The Effect of Explicit Instruction on Implicit and Explicit Linguistic Knowledge in Kindergartners

References

• Aboh, E. O. (2004). The morphosyntax of complement-head sequences. Clause structures and word order patterns in Kwa. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aboh, E. O., & DeGraff, M. (2014). Some notes on bare noun phrases in Haitian Creole and Gungbe. In T. A. Åfarlí & B. Maehlum (Eds.), The Sociolinguistics of Grammar,206-236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Agresti, A., & Coull, B. A. (1998). Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician, 52(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2685469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcón Soler, E. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Allport, A. (1988). What concept of consciousness? In A. J. Marcel & E. Bisiach (Eds.), Consciousness in contemporary science (pp. 159–182). Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andringa, S., & Dabrowska, E. (2019). Individual differences in first and second language ultimate attainment and their causes. Language Learning, 69(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12328
   Google Scholar
• Andringa, S., de Glopper, C. M., & Hacquebord, H. (2011). Effect of explicit and implicit instruction on free written reponses task performance. Language Learning, 61(3), 868–903. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00623.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andringa, S., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). New directions in the study of implicit and explicit learning. An introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500008X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appah, C. K. I. 2003. Nominal derivation in Akan. A descriptive analysis. M.A. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., & Simpson, I. C. (2012). Statistical learning is related to reading ability in children and adults. Cognitive Science, 36(2), 286–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01200.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9(4), 321–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader, M., & Häussler, J. (2010). Toward a model of grammaticality judgments. Journal of Linguistics, 46(20), 273–330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990260
   Google Scholar
• Baguley, T. (2009). Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported? British Journal of Psychology, 100(3), 603–617. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X377117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baguley, T. (2012). Serious Stats. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. I., Olson, C. R., & Behrmann, M. (2004). Role of attention and perceptual grouping in visual statistical learning. Psychological Science, 15(7), 460–466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00702.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed- effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batstone, R. (2002). Making sense of new language: A discourse perspective. Language Awareness, 11(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410208667043
   Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E. (1994). Representation and ways of knowing: Three issues in second language acquisition. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 549–569). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birdsong, D. (2005). Nativelikeness and non-nativelikeness in L2A research. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2005.43.4.319
   Google Scholar
• Birdsong, D. (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 56, 9–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00353.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birdsong, D., & Vanhove, J. (2016). Age of second language acquisition: Critical periods and social concerns. In S. Nicoladis & E. Montanari (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: Factors moderating language proficiency (pp. 163–181). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20(1–2), 3–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524544.005
   Google Scholar
• Blom, E., & Unsworth, S. (2010). Experimental methods in language acquisition research. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, M. A. (2011). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 247–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, P. J., & Kempe, V. (2019). More is more in language learning: Reconsidering the less-is-more hypothesis. Language Learning, 69(1), 13–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12320
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A., Yang, W., Chang, F., & Kidd, E. (2018). Four-year-old Cantonese-speaking children’s online processing of relative clauses: A permutation analysis. Journal of Child Language, 45(1), 174–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000917000198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. H., Gershkoff-Stowe, L., Wu, C. Y., Cheung, H., & Yu, C. (2017). Tracking multiple statistics: Simultaneous learning of object names and categories in English and Mandarin Speakers. Cognitive Science, 41(6), 1485–1509. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clackson, K., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H. (2011). Chidlren’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 128–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleeremans, A. (2008). Consciousness: The radical plasticity thesis. In R. Banerjee & B. K. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Progress in brain research (Vol. 168, pp. 19–33). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cleeremans, A. (2011). The radical plasticity thesis: How the brain learns to be conscious. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(86), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00086
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cleeremans, A. (2014). Connection conscious and unconscious processing. Cognitive Science, 38(6), 1286–1315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114(3), 356–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2006). Statistical learning within and between modalities: Pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations. Psychological Science, 17(10), 905–912. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01801.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., Loftus, S., Zipoli, R., Jr, & Kapp, S. (2009). Direct vocabulary instruction in Kindergarten: Teaching for breadth, versus depth. The Elementary School Journal, 110(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/598840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curcic, M., Andringa, S., & Kuiken, F. (2019). The role of awareness and cognitive aptitudes in L2 predictive language processing. Language Learning, 69(1), 42–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12321
   Google Scholar
• Degé, F., & Schwarzer, G. (2011). The effect of a music program on phonological awareness in preschoolers. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Lau, H., & Kouider, S. (2017). What is consciousness, and could machines have it? Science, 358(6362), 486–492. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(3), 379–410. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310001425X
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–533. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004022
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and Explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 312–348). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R., & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period really mean? In J. F. Kroll & A. M. D. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 88–108). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. (2009). Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of second language teaching (pp. 119–138). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. (1993). Concsiousness explained. Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Diekelmann, S., & Born, J. (2010). The memory function of sleep. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dink, J. W., & Ferguson, B. 2015. eyetrackingR; An R library for eye-tracking data analysis. http://www.eyetrackingr.com.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, C. J. (2019). Cognitive language aptitude. Language Learning, 69(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12322
   Google Scholar
• Dumay, N., & Gaskell, M. G. (2007). Sleep-associated changes in the mental representations of spoken words. Psychological Science, 18(1), 35–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01845.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 250–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.3.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 305–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310505014X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2011). Implicit and explicit SLA and their interface. In C. Sanz & R. Loew (Eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA & bilingualism (pp. 35–47). Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2015). Implicit and explicit learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 3–23). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge, and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing, and teaching (pp. 3–25). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endress, A. D., & Bonatti, L. L. (2007). Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream. Cognition, 105(2), 247–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, L. C., & Thiessen, E. D. (2015). Statistical learning of language: Theory, validity and predictions of a statistical learning account of language acquisition. Developmental Review, 37, 66-108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. L. A., & Monaghan, P. (2016). Simultaneous segmentation and generalization of non-adjacent dependencies from continuous speech. Cognition, 147, 70–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, R. L. A., & Monaghan, P. (2017). Sleep-driven computations in speech processing. PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0169538. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukushima, J., Hatta, T., & Fukushima, K. (2000). Development of voluntary control of saccadic eye movements: I. Age-related changes in normal children. Brain and Development, 22(3), 173–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0387-7604(00)00101-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuya, Y. J., & Martínez-Flor, A. (2009). The interactive effects of pragmatic-eliciting tasks and pragmatic instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 41(3), 478–500. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnes, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2011). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming predicting early development in reading and spelling: Results from a cross-linguistic longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S., Svetics, I., & Lemelin, S. (2003). Differential effects of attention. Language Learning, 53(3), 497–546. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillon, G. T. (2018). Phonological awareness: From research to practice. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Godfroid, A. (2015). The effects of implicit instruction on implicit and explicit knowledge development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 177–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfroid, A., Loewen, S., Jung, S., & Park, J.-H. (2015). Timed and untimed grammaticality judgments measure distinct types of knowledge: Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2), 269–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13(5), 431–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, R. L., Bootzin, R. B., & Nadel, L. (2006). Naps promote abstraction in language-learning infants. Psychological Science, 17(8), 670–674. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01764.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70(2), 109–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00003-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y., & Novella, M. (2015). Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 443–482). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Granena, G., & Yilmaz, Y. (2019). Corrective feedback and the role of implicit sequence-learning ability in L2 online performance. Language Learning, 69(1), 127–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12319
   Google Scholar
• Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E., & Wiley, E. (2003). Critical evidence: A test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 14(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamrick, P., & Rebuschat, P. (2012). How implicit is statistical learning? In P. Rebuschat & J. Williams (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 365–382). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Y., & Ellis, R. (1998). Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge and general language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 2(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889800200102
   Google Scholar
• Han, Z., & Finneran, R. (2014). Re-engaging the interface debate: Strong, weak, none, or all? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 370–389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12034
   Google Scholar
• Hartshorne, J. K., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Pinker, S. (2018). A critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition, 177, 263–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, E. (2012). Research methods in child language: A practical guide. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Housen, A. M., & Pierrard, M. (2006). Investigating instructed second language acquisition. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 235–269). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit language learning. Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. (2015). Explaining phenomena of first and second language acquisition with the constructs of implicit and explicit learning. The virtues and pitfalls of a two-system view. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 25–46). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. Post to HLP/Jaeger lab blog. May 14 2009, https://hlplab.wordpress.com/2009/05/14/random-effect-structure/
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., & Goswami, U. (2010). Phonological awareness, vocabulary, and reading in deaf children with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(2), 237–261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0139)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachergis, G., Yu, C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2014). Cross-situational word learning is both implicit and strategic. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 588. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, E. (2013). Experimental paradigms in psycholinguistics. In R. J. Podesva & D. Sharma (Eds.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 135–169). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, E. (2011). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 171–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissling, E. M. (2013). Teaching pronunciation: Is explicit phonetics instruction beneficial for FL learners? The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 720–744. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koike, D. A., & Pearson, L. (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System, 33(3), 481–501. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.008
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. D., Scarcella, R. C., & Long, M. A. (1982). Child-adult differences in second language acquisition. Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Lany, J., & Saffran, J. R. (2013). Statistical learning mechanisms in infancy. In J. L. R. Rubenstein & P. Rakic (Eds.), Comprehensive developmental neuroscience: Neurel circuit development and function in the brain (Vol. 3, pp. 231–248). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lany, J. (2014). Judging words by their covers and the company they keep: Probabilistic cues support word learning. Child Development, 85(4), 1727–1739. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Léger, P.-M., Sénécal, S., Karpova, E., Brieugne, D., Di Fabio, M.-L., & Georges, V. (2018). Setup guidelines for eye tracking in child and teenager research in the context of learning by interaction with a tablet. Neuroeducation, 5(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24046/neuroed.20180501.33
   Google Scholar
• Lichtman, K. (2016). Age and learning environment: Are children implicit second language learners? Journal of Child Language, 43(3), 707–730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen, S. (2009). Grammaticality judgment tests and the measurement of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, H. Reinders, R. Erlam, & J. Philip (Eds.), Implicit and Explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 94–112). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Maquet, P. (2001). The role of sleep in learning and memory. Science, 294(5544), 1048–1052. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinis, T. (2010). Using on-line processing methods in language acquisition research. In E. Blom & S. Unsworth (Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 139–162). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 38(4), 843–847.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, E., Morgan-Short, K., Thompson, S., & Abugaber, D. (2018). Replication in second language research: Narrative and systematic reviews and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 1–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12286
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Flor, A., & Fukuya, Y. J. (2005). The effects of instruction on learners’ production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System, 33(3), 463–480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.007
   Google Scholar
• Marulis, L. M., & Neuman, S. B. (2010). The effects of vocabulary intervention on young children’s word learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 300–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310377087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirković, J., & Gaskell, M. G. (2016). Does sleep improve your grammar? Preferential consolidation of arbitrary components of new linguistic knowledge. PLOS ONE, 11(4), e0152489. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, P., Mattaock, K., Davies, R. A. I., & Smith, A. C. (2015). Gavagai is as Gavagai does: Learning nouns and verbs from cross-situational statistics. Cognitive Science, 39(5), 1099–1112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Short, K., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M.T. (2012). Explicit and Implicit Second Language Training Differentially Affect the Achievement of Native-like Brain Activation Patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24 (4): 933–947. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integration formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50(4), 617–673. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newport, E. L. (2020). Children and adults as language learners: Rules, variation, and maturational change. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12 (1): 153–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, I. L. C., Folia, V., Forkstam, C., Jensen, O., & Petersson, K. M. (2013). Sleep promotes the extraction of grammatical rules. PLOS One, 8(6), e65046. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakuklak, E., & Neville, H. J. (2011). Maturational constraints on the recruitment of early processes for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 2752–2765. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, B. A. (2012). Assessing vocabulary skills. In E. Hoff (Ed.), Research methods in child language: A practical guide (pp. 100–112). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistics theory of bilingualism. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Parnes, A. T.2011 Ang marks the what? An analysis of noun phrase markers in Cebuano. M.A. Thesis, Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10(5), 233–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (1998). PARSER: A model for Word Segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(2), 246–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, M., & Zuckerman, S. (2018). Coloring book: A new method for testing language comprehension. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2609-2628. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1114-8
   Google Scholar
• Podesva, R. J., & Sharma, D. (2013). Research methods in linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. J. D. 2009. The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives. Technical Report, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Psychology Software Tools, Inc. (2012). E-Prime 3.0. http://www.pstnet.com/.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6(6), 317–327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80149-X
   Google Scholar
• Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (2012). Introduction: Statistical learning and language acquisition. In P. Rebuschat & J. N. Williams (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 1–12). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Rebuschat, P. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63(3), 595–626. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. (1997a). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197002052
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. (1997b). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47(1), 45–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.21997002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romberg, A. R., & Saffran, J. R. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(6), 906–914. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word-segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 606–621. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagarra, N., & Hanson, A. S. (2011). Eyetracking methodology: A user’s guide for linguistic research. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 4(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2011-1113
   Google Scholar
• Saito, K. (2013). The acquisitional value of recasts in instructed second language speech learning: Teaching the perception and production of English /r/ to Adult Japanese learners. Language Learning, 63(3), 499–529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saygin, Z. M., Norton, E. S., Osher, D. E., Beach, S. D., Cyr, A. B., Ozernov-Palchik, O., Yendiki, A., Fischl, B., Gaab, N., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2013). Tracking the roots of reading ability: White matter volume and integrity correlate with phonological awareness in prereading and early-reading Kindergarten children. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(33), 13251–13258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4383-12.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C., & Miller, K. (2010). Using comprehension methods in language acquisition research. In E. Blom & S. Unsworth (Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 35–56). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, C. T., & Sprouse, J. (2013). Judgment data. In R. J. Podesva & D. Sharma (Eds.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 27–51). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, V. (1989). An empirical study of explicit and implicit teaching strategies in French. The Modern Language Journal, 72(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05303.x
   Google Scholar
• Sedivy, J. C. (2010). Using eyetracking in language acquisition research. In E. Blom & S. Unsworth (Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 115–138). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, R. (2007). A comparison of three methods of vocabulary instruction during Read-Alouds in Kindergarten. The Elementary School Journal, 108(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/525549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singleton, D., & Munoz, C. (2011). Around and beyond the critical period hypothesis. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 407–425). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, D., & Ryan, L. (2004). Language acquisition the age factor. Second edition. Multilingual Matters Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. B., Suanda, S. H., & Yu, C. (2014). The unrealized promise of infant statistical word-referent learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(5), 251–258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. B., & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition, 106(3), 1558–1568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spit, S., Andringa, S., Rispens, J., & Aboh, E. O. (2019). The opt out paradigm: First steps towards a new experimental method that measures meta-linguistic awareness. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 206–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.17027.spi
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spit, S., Andringa, S., Rispens, J., & Aboh, E. O. (2020, November 18). Kindergarteners use cross-situational statistics to infer the meaning of grammatical elements. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kyvnz.
   Google Scholar
• Spit, S., Andringa, S., Rispens, J., & Aboh, E. O. (2021). Do kindergarteners develop awareness of the statistical regularities they acquire? Language Learning, 71(2), 573–611. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spit, S., Andringa, S., Rispens, J., Aboh, E. O., & Vet, D. J. (2019, November 11). Meta-linguistic awareness in early (second) language acquisition. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/bp5qe
   Google Scholar
• Stickgold, R. (2005). Sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Nature, 437(7063), 1272–1278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen, E. D., Kronstein, A. T., & Hufnagle, D. G. (2013). The extraction and integration framework: A two-process account of statistical learning. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 792–814. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 134(4), 552–564. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.552
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Neuroscience, 2(10), 717–726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/35094573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. (2016). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge and use. In G. Hickok & S. A. Small (Eds.), The neurobiology of language (pp. 953–968). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Vaahtoranta, E., Suggate, S., Jachmann, C., Lenhart, J., & Lenhard, W. (2018). Can explaining less be more? Enhancing vocabulary through explicit versus elaborative storytelling. First Language, 38(2), 198–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723717737452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlach, H. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2013). Memory constraints on infants’ cross-situational statistical learning. Cognition, 127(3), 375–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vouloumanos, A. (2008). Fine-grained sensitivity to statistical information in adult word learning. Cognition, 107(2), 274–729. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J., & Evans, J. (1998). What kind of focus and on which forms? In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 139–155). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 269–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. N. (2009). Implicit learning in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 319–353). Emerald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S. E., & Horst, J. S. (2014). Goodnight book: Sleep consolidation improves word learning via storybooks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2007). Rapid word learning under uncertainty via cross-situational statistics. Psychological Science, 18(5), 414–420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01915.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart, F. S., Vissers, C. T. W. M., Kessels, R. P. C., & Maes, J. H. R. (2017). Procedural learning across the lifespan: A systematic review with implications for atypical development. Journal of Neuropsychology 13(2), 149-182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12139
   Google Scholar