Reduplicated Words Are Easier to Learn

References

• Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9, 321–324. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein Ratner, N. (1984). Patterns of vowel modification in mother-child speech. Journal of Child Language, 11, 557–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bever, T. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic universals. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 227–360). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, E. K. R., Chapman, R. S., & Schwartz, S. E. (2004). Fast mapping of words and story recall by individuals with Down syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1286–1300. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/097)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. (2000). The OCP in the perception grammar. Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-435. Retrieved from http://roa.rutgers.edu/article/view/445.
   Google Scholar
• Boll-Avetisyan, N., & Kager, R. (2014). OCP-place in speech segmentation. Language and Speech, 57, 394–421. doi:10.1177/0023830913508074
   Google Scholar
• Bonatti, L., Peña, M., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2007). On consonants, vowels, chickens, and eggs. Psychological Science, 8, 924–925. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02002.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, M. R., & Cartwright, T. A. (1996). Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition, 61, 93–125. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00719-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, M. R., & Siskind, J. M. (2001). The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition, 81, B33–B44. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00122-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caselli, M. C., Bates, E., Casadio, P., Fenson, J., Fenson, L., Sanderl, L., & Weir, J. (1995). A cross-linguistic study of early lexical development. Cognitive Development, 10, 159–199. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(95)90008-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2010). Language acquisition meets language evolution. Cognitive Science, 34, 1131–1157. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01049.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. B., Atkinson, D. J., & Chaput, H. H. (2004). Habit X: A new program for obtaining and organizing data in infant perception and cognition studies (Version 1.0). Austin, TX: University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Creel, S. C., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (2004). Distant melodies: Statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in tone sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, S., Mintz, T. H., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Stress changes the representational landscape: Evidence from word segmentation. Cognition, 96, 233–262. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daland, R. (2013). Variation in the input: A case study of manner class frequencies. Journal of Child Language, 40, 1091–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, P. S., & Fenson, L. (1996). Lexical development norms for young children. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 125–127. doi:10.3758/BF03203646
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, M. H., Petersson, K. M., Geukes, S., Zwitserlood, P., & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). Processing multiple non-adjacent dependencies: Evidence from sequence learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 2065–2076. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endress, A., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Mehler, J. (2007). Perceptual constraints and the learnability of simple grammars. Cognition, 105, 577–614. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endress, A. D., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2009). Perceptual and memory constraints on language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 348–353. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endress, A. D., Scholl, B. J., & Mehler, J. (2005). The role of salience in the extraction of algebraic rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 406. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–448. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. (2000). Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning. Nature, 407, 630–633. doi:10.1038/35036586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. (2003). The simplicity principle in human concept learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 227–232. doi:10.1046/j.0963-7214.2003.01267.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. A. (1964). Baby talk in six languages. American Anthropologist, 66, 103–114. doi:10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. A. (1978). Talking to children: A search for universals. In J. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language. Volume 1. Method and theory (pp. 203–224). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernald, A., Pinto, J. P., Swingley, D., Weinberg, A., & McRoberts, G. W. (1998). Rapid gains in speed of verbal processing by infants in the 2nd year. Psychological Science, 9, 228–231. doi:10.1111/psci.1998.9.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A. L., & Marchman, V. A. (2008). Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language. In I. A. Sekarina, E. M. Fernández, & H. Clahsen (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics: On-line methods in children’s language processing (pp. 113–132). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, S. A. (2004). Language processing and segmental OCP effects. In B. Hayes, R. M. Kirchner, & D. Steriade (Eds.), Phonetically based Phonology (pp. 346–371). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerken, L. (2010). Infants use rational decision criteria for choosing among models of their input. Cognition, 115, 362–366. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerken, L., Dawson, C., Chatila, R., & Tenenbaum, J. (2015). Surprise! Infants consider possible bases of generalization for a single input example. Developmental Science, 18, 80–89. doi:10.1111/desc.2014.18.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervain, J., Berent, I., & Werker, J. F. (2012). Binding at birth: The newborn brain detects identity relations and sequential position in speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 564–574. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervain, J., Macagno, F., Cogoi, S., Peña, M., & Mehler, J. (2008). The neonate brain detects speech structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 14222–14227. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806530105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gervain, J., & Werker, J. F. (2008). How infant speech perception contributes to language acquisition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 1149–1170. doi:10.1111/lnco.2008.2.issue-6
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70, 109–135. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00003-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, R. L., Gerken, L., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (2000). The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning. Memory & Cognition, 28, 253–263. doi:10.3758/BF03213804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Gomez, N., Hayashi, A., Tsuji, S., Mazuka, R., & Nazzi, T. (2014). The role of the input on the development of the LC bias: A crosslinguistic comparison. Cognition, 132, 301–311. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberda, J. (2003). The development of a word-learning strategy. Cognition, 87, B23–B34. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00186-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Højen, A., & Nazzi, T. (2016). Vowel bias in Danish word-learning: Processing biases are language-specific. Developmental Science, 19(1), 41–49. doi:10.1111/desc.12286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston-Price, C., Plunkett, K. I. M., & Harris, P. (2005). ‘Word-learning wizardry’ at 1;6. Journal of Child Language, 32, 175–189. doi:10.1017/S0305000904006610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurch, B., & Mattes, V. (2009). Introduction: Diachrony and productivity of reduplication. Morphology, 19, 107–112. doi:10.1007/s11525-009-9136-7
   Google Scholar
• Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., & Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 109, 54–65. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. J. (1993). Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development, 64, 675–687. doi:10.2307/1131210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M., & Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 159–207. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., & Gillis, S. (2005). Diminutives in child-directed speech supplement metric with distributional word segmentation cues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 145–151. doi:10.3758/BF03196360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., Gillis, S., & Samson, G. (2007). Diminutives facilitate word segmentation in natural speech: Cross-linguistic evidence. Memory & Cognition, 35, 762–773. doi:10.3758/BF03193313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killing, S. E., & Bishop, D. V. (2008). Move it! Visual feedback enhances validity of preferential looking as a measure of individual differences in vocabulary in toddlers. Developmental Science, 11, 525–530. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00698.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leben, W. R. (1973). Suprasegmental phonology ( Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• MacNeilage, P. F., Davis, B. L., Kinney, A., & Matyear, C. L. (2000). The motor core of speech: A comparison of serial organization patterns in infants and languages. Child Development, 71, 153–163. doi:10.1111/cdev.2000.71.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Rao, S. B., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77–80. doi:10.1126/science.283.5398.77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, D., Pathman, T., & Mondloch, C. J. (2006). The shape of boubas: Sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science, 9, 316–322. doi:10.1111/desc.2006.9.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. J. (1986). OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 207–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R. C., Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S. (2014). How arbitrary is language?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130299. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, P., & Zuidema, W. (2015). General purpose cognitive processing constraints and phonotactic properties of the vocabulary. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Evolution and Phonetic Capabilities: Causes, Constraints and Consequences. Retrieved from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/staff/monaghan/papers/monaghan_zuidema_15_icphs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, E. A. (1978). Reduplicative constructions. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (vol. 3): Word structure (pp. 297–334). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreton, E. (2008). Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology, 25, 83–127. doi:10.1017/S0952675708001413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreton, E. (2012). Inter-and intra-dimensional dependencies in implicit phonotactic learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 165–183. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzi, T. (2005). Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: Differences between consonants and vowels. Cognition, 98, 13–30. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newport, E. L. (1988). Constraints on learning and their role in language acquisition: Studies of the acquisition of American Sign Language. Language Sciences, 10, 147–172. doi:10.1016/0388-0001(88)90010-1
   Google Scholar
• Pacton, S., & Perruchet, P. (2008). An attention-based associative account of adjacent and nonadjacent dependency learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozdniakov, K., & Segerer, G. (2007). Similar place avoidance: A statistical universal. Linguistic Typology, 11, 307–348. doi:10.1515/LINGTY.2007.025
   Google Scholar
• Rousset, I. (2004). Structures syllabiques et lexicales des langues du monde: Données, typologies, tendances universelles et contraintes substantielles. (Doctoral dissertation). Université Stendhal, Grenoble, France.
   Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R. (2002). Constraints on statistical language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 172–196. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928. doi:10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., & Thiessen, E. D. (2003). Pattern induction by infant language learners. Developmental Psychology, 39, 484–494. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, G., & Plunkett, K. (1998). Rapid Word Learning by Fifteen-Month-Olds under Tightly Controlled Conditions. Child Development, 69, 309–320. doi:10.1111/cdev.1998.69.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L. (2009). Developmental differences in the effects of phonological, lexical and semantic variables on word learning by infants. Journal of Child Language, 36, 291–321. doi:10.1017/S030500090800891X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L., & Hoover, J. R. (2010). An online calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on the basis of child corpora of spoken American English. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 497–506. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swingley, D. (2011). The looking-while-listening procedure. In E. Hoff (Ed.), Research method in child language: A practical guide (pp. 29–42). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Liang, W., Zhang, Z., Kaciroti, N., & Marchman, V. A. (2008). Baby’s first 10 words. Developmental Psychology, 44, 929–938. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro, J. M., Sinnett, S., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2005). Speech segmentation by statistical learning depends on attention. Cognition, 97, B25–B34. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunney, R. J., & Altmann, G. (2001). Two modes of transfer in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 614–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., Cohen, L. B., Lloyd, V. L., Casasola, M., & Stager, C. L. (1998). Acquisition of word–object associations by 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1289–1309. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.6.1289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, K., & Culicover, P. (1980). Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 114, 245–272. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar