References
- Baillargeon, R., Li, J., Ng, W., & Yuan, S. (2009). An account of infants’ physical reasoning. In A. Woodward & A. Needham (Eds.), Learning and the infant mind (pp. 66–116). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Baillargeon, R., & DeJong, G. F. (2017). Explanation-based learning in infancy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(5), 1511–1526. doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1334-4
- Bowerman, M. (1996). Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Gerritt (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 385–436). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2003). Space under construction: language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin- Meadow (Eds (Eds), Language in mind: advances in the study of language and cognition (pp. pp. 387–428). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Bowerman, M., & Pederson, E S. C. Levinson (Ed (1992). Topological relations picture series. In S. C. Levinson (Ed (Ed), Space stimuli kit 1.2 (pp. 51). Netherlands: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics: Nijmegen.
- Casasola, M., & Cohen, L. (2002). Infant categorization of containment, support and tight-fit spatial relationships. Developmental Science, 5(2), 247–264. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00226
- Garrod, S. C., Ferrier, G., & Campbell, S. (1999). In and On: Investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions. Cognition, 72(2), 167–189. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00038-4
- Gentner, D., & Bowerman, M. (2009). Why some spatial semantic categories are harder to learn than others: The typological prevalence hypothesis. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, Ş. Õzçalişkan, & Ş. Õzçalişkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 465–480). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Johannes, K. (2015). Geometric and functional knowledge in the acquisition of spatial language (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
- Johannes, K., Wilson, C., & Landau, B. (2016). The importance of lexical verbs in the acquisition of spatial prepositions: The case of in and on. Cognition, 157, 174–189. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.022
- Johnston, J. R., & Slobin, D. I. (1979). The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. Journal of Child Language, 6(3), 529–545. doi:10.1017/S030500090000252X
- Landau, B. (2017). Update on ‘what’ and ‘where’ in spatial language: A new division of labor for spatial terms. Cognitive Science, 41(Suppl 2), 321–350. doi:10.1111/cogs.12410
- Landau, B. (2018). doi:10.1111/tops.12394
- Landau, B., Johannes, K., Skordos, D., & Papafragou, A. (2016). Containment and support: Core and complexity in spatial language learning. Cognitive Science. doi:10.1111/cogs.12389
- Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
- Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. P. (2006). Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511486753
- MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. The database (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Meints, K., Plunkett, K., Harris, P., & Dimmock, D. (2002). What is ‘on’ and ‘under’ for 15-, 18-, and 24-month-olds? Typicality effects in early comprehension of spatial prepositions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(1), 113–130. doi:10.1348/026151002166352
- Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10(1), 89–96. doi:10.1111/desc.2007.10.issue-1
- Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 49–100. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
- Vandeloise, C. (1991). Spatial prepositions: a case study from french. A.R.K. Bosch, Trans.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.