Role of Pitch in Toddler Looking to New and Given Referents in American English

References

• Afshordi, N., Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2011). Responses to felicitous/infelicitous uses of contrastive stress in online processing of adjective–noun phrase by 36-month-olds. Poster presented at 2011 Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Akhtar, N., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (1996). The role of discourse novelty in early word learning. Child Development, 67(2), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M. E. (2014). Child comprehension of intonationally-encoded disbelief. BUCLD 38: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, (Vol. 2, pp. 25–38).
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. E. (2008). THE BACON not the bacon: How children and adults understand accented and unaccented noun phrases. Cognition, 108(1), 69–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. E., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. (2007). Children’s use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 527–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960600845950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslin, R. N., Pisoni, D. B., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1983). Auditory development and speech perception in infancy. In M. M. Haith, J. J. Campos, & P. H. Mussen (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Infancy and developmental psychobiology (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley 573–687.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D. A. (1993a). Early referential understanding: Infants’ ability to recognize referential acts for what they are. Developmental Psychology, 29(5), 832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.5.832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D. A. (1993b). Infants’ ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference. Journal of Child Language, 20(2), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900008345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S. (2015). Fittiing linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, S., & Grice, M. (2004). Accenting accessible information. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2, An International Conference, (pp. 21–24).
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, S., & Roth, A. (2014). Prominence and coreference–On the perceptual relevance of F0 movement, duration and intensity. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 7, an International Conference, (pp. 227–231).
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, M. E., & Ayers, G. E. (1997). Guidelines for ToBI labelling (version 3). The Ohio State University Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, S., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1995). Focus, accent, and argument structure: Effects on language comprehension. Language and Speech, 38(4), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099503800403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., & Mazzella, J. R. (1983). Intonational marking of given and new information: Some consequences for comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 11(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer 5.3 [Computer program]. Retrieved January 15, 2014, from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bortfeld, H., & Morgan, J. L. (2010). Is early word-form processing stress-full? How natural variability supports recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 60(4), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (1983). Prosodic structure and the given/new distinction. In A. Cutler & D. R Ladd (Eds.), Prosody: Models and measurements (pp. 67–77). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brugos, A., Veilleux, N., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2006). 6.9.11 Transcribing prosodic structure of spoken utterances with ToBI [ January IAP]. https://ocw.mit.edu
   Google Scholar
• Byers-Heinlein, K., Tsui, A. S. M., Bergmann, C., Black, A. K., Brown, A., Carbajal, M. J., Durrant, S., Fennell, C. T., Fiévet, A.-C., Frank, M. C., Gampe, A., Gervain, J., Gonzalez-Gomez, N., Hamlin, J. K., Havron, N., Hernik, M., Kerr, S., Killam, H., Klassen, K., & Wermelinger, S. (2021). A multilab study of bilingual infants: Exploring the preference for infant-directed speech. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920974622
   Google Scholar
• Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 27–55). New York: Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Chafe, W. (1996). Discourse, consciousness and time. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, A. (2011a). The developmental path to phonological focus-marking in Dutch. In S. Frota, P. Prieto, & G. Elordieta (Eds.), Prosodic categories: Production, perception and comprehension (pp. 93–109). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, A. (2011b). Tuning information packaging: Intonational realization of topic and focus in child Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 38(5), 1055–1083. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000910000541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, A. (2015). Children’s use of intonation in reference and the role of input. In L. Serratrice & S. E. M. Allen (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 83–104). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, A., den Os, E., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2007). Pitch accent type matters for online processing of information status: Evidence from natural and synthetic speech. The Linguistic Review, 24(2–3). https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2007.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 1–40). Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J., Mo, Y., & Hasegawa-Johnson, M. (2010). Signal-based and expectation-based factors in the perception of prosodic prominence. Laboratory Phonology, 1(2), 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2010.022
   Google Scholar
• Cruttenden, A. (1985). Intonation comprehension in ten-year-olds. Journal of Child Language, 12(3), 643–661. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090000670X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Chambers, C. G. (2002). Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(2), 292–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00001-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCasper, A. J., & Spence, M. J. (1986). Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns’ perception of speech sounds. Infant Behavior and Development, 9(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-6383(86)90025-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilley, L. C., Ladd, D. R., & Schepman, A. (2005). Alignment of L and H in bitonal pitch accents: Testing two hypotheses. Journal of Phonetics, 33(1), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, S., & Verkuilen, J. (2017). Empirical logit analysis is not logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantz, R. L. (1964). Visual experience in infants: Decreased attention to familiar patterns relative to novel ones. Science, 146(3644), 668–670. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3644.668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-bates communicative development inventories: User’s guide and technical manual (2nd ed.). Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Fernald, A. (1985). Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behavior and Development, 8(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(85)80005-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald, A., & Kuhl, P. (1987). Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech. Infant Behavior and Development, 10(3), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-6383(87)90017-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald, A., & Simon, T. (1984). Expanded intonation contours in mothers’ speech to newborns. Developmental Psychology, 20(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.20.1.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A. L., & Marchman, V. A. (2008). In I. Sekerina, E. M. Fernández, & H. Clahsen (Eds.), Developmental Psycholinguistics: On-Line Methods in Children’s Language Processing (pp. 97–135). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, S. M., & Cunningham, C. C. (1983). What do babies listen to most? A developmental study of auditory preferences in nonhandicapped infants and infants with Down’s syndrome. Developmental Psychology, 19(3), 332. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.19.3.332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, E., & Davies, C. (2014). In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic Development in First Language Acquisition, Trends in Langauge Acquisition Research (Vol. 10, pp. 161–181). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.10.10gra
   Google Scholar
• Grassmann, S., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Two-year-olds use primary sentence accent to learn new words. Journal of Child Language, 34(3), 677. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassmann, S., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Prosodic stress on a word directs 24-month-olds’ attention to a contextually new referent. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 3098–3105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünloh, T., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Young children’s intonational marking of new, given and contrastive referents. Language Learning and Development, 11(2), 95–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2014.889530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundel, J. K., & Fretheim, T. (2009). Information structure. In F. Brisard, J.-O. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics highlights 5: Grammar, meaning and pragmatics (pp. 146–160). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2), 274–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/416535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gussenhoven, C. (2005). Transcription of dutch intonation. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 118–145). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 199–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschberg, J. (1993). Pitch accent in context predicting intonational prominence from text. Artificial Intelligence, 63(1–2), 305–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(93)90020-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst, J. S., Samuelson, L. K., Kucker, S. C., & McMurray, B. (2011). What’s new? Children prefer novelty in referent selection. Cognition, 118(2), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, K. (2014). Children‘s pragmatic use of prosodic prominence. In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic Development in First Language Acquisition (Vol. 10, pp. 199–218). Philadelphia: John Benjamin. https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.10.12ito
   Google Scholar
• Ito, K., Bibyk, S. A., Wagner, L., & Speer, S. R. (2014). Interpretation of contrastive pitch accent in six-to eleven-year-old English-speaking children (and adults). Journal of Child Language, 41(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, K., Jincho, N., Minai, U., Yamane, N., & Mazuka, R. (2012). Intonation facilitates contrast resolution: Evidence from Japanese adults and 6-year-olds. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(1), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, K., & Speer, S. R. (2008). Anticipatory effects of intonation: Eye movements during instructed visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 541–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. K., Seidl, A., & Tyler, M. D. (2014). The edge factor in early word segmentation: Utterance-level prosody enables word form extraction by 6-month-olds. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e83546. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M., & Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39(3), 159–207. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurumada, C., & Clark, E. V. (2017). Pragmatic inferences in context: Learning to interpret contrastive prosody. Journal of Child Language, 44(4), 850–880. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808814
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, D. R., & Schepman, A. (2003). “Sagging transitions” between high pitch accents in English: Experimental evidence. Journal of Phonetics, 31(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(02)00073-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents (Vol. 71). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Pointing out new news, old news, and absent referents at 12 months of age. Developmental Science, 10(2), F1–F7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00552.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, E., & Plunkett, K. (2012). The role of novelty in early word learning. Cognitive Science, 36(7), 1157–1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01239.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Morgan, J. L. (1999). Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants. Cognitive Psychology, 38(4), 465–494. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P., Lambertz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J., & Amiel-Tison, C. (1988). A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29(2), 143–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90035-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D. (2014). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1998). Language discrimination by newborns: Toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 756. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzi, T., Floccia, C., & Bertoncini, J. (1998). Discrimination of pitch contours by neonates. Infant Behavior and Development, 21(4), 779–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90044-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonetics and phonology of English intonation [Doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 271–311). A Bradford Book, The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomper, R., Ellis Weismer, S., Saffran, J., & Edwards, J. (2021). Coarticulation facilitates lexical processing for toddlers with autism. Cognition, 214, 104799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomper, R., & Saffran, J. R. (2019). Familiar object salience affects novel word learning. Child Development, 90(2), e246–e262. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyykkönen, P., Matthews, D., & Järvikivi, J. (2010). Three-year-olds are sensitive to semantic prominence during online language comprehension: A visual world study of pronoun resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960902944014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Querleu, D., Renard, X., Versyp, F., Paris-Delrue, L., & Crèpin, G. (1988). Fetal hearing. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 28(3), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(88)90030-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Rose, S. A., Gottfried, A. W., Melloy-Carminar, P., & Bridger, W. H. (1982). Familiarity and novelty preferences in infant recognition memory: Implications for information processing. Developmental Psychology, 18(5), 704. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.5.704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakkalou, E., & Gattis, M. (2012). Infants infer intentions from prosody. Cognitive Development, 27(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansavini, A., Bertoncini, J., & Giovanelli, G. (1997). Newborns discriminate the rhythm of multisyllabic stressed words. Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmerse, D., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Young children use shared experience to interpret definite reference. Journal of Child Language, 42(5), 1146–1157. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000914000555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekerina, I. A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2012). Interactive processing of contrastive expressions by Russian children. First Language, 32(1–2), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723711403981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sityaev, D. (2000). The relationship between accentuation and information status of discourse referents: A corpus-based study. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 12, 285–304.
   Google Scholar
• Song, H., & Fisher, C. (2005). Who’s “she”? Discourse prominence influences preschoolers’ comprehension of pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southgate, V., Chevallier, C., & Csibra, G. (2010). Seventeen-month-olds appeal to false beliefs to interpret others’ referential communication. Developmental Science, 13(6), 907–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00946.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steedman, M. (1991). Structure and intonation. Language, 67(2), 262–296. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N., Spieker, S., & MacKain, K. (1982). Intonation contours as signals in maternal speech to prelinguistic infants. Developmental Psychology, 18(5), 727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.5.727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terken, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1994). Deaccentuation of words representing ‘given’ information: Effects of persistence of grammatical function and surface position. Language and Speech, 37(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099403700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terken, J., & Nooteboom, S. G. (1987). Opposite effects of accentuation and deaccentuation on verification latencies for given and new information. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2(3–4), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968708406928
   Google Scholar
• Thorson, J. C., & Morgan, J. L. (2021). Prosodic realizations of new, given, and corrective referents in the spontaneous speech of toddlers. Journal of Child Language, 48(3), 541–568. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., & Barton, M. E. (1994). Learning words in nonostensive contexts. Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.5.639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull, R., Royer, A., Ito, K., & Speer, S. R. (2014). Prominence perception in and out of context. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 7, an International Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, R., Royer, A. J., Ito, K., & Speer, S. R. (2017). Prominence perception is dependent on phonology, semantics, and awareness of discourse. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 1017–1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1279341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallduví, E., & Engdahl, E. (1996). The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics, 34(3), 459–520. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1996.34.3.459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venditti, J. J., & Hirschberg, J. (2003). Intonation and discourse processing. In M. J. Solé & D. Recasens (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 107–114). https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2003/p15_0107.html
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G. (2010). The many roads to prominence. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 52, pp. 163–183). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(10)52004-8
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G., Tanenhaus, M., & Gunlogson, C. (2008). Interpreting pitch accents in online comprehension: H* vs. L+H*. Cognitive Science, 32(7), 1232–1244. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802138755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, A., Braun, B., & Crocker, M. W. (2006). Finding referents in time: Eye-tracking evidence for the role of contrastive accents. Language and Speech, 49(3), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309060490030301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, B., Peppé, S., & Goulandris, N. (2004). Intonation development from five to thirteen. Journal of Child Language, 31(4), 749–778. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090400652X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., Crain, S., & Zhan, L. (2012). Sometimes children are as good as adults: The pragmatic use of prosody in children’s on-line sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(1), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar