Anticodon sequence determines the impact of mistranslating tRNA^Ala variants

References

• Chapeville F, Lipmann F, von Ehrenstein G, et al. On the role of soluble ribonucleic acid in coding for amino acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1962;48:1086–1092. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.6.1086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogle JM, Murphy FV, Tarry MJ, et al. Selection of tRNA by the ribosome requires a transition from an open to a closed form. Cell. 2002;111(5):721–732. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01086-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveland AB, Demo G, Grigorieff N, et al. Ensemble cryo-EM elucidates the mechanism of translation fidelity. Nature. 2017;546(7656):113–117. doi: 10.1038/nature22397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftfield RB, Vanderjagt D. The frequency of errors in protein biosynthesis. Biochem J. 1972;128(5):1353–1356. doi: 10.1042/bj1281353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stansfield I, Jones KM, Herbert P, et al. Missense translation errors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Biol. 1998;282(1):13–24. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi K, Bhatt MJ, Farabaugh PJ. Codon-specific effects of tRNA anticodon loop modifications on translational misreading errors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(19):10331–10339. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordret E, Dahan O, Asraf O, et al. Systematic detection of amino acid substitutions in proteomes reveals mechanistic basis of ribosome errors and selection for translation fidelity. Mol Cell. 2019;75(3):427–441.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes AC, Miranda I, Silva RM, et al. A genetic code alteration generates a proteome of high diversity in the human pathogen Candida albicans. Genome Biol. 2007;8(10):R206. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netzer N, Goodenbour JM, David A, et al. Innate immune and chemically triggered oxidative stress modifies translational fidelity. Nature. 2009;462(7272):522–526. doi: 10.1038/nature08576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltrout E, Goodenbour JM, Fréchin M, et al. Misacylation of tRNA with methionine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(20):10494–10506. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lant JT, Berg MD, Sze DHW, et al. Visualizing tRNA-dependent mistranslation in human cells. RNA Biol. 2018;15(4–5):567–575. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2017.1379645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos M, Pereira PM, Varanda AS, et al. Codon misreading tRNAs promote tumor growth in mice. RNA Biol. 2018;15:773–786. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2018.1454244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman SM, Kon Y, Hauke AC, et al. Conditional accumulation of toxic tRNAs to cause amino acid misincorporation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(15):7831–7843. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg MD, Zhu Y, Genereaux J, et al. Modulating mistranslation potential of tRNASer in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2019;213(3):849–863. doi: 10.1534/genetics.119.302525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich A, RajBhandary UL. Transfer RNA: molecular structure, sequence, and properties. Annu Rev Biochem. 1976;45(1):805–860. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.45.070176.004105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Duve C. The second genetic code. Nature. 1988;333(6169):117–118. doi: 10.1038/333117a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giegé R, Eriani G. The tRNA identity landscape for aminoacylation and beyond. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(4):1528–1570. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou YM, Schimmel P. A simple structural feature is a major determinant of the identity of a transfer RNA. Nature. 1988;333(6169):140–145. doi: 10.1038/333140a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou YM, Schimmel P. Evidence that a major determinant for the identity of a transfer RNA is conserved in evolution. Biochemistry. 1989;28(17):6800–6804. doi: 10.1021/bi00443a003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asahara H, Himeno H, Tamura K, et al. Escherichia coli seryl-tRNA synthetase recognizes tRNASer by its characteristics tertiary structure. J Mol Biol. 1994;236(3):738–748. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biou V, Yaremchuk A, Tukalo M, et al. The 2.9 Å crystal structure of T. thermophilus seryl-tRNA synthetase complexed with tRNASer. Science. 1994;263(5152):1404–1410. doi: 10.1126/science.8128220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asahara H, Himeno H, Tamura K, et al. Discrimination among E. coli tRNAs with a long variable arm. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1993;29:207–208.
   Google Scholar
• Soma A, Kumagai R, Nishikawa K, et al. The anticodon loop is a major identity determinant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNALeu. J Mol Biol. 1996;263(5):707–714. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitschopf K, Achsel T, Busch K, et al. Identity elements of human tRNALeu: structural requirements for converting human tRNASer into a leucine acceptor in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23(18):3633–3637. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.18.3633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg MD, Hoffman KS, Genereaux J, et al. Evolving mistranslating tRNAs through a phenotypically ambivalent intermediate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2017;206(4):1865–1879. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.203232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geslain R, Cubells L, Bori-Sanz T, et al. Chimeric tRNAs as tools to induce proteome damage and identify components of stress responses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(5):e30. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp1083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woese CR. On the evolution of the genetic code. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965;54(6):1546–1552. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.6.1546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woese CR. A new biology for a new century. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68(2):173–186. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.68.2.173-186.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacson JR, Berg MD, Charles B, et al. A novel mistranslating tRNA model in Drosophila melanogaster has diverse, sexually dimorphic effects. G3 Bethesda Md. 2022;12(5):jkac035. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac035
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reverendo M, Soares AR, Pereira PM, et al. TRNA mutations that affect decoding fidelity deregulate development and the proteostasis network in zebrafish. RNA Biol. 2014;11(9):1199–1213. doi: 10.4161/rna.32199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feany MB, Bender WW. A Drosophila model of Parkinson’s disease. Nature. 2000;404(6776):394–398. doi: 10.1038/35006074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song L, He Y, Ou J, et al. Auxilin underlies progressive locomotor deficits and dopaminergic neuron loss in a Drosophila model of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Rep. 2017;18(5):1132–1143. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal A, Reichert H, VijayRaghavan K. A locomotor assay reveals deficits in heterozygous Parkinson’s disease model and proprioceptive mutants in adult Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(49):24830–24839. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807456116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg MD, Giguere DJ, Dron JS, et al. Targeted sequencing reveals expanded genetic diversity of human transfer RNAs. RNA Biol. 2019;16(11):1574–1585. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2019.1646079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisien M, Wang X, Pan T. Diversity of human tRNA genes from the 1000-genomes project. RNA Biol. 2013;10(12):1853–1867. doi: 10.4161/rna.27361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lant JT, Kiri R, Duennwald ML, et al. Formation and persistence of polyglutamine aggregates in mistranslating cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(20):11883–11899. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple GF, Dozy AM, Roy KL, et al. Construction of a functional human suppressor tRNA gene: an approach to gene therapy for β-thalassaemia. Nature. 1982;296(5857):537–540. doi: 10.1038/296537a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko W, Porter JJ, Sipple MT, et al. Efficient suppression of endogenous CFTR nonsense mutations using anticodon-engineered transfer RNAs. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2022;28:685–701. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2022.04.033
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Porter JJ, Heil CS, Lueck JD. Therapeutic promise of engineered nonsense suppressor tRNAs. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2021;12(4):e1641. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Mias RA, Hess KN, Ruiz BY, et al. Proteome-wide identification of amino acid substitutions deleterious for protein function. bioRxiv. 2022 April; pre-print: not peer-reviewed. doi: 10.1101/2022.04.06.487405:9
   Google Scholar
• Brachmann CB, Davies A, Cost GJ, et al. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast. 1998;14(2):115–132. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980130)14:2<115:AID-YEA204>3.0.CO;2-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes TR, Marton MJ, Jones AR, et al. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell. 2000;102(1):109–126. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00015-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg MD, Genereaux J, Zhu Y, et al. Acceptor stem differences contribute to species-specific use of yeast and human tRNASer. Genes. 2018;9(12):E612. doi: 10.3390/genes9120612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprouffske K, Wagner A. Growthcurver: an R package for obtaining interpretable metrics from microbial growth curves. BMC Bioinf. 2016;17(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1016-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg MD, Isaacson JR, Cozma E, et al. Regulating expression of mistranslating tRNAs by readthrough RNA polymerase II transcription. ACS Synth Biol. 2021;10(11):3177–3189. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.1c00461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappsilber J, Mann M, Ishihama Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(8):1896–1906. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leutert M, Rodríguez‐Mias RA, Fukuda NK, et al. R2‐P2 rapid‐robotic phosphoproteomics enables multidimensional cell signaling studies. Mol Syst Biol. 2019;15(12):e9021. doi: 10.15252/msb.20199021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng JK, Jahan TA, Hoopmann MR. Comet: an open-source MS/MS sequence database search tool. Proteomics. 2013;13(1):22–24. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201200439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Käll L, Canterbury JD, Weston J, et al. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat Methods. 2007;4(11):923–925. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argentini A, Goeminne LJE, Verheggen K, et al. moFF: a robust and automated approach to extract peptide ion intensities. Nat Methods. 2016;13(12):964–966. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Riverol Y, Bai J, Bandla C, et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1):D543–52. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grantham R. Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science. 1974;185(4154):862–864. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4154.862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veljkovic V, Cosic I, Dimitrijevic LD. Is it possible to analyze DNA and protein sequences by the methods of digital signal processing? IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985;BME-32(5):337–341. doi: 10.1109/TBME.1985.325549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhakaran M. The distribution of physical, chemical and conformational properties in signal and nascent peptides. Biochem J. 1990;269(3):691–696. doi: 10.1042/bj2690691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodje MN, Al-Karadaghi S. Occurrence, conformational features and amino acid propensities for the π-helix. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2002;15(5):353–358. doi: 10.1093/protein/15.5.353
   Google Scholar
• Huh W-K, Falvo JV, Gerke LC, et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature. 2003;425(6959):686–691. doi: 10.1038/nature02026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosjean H, Westhof E. An integrated, structure- and energy-based view of the genetic code. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(17):8020–8040. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Then A, Mácha K, Ibrahim B, et al. A novel method for achieving an optimal classification of the proteinogenic amino acids. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15321. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72174-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crick FH. Codon—anticodon pairing: the wobble hypothesis. J Mol Biol. 1966;19(2):548–555. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(66)80022-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres AG, Piñeyro D, Filonava L, et al. A-to-I editing on tRNAs: biochemical, biological and evolutionary implications. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(23):4279–4286. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.09.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senger B, Auxilien S, Englisch U, et al. The modified wobble base inosine in yeast tRNAIle is a positive determinant for aminoacylation by isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase. Biochemistry. 1997;36(27):8269–8275. doi: 10.1021/bi970206l
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yona AH, Bloom-Ackermann Z, Frumkin I, et al. tRNA genes rapidly change in evolution to meet novel translational demands. Elife. 2013;2:e01339. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koonin EV, Novozhilov AS. Origin and evolution of the genetic code: the universal enigma. IUBMB Life. 2009;61(2):99–111. doi: 10.1002/iub.146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledoux S, Uhlenbeck OC. Different aa-tRNAs are selected uniformly on the ribosome. Mol Cell. 2008;31(1):114–123. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlman RP, Dale T, Uhlenbeck OC. Uniform binding of aminoacylated transfer RNAs to the ribosomal A and P sites. Mol Cell. 2004;16(5):799–805. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.10.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlgemuth I, Pohl C, Rodnina MV. Optimization of speed and accuracy of decoding in translation. EMBO J. 2010;29(21):3701–3709. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothe U, Rodnina MV. Codon reading by tRNAAla with modified uridine in the wobble position. Mol Cell. 2007;25(1):167–174. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olejniczak M, Uhlenbeck O. tRNA residues that have coevolved with their anticodon to ensure uniform and accurate codon recognition. Biochimie. 2006;88(8):943–950. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2006.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaletto P, Machnicka MA, Purta E, et al. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways. 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D303–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarian C, Townsend H, Czestkowski W, et al. Accurate translation of the genetic code depends on tRNA modified nucleosides. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(19):16391–16395. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200253200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konevega AL, Soboleva NG, Makhno VI, et al. Purine bases at position 37 of tRNA stabilize codon–anticodon interaction in the ribosomal a site by stacking and Mg2+-dependent interactions. RNA. 2004;10(1):90–101. doi: 10.1261/rna.5142404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenner LB, Demeshkina N, Yusupova G, et al. Structural aspects of messenger RNA reading frame maintenance by the ribosome. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(5):555–560. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pernod K, Schaeffer L, Chicher J, et al. The nature of the purine at position 34 in tRNAs of 4-codon boxes is correlated with nucleotides at positions 32 and 38 to maintain decoding fidelity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(11):6170–6183. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslow DK, Cameron DM, Collins SR, et al. A comprehensive strategy enabling high-resolution functional analysis of the yeast genome. Nat Methods. 2008;5(8):711–718. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg MD, Zhu Y, Ruiz BY, et al. The amino acid substitution affects cellular response to mistranslation. G3 Bethesda. 2021;11(10):jkab218. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab218
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein KC, Frydman J. The stop-and-go traffic regulating protein biogenesis: how translation kinetics controls proteostasis. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(6):2076–2084. doi: 10.1074/jbc.REV118.002814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight JRP, Garland G, Pöyry T, et al. Control of translation elongation in health and disease. Dis Model Mech. 2020;13(3):dmm043208. doi: 10.1242/dmm.043208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnikov S, Mailliot J, Rigger L, et al. Molecular insights into protein synthesis with proline residues. EMBO Rep. 2016;17(12):1776–1784. doi: 10.15252/embr.201642943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble CE, Brule CE, Dean KM, et al. Adjacent codons act in concert to modulate translation efficiency in yeast. Cell. 2016;166(3):679–690. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoneim DH, Zhang X, Brule CE, et al. Conservation of location of several specific inhibitory codon pairs in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeasts reveals translational selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(3):1164–1177. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray LE, Rowley N, Dawes IW, et al. A yeast glutamine tRNA signals nitrogen status for regulation of dimorphic growth and sporulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(15):8619–8624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate JJ, Rai R, Cooper TG. Nitrogen starvation and TorC1 inhibition differentially affect nuclear localization of the Gln3 and Gat1 transcription factors through the rare glutamine tRNACUG in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2015;199(2):455–474. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.173831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agris PF, Eruysal ER, Narendran A, et al. Celebrating wobble decoding: half a century and still much is new. RNA Biol. 2018;15(4–5):537–553. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2017.1356562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basilio C, Wahba AJ, Lengyel P, et al. Synthetic polynucleotides and the amino acid code. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962;48(4):613–616. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.4.613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson MJO, Esberg A, Huang B, et al. Eukaryotic wobble uridine modifications promote a functionally redundant decoding system. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28(10):3301–3312. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01542-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozov A, Westhof E, Yusupov M, et al. The ribosome prohibits the G•U wobble geometry at the first position of the codon-anticodon helix. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:6434–6441. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogalski M, Karcher D, Bock R. Superwobbling facilitates translation with reduced tRNA sets. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15(2):192–198. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom-Ackermann Z, Navon S, Gingold H, et al. A comprehensive tRNA deletion library unravels the genetic architecture of the tRNA pool. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(1):e1004084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar