Repetition, but Not Acoustic Differentiation, Facilitates Pseudohomophone Learning by Children

References

• Backscheider, A. G., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). Children’s understanding of homonyms. Journal of Child Language, 22(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090000965X
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Backscheider, A. G., Gelman, S. A., Martinez, I., & Kowieski, J. (1999). Children’s use of different information types when learning homophones and nonce words. Cognitive Development, 14(4), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(99)00017-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, T. J., Griffith, J. W., De Rossi, S., & Hermans, D. (2014). Meet the Fribbles: Novel stimuli for use within behavioral research. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00103
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. M. & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. ArXiv e-print. R etrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823
   Google Scholar
• Beveridge, M., & Marsh, L. (1991). The influence of linguistic context on young children’s understanding of homophonic words. Journal of Child Language, 18(2), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900011168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2020). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. [Computer Program]. http://www.praat.org
   Google Scholar
• Casenhiser, D. (2005). Children’s resistance to homonymy: An experimental study of pseudohomonyms. Journal of Child Language, 32(2), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000904006749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conwell, E. (2017). Are homophones acoustically distinguished in child-directed speech? Language Learning and Development, 13(3), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2016.1246248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conwell, E. (2018). Token frequency effects in homophone productions: An elicitation study. Language and Speech, 61(3), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830917737108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conwell, E., & Morgan, J. L. (2012). Is it a noun or is it a verb? Resolving the ambicategoricality problem. Language Learning and Development, 8(2), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2011.580236
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dautriche, I., Fibla, L., Fievet, A.-C., & Christophe, A. (2018). Learning homophones in context: Easy cases of favored in the lexicon of natural languages. Cognitive Psychology, 104, 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dautriche, I., Swingley, D., & Christophe, A. (2015). Learning novel phonological neighbors: Syntactic category matters. Cognition, 143, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, M. J. (2004). Children’s difficulty in learning homonyms. Journal of Child Language, 31(1), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090300583X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., Pethick, S. J., Tomasello, M., Mervis, C. B., & Stiles, J. (1994). Variability in early communication development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(5), 1–185. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S. (2008). Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of Lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language, 84(3), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann, A. (2018). Time and thyme are NOT homophones: A closer look at Gahl’s work on the lemma-frequency effect, including a reanalysis. Language, 94(2), e180–e190. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, E. M. (1990). Constraints children place on word meanings. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1401_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzocco, M. M. M. (1997). Children’s interpretations of homonyms: A developmental study. Journal of Child Language, 24(2), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000997003103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriman, W. E., & Schuster, J. M. (1991). Young children’s differentiation of object name reference. Child Development, 62(6), 1288–1301. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, J. S. (2020). Of mice and men: Speech sound acquisition as discriminative learning from prediction error, not just statistical tracking. Cognition, 197, 104081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 60(3), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette-Smith, M., Fecher, N., & Johnson, E. K. (2016). Two-year-olds’ sensitivity to subphonemic mismatch during online spoken word recognition. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 78(8), 2329–2340. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1186-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Computer Program] R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Sanker, C. (2019). Effects of lexical ambiguity, frequency, and acoustic details in auditory perception. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 81(1), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1604-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. F., & Lew-Williams, C. (2016). Repetition across successive sentences facilitates young children’s word learning. Developmental Psychology, 52(6), 879–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies in child language development (pp. 175-208). Holt, Reinhart, Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, M., Berner, C., & Rabagliati, H. (2019). Children use polysemy to structure new word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 148(5), 926–942. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, M., & Rabagliati, H. (2015). How concepts and conventions structure the lexicon: Cross-linguistic evidence from polysemy. Lingua, 157, 124–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L., & Maekawa, J. (2005). A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: The role of phonotactic probability and word frequency. Journal of Child Language, 32(4), 827–853. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000905007099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swingley, D. (2016). Two-year-olds interpret novel phonological neighbors as familiar words. Developmental Psychology, 52(7), 1011–1023. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherhead, D., & White, K. S. (2016). He says potato, she says potahto: Young infants track talker-specific accents. Language Learning and Development, 12(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2015.1024835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K. S., & Morgan, J. L. (2008). Sub-segmental detail in early lexical representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamuner, T. S., Moore, C., & Desmeules-Trudel, F. (2016). Toddlers’ sensitivity to within-word coarticulation during spoken word recognition: Developmental differences in lexical competition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 152, 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar