Lane change for self-driving in highly dense traffic using motion based uncertainty propagation

References

• Althoff, M., Stursberg, O., & Buss, M. (2009). Model-based probabilistic collision detection in autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 10(2), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2009.2018966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. J., Peters, S. C., Pilutti, T. E., & Iagnemma, K. (2010). An optimal-control-based framework for trajectory planning, threat assessment, and semi-autonomous control of passenger vehicles in hazard avoidance scenarios. International Journal of Vehicle Autonomous Systems, 8(2/3/4), 190–216. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVAS.2010.035796
   Google Scholar
• Bujarbaruah, M., Zhang, X., Rosolia, U., & Borrelli, F. (2018). Adaptive mpc for iterative tasks [Paper presentation]. 2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pp. 6322–6327. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2018.8618694
   Google Scholar
• Butakov, V., & Ioannou, P. (2015). Driving autopilot with personalization feature for improved safety and comfort. In 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 387–393.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A., Gao, Y., Lefevre, S., & Borrelli, F. (2014). Stochastic predictive control of autonomous vehicles in uncertain environments. In 12th International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control, pp. 712–719.
   Google Scholar
• Chee, W., & Tomizuka, M. (1994). Vehicle lane change maneuver in automated highway systems (Report No. UCB-ITS-PRR-94-22), UC Berkeley, https://escholarship.org/content/qt29j5s3gk/qt29j5s3gk.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dikmen, M., & Burns, C. M. (2016). Autonomous driving in the real world: Experiences with tesla autopilot and summon [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 225–228.
   Google Scholar
• Falcone, P., Borrelli, F., Asgari, J., Tseng, H. E., & Hrovat, D. (2007). Predictive active steering control for autonomous vehicle systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 15(3), 566–580. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2007.894653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furda, A., & Vlacic, L. (2011). Enabling safe autonomous driving in real-world city traffic using multiple criteria decision making. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 3(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2011.940472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., Gray, A., Tseng, H. E., & Borrelli, F. (2014). A tube-based robust nonlinear predictive control approach to semiautonomous ground vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics, 52(6), 802–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2014.902537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, A. (2015). Trajectory generation for lane-change maneuver of autonomous vehicles [Master’s thesis, Perdue University]. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1534&context=open_access_theses.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, A., Gao, Y., Hedrick, J. K., & Borrelli, F. (2013). Robust predictive control for semi-autonomous vehicles with an uncertain driver model [Paper presentation]. In 2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2013.6629472
   Google Scholar
• Gray, A., Gao, Y., Lin, T., Hedrick, J. K., & Borrelli, F. (2013). Stochastic predictive control for semi-autonomous vehicles with an uncertain driver model [Paper presentation]. In 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013), pp. 2329–2334.
   Google Scholar
• Ingle, S., & Phute, M. (2016). Tesla autopilot: semi autonomous driving, an uptick for future autonomy. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(9), 369–372.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, D., Weidl, G., Dang, T., Breuel, G., Tamke, A., Wedel, A., & Rosenstiel, W. (2012). Object-oriented bayesian networks for detection of lane change maneuvers. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 4(3), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2012.2203229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B., Yi, K., Yoo, H.-J., Chong, H.-J., & Ko, B. (2015). An imm/ekf approach for enhanced multitarget state estimation for application to integrated risk management system. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64(3), 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2014.2329497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, J., Pfeiffer, M., Schildbach, G., & Borrelli, F. (2015). Kinematic and dynamic vehicle models for autonomous driving control design. In Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2015 IEEE, pp. 1094–1099.
   Google Scholar
• Kouvaritakis, B., Cannon, M., Raković, S. V., & Cheng, Q. (2010). Explicit use of probabilistic distributions in linear predictive control. Automatica, 46(10), 1719–1724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2010.06.034
   Google Scholar
• Mattingley, J., & Boyd, S. (2012). Cvxgen: A code generator for embedded convex optimization. Optimization and Engineering, 13(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-011-9176-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayne, D. Q., Rawlings, J. B., Rao, C. V., & Scokaert, P. O. (2000). Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality. Automatica, 36(6), 789–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00214-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayne, D. Q., Seron, M. M., & Raković, S. (2005). Robust model predictive control of constrained linear systems with bounded disturbances. Automatica, 41(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2004.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, S., & Yi, K. (2008). Human driving data-based design of a vehicle adaptive cruise control algorithm. Vehicle System Dynamics, 46(8), 661–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110701576130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naranjo, J. E., Gonzalez, C., Garcia, R., & De Pedro, T. (2008). Lane-change fuzzy control in autonomous vehicles for the overtaking maneuver. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 9(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2008.922880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, J., Silvlin, J., Brannstrom, M., Coelingh, E., & Fredriksson, J. (2016). If, when, and how to perform lane change maneuvers on highways. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 8(4), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2016.2565718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajamani, R. (2011). Vehicle dynamics and control. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, J., & Yi, K. (2017). A new adaptive uncertainty propagation method based stochastic model predictive control for automated driving vehicles [Paper presentation]. 2017 American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 5660–5665.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, J., Chae, H., & Yi, K. (2018). Stochastic model-predictive control for lane change decision of automated driving vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(6), 4771–4782. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2018.2804891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, J., Yi, K., Jung, J., Lee, K., Chong, H., & Ko, B. (2016). Design and evaluation of a model predictive vehicle control algorithm for automated driving using a vehicle traffic simulator. Control Engineering Practice, 51, 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2016.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, M., Furukawa, Y., & Kasuya, K. (2011). Steering avoidance support system by dyc combined with collision mitigation brake system. In Proc. of FAST-zero’11 Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Tapani, A. (2012). Vehicle trajectory effects of adaptive cruise control. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2012.639641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomar, R. S., Verma, S., & Tomar, G. S. (2010). Prediction of lane change trajectories through neural network. In 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, pp. 249–253.
   Google Scholar
• Usman, G., & Kunwar, F. (2009). Autonomous vehicle overtaking-an online solution. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, pp. 596–601.
   Google Scholar
• van Aerde, M., & Rakha, H. (1999). A framework for the evaluation of system safety benefits of intelligent cruise control systems. Journal of Intelligent Transportation System, 5(2), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10248079908903763
   Google Scholar
• Vitus, M. P., & Tomlin, C. J. (2013). A probabilistic approach to planning and control in autonomous urban driving [Paper presentation]. 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2459–2464.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, L., Raksincharoensak, P., Maeda, K., & Nagai, M. (2011). Lane change behavior modeling for autonomous vehicles based on surroundings recognition. International Journal of Automotive Engineering, 2(2), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.20485/jsaeijae.2.2_7
   Google Scholar
• Wei, J., Dolan, J. M., & Litkouhi, B. (2010). A prediction-and cost function-based algorithm for robust autonomous freeway driving. 2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 512–517.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, J., Dolan, J. M., & Litkouhi, B. (2013). Autonomous vehicle social behavior for highway entrance ramp management [Paper presentation]. 2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2013.6629471
   Google Scholar
• Yang, D., Zheng, S., Wen, C., Jin, P. J., & Ran, B. (2018). A dynamic lane-changing trajectory planning model for automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 95, 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., Maier, C., Chen, H., & Allgöwer, F. (2013). Tube mpc scheme based on robust control invariant set with application to lipschitz nonlinear systems. Systems & Control Letters, 62(2), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2012.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar