References
- Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.
- Aksu-Koç, A., Avci, G., Aydin, C., Sefer, N., & Yasa, Y. (2005, July). The relation between mental verbs and ToM performance: Evidence from Turkish children [Paper presentation]. IASCL, Berlin.
- Aksu‐Koç, A., Ögel‐Balaban, H., & Alp, I. E. (2009). Evidentials and source knowledge in Turkish. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2009(125), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.247
- Andrés‐Roqueta, C., Adrian, J., Clemente, R., & Katsos, N. (2013). Which are the best predictors of theory of mind delay in children with specific language impairment? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(6), 726–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12045
- Apperly, I., & Butterfill, S. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review, 116(4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016923
- Apperly, I., & Robinson, E. J. (1998). Children’s mental representation of referential relations. Cognition, 67(3), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00030-4
- Apperly, I. A., Samson, D., Carroll, N., Hussain, S., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006). Intact 1st and 2nd order false belief reasoning in a patient with severely impaired grammar. Social Neuroscience, Special Issue on Theory of Mind, 1(3–4), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910601038693
- Arsenijevic, B., & Hinzen, W. (2012). On the absence of X-within-X recursion in human grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(3), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00095
- Astington, J. A., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1311–1320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.5.1311
- Baars, B. J. (2002). The conscious access hypothesis: Origins and recent evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01819-2
- Baillargeon, R., Buttelmann, D., & Southgate, V. (2018). Invited Commentary: Interpreting failed replications of early false-belief findings: Methodological and theoretical considerations. Cognitive Development, 46, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.06.001
- Baillargeon, R., Scott, R., & He, Z. (2010). False-belief understanding in infants. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14(3), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.006
- Baldo, J. V., Dronkers, N. F., Wilkins, D., Ludy, C., Raskin, P., & Kim, J. (2005). Is problem solving dependent on language? Brain and Language, 92(3), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.103
- Berio, L. (2020). Culturally embedded schemata for false belief reasoning. Synthese, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02655-7
- Bhadra, D. (2018). Evidentials are syntax-sensitive: The view from Bangla. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 106. 1–39. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.449
- Brandt, S., Buttelmann, D., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Children’s understanding of first and third person perspectives in complement clauses and false belief tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 151, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.03.004
- Brandt, S., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Development of word order in German complement-clause constructions: Effects of input frequencies, lexical items, and discourse function. Language, 86(3), 583–610. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0010
- Carruthers, P. (2002). The cognitive functions of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(6), 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000122
- Cheung, H., Husan-Chih, C., Creed, N., Ng, L., Wang, S., & Mo, L. (2004). Relative roles of general and complementation language in theory of mind development: Evidence from Cantonese and English. Child Development, 75(4), 1155–1170. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00731.x
- Choi, S. (1991). Early acquisition of epistemic meanings in Korean: A study of sentence-ending suffixes in the spontaneous speech of three children. First Language, 11(31), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014272379101103105
- Chomsky, N. (2007). Approaching UG from below. Interfaces+ recursion= language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-semantics, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207552
- Clark, E. V., & Sengul, C. J. (1978). Strategies in the acquisition of deixis. Journal of Child Language, 5(3), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900002099
- Collins, J. (2000). Theory of mind, logical form and eliminativism. Philosophical Psychology, 13(4), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080020007616
- Cournane, A. (2015). Revisiting the Epistemic Gap: Evidence for a grammatical source. In Proceedings of the 39th Boston University conference on language development. Cascadilla Press.
- Dale, P., & Crain-Thoreson, C. (1993). Pronoun reversals: Who, when, and why? Journal of Child Language, 20(3), 573–589. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900008485
- De Villiers, J. G. (in press). The role(s) of language in theory of mind reasoning. In K. Ochsner & M. Gilead (Eds.), Neural basis of Mentalizing. New York: Springer Press.
- De Villiers, J. (2007, November). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua, 117(11), 1858–1878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.006
- De Villiers, J. (2014). What kind of concepts need language? In W. Hinzen (Ed.), Language sciences, 46,100–114. Special issue. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.009
- De Villiers, J., & Garfield, J. (2017). Evidentiality, questions and the reflection principle in Tibetan: What do children learn when they learn about evidentiality? In F. N. Ketrez, A. C. Küntay, Ş. Özçalışkan, & A. Özyürek (Eds.), Social cognition and environment in language development: Studies in honor of Ayhan Aksu-Koç. John Benjamins series: Trends in language acquisition (pp. 113–130). John Benjamins.
- De Villiers, J., & Garfield, J. (2009). Evidentiality and narrative. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(6–8), 191–217.
- De Villiers, J. G. (1999). On acquiring the structural representations for false complements. In B. Hollebrandse (Ed.), New perspectives on language acquisition. UMOP.
- De Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. (2000). Linguistic Determinism and the Understanding of False Beliefs. In P. Mitchell & K. Riggs (Eds.), Children’s reasoning and the mind(pp. 191–228). Psychology Press.
- De Villiers, J. G. (2001). Extension, intension and other minds. In M. Almgren, A. Barrena, M.-J. Ezeizabarrena, I. Idiazabal, & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), Research in child language acquisition: Proceedings of the 8th conference of the international association for the study of child language. Cascadilla press.
- De Villiers, J. G. (2005). Can language acquisition give children a point of view? In J. W. Astington & J. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 189–219). Oxford University Press.
- De Villiers, J. G., Garfield, J., Gernet Girard, H., Roeper, T., & Speas, P. (2009). Evidentials in Tibetan: Acquisition, semantics and cognitive development. In S. Fitneva & T. Matsui (Eds.), Evidentiality: A window into language and cognitive development. Special Issue: New directions for adolescent and child development (Vol. 125, pp. 29–48).
- De Villiers, J. G. (2010). On building up a sufficient representation for belief: Tense, point of view and Wh-movement. In J. Costa, A. Castro, M. Lobo, & F. Pratas (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of Gala 2009 (pp. 121–134). Cambridge Scholars press.
- De Villiers, J. G., Harrington, E., Gadilauskas, E., & Roeper, T. (2012). Tense and Truth in Children’s Question Answering. In A. Biller, E. Chung, & A. Kimball (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual Boston University conference on language development. Cascadilla Press.
- De Villiers, J. G. (2017). Finding signatures of linguistic reasoning. Commentary on W. Hinzen, Reference across pathologies: A new linguistic lens on disorders of thought. Theoretical Linguistics, 43(3–4), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2017-0015
- De Villiers, J. G., Nordmeyer, A., & Roeper, T. (2018). How do children deal with shifted indexicals? In R. Ivan (Ed.), UMOP 40: The leader of the pack: A Festschrift in Honor of Peggy Speas (Vol. 40). U. Mass Graduate Linguistics Student Association.
- De Villiers, J. G. (2018). Perspectives on Truth: The case of language and false belief reasoning. In K. Syrett & S. Arunachalam (Eds.), Semantics in language acquisition, for the John Benjamins series trends in language acquisition (pp. 222–245). John Benjamins.
- De Villiers, J. G., Kotfila, J., & Roeper, T. (2020). When is recursion easier for children? In Proceedings of GALA 17. Springer.
- De Villiers, J. G., & Pyers, J. E. (2002). Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding. Cognitive Development, 17(1), 1037–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00073-4
- De Villiers, P., de Villiers, J., Lindley, E., & Chen, M. & the School Readiness Research Consortium. (2015, April). Language, inhibitory control and explicit false belief understanding: A longitudinal structural equation model [Poster presentation]. SRCD.
- De Villiers, P. A., Burns, F., & Pearson, B. (2003). The role of language in theory of mind development of language-impaired children: Complementing theories. In B. Beachley, A. Brown, & F. Conlin (Eds.), Proceeding of the 27th annual Boston university conference on language development (Vol. 1). Cascadilla Press.
- De Villiers, P. A., & de Villiers, J. G. (1974). On this, that and the other: Non-egocentrism in very young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18(3), 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(74)90122-2
- Dennett, D. (1978). Beliefs about beliefs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 568–570. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076664
- Dungan, J., & Saxe, R. (2012). Matched false-belief performance during verbal and nonverbal interference. Cognitive Science, 36(6), 1148–1156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01248.x
- Dunn, J., & Brophy, M. (2005). Communication, relationships, and individual differences in children’s understanding of mind. In J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 50–69). Oxford University Press.
- Durrleman, S., Burnel, M., De Villiers, J., Thommen, E., Delage, H., & Yao, R. (2019). The impact of grammar on mentalizing: A training study including children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Developmental Language Disorder’. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02478
- Durrleman, S., Burnel, M., Thommen, E., Foudon, N., Sonie, S., Reboul, A., & Fourneret, P. (2016). The language-cognition interface in ASD: Complement sentences and false belief reasoning. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 21, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2015.10.003
- Durrleman, S., Hinzen, W., & Franck, J. (2018). False belief and relative clauses in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders, 74, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.04.001
- Farrar, J., Benigno, J., Tompkins, V., & Gage, N. (2017). Are there different pathways to explicit false belief understanding? General language and complementation in typical and atypical children. Cognitive Development, 43(C), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.02.005
- Farrar, M. J., Johnson, B., Tompkins, V., Easters, M., Zilisi-Medus, A., & Benigno, J. P. (2009). Language and theory of mind in preschool children with specific language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 42(6), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.07.001
- Fay, W. (1979). Personal pronouns and the autistic child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9(3), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01531739
- Fillmore, C. (1975). Santa Cruz lectures on deixis, 1971. Indiana University Linguistics Club. French-speaking and English-speaking Children. Journal of Child Language, 24(2), 311–326.
- Floyd, S. B. (2014). The role of language in the concept of telicity [Honors thesis]. Northampton, MA: Smith College. https://scholarworks.smith.edu/theses/1546
- Forgeot D’Arc, B., & Ramus, F. (2011). Belief attribution despite verbal interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 975–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.524413
- Gentner, D., & Kurtz, K. (2005). Relational Categories. In W. K. Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman, & P. W. Wolff (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the laboratory. APA.
- Girouard, P., Ricard, M., & Decarie, T. G. (1997). The acquisition of personal pronouns in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 19(1), 73–85.
- Gut, A., Haman, M., Gorbaniuk, O., & Chylińskia, M. (2020). The development of understanding opacity in preschoolers: A transition from a coarse-to fine-grained understanding of beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00596
- Hacquard, V. (2006). Aspects of modality [PhD dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
- Hacquard, V., & Lidz, J. (2018). Children's attitude problems: Bootstrapping verb meaning from syntax and pragmatics. Mind & Language,34(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12192
- Hale, C., & Tager‐Flusberg, H. (2003). The influence of language on theory of mind: A training study. Developmental Science, 6(3), 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00289
- Hermer-Vasquez, L., Spelke, E. S., & Katsnelson, A. S. (1999). Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual-task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology, 39(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0713
- Hinzen, W. (2007). Mind design and minimal syntax. Oxford University press.
- Hinzen, W. (2009). The naturalization of truth [Unpublished manuscript].
- Hinzen, W., Sheehan, M., & Reichard, U. (2014). Intensionality, grammar, and the sententialist hypothesis. In P. Kosta, S. Franks, T. Radeva-Bork, & L. Schürcks (Eds.), Minimalism and beyond, radicalizing the interfaces (pp. 315–349). John Benjamins.
- Hinzen, W. (2017). Reference across pathologies: A new linguistic lens on disorders of thought. Theoretical Linguistics, 43(3–4), 169–232. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2017-0013
- Hollebrandse, B., & Roeper, T. (2014). Empirical results and formal approaches to recursion in acquisition. In T. Roeper & M. Speas (Eds.), Recursion: Complexity in cognition. Springer.
- Huang, N., Liao, C.-H., Hacquard, V. & Lidz, J. (2018). Learning attitude verb meanings in a morphosyntactically poor language viasyntactic bootstrapping. In Proceedings of BUCLD (Vol. 42, pp. 1–58). College Park, MD: University of Maryland
- Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (2007). Executive function and theory of mind: Predictive relations from ages 2 to 4. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1447. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1447
- Iglesias, A., de Villiers, J. G., Golinkoff, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Wilson, M. S. (2019). Capturing language differences and similarities in Dual Language Learners. Paper presented at SRCD, Baltimore, March.
- Iglesias, A., Golinkoff, R., de Villiers, J. G., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Wilson, M. S. (in press). QUILS:ES. Brookes Publishing company.
- Jung, W., & Hummel, J. E. (2013). The effects of dual verbal and visual tasks on featural vs. relational category learning. In Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the cognitive science society.
- Kalsang, J. G., Speas, M., Garfield, J., & de Villiers, J. G. (2013). Direct evidentials, case, tense and aspect in Tibetan. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31(2), 517–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-013-9193-9
- Kamawar, D., & Olson, D. R. (1999). Children’s representational theory of language: The problem of opaque contexts. Cognitive Development, 14(4), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(99)00018-0
- Kotfila, J., & de Villiers, J. G. (2019). When must children acquire long distance wh-questions? In Proceedings of Boston University conference on language development. Cascadilla press.
- Kulke, L., Von Duhn, B., Schneider, D., & Rakoczy, H. (2018). Is implicit theory of mind a real and robust phenomenon? Results from a systematic replication study. Psychological Science, 29(6), 888–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617747090
- Kyuchukov, H., & de Villiers, J. G. (2009). Theory of mind and evidentiality in Romani-Bulgarian bilingual children. Psychology of Language and Communication, 13(2), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-009-0007-4
- Lasersohn, P. (2005). Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(6), 643–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-0596-x
- Lewis, S., Hacquard, V., & Lidz, J. (2013). The semantics and pragmatics of belief reports in preschoolers. Proceedings of SALT, 22, 247–267. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v22i0.3085
- Lewis, S., Hacquard, V., & Lidz, J. (2017). “Think” pragmatically: Children’s interpretation of belief reports. Language Learning and Development, 13(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2017.1296768
- Lohmann, H., & Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: A training study. Child Development, 74(4), 1130–1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00597
- Loveland, K. A. (1984). Learning about points of view: Spatial perspective and the acquisition of ‘I/you’. Journal of Child Language, 11(3), 535–556. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900005948
- Low, J. (2010). Preschoolers’ implicit and explicit false-belief understanding: Relations with complex syntactical mastery. Child Development, 81, 597–615.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01418.x
- Low, J., & Watts, J. (2013). Attributing false beliefs about object identity reveals a signature blind spot in humans’ efficient mind-reading system. Psychological Science, 24(3), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612451469
- Margulis, K. S. (2014). The role of language in understanding second order relations: An eyetracker study. Honors Project, Smith College. https://scholarworks.smith.edu/theses/22
- Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Arnott, B., Leekam, S., & Rosnay, M. (2013). Mind‐mindedness and theory of mind: Mediating roles of language and perspectival symbolic play. Child Development, 84(5), 1777–1790. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12061
- Merchant, G., & de Villiers, J. G. (2007, April). Children’s control of reference in opaque contexts in production [Poster presentation]. Society for Research in Child Development, Boston.
- Newen, A., & Wolf, J. (2020). The situational mental file account of the false belief tasks: A new solution of the paradox of false belief understanding. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-020-00466-w
- Newton, A. (2006). Verbal interference with adult false belief reasoning. BA Honors thesis. Cognitive Science. Smith College.
- Newton, A., & de Villiers, J. G. (2007). Thinking while talking: adults fail non-verbal false belief reasoning. Psychological Science,18(7), 74–579.
- Nilsson, K., & López, K. (2016). Theory of mind in children with specific language impairment: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Child Development, 87(1), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12462
- Nordmeyer, A. (2011). To be or not to be: Examining the role of language in a concept of negation [Honors thesis]. Smith College.
- Ozturk, O., & Papafragou, A. (2016). The acquisition of evidentiality and source monitoring. Language Learning and Development, 12(2), 199–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2015.1024834
- Paal, T., & Bereczkei, T. (2007). Adult theory of mind, cooperation, Machiavellianism: The effect of mindreading on social relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.021
- Papafragou, A., Li, P., Choi, Y., & Han, C. (2007). Evidentiality in language and cognition. Cognition, 103(2), 253–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.001
- Pearson, H. (2013, February). A judge-free semantics for predicates of personal taste. Journal of Semantics, 30(1), 103–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffs001
- Perner, J., & Leahy, B. (2016). Mental files in development: Dual naming, false belief, identity and intensionality. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 7(2), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0235-6
- Perner, J., & Ruffman, T. (2005). Infants’ insight into the mind: How deep? Science, 308(5719), 214–216. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111656
- Perner, J., Sprung, M., Zauner, P., & Haider, H. (2003). Want that is understood well before Say that, think that, and false belief: A test of de Villiers’s linguistic determinism on German–Speaking children. Child Development, 74(1), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00529
- Peterson, C., & Siegal, M. (1995). Deafness, conversation and theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36(3), 459–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb01303.x
- Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512
- Pyers, J., & Senghas, A. (2009). Language promotes false-belief understanding: Evidence from learners of a new sign language. Psychological Science, 20(7), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02377.x
- Rakoczy, H. (2017). In defense of a developmental dogma: Children acquire propositional attitude folk psychology around age 4. Synthese, 194(3), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0860-8
- Recanati, F. (2002). Does Linguistic communication rest on inference? Mind & Language, 17(1/2), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00191
- Rizzi, L., & Cinque, G. (2016). Functional categories and syntactic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2(1), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040827
- Rubio-Fernández, P. (2019). Publication standards in infancy research: Three ways to make violation-of-expectation studies more reliable. Infant Behavior and Development, 54, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.09.009
- Russell, J. (1987). “Can we say … ?” Children’s understanding of intensionality. Cognition, 25(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(87)80007-0
- Samuel, S., Durdevic, K., Legg, E. W., Lurz, R., & Clayton, N. S. (2019). Is language required to represent others’ mental states? evidence from beliefs and other representations. Cognitive Science, 43(1), e12710. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12710
- San Juan, V., & Astington, J. W. (2012). Bridging the gap between implicit and explicit understanding: How language development promotes the processing and representation of false belief. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02051.x
- Schafer, R., & de Villiers, J. G. (2000). Imagining articles: What a and the can tell us about the emergence of DP. In Proceedings of the 24th annual Boston University conference on language development (Vol. 2). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla press.
- Schick, B., de Villiers, P., de Villiers, J., & Hoffmeister, R. (2007). Language and theory of mind: A study of deaf children. Child Development, 78(2), 376–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01004.x
- Segal, G. (1998). Representing representations. Language and Thought, 146–161.
- Senju, A., Southgate, V., White, S., & Frith, U. (2009). Mindblind eyes: An absence of spontaneous theory of mind in Asperger syndrome. Science, 325(5942), 883–885. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1176170
- Shukla, M., & de Villiers, J. G. (submitted, 2020). The role of language in building abstract, generalized conceptual representations of two-place predicates: A comparison between adults and infants.
- Shuliang, M., Yanjie, S., & Sabbagh, M. A. (2014). Sentential complements and false belief understanding in Chinese Mandarin-speaking preschoolers: A training study. Cognitive Development, 29, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.11.001
- Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. The Free Press, Simon and Shuster.
- Slade, L., & Ruffman, T. (2005). How language does (and does not) relate to theory of mind: A longitudinal study of syntax, semantics, working memory, and false belief. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151004X21332
- Smith, M., Apperly, I. A., & White, V. (2003). False belief reasoning and the acquisition of relative clause sentences. Child Development, 74(6), 1709–1719. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00633.x
- Southgate, V., & Vernetti, A. (2014). Belief-based action prediction in preverbal infants. Cognition, 130(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.008
- Speas, M. (2004). Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua, 114(3), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00030-5
- Stephenson, T. (2007). Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(4), 487–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988–008–9023–4
- Tager-Flusberg, H., & Joseph, R. M. (2005). Theory of mind, language, and executive functions in autism: A longitudinal perspective. In W. Schneider, R. Schumann-Hengsteler, & B. Sodian (Eds.), Young children’s cognitive development: Interrelationships among executive functioning, working memory, verbal ability, and theory of mind (pp. 239–257). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
- Tanz, C. (1980). Studies in the acquisition of deictic terms. Cambridge University Press.
- Tardif, T., So, -C. W.-C., & Kaciroti, N. (2007). Language and false belief: Evidence for general, not specific, effects in Cantonese-speaking preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 318–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.318
- Ünal, E., & Papafragou, A. (2016). Production–comprehension asymmetries and the acquisition of evidential morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.12.001
- Ünal, E., & Papafragou, A. (2018). Relations between language and cognition: Evidentiality and sources of knowledge. Topics in cognitive science.
- Uzundag, B. A., Taşçi, S. S., Küntay, A. C., & Ayhan, A. K. (2018). Functions of Turkish evidentials in early child–caregiver interactions: A growth curve analysis of longitudinal data. Journal of Child Language, 45(4), 878–899. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000917000526
- Van der Lely, H., Hennessey, S., & Battell, J. (2001). Linguistic determinism and false belief: Insight from children with specific language impairment [Manuscript]. University College.
- Van Hout, A., Harrigan, K., & de Villiers, J. G. (2010). Asymmetries in the acquisition of definite and indefinite noun phrases. In P. Hendriks & C. Koster (eds.), Special issue on asymmetries in child language. Lingua, 120(8), 1973–1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.006
- Varley, R., Siegal, M., & Want, S. C. (2001). Severe impairment in grammar does not preclude theory of mind. Neurocase, 7(6), 489–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/neucas/7.6.489
- Vonk, J. (2002). Can orangutans and gorillas acquire concepts for social relationships? International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 15(4), 257–277. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5r52391b
- Wang, L., & Leslie, A. (2016). Is implicit theory of mind the ‘real deal’? the own-belief/true-belief default in adults and young preschoolers. Mind & Language, 31(2), 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12099
- Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling theory of mind tasks. Child Development, 75(2), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x
- Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
- Woods, R. (2016). The syntax of speech acts: Embedding illocutionary force [PhD thesis]. University of York.
- Xu, F. (2007). Sortals, object individuation and language. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 11(9), 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.002