Acquiring the Last Plural: Morphophonological Effects on the Comprehension of /-əz/

References

• Arias-Trejo, N., Cantrell, L. M., Smith, L. B., & Canto, E. A. A. (2014). Early comprehension of the Spanish plural. Journal of Child Language, 41(6), 1356–1372. doi:10.1017/S0305000913000615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14(2–3), 150–177. doi:10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Oxford, England: Harvard U. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chirlian, N. S., & Sharpley, C. F. (1982). Children’s articulation development: Some regional differences. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 10(2), 23–30. doi:10.3109/asl2.1982.10.issue-2.03
   Google Scholar
• Dautriche, I., Swingley, D., & Christophe, A. (2015). Learning novel phonological neighbors: Syntactic category matters. Cognition, 143, 77–86. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B., Xu Rattanasone, N., & Demuth, K. (2017). Two-year-olds’ sensitivity to inflectional plural morphology: Allomorphic effects. Language Learning and Development, 13(1), 38–53. doi:10.1080/15475441.2016.1219257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2(3), 267–278. doi:10.1007/BF01067106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth, K., Culbertson, J., & Alter, J. (2006). Word-minimality, epenthesis and coda licensing in the early acquisition of English. Language and Speech, 49(2), 137–173. doi:10.1177/00238309060490020201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth, K., & Weschler, S. (2012). The acquisition of Sesotho nominal agreement. Morphology, 22(1), 67–88. doi:10.1007/s11525-011-9192-7
   Google Scholar
• Ettlinger, M., & Zapf, J. (2011). The role of phonology in children’s acquisition of the plural. Language Acquisition, 18(4), 294–313. doi:10.1080/10489223.2011.605044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Cauley, K. M., & Gordon, L. (1987). The eyes have it: Lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 14(1), 23. doi:10.1017/S030500090001271X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, M. F., & Koziol, S. (1971). Noun plural development in primary grade children. Child Development, 42(4), 1165–1173. doi:10.2307/1127801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, J., Cox, F., & Evans, Z. (1997). An acoustic phonetic study of broad, general, and cultivated Australian English vowels. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 17(2), 155–184. doi:10.1080/07268609708599550
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., Christophe, A., Dupoux, E., & Demuth, K. (2014). Modelling function words improves unsupervised word segmentation. Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (Vol. 1: Long Papers, pp. 282–292). Retrieved from http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P14-1027
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, C., & Demuth, K. (2006). Accounting for variability in 2-year-olds’ production of coda consonants. Language Learning and Development, 2(2), 97–118. doi:10.1207/s15473341lld0202_2
   Google Scholar
• Köpcke, K.-M. (1998). The acquisition of plural marking in English and German revisited: Schemata versus rules. Journal of Child Language, 25(2), 293–319. doi:10.1017/S0305000998003407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouider, S., Halberda, J., Wood, J., & Carey, S. (2006). Acquisition of English number marking: The singular-plural distinction. Language Learning and Development, 2(1), 1–25. doi:10.1207/s15473341lld0201_1
   Google Scholar
• Lahey, M., Liebergott, J., Chesnick, M., Menyuk, P., & Adams, J. (1992). Variability in children’s use of grammatical morphemes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13(3), 373. doi:10.1017/S0142716400005683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. J., Xu, F., & Clahsen, H. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(4), i–178. doi:10.2307/1166115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mealings, K. T., Cox, F., & Demuth, K. (2013). Acoustic investigations Into the later acquisition of syllabic -es plurals. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 56(4), 1260. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0163)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mervis, C. B., & Johnson, K. E. (1991). Acquisition of the plural morpheme: A case study. Developmental Psychology, 27(2), 222–235. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.2.222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, K., Yuen, I., Cox, F., & Demuth, K. (2016). The prosodic licensing of coda consonants in early speech: Interactions with vowel length. Journal of Child Language, 43(2), 265–283. doi:10.1017/S0305000915000185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011). FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Intell. Neuroscience, 2011, 1:1–1: 9. doi:10.1155/2011/156869
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Sauerland, U., Anderssen, J., & Yatsushiro, K. (2005). The plural is semantically unmarked. In Eds. (S. Kesper & M. Reis), Linguistic evidence: Empirical, theoretical and computational perspectives (pp. 413–434). doi:10.1515/9783110197549.413
   Google Scholar
• Smit, A. B. (1993). Phonologic error distributions in the Iowa-Nebraska articulation norms project: Consonant singletons. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(3), 533–547. doi:10.1044/jshr.3603.533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J. Y., & Demuth, K. (2008). Compensatory vowel lengthening for omitted coda consonants: A phonetic investigation of children’s early representations of prosodic words. Language and Speech, 51(4), 385–402. doi:10.1177/0023830908099071
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Song, J. Y., Demuth, K., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Ménard, L. (2013). The effects of coarticulation and morphological complexity on the production of English coda clusters: Acoustic and articulatory evidence from 2-year-olds and adults using ultrasound. Journal of Phonetics, 41(3–4), 281–295. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2013.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J. Y., Sundara, M., & Demuth, K. (2009). Phonological constraints on children’s production of English third person singular –s. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(3), 623–642. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0258)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas, E., Demuth, K., & Petocz, P. (2017). The role of frequency in learning morphophonological alternations: Implications for children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(5), 1316–1329. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-16-0138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas, E., Demuth, K., Smith‐Lock, K. M., & Petocz, P. (2015). Phonological and morphophonological effects on grammatical development in children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50(4), 516–528. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas, E., van de Vijver, R., Demuth, K., & Petocz, P. (2017). Acquisition of nominal morphophonological alternations in Russian. First Language, 37(5), 453–474. doi:10.1177/0142723717698839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1–2), 61–82. doi:10.1515/cogl.2001.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapf, J. A., & Smith, L. B. (2007). When do children generalize the plural to novel nouns? First Language, 27(1), 53–73. doi:10.1177/0142723707070286
   Google Scholar