302
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Developmental Changes in Causal Supports for Word Learning

&

REFERENCES

  • Ahn, W.-K., Gelman, S. A., Amsterlaw, J. A., Hohenstein, J., & Kalish, C. W. (2000). Causal status effect in children’s categorization. Cognition, 76(2), B35–43.
  • Alvarez, A., & Booth, A. E. (2011). Preschoolers’ preference for causal information. Paper presented at the International Mind Brain and Education Society Meeting, San Diego, CA.
  • Alvarez, A., & Booth, A. E. (in press). Motivated by meaning: Testing the effect of knowledge-infused rewards on preschoolers’ task persistence. Child Development.
  • Anderson, R., Manoogian, S. T., & Reznick, J. S. (1976). The undermining and enhancing of intrinsic motivation in preschool children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 915–922.
  • Bauer, P. J., & Fivush, R. (1992). Constructing event representations: Building on a foundation of variation and enabling relations. Cognitive Development, 7, 381–401.
  • Bauer, P. J., & Mandler, J. M. (1989). One thing follows another: Effects of temporal structure on 1- to 2-year-olds’ recall of events. Developmental Psychology, 25, 197–206.
  • Bauer, P. J., & Mandler, J. M. (1992). Putting the horse before the cart: The use of temporal order in recall of events by one-year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 28, 441–452.
  • Baumann, J. F., & Kame-enui, E. J. (Eds.). (2004). Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Beck, I. L. (2002). Developing vocabulary in the earliest grades. In Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction ( pp. 47–71). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Biederman, I., & Vessel, E. A. (2006). Perceptual pleasure and the brain. American Scientist, 94, 247–253.
  • Booth, A. E. (2008). The cause of infant categorization? Cognition, 106, 984–993.
  • Booth, A. E. (2009). Causal supports for early word learning. Child Development, 80, 1243–1250.
  • Booth, A. E. (under review). Causally rich categories support name-based inductive generalization in preschoolers.
  • Booth, A. E., Schuler, K., & Zajicek, R. (2010). Specifying the role of function in infant categorization. Infant Behavior and Development, 33, 672–684.
  • Booth, A. E., & Waxman, S. R. (2002). Object names and object functions serve as cues to categories for infants. Developmental Psychology, 38, 948–957.
  • Butler, L. P., & Markman, E. M. (2012). Preschoolers use intentional and pedagogical cues to guide inductive inferences and exploration. Child Development, 83, 1416–1428. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01775.x
  • Carlton, M. P., & Winsler, A. (1998). Fostering intrinsic motivation in early childhood classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal, 25(3), 159–166.
  • Condry, J., & Chambers, J. (1978). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning. In M. R. Lepper & D. Green ( Eds.), The hidden costs of reward: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation ( pp. 61–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cook, C., Goodman, N. D., & Schulz, L. E. (2011). Where science starts: Spontaneous experiments in preschoolers’ exploratory play. Cognition, 120, 341–349.
  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1–27.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Dunbar, K., & Klahr, D. (1989). Developmental differences in scientific discovery processes. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky ( Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon ( pp. 109–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory-of-mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 50(3), 274–290.
  • Gardiner, A. K., Greif, M. L., & Bjorklund, D. F. (2011). Guided by intention: preschoolers’ imitation reflects inferences of causation. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12, 355–373.
  • Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., & Lafrenière, M. A. K. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic school motivation as a function of age: The mediating role of autonomy support. Social Psychology of Education, 15(1), 77–95.
  • Gopnik, A. (2000). Explanation as orgasm and the drive for causal knowledge: The function, evolution, and phenomenology of the theory formation system. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson ( Eds.), Explanation and cognition ( pp. 299–323). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gopnik, A., & Nazzi, T. (2003). Words, kinds, and causal powers: A theory theory perspective on early naming and categorization. In D. H. O. Rakison & M. Lisa ( Ed.), Early category and concept development ( pp. 303–329). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Gopnik, A., & Schulz, L. (2007). Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Gopnik, A., & Sobel, D. M. (2000). Detecting blickets: How young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. Child Development, 71, 1205–1222.
  • Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3–13.
  • Graves, M. F. (2006). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Greif, M. L., Kemler Nelson, D. G., Keil, F. C., & Gutierrez, F. (2006). What do children want to know about animals and artifacts? Domain-specific requests for information. Psychological Science, 17, 455–459.
  • Hayes, B. K., & Thompson, S. P. (2007, August). Causal relations and feature similarity in children’s inductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 470–484; 136, 470–484.
  • Helm, J. H., & Katz, L. (2001). Young investigators: The project approach in the early years. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2005). Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2006). Young children’s conception of the biological world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 177–181.
  • Kemler Nelson, D. G., Chan, E. L., & Holt, M. B. (2004). When children as wWhat is it?’ what do they want to know about artifacts? Psychological Science, 15, 384–389.
  • Kemler Nelson, D. G., Frankenfield, A., Morris, C., & Blair, E. (2000). Young children’s use of functional information to categorize artifacts: Three factors that matter. Cognition, 77(2), 133–168.
  • Kemler Nelson, D. G., O’Neill, K., & Asher, Y. M. (2008). A mutually facilitative relationship between learning names and learning concepts in preschool children: The case of artifacts. The Journal of Cognition and Development, 9(2), 171–193.
  • Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise and other bribes. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., O’Laughlin, E., Schauble, M., Leadbeater, B. J., & Yotive, W. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Legare, C. H., Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (2010). Inconsistency with prior knowledge triggers children’s causal explanatory reasoning. Child Development, 81, 929–944.
  • Lepper, M. R., Sethi, S., Dialdin, D., & Drake, M. (1996). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A developmental perspective. In S. Luthar, J. Burack, D. Cicchetti, & J. Weisz ( Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Perspectives on adjustments ( pp. 23–50). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leslie, A. M., & Keeble, S. (1987). Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? Cognition, 25, 265–288.
  • Lyons, D. E. (2011). The scope and limits of overimitation in the transmission of artefact culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences, 366, 1158–1167.
  • Mascalzoni, E., Regolin, L., Vallortigara, G., & Simion, F. (2013). The cradle of causal reasoning: newborns’ preference for physical causality. Developmental Science, 16, 327–335.
  • Nazzi, T., & Gopnik, A. (2000). A shift in children’s use of perceptual and causal cues to categorization. Developmental Science, 3, 389–396.
  • Oakes, L. M., & Cohen, L. B. (1990). Infant perception of a causal event. Cognitive Development, 5, 193–207.
  • Schlottmann, A. (1999). Seeing it happen and knowing how it works: How children understand the relation between perceptual causality and underlying mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 303–317.
  • Schulz, L. E., & Bonawitz, E. B. (2007). Serious fun: Preschoolers engage in more exploratory play when evidence is confounded. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1045–1050.
  • Schulz, L. E., Gopnik, A., & Glymour, C. (2007, May). Preschool children learn about causal structure from conditional interventions. Developmental Science, 10, 322–332.
  • Welder, A. N., & Graham, S. A. (2001). The influences of shape similarity and shared labels on infants’ inductive inferences about nonobvious object properties. Child Development, 72, 1653–1673.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.