007). A safe longitudinal control for adaptive cruise control and Stop-and-Go scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 15(2), 246–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meen, G. (1999). Regional house prices and the ripple effect: A new interpretation. Housing Studies, 14(6), 733–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, J. B., Godbole, D. N., Lygeros, J., & Sengupta, R. (1998). Capacity analysis of traffic flow over a Single-Lane automated highway system. ITS Journal—Intelligent Transportation Systems Journal, 4(1–2), 49–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miedema, H. M. E. (2007). Adverse effects of traffic noise. In T. Garling & L. Steg (Eds.), Threats from car traffic to the quality of urban life. Problems, causes, and solutions (pp. 53–77). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Milakis, D. (2015). Will Greeks Cycle? Exploring intention and attitudes in the case of the new bicycle network of Patras. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9(5), 321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milakis, D., Snelder, M., van Arem, B., van Wee, B., & Correia, G. (2017). Development and transport implications of automated vehicles in the Netherlands: scenarios for 2030 and 2050. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 17(1), 63–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milakis, D., van Arem, B., & van Wee, B. (2015). The ripple effect of automated driving. In 2015 BIVEC-GIBET Transport Research Day. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: BIVEC-GIBET.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. A. (1997). Institutional and societal issues associated with atuomated highway systems. An environmental perspective. In P. A. Ioannou (Ed.), Automated highway systems (pp. 313–324). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. A., Bresnock, A., Shladover, S., & Lechner, E. H. (1997). Regional mobility impacts assessment of highway automation. In P. A. Ioannou (Ed.), Automated highway systems (pp. 293–311). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mladenovic, M. N., & McPherson, T. (2016). Engineering social justice into traffic control for Self-Driving vehicles?. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 1131–1149.
   Google Scholar
• Monteil, J., Nantes, A., Billot, R., Sau, J., & El Faouzi, N. (2014). Microscopic cooperative traffic flow: calibration and simulation based on a next generation simulation dataset. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 8(6), 519–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, S., Moon, I., & Yi, K. (2009). Design, tuning, and evaluation of a full-range adaptive cruise control system with collision avoidance. Control Engineering Practice, 17(4), 442–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naranjo, J. E., Jiménez, F., Anaya, J. J., Talavera, E., & Gómez, O. (2016). Application of vehicle to another entity (V2X) communications for motorcycle crash avoidance. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2016.1247703
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2008). National motor vehicle crash causation survey. Report DOT HS 811 059. Washington, DC: NHTSA.
   Google Scholar
• Ngoduy, D. (2012). Application of gas-kinetic theory to modelling mixed traffic of manual and ACC vehicles. Transportmetrica, 8(1), 43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngoduy, D. (2013). Instability of cooperative adaptive cruise control traffic flow: A macroscopic approach. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 18(10), 2838–2851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oja, P., Titze, S., Bauman, A., de Geus, B., Krenn, P., Reger-Nash, B., & Kohlberger, T. (2011). Health benefits of cycling: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 21(4), 496–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, J., & Shladover, S. E. (2015). Potential cyberattacks on automated vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(2), 546–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piao, J., & McDonald, M. (2008). Advanced driver assistance systems from autonomous to cooperative approach. 28(5), 659–684.
   Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., Buehler, R., Bassett, D. R., & Dannenberg, A. L. (2010). Walking and cycling to health: A comparative analysis of city, state, and international data. American Journal of Public Health, 100(10), 1986–1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimondi, F. M., & Melluso, M. (2008). Fuzzy motion control strategy for cooperation of multiple automated vehicles with passengers comfort. Automatica, 44(11), 2804–2816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajamani, R., & Shladover, S. E. (2001). Experimental comparative study of autonomous and co-operative vehicle-follower control systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 9(1), 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios-torres, J., & Malikopoulos, A. A. (2016). Automated and cooperative vehicle merging at highway On-Ramps. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2587582
   Google Scholar
• Rudin-Brown, C. M., & Parker, H. A. (2004). Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): Implications for preventive strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(2), 59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAE International. (2016). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for On-Road motor vehicles. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
   Google Scholar
• Scarinci, R., & Heydecker, B. (2014). Control concepts for facilitating motorway On-ramp merging using intelligent vehicles. Transport Reviews, 34(6), 775–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, T., Adireddy, G., & Yuan, H. (2012). Autonomous vehicle collision avoidance system using path planning and model-predictive-control-based active front steering and wheel torque control. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 226(6), 767–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shladover, S. E. (1995). Review of the state of development of Advanced Vehicle Control Systems (AVCS). Vehicle System Dynamics, 24(6–7), 551–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shladover, S. E. (2005). Automated vehicles for highway operations (automated highway systems). Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 219(1), 53–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shladover, S. E., Su, D., & Lu, X.-Y. (2012). Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2324, 63–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert, F. W., Oehl, M., & Pfister, H. R. (2014). The influence of time headway on subjective driver states in adaptive cruise control. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 25(PART A), 65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spieser, K., Treleaven, K., Zhang, R., Frazzoli, E., Morton, D., & Pavone, M. (2014). Toward a systematic approach to the design and evaluation of automated Mobility-on-Demand systems: A case study in Singapore. In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds.), Road vehicle automation (pp. 229–245). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Spyropoulou, I., Penttinen, M., Karlaftis, M., Vaa, T., & Golias, J. (2008). ITS Solutions And Accident Risks: Prospective and limitations. Transport Reviews, 28(5), 549–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., & Young, M. S. (1998). Vehicle automation and driving performance. Ergonomics, 41(7), 1014–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, W. B. (1997). Societal and institutional aspects of AHS deployment. In P. A. Ioannou (Ed.), Automated highway systems (pp. 335–348). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, N., Nilsson, J., Karlsson, I. C. M., & Nilsson, L. (2014). Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 218–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z., Bebis, G., & Miller, R. (2006). On-Road vehicle detection: A review. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(5), 694–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talebpour, A., & Mahmassani, H. S. (2016). Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 71, 143–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. D., & Austin, L. (2000). A review of current sensor technologies and applications within automotive and traffic control systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 214(6), 589–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahidi, A., & Eskandarian, A. (2003). Research advances in intelligent collision avoidance and adaptive cruise control. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 4(3), 143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vajedi, M., & Azad, N. L. (2015). Ecological adaptive cruise controller for Plug-In hybrid electric vehicles using nonlinear model predictive control. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(1), 113–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Arem, B., & Smits, C. (1997). An exploration of the development of automated vehicle guidance systems. Delft, The Netherlands: TNO.
   Google Scholar
• van Arem, B., van Driel, C., & Visser, R. (2006). The impact of Co-operative Adaptive Cruise Control on traffic flow characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 7(4), 429–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg, V., & Verhoef, E. T. (2016). Autonomous cars and dynamic bottleneck congestion: The effects on capacity, value of time and preference heterogeneity. Transportation Research Part B, 94, 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, R., Wang, H., Gregor, B., & Bettinardi, A. (2015). Potential changes to travel behaviors & patterns: a fuzzy cognitive map modeling approach. Transportation, 42(6), 967–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadud, Z., MacKenzie, D., & Leiby, P. (2016). Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 86, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Chen, X. M., Ouyang, Y., & Li, M. (2015). Emission mitigation via longitudinal control of intelligent vehicles in a Congested Platoon. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 30, 490–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Daamen, W., Hoogendoorn, S. P., & van Arem, B. (2016a). Connected variable speed limits control and car-following controlwith vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Daamen, W., Hoogendoorn, S. P., & van Arem, B. (2016b). Cooperative Car-Following control: Distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(5), 1459–1471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Hoogendoorn, S., Daamen, W., & van Arem, B. (2014). Potential impacts of ecological adaptive cruise control systems on traffic and environment. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 8(2), 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Hoogendoorn, S. P., Daamen, W., van Arem, B., & Happee, R. (2015). Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 58, 73–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J. D. (1994). An hypothesized evolution of an automated highway system. Seal Beach, CA: Rockwell International Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C., Zhao, G., & Ou, B. (2011). A fuel economy optimization system with applications in vehicles with human drivers and autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(7), 515–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, L., & Gao, F. (2010). A comprehensive review of the development of adaptive cruise control systems. Vehicle System Dynamics, 48(10), 1167–1192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., Zhang, H., Gartner, N. H., & Arsava, T. (2016). Collaborative merging strategy for freeway ramp operations in a connected and autonomous vehicles environment. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, Y., Handy, S. L., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2010). Factors associated with proportions and miles of bicycling for transportation and recreation in six small US cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(2), 73–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, H., Boyle, L. N., Moeckli, J., Dow, B. R., & Brown, T. L. (2012). Use patterns among early adopters of adaptive cruise control. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(5), 722–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., Guler, S. I., & Menendez, M. (2016). Isolated intersection control for various levels of vehicle technology: Conventional, connected, and automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C, 72, 109–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S., Liu, W., Sun, D., & Li, C. (2013). A new extended multiple Car-Following Model considering the Backward-Looking effect on traffic flow. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, 8(1), 11016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, M. D., Correia, G., & van Arem, B. (2016). Preferences of travellers for using automated vehicles as last mile public transport of multimodal train trips. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. S., & Stanton, N. A. (2007). Back to the future: brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles. Ergonomics, 50(1), 46–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakharenko, R. (2016). Self-Driving cars will change cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 61, 26–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Guhathakurta, S., Fang, J., & Zhang, G. (2015). Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: An agent-based simulation approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 19, 34–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, M., Qu, X., & Jin, S. (2016). On the impact of cooperative autonomous vehicles in improving freeway merging: A modified intelligent driver Model-Based approach. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmud, J., Sener, I. N., & Wagner, J. (2016). Self-Driving vehicles determinants of adoption and conditions of usage. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2665, 57–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohdy, I. A., & Rakha, H. A. (2016). Intersection management via vehicle connectivity: The intersection cooperative adaptive cruise control system concept. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20(1), 17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar