An Anticolonial Framework for Urban Teacher Preparation

References

• Akiba, M. (2011). Identifying program characteristics for preparing pre-service teachers for diversity. Teachers College Record, 113(3), 658–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2013). What’s a nice test like you doing in a place like this? Rethinking Schools, 27(4), 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J. A. (1993). The canon debate, knowledge construction, and multicultural education. Educational Researcher, 22(5), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X022005004
   Google Scholar
• Behizadeh, N. (2014). Mitigating the dangers of a single story: Creating large-scale writing assessments aligned with sociocultural theory. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 125–136. doi:10.3102/0013189X14529604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. (2005, March 8). Critical theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/critical-theory/
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel, & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487–511). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cannella, G. (1999). Postformal thought as critique, reconceptualization, and possibility for teacher education reform. In J. Kincheloe (Ed.), Rethinking intelligence: Confronting psychological assumptions about teaching and learning (pp. 145–163). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caraballo, L. (2011). Theorizing identities in a ‘just(ly)’ contested terrain: Practice theories of identity amid critical-poststructural debates on achievement and curriculum. Journal of Curriculum & Pedagogy, 8(2), 155–177. doi:10.1080/15505170.2011.624939
   Google Scholar
• Caraballo, L., Lozenski, B., Lyiscott, J., & Morrell, E. (2017). YPAR and critical epistemologies: Rethinking education research. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 311–336. doi:10.3102/0091732X16686948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caraballo, L., & Lyiscott, J. (2008). Collaborative inquiry: Youth, social action, and critical qualitative research. Action Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2013). The politics of accountability: Assessing teacher education in the United States. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 6–27. doi:10.1080/00131725.2013.739015
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1992). Inside/ outside: Teacher research and knowledge.. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. doi:10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2010, October). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: How teacher performance assessments can measure and improve teaching. Center for American Progress. Retrieved from http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education/report/2010/10/19/8502/evaluating-teacher-effectiveness/.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. Y. (2011). Women, race, & class. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. (2006). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon, F. (1967). A dying colonialism. New York, NY: Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055. doi:10.1111/tcre.2001.103.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, M., Roberts, R. A., & Torre, M. E. (2004). Echoes of Brown: Youth documenting and performing the legacy of Brown v. Board of Education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1992). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed (R. R. Barr, Trans.). London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (2000). The new literacy studies: From socially situated to the work of the social. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 180–197). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, R. D., & Wong, P. L. Engaged pedagogy: Meeting the demands for justice in urban professional development schools. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(2), 69–87.
   Google Scholar
• Gurl, T., Caraballo, G. L., Gunn, J., Gerwin, D., & Bembenutty, H. (2016).Performance assessment, policy, privatization, and professionalization: Affordances and constraints for teacher education programs. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, K. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. doi:10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcombe, M. (2017, March 13) School apologizes after fifth-graders asked to make ‘slave auction’ posters. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/13/us/elementary-school-slave-auction-posters-trnd/
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. S. (2006). On silence and dominant accountability: A critical anticolonial investigation of the antiracism classroom. In G. J. Sefa Dei & A. Kempf (Eds.), Anticolonialism and education: The politics of resistance (pp. 43–63). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. D., Johnson, B., Farenga, S. J., & Ness, D. (2005). Trivializing teacher education: The accreditation squeeze. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kinloch, V. F. (2010). Harlem on our minds: Place, race, and the literacies of urban youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkland, D. (2013). A search past silence: The literacy of young black men. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. (2000). The schools our children deserve: Moving beyond traditional classrooms and ‘tougher standards.’ Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (2000). Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln(Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, (2nd ed., pp. 257–278). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyiscott, J. (2017). Racial identity and liberation literacies in the classroom. English Journal, 106(4), 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, T. (1999). Predictors of success in urban teaching: Analyzing two paradoxical cases. Multicultural Education, 6(3), 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, E., Nooruddin, I., & Shortle, A. (2016). Proud to be an American? The changing relationship of national pride and identity. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics, 1(1), 145–176. doi:10.1017/rep.2015.7
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, A. (2000). Constructing meaning about violence, school, and community: Participatory action research with urban youth. Urban Review, 32(2), 123–154. doi:10.1023/A:1005181731698
   Google Scholar
• Mirra, N., & Morrell, E. (2011). Teachers as civic agents: Toward a critical democratic theory of urban teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 408–420. doi:10.1177/0022487111409417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell, E. (2004). Becoming critical researchers: Literacy and empowerment for urban youth. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, E. (2008). Critical literacy and urban youth: Pedagogies of access, dissent, and liberation. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, E., Duenas, R., Garcia, V., & Lopez, J. (2013). Critical media pedagogies: Teaching for achievement in city schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, L. M., Gambrell, L. B., & Duke, N. K. (2011). Best practices in literacy instruction (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• National Commision on Teaching & America’s Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Education Review, 66(1). doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguera, P. A., & Akom, A. (2000). Disparities demystified. The Nation, 270(22), 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Olmedo, I. (1997). Challenging old assumptions: Preparing teachers for inner city schools. Teaching & Teacher Education, 13(3). doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00019-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. doi:10.3102/0013189X12441244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, K., Williams, L., Hopper, T., & McGregor, C. (2012). Indigenous principles decolonizing teacher education: What we have learned. In Education, 18(2), 18–34.
   Google Scholar
• Solórzano, D., & Yosso, T. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytic framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23–44. doi:10.1177/107780040200800103
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. (1996). Feminism and critical theory. In D. Landry, & G. MacLean (Eds.), The Spivak reader: Selected works of Gayati Chakravorty Spivak (pp. 53–74). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, V. (2012, December 23). The fundamental laws of ‘value added’ teacher evaluation. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2012/12/23/the-fundamental- aws-of-value-added-teacher-evaluation/.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. (2003). What’s ‘new’ in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (2005). Best practice: Today’s standards for teaching and learning in America’s schools (3rd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar