A modest proposal: global rationalization of ecological footprint to eliminate ecological debt

References

• Attfield, R. 1999. The Ethics of the Global Environment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balmford, A., Bruner, A., Cooper, P., Costanza, R., Farber, S., Green, R., Jenkins, M., Jefferiss, P., Jessamy, V., Madden, J., Munro, K., Myers, N., Naeem, S., Paavola, J., Rayment, M., Rosendo, S., Roughgarden, J., Trumper, K., & Turner, R. 2002. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297(5583):950–953.
   Google Scholar
• Beckerman, W. & Pasek, J. 2001. Justice, Posterity, and the Environment. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F. 2002. Technological regimes, path dependency, and the environment. Global Environmental Change 12(1):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bicknell, K., Ball, R., Cullen, R., & Bigsby, H. 1998. New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy. Ecological Economics 27(2):149– 160.
   Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. & Welsh, I. 2007. Eco-politics beyond the paradigm of sustainability: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Environmental Politics 16(2):185–205.
   Google Scholar
• Carley, M. & Spapens, P. 1998. Sharing the World: Sustainable Living & Global Equity in the 21st Century. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Catton, W. 1980. Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, N., Simmons, C., & Wackernagel, M. 2000. Sharing Nature’s Interest: Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. 2006. Sustainable consumption research as democratic expertise. Journal of Consumer Policy 29(1):67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farberi, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R., Paruelo, J., Raskins, R., Sutton, P., & van den Belt, M. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6230):253–260.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, K. 1999. Jobs and environment: the “double dividend” of ecological modernization? International Journal of Social Economics 26(7–9):101–102.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, H. & Cobb, J. 1989. For The Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, J. 2000. Nitrogen mobilization in Asia. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 57(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Global Footprint Network (GFN). 2006. National Footprints: Data and Methods. http://www.footprintnetwork.org/gfn_sub.php?content=datamethods. April 12, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Global Footprint Network (GFN). 2007. Carbon Footprint: http://www.footprintnetwork.org/gfn_sub.php?content=app_carbon_footprint. February 6, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C., & Brack, D. 1999. The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Energy and Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Hails, C. (Ed.). 2006. Living Planet Report 2006. Gland, Switzerland: WWF International. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/living_planet_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, J. 2003. Environmental Human Rights: Power, Ethics, and Law. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hawken, P., Lovins, A., & Lovins, L. 1999. Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, J., Lundqvist, U., Robert, K.-H., & Wackernagel, M. 1999. The ecological footprint from a systems perspective of sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 6(1):17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Illum, K. & Meyer, N. 2004. Joint implementation: methodology and policy considerations. Energy Policy 32(8):1013–1023.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. (Ed.). 1998. Environmental Governance: A Report on the Next Generation of Environmental Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M. & Murray, S. 2001. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia. Ecological Economics 37(2):229–255.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M. & Murray, S. 2003. The Ecological Footprint: Issues and Trends. ISA Research Paper 01-03. Australia: Centre for Integrated Sustainability Analysis, The University of Sydney. http://www.isa.org.usyd.edu.au/publications/documents/Ecological_Footprint_Issues_and_Trends.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Hansson, C., & Bond, S. 2007. On the bioproductivity and land-disturbance metrics of the Ecological Footprint. Ecological Economics 61(1):6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Loh, J. (Ed.). 2002. Living Planet Report 2002. Gland, Switzerland: WWF International. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/lpr2002.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Loh, J. & M. Wackernagel (Eds.). 2004. Living Planet Report 2004. Gland, Switzerland: WWF International. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/lpr2004.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, A. 2000. Ecological modernization, environmental policy and employment. Can environmental protection and employment be reconciled. Innovation 13(3):311–325.
   Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, D. & M. Kraft (Eds.). 1999. Toward Sustainable Communities: Transition and Transformations in Environmental Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2000. Globalization and environment: between apocalypse-blindness and ecological modernization. In G. Spaargaren, A. Mol, & F. Buttel (Eds.), Environment and Global Modernity. pp. 121–149. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. & D. Sonnenfeld (Eds.). 2000. Ecological Modernisation Around the World: Perspectives and Critical Debates. Portland, OR: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Mol. A. 2001. Globalization and Environmental Reform. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2003. Ecological modernization: industrial transformations and environmental reform. In C. Humphrey, T. Lewis, & F. Buttel (Eds.), Environment, Energy, and Society: Exemplary Works. pp. 401–412. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). 2005. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthur, S. & Ott, H. 1999. The Kyoto Protocol: International Climate Policy for the 21st Century. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. 1998. A global resources dividend. In D. Crocker & T. Linden (Eds.), Ethics of Consumption: The Good Life, Justice, and Global Stewardship. pp. 501–536. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, W. 2000. Eco-footprint analysis: merits and brickbats. Ecological Economics 32(3):371–374.
   Google Scholar
• Renascence Editions. 1999. Jonathan Swift, A Modest Proposal (1729). http://www.uoregon.edu/~rbear/modest.html. June 26, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. 2003. Global inequality and climate change. In C. Humphrey, T. Lewis, & F. Buttel (Eds.), Environment, Energy, and Society: Exemplary Works. pp. 254–262. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, W. 2004. Sustainable development. In M. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology. pp. 71–82. Northampton, MA: Edgar Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, W. & T. Santarius (Eds.). 2007. Fair Future: Resource Conflicts, Security, and Global Justice. London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Shue, H. 1995. Ethics, the environment and the changing international order. International Affairs 71(3):453–461.
   Google Scholar
• Simms, A. 2005. Ecological Debt: The Health of the Planet and the Wealth of Nations. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Speth, J. & P. Haas (Eds.). 2006. Global Environmental Governance. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilman, D. 1999. Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: The need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96(11):5995–6000.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, K., Lenzen, M., Wiedmann, T., & Barrett, J. 2007. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities–Part 1: A technical note on combining input-output and ecological footprint analysis. Ecological Economics 62(1):7–44.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html. June 9, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1976. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_cescr.htm. June 9, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Venetoulis, J., Chazan, D., & Gaudet, C. 2004. Ecological Footprint of Nations. Oakland, CA: Redefining Progress. http://www.rprogress.org/publications/2004/footprintnations2004.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, L. & Woodall, P. 2004. Whose Trade Organization? A Comprehensive Guide to the WTO. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Moran, D., Wermer, P., Goldfinger, S., Deumling, D., & Murray, M. 2005. National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts 2005: The Underlying Calculation Method. Oakland, CA: Global Footprint Network. http://www.footprintnetwork.org/download.php?id=5.
   Google Scholar
• Wackernagel, M. & Rees, W. 1997. Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: Economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecological Economics 20(1):3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T., Minx, J., Barrett, J., & Wackernagel, M. 2006. Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input-output analysis. Ecological Economics 56(1):28–48.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Turner, K., & Barrett, J. 2007a. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities–Part 2: Review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics 61(1):15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Turner, K., Minx, J., & Barrett, J. 2007b. Multiregional Input-Output Modeling Opens New Opportunities for the Estimation of Ecological Footprints Embedded in International Trade. International Ecological Footprint Conference. May 8–10, Cardiff.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2008. Understanding Poverty. http://go.worldbank.org/RQBDCTUXW0. February 2, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• York, R., Rosa, Eugene A., & Dietz, T. 2003. Footprints on the earth: the environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review 68(2):279–300.
   Google Scholar