Utilization of microRNAs and their regulatory functions for improving biotic stress tolerance in tea plant [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze]

References

• Chacko SM, Thambi PT, Kuttan R, et al. Beneficial effects of green tea: a literature review. Chin Med. 2010;5:13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wight W. Tea classification revised. Curr Sci. 1962;31:298–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee B. Botanical classification of tea. In: Wilson KC, Clifford MN, editors. Tea cultivation to consumption. London: Chapman and Hall; 1992. p. 25–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mondal TK. Genetics and Breeding. In: Breeding and biotechnology of tea and its wild species. New Delhi: Springer. 2014. p. 9–34.
   Google Scholar
• Jeyaraj A, Chandran V, Gajjeraman P. Differential expression of microRNAs in dormant bud of tea [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze]. Plant Cell Rep. 2014;33(7):1053–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan N, Mukhtar H. Tea and health: studies in humans. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19(34):6141–6147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugh DT, Godfrey M, Limeback H, et al. Black tea source, production, and consumption: assessment of health risks of fluoride intake in New Zealand. J Environ Public Health. 2017;2017:5120504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boros K, Jedlinszki N, Csupor D. Theanine and caffeine content of infusions prepared from commercial tea samples. Pharmacogn Mag. 2016;12(45):75–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CS, Landau JM. Effects of tea consumption on nutrition and health. J Nutr. 2000;130(10):2409–2412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negishi H, Xu JW, Ikeda K, et al. Black and green tea polyphenols attenuate blood pressure increases in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Nutr. 2004;134(1):38–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay M, Mondal TK, Chand PK. Biotechnological advances in tea (Camellia sinensis [L.] O. Kuntze): a review. Plant Cell Rep. 2001;35(2):255–287.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Feng X, Wang Y, et al. Advances in research on functional genes of tea plant. Gene. 2019;711:143940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Liu Y, Wang S, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of galactinol synthases in Camellia sinensis with different responses to biotic and abiotic stressors. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65(13):2751–2759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia EH, Zhang HB, Sheng J, et al. The tea tree genome provides insights into tea flavor and independent evolution of caffeine biosynthesis. Mol Plant. 2017;10(6):866–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabu GR, Mandal AK. Computational identification of miRNAs and their target genes from expressed sequence tags of tea (Camellia sinensis). Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2010;8(2):113–121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unver T, Namuth-Covert DM, Budak H. Review of current methodological approaches for characterizing microRNAs in plants. Int J Plant Genomics. 2009;2009:262463.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohanpuria P, Yadav SK. Characterization of novel small RNAs from tea (Camellia sinensis L.). Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(4):3977–3986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamore PD, Haley B. Ribo-gnome: the big world of small RNAs. Science. 2005;309(5740):1519–1524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X. Small RNAs - secrets and surprises of the genome. Plant J. 2010;61(6):941–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng LL, Qu LH. Application of microRNA gene resources in the improvement of agronomic traits in rice. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015;13(3):329–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Jin H. Spray-induced gene silencing: a powerful innovative strategy for crop protection. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25(1):4–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi T, Guo J, Peng H, et al. Host-induced gene silencing: a powerful strategy to control diseases of wheat and barley. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(1):pii: E206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voinnet O. Origin, biogenesis, and activity of plant microRNAs. Cell. 2009;136:669–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurihara Y, Takashi Y, Watanabe Y. The interaction between DCL1 and HYL1 is important for efficient and precise processing of pri-miRNA in plant microRNA biogenesis. RNA. 2006;12:206–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Spector DL. Identification of nuclear dicing bodies containing proteins for microRNA biogenesis in living arabidopsis plants. Curr Biol. 2007;17:818–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Yang Z, Yu B, et al. Methylation protects miRNAs and siRNAs from a 3ʹ-end uridylation activity in arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 2005;15:1501–1507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Ebright YW, Yu B, et al. HEN1 recognizes 21–24 nt small RNA duplexes and deposits a methyl group onto the 2ʹ OH of the 3ʹ terminal nucleotide. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:667–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Bartel B. MicroR3and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:19–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu QW, Luo YP. Identification of miRNAs and their targets in tea (Camellia sinensis). J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013;14(10):916–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeyaraj A, Zhang X, Hou Y, et al. Genome-wide identification of conserved and novel microRNAs in one bud and two tender leaves of tea plant (Camellia sinensis) by small RNA sequencing, microarray-based hybridization and genome survey scaffold sequences. BMC Plant Biol. 2017a;17(1):212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu S, Mi X, Zhang R, et al. Integrated analysis of miRNAs and their targets reveals that miR3Sc/TCP2 regulates apical bud burst in tea plant (Camellia sinensis). Planta. 2019;250(4):1111–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Chen C, Wang Y, et al. Conserved microRNA act boldly during sprout development and quality formation in Pingyang Tezaocha (Camellia sinensis). Front Genet. 2019;10:237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun P, Cheng C, Lin Y, et al. Combined small RNA and degradome sequencing reveals complex microRNA regulation of catechin biosynthesis in tea (Camellia sinensis). PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao S, Wang X, Yan X, et al. Revealing of microRNA involved regulatory gene networks on terpenoid biosynthesis in Camellia sinensis in different growing time points. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(47):12604–12616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhu X, Chen X, et al. Identification and characterization of cold-responsive microRNAs in tea plant (Camellia sinensis) and their targets using high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng C, Zhao L, Wang Y, et al. Integrated RNA-Seq and sRNA-Seq analysis identifies chilling and freezing responsive key molecular players and pathways in tea plant (Camellia sinensis). PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0125031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu SC, Xu YX, Ma JQ, et al. Small RNA and degradome profiling reveals important roles for microRNAs and their targets in tea plant response to drought stress. Physiol Plant. 2016;158(4):435–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Zhao S, Zhu C, et al. Identification of drought-responsive miRNAs and physiological characterization of tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.) under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2017;17(1):211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeyaraj A, Liu S, Zhang X, et al. Genome-wide identification of microRNAs responsive to Ectropis oblique feeding in tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.). Sci Rep. 2017b;7(1):13634.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeyaraj A, Wang X, Wang S, et al. Identification of regulatory networks of microRNAs and their targets in response to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.). Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou YH, Jeyaraj A, Zhang X, et al. Absolute quantification of microRNAs in green tea (Camellia sinensis) by stem-loop quantitative real-time PCR. J Sci Food Agric. 2017;97(9):2975–2981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song H, Zhang X, Shi C, et al. Selection and verification of candidate reference genes for mature microRNA expression by quantitative Rt-Pcr in the tea plant (Camellia sinensis). Genes (Basel). 2016;7(6):pii: E25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchetia S, Handique G, Roy S, et al. Genomics approaches for biotic and abiotic stress improvement in tea. In: Han WY, Li X, Ahammed G. editors. Chapter 13. Stress physiology of tea in the face of climate change. Singapore: Springer. p. 289–312.
   Google Scholar
• Ponmurugan P, Baby UI, Rajkumar R. Growth, photosynthetic and biochemical responses of tea cultivars infected with various diseases. Photosyn. 2007;45:143–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewari A. To check the bio-efficiency of deuce 2.8 (deltamethrin) against Helopeltis theivora or more commonly known as the tea mosquito. Int J Innov Appl Sci Eng. 2016;2:31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ponmurugan P, Manjukarunambika K, Gnanamangai BM. Impact of various foliar diseases on the biochemical, volatile and quality constituents of green and black teas. Aust Plant Pathol. 2016;45:175.
   Google Scholar
• Huang GT, Ma SL, Bai LP, et al. Signal transduction during cold, salt, and drought stresses in plants. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:969–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khraiwesh B, Zhu JK, Zhu J. Role of miRNAs and siRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses of plants. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1819(2):137–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YN, Tang L, Hou Y, et al. Differential transcriptome analysis of leaves of tea plant (Camellia sinensis) provides comprehensive insights into the defense responses to Ectropis oblique attack using RNA-Seq. Funct Integr Genomics. 2016;16:383–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YG, Huang MD. Biological control progress of Ectropis oblique Prout. J Environ Entomol. 2001;4:181–184.
   Google Scholar
• Chen ZM, Sun XL, Dong WX. Genetics and chemistry of the resistance of tea plant to pests. In: Chen L, Apostolides Z, Chen Z-M, editors. Advanced topics in Science and Technology in China. Global Tea Breeding. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 343–360.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley ME, Lamont BB, Fairbanks MM, et al. Plant structural traits and their role in antiherbivore defense. Perspec Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2007;8:157–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arimura GI, Matsui K, Takabayashi J. Chemical and molecular ecology of herbivore-induced plant volatiles: proximate factors and their ultimate functions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009;50:911–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurnberger T, Kemmerling B. Receptor protein kinases-pattern recognition receptors in plant immunity. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:519–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artico S, Ribeiro-Alves M, Oliveira-Neto OB, et al. Transcriptome analysis of Gossypium hirsutum fower buds infested by cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis) larvae. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MG, Wurms KV, Davy MW, et al. Transcriptome analysis of kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) bark in response to armoured scale insect (Hemiberlesia lataniae) feeding. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0141664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhns EH, Seidl-Adams I, Tumlinson JH. Heliothine caterpillars differ in abundance of a gut lumen aminoacylase (-ACY-1)-suggesting a relationship between host preference and fatty acid amino acid conjugate metabolism. J Insect Physiol. 2012;58:408–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiep V, Vadassery J, Lattke J, et al. Systemic cytosolic Ca2+ elevation is activated upon wounding and herbivory in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2015;207:996–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavani A, Chaitanya RK, Chauhan VK, et al. Differential oxidative stress responses in castor semilooper. Achaea janata. J Invertebr Pathol. 2015;132:157–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das A, Pramanik K, Sharma R, et al. In-silico study of biotic and abiotic stress-related transcription factor binding sites in the promoter regions of rice germin-like protein genes. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0211887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R. Role of microRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014;174:93–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakata M, Mitsuda N, Herde M, et al. A bHLH-type transcription factor, ABA-INDUCIBLE BHLH-TYPE TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR/JA-ASSOCIATED MYC2-LIKE1, acts as a repressor to negatively regulate jasmonate signaling in arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2013;25:1641–1656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki-Sekimoto Y, Jikumaru Y, Obayashi T, et al. Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors JASMONATE-ASSOCIATED MYC2-LIKE1 (JAM1), JAM2, and JAM3 are negative regulators of jasmonate responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013;163:291–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu W, Dubos C, Lepiniec L. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis by MYB-bHLH-WDR complexes. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20:176–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrocal-Lobo M, Molina A, Solano R. Constitutive expression of ETHYLENE- RESPONSE-FACTOR1 in arabidopsis confers resistance to several necrotrophic fungi. Plant J. 2002;29:23–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YF, Etheridge N, Schaller GE. Ethylene signal transduction. Ann Bot (Lond). 2005;95:901–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen AN, Ernst HA, Leggio LL, et al. NAC transcription factors: structurally distinct, functionally diverse. Trends Plant Sci. 2005;10:79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegedus D, Yu M, Baldwin D, et al. Molecular characterization of Brassica napus NAC domain transcriptional activators induced in response to biotic and abiotic stress. Plant Mol Biol. 2003;53:383–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran LS, Nakashima K, Sakuma Y, et al. Isolation and functional analysis of arabidopsis stress-inducible NAC transcription factors that bind to a drought-responsive cis-element in the early responsive to dehydration stress 1 promoter. Plant Cell. 2004;16:2481–2498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He XJ, Mu RL, Cao WH, et al. AtNAC2, a transcription factor downstream of ethylene and auxin signaling pathways, is involved in salt stress response and lateral root development. Plant J. 2005;44:903–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshii M, Shimizu T, Yamazaki M, et al. Disruption of a novel gene for a NAC-domain protein in rice confers resistance to rice dwarf virus. Plant J. 2009;57:615–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo PJ, Kim MJ, Park JY, et al. Cold activation of a plasma membrane-tethered NAC transcription factor induces a pathogen resistance response in arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010;61:661–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia N, Zhang G, Sun YF, et al. TaNAC8, a novel NAC transcription factor gene in wheat, responds to stripe rust pathogen infection and abiotic stresses. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2010b;74:394–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuruzzaman M, Manimekalai R, Sharoni AM, et al. Genome-wide analysis of NAC transcription factor family in rice. Gene. 2010;465:30–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuruzzaman M, Sharoni AM, Kikuchi S. Roles of NAC transcription factors in the regulation of biotic and abiotic stress responses in plants. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean R, Van Kan JAL, Pretorius ZA, et al. The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol. 2015;16:414–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copes WE, Thomson JL. Survival analysis to determine the length of the incubation period of camellia twig blight caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Plant Dis. 2008;92:1177–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu F, Weir BS, Damm U, et al. Unravelling Colletotrichum species associated with Camellia: employing ApMat and GS loci to resolve species in the C. gloeosporioides complex. Persoonia. 2015;35:63–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang WP, Yang LC, Zhu XJ, et al. Seasonal and habitat dependent variations in culturable endophytes of Camellia sinensis. J Plant Pathol Microbiol. 2013;4:169.
   Google Scholar
• Münch S, Lingner U, Floss DS, et al. The hemibiotrophic lifestyle of Colletotrichum species. J Plant Physiol. 2008;165:41–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiberg A, Wang M, Bellinger M, et al. Small RNAs: a new paradigm in plant-microbe interactions. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2014;52:495–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Dong J, Bennetzen JL, et al. Integrating transcriptome and microRNA analysis identifies genes and microRNAs for AHO-induced systemic acquired resistance in N. Tabacum Sci Rep. 2017;7:12504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JD, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006;444:323–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm ST, Coaker G, Day B, et al. Host microbe interactions: shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell. 2006;124:803–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiu SH, Bleecker A. Plant receptor-like kinase gene family: diversity, function and signaling. Science’s STKE. 2001a;113:re22.
   Google Scholar
• Song WY, Wang GL, Chen LL, et al. A receptor kinase-like protein encoded by the rice disease resistance gene, Xa21. Science. 1995;270:1804–1806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangl J, Jones J. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature. 2002;411:826–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiu SH, Bleecker A. Receptor-like kinases from arabidopsis form a monophyletic gene family related to animal receptor kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001b;98:10763–10768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minguez P, Parca L, Diella F, et al. Deciphering a global network of functionally associated posttranslational modifications. Mol Syst Biol. 2012;8:599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JV, Mann M. Status of large-scale analysis of posttranslational modifications by mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013;12:3444–3452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayapuram N, Bonhomme L, Bigeard J, et al. Identification of novel PAMP triggered phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events in Arabidopsis thaliana by quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis. J Proteome Res. 2014;13:2137–2151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuhse TS, Peck SC, Hirt H, et al. Microbial elicitors induce activation and dual phosphorylation of the arabidopsis thaliana MAPK 6. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:7521–7526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng X, Xu J, He Y, et al. Phosphorylation of an ERF transcription factor by arabidopsis MPK3/MPK6 regulates plant defense gene induction and fungal resistance. Plant Cell. 2013;25:1126–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandoth PK, Ranf S, Pancholi SS, et al. Tomato MAPKs LeMPK1, LeMPK2, and LeMPK3 function in the systemin-mediated defense response against herbivorous insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:12205–12210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd AN, Kudla J, Sanders D. The language of calcium signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:593–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez-Rodriguez MC, Adams-Phillips L, Liu Y, et al. MEKK1 is required for flg22-induced MPK4 activation in arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol. 2007;143:661–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Roychoudhury A. WRKY proteins: signaling and regulation of expression during abiotic stress responses. Sci World J. 2015;2015:807560.
   Google Scholar
• Andreasson E, Jenkins T, Brodersen P, et al. The MAP kinase substrate MKS1 is a regulator of plant defense responses. Embo J. 2005;24:2579–2589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui H, Tsuda K, Parker JE. Effector-triggered immunity: from pathogen perception to robust defense. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66:487–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai J, Jeong DH, De Paoli E, et al. MicroRNAs as master regulators of the plant NB-LRR defense gene family via the production of phased, trans-acting siRNAs. Genes Dev. 2011;25:2540–2553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Pignatta D, Bendix C, et al. MicroRNA regulation of plant innate immune receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:1790–1795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivaprasad PV, Chen HM, Patel K, et al. A microRNA superfamily regulates nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeats and other mRNAs. Plant Cell. 2012;24:859–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oren M, Barela Hudge MA ll, Golconda P, et al. Genomic instability and shared mechanisms for gene diversification in two distant immune gene families: the echinoid 185/333 and the plant NBS-LRR. In: Malagoli Deditor. The evolution of the immune system: conservation and diversification. London, UK: Elsevier-Academic Press; 2016. p. 295–310.
   Google Scholar
• Silveira PR, Nascimento KJT, Andrade CCL, et al. Physiological changes in tomato leaves arising from Xanthomonas gardneri infection. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2015;92:e130–e138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Wang Q. MicroRNA-based biotechnology for plant improvement. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun G. MicroRNAs and their diverse functions in plants. Plant Mol Biol. 2012;80:17–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Luo H. MicroRNA-mediated gene regulation: potential application for plant genetic engineering. Plant Mol Biol. 2013;83:59–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Wang Q. MicroRNA, a new target for engineering new crop varieties. Bioengineered. 2016;7:7–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari M, Sharma D, Trivedi PK. Artificial microRNA mediated gene silencing in plants: progress and perspectives. Plant Mol Biol. 2014;86:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid A, Zhang Q, Yasir M, et al. Small RNA based genetic engineering for plant viral resistance: application in crop protection. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Feng Z, Bian L, et al. miR398 regulation in rice of the responses to abiotic and biotic stresses depends on CSD1 and CSD2 expression. Funct Plant Biol. 2010;38:44–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Li D, Mao D, et al. Over-expression of microRNA319 impacts leaf morphogenesis and leads to enhanced cold tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Environ. 2013;36:2207–2218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu J, Wang J, Hu H, et al. Cross‐talk between freezing response and signaling for regulatory transcriptions of MIR475b and its targets by miR475b promoter in Populus suaveolens. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naya L, Paul S, Valdés-López O, et al. Regulation of copper homeostasis and biotic interactions by microRNA 398b in common bean. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e84416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Liu H, Guo S, et al. OsmiR396d affects gibberellin and brassinosteroid signaling to regulate plant architecture in rice. Plant Physiol. 2018;176(1):946–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Jiang J, Hu Z, et al. Over-expression of miR158 causes pollen abortion in Brassica campestris ssp. Chinensis Plant Mol Biol. 2017;93(3):313–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Wang L, Lim JY, et al. Phosphorylation of CBP20 Links microRNA to root growth in the ethylene response. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(11):e1006437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao JL, Tomes S, Xu J, et al. How microRNA172 affects fruit growth in different species is dependent on fruit type. Plant Signal Behav. 2016;11(4):e1156833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu N, Tu L, Wang L, et al. MicroRNA 157-targeted SPL genes regulate floral organ size and ovule production in cotton. BMC Plant Biol. 2017;17(1):7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campo S, Peris-Peris C, Sire C, et al. Identification of a novel microRNA (miRNA) from rice that targets an alternatively spliced transcript of the Nramp6 (Natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 6) gene involved in pathogen resistance. New Phytol. 2013;199:212–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro L, Dunoyer P, Jay F, et al. A plant miRNA contributes to antibacterial resistance by repressing auxin signalling. Science. 2006;312:436–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang QQ, Zhang J, et al. Identification of microRNAs involved in pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered plant innate immunity. Plant Physiol. 2010;152:2222–2231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saifi M, Yogindran S, Nasrullah N, et al. Co-expression of anti-miR319g and miRStv_11 lead to enhanced steviol glycosides content in stevia rebaudiana. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19(1):274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mishra R, Mohanty JN, Chand SK, et al. Can-miRn37a mediated suppression of ethylene response factors enhances the resistance of chilli against anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum truncatum L. Plant Sci. 2018;267:135–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akmal M, Baig MS, Khan JA. Suppression of cotton leaf curl disease symptoms in Gossypium hirsutum through over expression of host-encoded miRNAs. J Biotechnol. 2017;263:21–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels D, Sunkar R. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2005;24:23–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunkar R, Li YF, Jagadeeswaran G. Functions of microRNAs in plant stress responses. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17:196–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zou Z, Gong P, et al. Over-expression of microRNA169 confers enhanced drought tolerance to tomato. Biotechnol Lett. 2011;33(2):403–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao P, Bai X, Yang L, et al. Over-expression of osa-MIR396c decreases salt and alkali stress tolerance. Planta. 2010;231(5):991–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Q, Zeng J, He XQ. MiR169 and its target PagHAP2-6 regulated by ABA are involved in poplar cambium dormancy. J Plant Physiol. 2016;198:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song JB, Gao S, Sun D, et al. miR394 and LCR are involved in arabidopsis salt and drought stress responses in an abscisic acid-dependent manner. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu QH, Upadhyaya NM, Gubler F, et al. Over-expression of miR172 causes loss of spikelet determinacy and floral organ abnormalities in rice (Oryza sativa). BMC Plant Biol. 2009;9:149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Sun MY, Wang XS, et al. Over-expression of GmGIa-regulated soybean miR172a confers early flowering in transgenic arabidopsis thaliana. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(5):pii: E645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi ZH, Zhang C, Xu XF, et al. Overexpression of AtTTP affects ARF17 expression and leads to male sterility in arabidopsis. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0117317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curaba J, Talbot M, Li Z, et al. Over-expression of microRNA171 affects phase transitions and floral meristem determinancy in barley. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zou Z, Zhang J, et al. Over-expression of sly-miR156a in tomato results in multiple vegetative and reproductive trait alterations and partial phenocopy of the sft mutant. FEBS Lett. 2011;585(2):435–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan CG, Wang CH, Fang RX, et al. Artificial microRNAs highly accessible to targets confer efficient virus resistance in plants. J Virol. 2008;82:11084e11095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ai T, Zhang L, Gao Z, et al. Highly efficient virus resistance mediated by artificial microRNAs that target the suppressor of PVX and PVY in plants. Plant Biol. 2011;13:304e316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kung YJ, Lin SS, Huang YL, et al. Multiple artificial microRNAs targeting conserved motifs of the replicase gene confer robust transgenic resistance to negative-sense single-stranded RNA plant virus. Mol Plant Pathol. 2012;13:303e317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali I, Amin I, Briddon RW, et al. Artificial microRNA-mediated resistance against the monopartite begomovirus cotton leaf curl burewala virus. Virol J. 2013;10:231e238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu TV, Choudhury NR, Mukherjee SK. Transgenic tomato plants expressing artificial microRNAs for silencing the pre-coat and coat proteins of a begomovirus, tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus, show tolerance to virus infection. Virus Res. 2013;172:35e45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo H, Song X, Wang G, et al. Plant generated artificial small RNAs mediated aphid resistance. PLoS One. 2014;9:e97410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur A, Sanju S, Siddappa S, et al. Artificial microRNA mediated gene silencing of Phytophthora infestans single effector avr3a gene imparts moderate type of late blight resistance in potato. Plant Pathol J. 2015;14:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Yogindran S, Ghosh A, Rajam MV. Artificial miRNAs for specific gene silencing and engineering virus resistance in plants. Cell Dev Biol. 2015;4:e137.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang Z, Yang W, et al. Degradation of fungal microRNAs triggered by short tandem target mimics is via the small-RNA-degrading nuclease. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan J, Gu Y, Jia X, et al. Effective small RNA destruction by the expression of a short tandem target mimic in arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2012;24(2):415–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teotia S, Zhang D, Tang G. Knockdown of rice microRNA166 by short tandem target mimic (STTM). Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1654:337–349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lucas-Barbosa D. Integrating studies on plant–pollinator and plant–herbivore interactions. Trends Plant Sci. 2016;21:125–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey SP, Baldwin IT. RNA-directed RNA polymerase 1 (RdR1) mediates the resistance of Nicotiana attenuata to herbivore attack in nature. Plant J. 2007;50:40–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey SP, Shahi P, Gase K, et al. Herbivory-induced changes in the small-RNA transcriptome and phytohormone signaling in Nicotiana attenuata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:4559–4564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Gao Q, Wu B, et al. NgRDR1, an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase isolated from Nicotiana glutinosa, was involved in biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2009;47:359–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Ferrer V, Voinnet O. Roles of plant small RNAs in biotic stress responses. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:485–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Wang M, Gao Z, et al. Isolation of a novel RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 6 from Nicotiana glutinosa, NgRDR6, and analysis of its response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38:929–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozorov TA, Pandey SP, Dinh ST, et al. DICER-like proteins and their role in plant-herbivore interactions in Nicotiana attenuata. J Integr Plant Biol. 2012;54(3):189–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar