New Qing History: Dispute, Dialog, and Influence

Bibliography

• English-Language Sources Cited
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, Beatrice S. Monarchs and Ministers: The Grand Council in Mid-Ching China, 1723–1820. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Peter and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Bol, Peter. “‘The Localist Turn’ and ‘Local Identity’ in Late Imperial China.” Late Imperial China, vol. 24, no. 2 (2003): 1–50. doi: 10.1353/late.2004.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Michael G. A Court on Horseback: Imperial Touring and the Construction of Qing Rule, 1680–1785. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Asia Center, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, Pamela Kyle. “A Reserved Approach to ‘New Qing History’. Unpublished manuscript, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, Pamela Kyle. Orphan Warriors: Three Manchu Generations of the End of the Qing World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, Pamela, Helen Siu, and Donald, Sutton. Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, Yingcong. The Sichuan Frontier and Tibet: Imperial Strategy in the Early Qing. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Yizhuang. “Reflections on the ‘New Qing History’ School in the United States.” Chinese Studies in History, vol. 43, no. 2 (2009): 92–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirlik, Arif. “Born in Translation: ‘China’ in the Making of ‘Zhongguo’”. Boundary 2: An International Journal of Literature and Culture, July 29, 2015, available at http://boundary2.org/2015/07/29/born-in-translation-china-in-the-making-of-zhongguo/.
   Google Scholar
• Duara, Prasenjit. Rescuing History from the Nation: Questioning Narratives of Modern China. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Dunnell, Ruth W. and James A. Millward. “Introduction.” In New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengde, edited by Ruth W. Dunnell, James A. Millward, Mark C. Elliott, and Philippe Forêt, 1–11. London: Rutledge Curzon, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, Mark C. The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, Mark C. “The Case of the Missing Indigene: Debate Over a ‘Second-Generation’ Ethnic Policy.” The China Journal, no. 73 (2015): 186–213. doi: 10.1086/679274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esherick, Joseph W. “How the Qing Became China.” In Empire to Nation: Historical Perspectives on the Making of the Modern World, edited by Joseph W.Esherick, Hasan Kalali, and EricVan Young, 229–58. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Inc., 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbank, John K. “Synarchy under the Treaties.” In Chinese Thought and Institutions, edited by John K.Fairbank, 204–31. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Farquhar, David M. “Emperor as a Bodhisattva in the Governance of the Ch'ing Empire.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, vol. 38, no. 1 (1978): 5–34. doi: 10.2307/2718931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, Joseph. “On Future Trends in Ch'ing Studies—Three Views.” Ch'ing-shih wen-ti, vol. 4, no. 1 (1979): 105–6.
   Google Scholar
• Fogel, Joshua A. Politics and Sinology: The Case of Naitō Konan (1866–1934). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Giersch, C. Patterson. Asian Borderlands: The Transformation of Qing China's Yunnan Frontier. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Melvin C. The Snow Lion and the Dragon: China, Tibet, and the Dalai Lama. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, R. Kent. “Who Were the Manchus? A Review Essay.” Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 61, no. 1 (2002): 151–64. doi: 10.2307/2700193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt, Michael and Antonio Hegri. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell, Stevan. “Introduction: Civilizing Projects and the Reaction to Them.” In Cultural Encounters on China's Ethnic Frontiers, edited by StevanHarrell, 3–36. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Hedin, Sven Anders. My Life as an Explorer. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, Ping-ti. “In Defense of Sinicization: A Rebuttal of Evelyn Rawski's ‘Reenvisioning the Qing.” The Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 57, no. 1 (1998): 123–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosteller, Laura. Qing Colonial Enterprise: Ethnography and Cartography in Early Modern China. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Iggers, Greorg G. Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge, 102. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, Frederic. “Forward.” In Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, edited by Jean-François Leotard, vii–xxi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Harold. Monarchy in the Emperor's Eyes: Image and Reality in the Chi'en-lung Reign. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Philip. Soul Stealers: The Chinese Sorcery Scare of 1768. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Leibold, James. Reconfiguring Chinese Nationalism: How the Qing Frontier and Its Indigenes Became Chinese. New York: Palgrave McMillan, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Huaiyin. Reinventing Modern China: Imagination and Authenticity in Chinese Historical Writing. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Xiaoyuan. Recast All Under Heaven: Revolution, War, Diplomacy, and Frontier China in the 20th Century. New York: Continuum Books, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Zhao. “Research Trends in Asia: ‘Writing History during a Prosperous Age: The New Qing History Project.” Late Imperial China, vol. 29, no. 1 (2008): 120–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millward, James A. Euroasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mullaney, Thomas. Coming to Terms with the Nation: Ethnic Classification in Modern China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Rawski, Evelyn. “Reenvisioning the Qing: The Significance of the Qing Period in Chinese History.” The Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 55, no. 4 (1996): 829–50. doi: 10.2307/2646525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoads, Edward J. M. Manchus and Han: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861–1928. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, William. “The Significance of the Qianlong-Jiaqing Transition in Qing History.” Late Imperial China, vol. 32, no. 2 (2011): 74–88. doi: 10.1353/late.2011.0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, Jennifer. Negotiated Power in Late Imperial China: The Zongli Yamen and the Politics of Reform. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, Jonathan. “The Qing Invention of Nature: Environment, Identity in Northeast China and Mongolia, 1750–1850”. Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Richard J. The Qing Dynasty and Traditional Chinese Culture. Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Struve, Lynn A. “Introduction.” In The Qing Formation of World Historical Time, edited by Lynn Struve, 1–54. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Waley-Cohen, Joanna. “The New Qing History.” Radical History Review, no. 88 (Winter 2004): 193–206. doi: 10.1215/01636545-2004-88-193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. Edward. Inventing China through History: The May Fourth Approaches to Historiography. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Gungwu. Renewal: The Chinese State and the New Global History. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Wensheng. White Lotus Rebels and South China Pirates: Crisis and Reform in the Qing Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, Jodi L. Empire and Identity in Guizhou: Local Resistance to Qing Expansion. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Lien-Sheng. “Schedules of Work and Rest in Imperial China.” In Studies in Chinese Institutional History, edited by Lien-Sheng Yang, 38–52. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Bin. Between Wind and Clouds: The Making of Yunnan (Second Century BCE to Twentieth Century CE). New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Zarrow, Peter. “Historical Trauma: Anti-Manchurism and Memories of Atrocity in Late Qing China.” History and Memory, vol. 16, no. 2 (fall/winter 2004): 67–107.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Longxi. The Tao and the Logos: Literary Hermaneutics, East and West. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Gang. “Reinventing China: Imperial Qing Ideology and the Rise of Modern Chinese National Identity in the Early Twentieth Century.” Modern China, vol. 32, no. 1 (January 2006): 3–30. doi: 10.1177/0097700405282349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinese Sources Cited
   Google Scholar
• Ding Yizhuang, Ou Lide 定宜庄 欧立德. “二十一世纪如何书写中国历史”, ⟪历史学评论⟫ 第一卷. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社，2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ge Zhaoguang 葛兆光. “重建中国的历史论述”, ⟪二十一世纪双月刊⟫, 2005年8月.
   Google Scholar
• Guo Chengkang 郭成康. “清朝皇帝的中国观”, no.4⟪清史研究⟫(2005): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Guo Chengkang. “也谈满族汉化” , no.2⟪清史研究⟫(2000): 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Xingtao 黄兴涛. “清朝满人的中国认同: 对美国新清史的一种回应”, Liu Fengyun 刘凤云 编,⟪清代政治与国家认同⟫, 北京: 社会科学文献出版社，2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Tingfu 蒋廷黼. ⟪中国近代史大纲⟫. 南京: 凤凰出版传媒集团, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Li Hsiao-ti 李孝悌. ⟪清末的下层社会启蒙运动, 1901–1911⟫. 石家庄: 河北教育出版社, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Li Zhiting 李治亭. “‘新清史’：新帝国主义史学标本”. 中国社会科学报, 4/20/2015, http://sscp.cssn.cn/xkpd/zm_20150/201504/t20150420_1592234.html
   Google Scholar
• Liu Fengyun 刘凤云. “ ‘新清史’ 研究: 不同方向的学术争鸣” http://www.csstoday.net/Item/2999.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Liu Fengyun. 编.⟪清代政治与国家认同⟫, 北京: 社会科学文献出版社，2012.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Fengyun. “观念与热点的转换： 清前期政治史研究的道路与趋势”， ⟪清史研究⟫no. 2 (2015): 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Lü Simian 吕思勉. 吕思勉读史札记. 上海: 上海古籍出版社，2005.
   Google Scholar
• Qian Mu 钱穆. 国史大纲. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Shi Quan石泉. 甲午战争前后之晚清政局. 北京: 三联书店, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Ming-ke 王明珂. 反思史学与史学反思: 文本与表征分析. 台北: 允晨文化公司, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Rongzu 汪荣祖. “为新清史辩护必须先懂得新清史” http://www.21ccom.net/articles/thought/bianyan/20150519124867_all.html
   Google Scholar
• Wang Rongzu. “以公心论新清史”, Wang Rongzu 汪荣祖 编,⟪清帝国性质再商榷⟫. 台北：中央大学出版中心，2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Qine 吴启讷. “清朝的战略防御有异于近代帝国的殖民扩张”, Wang Rongzu 汪荣祖 编,⟪清帝国性质再商榷⟫. 台北：中央大学出版中心，2014.
   Google Scholar
• Xia Mingfang 夏明方. “一部没有近代的中国近代史---从柯文三论看中国中心观的内在逻辑思维及其困境”， ⟪近代史研究⟫no.1 (2007): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Nianqun. 杨念群. “超越 ‘汉化论’ 与 ‘满洲特性论’ : 清史研究能否走出第三条道路?”.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Nianqun. “新清史与南北文化观”, Wang Rongzu 汪荣祖 编, ⟪清帝国性质再商榷⟫. 台北：中央大学出版中心，2014.
   Google Scholar
• Yun Yuding 恽毓鼎. ⟪恽毓鼎澄斋奏稿⟫. 杭州: 浙江古籍出版社, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng Xiaoxu 郑孝胥. ⟪郑孝胥日记⟫. 北京: 中华书局, 1993.
   Google Scholar