A new and efficient authentication scheme for vehicular ad hoc networks

References

• Bayat, M., Barmshoory, M., Rahimi, M., & Aref, M. R. (2015). A secure authentication scheme for vanets with batch verification. Wireless Networks, 21(5), 1733–1743. doi:10.1007/s11276-014-0881-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P. (1993). Random oracles are practical: A paradigm for designing efficient protocols. Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on computer and communications security (pp. 62–73). Fairfax, Virginia, USA. doi:10.1145/168588.168596
   Google Scholar
• Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P. (1996). The exact security of digital signatures-how to sign with RSA and Rabin. International conference on the theory and applications of cryptographic techniques (pp. 399–416). Zaragoza, Spain. doi:10.1007/3-540-68339-9_34
   Google Scholar
• Bento, L. C., Parafita, R., Rakha, H. A., & Nunes, U. J. (2019). A study of the environmental impacts of intelligent automated vehicle control at intersections via v2v and v2i communications. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/15472450.2018.1501272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, J. (2008). Car talk-[update]. IEEE Spectrum, 45(10), 16–16. doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2008.4635041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boneh, D., Lynn, B., & Shacham, H. (2001). Short signatures from the Weil pairing. International conference on the theory and application of cryptology and information security (pp. 514–532). Gold Coast, Australia. doi:10.1007/s00145-004-0314-9
   Google Scholar
• Boyen, X., & Waters, B. (2006). Compact group signatures without random oracles. Annual international conference on the theory and applications of cryptographic techniques (pp. 427–444). St. Petersburg, Russia. doi:10.1007/11761679_26
   Google Scholar
• Caballero-Gil, C., Molina-Gil, J., Hernández-Serrano, J., León, O., & Soriano-Ibanez, M. (2016). Providing k-anonymity and revocation in ubiquitous vanets. Ad Hoc Networks, 36, 482–494. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2015.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., & Cheng, Z. (2005). Security proof of Sakai-Kasaharas identity-based encryption scheme. IMA International conference on cryptography and coding (pp. 442–459). Cirencester, United Kingdom. Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30276-6
   Google Scholar
• Chim, T. W., Yiu, S.-M., Hui, L. C., & Li, V. O. (2012). MLAS: Multiple level authentication scheme for vanets. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(7), 1445–1456. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chim, T. W., Yiu, S.-M., Hui, L. C., & Li, V. O. (2014). VSPN: Vanet-based secure and privacy-preserving navigation. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 63(2), 510–524. doi:10.1109/TC.2012.188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consortium, C. V. S. C., et al. (2005). Vehicle safety communications project: Task 3 final report: Identify intelligent vehicle safety applications enabled by DSRC. Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, US Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Draft amendment for wireless access in vehicular environments (wave), IEEE std. 802.11p/d5.0. (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Etsi, T. (2011). 102 690 v1. 1.1. Machine-to-Machine communications (M2M), 2011–10.
   Google Scholar
• Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., & Rivest, R. L. (1988). A digital signature scheme secure against adaptive chosen-message attacks. SIAM Journal on Computing, 17(2), 281–308. doi:10.1137/0217017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granlund, T. (2010). The GMP development team. GNU MP: The GNU Multiple Precision Arithmetic Library, 5(5), 1–139.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, J., Baugh, J. P., & Wang, S. (2007). A group signature based secure and privacy-preserving vehicular communication framework. 2007 mobile networking for vehicular environments, 103–108. Anchorage, Alaska Jung. doi:10.1109/MOVE.2007.4300813
   Google Scholar
• He, D., Zeadally, S., Xu, B., & Huang, X. (2015). An efficient identity-based conditional privacy-preserving authentication scheme for vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 10(12), 2681–2691. doi:10.1109/TIFS.2015.2473820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng, S. J., Tzeng, S. F., Pan, Y., Fan, P., Wang, X., Li, T., & Khan, M. K. (2013). b-specs+: Batch verification for secure pseudonymous authentication in vanet. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 8(11), 1860–1875. doi:10.1109/TIFS.2013.2277471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, D., Misra, S., Verma, M., & Xue, G. (2011). PACP: An efficient pseudonymous authentication-based conditional privacy protocol for vanets. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(3), 736–746. doi:10.1109/TITS.2011.2156790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEEE STD 1609.2-2013 (revision of IEEE STD 1609.2-2006). (2013). (p. 1–289).
   Google Scholar
• Islam, S., & Biswas, G. (2012). An efficient and provably-secure digital signature scheme based on elliptic curve bilinear pairings. Theoretical and Applied Informatics, 24(2), 109. doi:10.2478/v10179-012-0009-0
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. D., Sur, C., Park, Y., & Rhee, K.-H. (2009). A robust conditional privacy-preserving authentication protocol in vanet. International conference on security and privacy in mobile information and communication systems (pp. 35–45). Turin, Italy. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04434-2_4
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C.-C., & Lai, Y.-M. (2013). Toward a secure batch verification with group testing for vanet. Wireless Networks, 19(6), 1441–1449. doi:10.1007/s11276-013-0543-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Lu, H., & Guizani, M. (2015). ACPN: A novel authentication framework with conditional privacy-preservation and non-repudiation for vanets. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 26(4), 938–948. doi:10.1109/TPDS.2014.2308215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, X., Sun, X., Ho, P. H., & Shen, X. (2007). GSIS: A secure and privacy-preserving protocol for vehicular communications. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 56(6), 3442–3456. doi:10.1109/TVT.2007.906878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Wang, L., & Chen, H. H. (2015). Message authentication using proxy vehicles in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64(8), 3697–3710. doi:10.1109/TVT.2014.2358633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, R., Lin, X., Liang, X., & Shen, X. (2012). A dynamic privacy-preserving key management scheme for location-based services in vanets. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13(1), 127–139. doi:10.1109/TITS.2011.2164068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, R., Lin, X., Zhu, H., Ho, P.-H., & Shen, X. (2008). ECPP: Efficient conditional privacy preservation protocol for secure vehicular communications. Infocom 2008. The 27th conference on computer communications. IEEE (pp. 1229–1237). Phoenix AZ, USA. doi:10.1109/INFOCOM.2008.179
   Google Scholar
• Mahajan, A., Potnis, N., Gopalan, K., Wang, A. (2005). Evaluation of mobility models for vehicular ad-hoc network simulations (Report No. 051220). Las Vegas, USA: Florida State University.
   Google Scholar
• Malip, A., Ng, S.-L., & Li, Q. (2014). A certificateless anonymous authenticated announcement scheme in vehicular ad hoc networks. Security and Communication Networks, 7(3), 588–601. doi:10.1002/sec.760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, W. (2003). Modern cryptography: Theory and practice. Pearson Education India, Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Maxim, R., & Jean-Pierre, H. (2005). The security of vehicular ad hoc networks. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM workshop on security of ad hoc and sensor networks (pp. 11–21). Alexandria, VA, USA. doi:10.1145/1102219.1102223
   Google Scholar
• Mitsunari, S., Sakai, R., & Kasahara, M. (2002). A new traitor tracing. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, 85(2), 481–484.
   Google Scholar
• Ozbay, K., Ban, X. J., & Yang, C. D. (2018). Developments in connected and automated vehicles. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(3), 187–189. doi:10.1080/15472450.2018.1466407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pournaghi, S. M., Zahednejad, B., Bayat, M., & Farjami, Y. (2018). NECPPA: A novel and efficient conditional privacy-preserving authentication scheme for vanet. Computer Networks, 134, 78–92. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, F., Wu, Z., Wang, F.-Y., & Cho, W. (2015). A security and privacy review of vanets. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(6), 2985–2996. doi:10.1109/TITS.2015.2439292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raya, M., & Hubaux, J.-P. (2007). Securing vehicular ad hoc networks. Journal of Computer Security, 15(1), 39–68. doi:10.3233/JCS-2007-15103
   Google Scholar
• Shacham, H., & Waters, B. (2007). Efficient ring signatures without random Oracles. In Okamoto, Tatsuaki & Wang, Xiaoyun (Eds.), Public Key Cryptography—PKC 2007 (pp. 166–180). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 4450. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-71677-8_12
   Google Scholar
• Shao, J., Lin, X., Lu, R., & Zuo, C. (2016). A threshold anonymous authentication protocol for vanets. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(3), 1711–1720. doi:10.1109/TVT.2015.2405853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shladover, S. E. (2018). Connected and automated vehicle systems: Introduction and overview. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(3), 190–200. doi:10.1080/15472450.2017.1336053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studer, A., Shi, E., Bai, F., & Perrig, A. (2009). Tacking together efficient authentication, revocation, and privacy in vanets. Secon’09. 6th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2009. (pp. 1–9). Rome, Italy. doi:10.1109/SAHCN.2009.5168976
   Google Scholar
• Sun, X., Lin, X., & Ho, P.-H. (2007). Secure vehicular communications based on group signature and id-based signature scheme. ICC’07. IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2007. (pp. 1539–1545). Glasgow, Scotland. doi:10.1109/ICC.2007.258
   Google Scholar
• Tzeng, S. F., Horng, S. J., Li, T., Wang, X., Huang, P. H., & Khan, M. K. (2017). Enhancing security and privacy for identity-based batch verification scheme in vanets. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(4), 3235–3248. doi:10.1109/TVT.2015.2406877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah, I., Wahid, A., Shah, M. A., & Waheed, A. (2017). VBPC: Velocity based pseudonym changing strategy to protect location privacy of vehicles in vanet. 2017 International Conference on Communication Technologies (comtech) (pp. 132–137). Military College of Signals (MCS), Pakistan. doi:10.1109/COMTECH.2017.8065762
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., Xu, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., & Zhu, L. (2016). 2flip: A two-factor lightweight privacy-preserving authentication scheme for vanet. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(2), 896–911. doi:10.1109/TVT.2015.2402166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Zhong, H., Xu, Y., & Cui, J. (2016). ECPB: Efficient conditional privacy-preserving authentication scheme supporting batch verification for vanets. IJ Network Security, 18(2), 374–382. doi:10.6633/IJNS.201603.18(2).20
   Google Scholar
• Wasef, A., Jiang, Y., & Shen, X. (2010). DCS: an efficient distributed-certificate-service scheme for vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(2), 533–549. doi:10.1109/TVT.2009.2028893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, H., Beznosov, K., Qin, Z., & Ripeanu, M. (2010). Efficient and spontaneous privacy-preserving protocol for secure vehicular communication. 2010 IEEE international conference on Communications (ICC). (pp. 1–6). Capetown, South Africa. doi:10.1109/ICC.2010.5502673
   Google Scholar
• Xiong, H., Chen, Z., & Li, F. (2012). Efficient privacy-preserving authentication protocol for vehicular communications with trustworthy. Security and Communication Networks, 5(12), 1441–1451. doi:10.1002/sec.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, H., Guan, Z., Hu, J., & Chen, Z. (2012). Anonymous authentication protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks: An overview. Applied Cryptography and Network Security, 53–72. https://api.intechopen.com/chapter/pdf-preview/32070
   Google Scholar
• Xue, X., & Ding, J. (2012). LPA: A new location-based privacy-preserving authentication protocol in vanet. Security and Communication Networks, 5(1), 69–78. doi:10.1002/sec.305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., Ho, P. H., & Tapolcai, J. (2011). On batch verification with group testing for vehicular communications. Wireless Networks, 17(8), 1851. doi:10.1007/s11276-011-0383-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., Safavi-Naini, R., & Susilo, W. (2004). An efficient signature scheme from bilinear pairings and its applications. International Workshop on Public Key Cryptography, 2947 277–290. Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24632-9_20
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, J., & Roy, S. (2003). Mac for dedicated short range communications in intelligent transport system. IEEE Communications Magazine, 41(12), 60–67. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2003.1252800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar