References
- Anderssen, M., Bentzen, K., & Westergaard, M. (2010). Variation in the input: Studies in the acquisition of word order (Vol. 39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9207-6
- Ansaldo, U., Matthews, S., & Lim, L. (2007). Deconstructing creole (Vol. 73). John Benjamins.
- Bakker, P. (2008). Pidgins versus creoles and pidgincreoles. Wiley- Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305982.ch6
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Bichakjian, B. H. (1988). Evolution in language (Vol. 18). Karoma Pub.
- Bickerton, D. (2015). Roots of language. Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.17169/langsci.b91.109
- Blasi, D. E., Michaelis, S. M., & Haspelmath, M. (2017). Grammars are robustly transmitted even during the emergence of creole languages. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(10), 723. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0192-4
- Culbertson, J., & Adger, D. (2014). Language learners privilege structured meaning over surface frequency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(16), 5842–5847. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320525111
- Culbertson, J., & Kirby, S. (2016). Simplicity and specificity in language: Domain-general biases have domain-specific effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1964. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01964
- Culbertson, J., & Newport, E. L. (2015). Harmonic biases in child learners: In support of language universals. Cognition, 139, 71–82. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010027715000372
- Culbertson, J., Smolensky, P., & Legendre, G. (2012). Learning biases predict a word order universal. Cognition, 122(3), 306–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.017
- Damerau, F. J. (1964). A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors. Communications of the ACM, 7(3), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/363958.363994
- DeGraff, M. (1999). Language creation and language change. The MIT Press.
- Dietrich, R., Klein, W., & Noyau, C. (1995). The acquisition of temporality in a second language (Vol. 7). John Benjamins.
- Drechsel, E. J. (1981). A preliminary sociolinguistic comparison of four indigenous pidgin languages of north america (with notes towards a sociolinguistic typology in american indian linguistics). Anthropological Linguistics, 23(3), 93–112. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30027542
- Endres, D. M., & Schindelin, J. E. (2003). A new metric for probability distributions. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 49(7), 1858–1860. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2003.813506
- Fedzechkina, M., Newport, E. L., & Jaeger, T. F. (2017). Balancing effort and information transmission during language acquisition: Evidence from word order and case marking. Cognitive Science, 41(2), 416–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12346
- Feher, O., Ritt, N., & Smith, K. (2019). Asymmetric accommodation during interaction leads to the regularisation of linguistic variants. Journal of Memory and Language, 109, 104036. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X19300671
- Fehér, O., Wonnacott, E., & Smith, K. (2016). Structural priming in artificial languages and the regularisation of unpredictable variation. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 158–180. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X1630047X?via%3Dihub
- Ferdinand, V., Kirby, S., & Smith, K. (2019). The cognitive roots of regularization in language. Cognition, 184, 53–68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027718303135?via%3Dihub
- Fraser, C., Bellugi, U., & Brown, R. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80076-6
- Good, J. (2012). Typologizing grammatical complexities: Or why creoles may be paradigmatically simple but syntagmatically average. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 27(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.27.1.01goo
- Good, J. (2015). Paradigmatic complexity in pidgins and creoles. Word Structure, 8(2), 184–227. https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2015.0081
- Håkansson, G. (1995). Syntax and morphology in language attrition: A study of five bilingual expatriate swedes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1995.tb00078.x
- Hare, M., & Elman, J. L. (1995). Learning and morphological change. Cognition, 56(1), 61–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00655-5
- Hudson Kam, C. L., & Chang, A. (2009). Investigating the cause of language regularization in adults: Memory constraints or learning effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 815–821. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015097
- Hudson Kam, C. L., & Newport, E. L. (2005). Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development, 1(2), 151–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2005.9684215
- Hudson Kam, C. L., & Newport, E. L. (2009). Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology, 59(1), 30–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.01.001
- Hupp, J. M., Sloutsky, V. M., & Culicover, P. W. (2009). Evidence for a domain-general mechanism underlying the suffixation preference in language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(6), 876–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960902719267
- Jansson, F., Parkvall, M., & Strimling, P. (2015). Modeling the evolution of creoles. Language Dynamics and Change, 5(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00501005
- Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13(4), 301–347. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897666879396
- Kouwenberg, S., & Singler, J. V. (2009). The handbook of pidgin and creole studies. Wiley-Blackwell.
- Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2015). lmertest: Tests in linear mixed effects models (R package version 2.0-29) [ Computer software manual]. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
- Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns (Vol. 4). University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Lefebvre, C., White, L., & Jourdan, C. (2006). L2 acquisition and creole genesis: Dialogues (Vol. 42). John Benjamins.
- Levenshtein, V. I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. In Soviet physics doklady (Vol. 10, pp. 707–710). Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1966SPhD…10.707L
- Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). bayestestr: Describing effects and their uncertainty, existence and significance within the bayesian framework. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(40), 1541. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01541
- Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. J., Xu, F., & Clahsen, H. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(4), i–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166115
- Martin, A., & Culbertson, J. (2020). Revisiting the Suffixing Preference: Native-Language Affixation Patterns Influence Perception of Sequences. Psychological Science, 31(9), 1107–1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620931108
- Martin, A., Holtz, A., Abels, K., Adger, D., & Culbertson, J. (2020). Experimental evidence for the influence of structure and meaning on linear order in the noun phrase. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1085
- McWhorter, J. (2001). The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology, 5(2/3), 125–166. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2001.001
- McWhorter, J. (2005). Defining creole. Oxford University Press.
- Miller, K. L., & Schmitt, C. (2012). Variable input and the acquisition of plural morphology. Language Acquisition, 19(3), 223–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2012.685026
- Montrul, S. A. (2004). The acquisition of spanish: Morphosyntactic development in monolingual and bilingual l1 acquisition and adult l2 acquisition (Vol. 37). John Benjamins.
- Mufwene, S. S. (2008). Language evolution: Contact, competition and change. Bloomsbury.
- Newport, E. L. (1999). Reduced input in the acquisition of signed languages: Contributions to the study of creolization. In M. DeGraff (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development, 161–178. The MIT Press.
- Nichols, J. D. (1995). The ojibwe verb in ‘broken oghibbeway’. Amsterdam Creole Studies, 12, 1–18.
- Parkvall, M. (2008). The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Mietsamo, M. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (Eds.), Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Chang(p. 265-285). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94.17par
- Peirce, J. W. (2007). Psychopy–psychophysics software in python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
- Peirce, J. W. (2009). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using psychopy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2(10). https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008
- Perfors, A. (2012a). Probability matching vs over-regularization in language: Participant behavior depends on their interpretation of the task. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 845-850). Cognitive Science Society. https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2012/papers/0155/paper0155.pdf
- Perfors, A. (2012b). When do memory limitations lead to regularization? An experimental and computational investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(4), 486–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.009
- Perfors, A. (2016). Adult regularization of inconsistent input depends on pragmatic factors. Language Learning and Development, 12(2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2015.1052449
- Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1999). Syntactic priming in language production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(4), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01293-0
- Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765800677556046
- Pygame Community. (2009). Pygame - python game development. Retrieved from http://pygame.org/
- R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [ Computer software manual]. https://www.R-project.org/
- Raymond, W. D., Healy, A. F., McDonnel, S., & Healy, C. A. (2009). Acquisition of morphological variation: The case of the english definite article. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(1), 89–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802075489
- Reali, F., & Griffiths, T. L. (2009). The evolution of frequency distributions: Relating regularization to inductive biases through iterated learning. Cognition, 111(3), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.012
- Ross, D. S., & Newport, E. L. (1996). The development of language from non-native linguistic input. In Proceedings of the 20th annual boston university conference on language development (Vol. 2, pp. 634–645). http://wearables.cc.gatech.edu/paper_of_week/Ross_and_Newport_1996.pdf
- Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2(6), 110–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/3002019
- Schilling-Estes, N., & Wolfram, W. (1994). Convergent explanation and alternative regularization patterns: Were/weren’t leveling in a vernacular english variety. Language Variation and Change, 6(3), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001691
- Schumacher, R. A., Pierrehumbert, J. B., & LaShell, P. (2014). Reconciling inconsistency in encoded morphological distinctions in an artificial language. In Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the cognitive science society. http://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/jpierrehumbert/publications/schumacher_pierrehumbert_lashell_CogSci2014.pdf
- Schwab, J. F., Lew-Williams, C., & Goldberg, A. E. (2018). When regularization gets it wrong: Children over-simplify language input only in production. Journal of Child Language, 45(5), 1054-1072. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000918000041
- Senghas, A., & Coppola, M. (2001). Children creating language: How nicaraguan sign language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science, 12(4), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00359
- Senghas, A., Newport, E. L., & Supalla, T. (1997). Argument structure in nicaraguan sign language: The emergence of grammatical devices. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, and A. Greenhill (Eds.),Proceedings of the 21st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 550-561). Cascadilla Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237295284_Argument_Structure_in_Nicaraguan_Sign_Language_The_Emergence_of_Grammatical_Devices
- Siegel, J. (1997). Mixing, leveling, and pidgin/creole development. In A. K. Spears & D. Winford (Eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles (pp. 111–149). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.19.09sie
- Siegel, J. (2004). Morphological simplicity in pidgins and creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 19(1), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.19.1.06sie
- Siegel, J. (2006). Links between SLA and creole studies: Past and present. In C. Lefebvre, L. White & C. Jourdan (Eds.), L2 acquisition and creole genesis: Dialogues (pp. 15–46). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.42.03sie
- Singleton, J. L., & Newport, E. L. (2004). When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of american sign language from inconsistent input. Cognitive Psychology, 49(4), 370–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.05.001
- Slobin, D. I. (1966). The acquisition of Russian as a native language. In F. Smith & G. A. Miller (Eds.), The genesis of language: A psycholinguistic approach (pp. 129–148). The MIT Press.
- Slobin, D. I. (1986). The acquisition and use of relative clauses in Turkic and Indoeuropean languages. In D.I. Slobin & K. Zimmer (Eds.), Typological studies in language: Studies in Turkish linguistics (Vol. 8, pp. 273–94). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.8.16slo
- Smith, K., Perfors, A., Fehér, O., Samara, A., Swoboda, K., & Wonnacott, E. (2017). Language learning, language use and the evolution of linguistic variation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1711), 20160051. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0051
- Smith, K., & Wonnacott, E. (2010). Eliminating unpredictable variation through iterated learning. Cognition, 116(3), 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.06.004
- Spears, A. K. (2008). Pidgins/creoles and african american english. In S. Kouwenberg & J. V. Singler (Eds.), The handbook of pidgin and creole studies (pp. 512–542). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305982.ch21
- Stefansson, V. (1909). The eskimo trade jargon of herschel island. American Anthropologist, 11(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1909.11.2.02a00050
- Thomason, S. G. (1980). On interpreting ‘The Indian Interpreter’. Language in Society, 9(2), 167–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500008046
- Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differentiation of english in norwich (Vol. 13). CUP Archive.
- Van der Voort, H. (1997). New light on eskimo pidgins. In A. K. Spears & D. Winford (Eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles: (pp. 373-94). John Benjamins.
- Van Trijp, R. (2013). Linguistic assessment criteria for explaining language change: A case study on syncretism in german definite articles. Language Dynamics and Change, 3(1), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-13030106
- Velupillai, V. (2015). Pidgins, creoles and mixed languages: An introduction (Vol. 48). John Benjamins.
- Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779–804. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194105
- Winford, D. (2003). An introduction to contact linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.
- Wonnacott, E., & Newport, E. L. (2005). Novelty and regularization: The effect of novel instances on rule formation. In Bucld 29: Proceedings of the 29th nnual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 29, pp. 663–673). Cascadilla Press. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.222.7380&rep=rep1&type=pdf