Planning for landscape multifunctionality

References

• Antrop, M. 2004. Multifunctionality and values in rural and suburban landscapes. In J. Brandt & H. Vejre (Eds.). Multifunctional Landscapes Volume 1: Theory, Values and History. pp. 165–180. Southampton, MA: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett School of Planning & LDA Design Exeter. 2004. Vision for a Sustainable, Multi-Functional Rural-Urban Fringe. Final Report. Cheltenham: Countryside Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict, M. & McMahon, E. 2006. Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, J. 1998. Exploring and Expanding the Landscape Values Terrain. Faculty Paper Series FS 98-20. Athens, GA: Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Bills, N. & Gross, D. 2005. Sustaining multifunctional agricultural landscapes: comparing stakeholder perspectives in New York (US) and England (UK). Land Use Policy 22(4):313–332.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnet, I., Potter, C., & Simmons, E. 2003. Landscape change in the multifunctional countryside: a biographical analysis of farmer decision-making in the English High Weald. Landscape Research 28(4):349–364.
   Google Scholar
• Bowes, M. & Krutilla, J. 1989. Multiple-Use Management: The Economics of Public Forest Land. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, J. 2003. Multifunctional landscapes: perspectives for the future. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China 15(2):187– 192.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, J. & Vejre, H. 2004. Multifunctional landscapes: motives, concepts and perceptions. In J. Brandt & H. Vejre (Eds.), Multifunctional Landscapes Volume 1: Theory, Values and History. pp. 3–33. Southampton, MA: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunstad, R., Gaasland, I., & Vardal, E. 2005. Multifunctionality of agriculture: an inquiry into the complementarity between landscape preservation and food security. European Review of Agricultural Economics 32(4):469–488.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, M. 2006. Urban landscape conservation and the role of ecological greenways at local and metropolitan scales. Landscape and Urban Planning 76(1–4):23–44.
   Google Scholar
• Campos, P., Bonnieux, F., Caparros, A., & Paoli, J. 2007. Measuring total sustainable incomes from multifunctional management of Corsican maritime pine and Andalusian cork oak Mediterranean forests. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50(1):65–85.
   Google Scholar
• Catchpole, R. 2007. Habitat Networks in England. June 4–5, Urban Green Conference. University of Salford.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Urban and Regional Ecology (CURE). 2002. Sustainable Development in the Countryside Around Towns. Countryside Agency Working Papers CAX 111 & 112. Cheltenham: Countryside Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Cocklin, C., Dibden, J., & Maunter, N. 2006. From market to multifunctionality? Land stewardship in Australia. The Geographical Journal 172(3):197–205.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2000. The European Landscape Convention. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Countryside Agency. 2006. Landscape: Beyond the View. Newcastle: Natural England Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Countryside Agency & Groundwork Trust, 2005. The Countryside In and Around Towns: A Vision for Connecting Town and Country in the Pursuit of Sustainable Development. Wetherby: Countryside Agency Publications.
   Google Scholar
• de Blust, G. & van Olmen, M. 2000. Monitoring multifunctional terrestrial landscapes: some comments. In J. Brandt, B. Tress, & G. Tress (Eds.), Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management pp. 63–70. Roskilde: Centre for Landscape Research.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). 2007. Securing a Healthy Natural Environment: An Action Plan for Embedding an Ecosystems Approach. London: DEFRA.
   Google Scholar
• Ekins, P. 2003. Identifying critical natural capital: conclusions about critical natural capital. Ecological Economics 44(2–3):277–292.
   Google Scholar
• Entec UK. 2003. The Countryside Agency Urban Fringe Action Plans: Their Role, Scope and Mechanisms for Implementation. Report for Countryside Agency. Cheshire, England: Entec UK Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Forestry Commission. 2009. Newlands Executive Briefing: Transforming Brownfields into Thriving, Durable and Economically-Viable Natural Environments. Delamere, Cheshire: Forestry Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gallent, N., Andersson, J., & Bianconi, M. 2004. Vision for a Sustainable, Multi-Functional Rural-Urban Fringe. Cheltenham: Countryside Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Gallent, N., Andersson, J., & Bianconi, M. 2006. Planning on the Edge: The Context for Planning at the Rural-Urban Fringe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S., Handley J., Ennos, A., & Pauleit, S. 2007. Adapting cities for climate change: the role of the green infrastructure. Built Environment 33(1):97–115.
   Google Scholar
• Hagedorn K. 2004. Multifunctional Agriculture: An Institutional Interpretation. 90th EAAE Seminar. October 28–29, Rennes, France. The Hague: European Association of Agricultural Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Haines-Young, R. & Potschin, M. 2004. Valuing and assessing of multifunctional landscapes: an approach based on the Natural Capital Concept. In J. Brandt & H. Vejre (Eds.), Multifunctional Landscapes Volume 1: Theory, Values and History. pp. 181–192. Southampton, MA: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., & Cheshire, D. 2006. Defining and Identifying Environmental Limits for Sustainable Development: A Scoping Study. Final Full Technical Report to DEFRA. Nottingham: Centre for Environmental Management, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, K. & Selman, P. 2005. The “landscape scale” in planning: recent experience of biogeographic planning units in Britain. Landscape Research 30(4):549–558.
   Google Scholar
• Hytönen, M. 1995. History, evolution and significance of the multiple-use concept. In M. Hytönen (Ed.), Multiple-use Forestry in the Nordic Countries. pp. 43–66. Helsinki: METLA.
   Google Scholar
• Iverson Nassauer, J. 1997. Cultural sustainability: aligning aesthetics and ecology. In J. Iverson Nassauer (Ed.), Placing Nature: Culture and Landscape Ecology. pp. 65–84. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jongman, R. 2002. Landscape planning for biological diversity in Europe. Landscape Research 27(2):187–195.
   Google Scholar
• Knickel, K. & Renting, H. 2000. Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of multifunctionality and rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4):512–528.
   Google Scholar
• Land Use Consultants. 2008. Central Scotland Green Network: Defining the Concept. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission. Landscape Institute. 2009. Green Infrastructure: Connected and Multifunctional Landscapes. Position Statement. London: Landscape Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lankoski, J., Lichtenberg, E., & Ollikainen, M. 2004. Performance of Alternative Policies in Addressing Environmental Dimensions of Multifunctionality. Discussion Paper No. 4. Helsinki: Department of Economics and Management, University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• LDA Design. 2009. Green Infrastructure Study: Exeter Area and East Devon New Growth Point. Exeter: LDA Design Consulting LLP.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, C., Handley, J., & Rodwell, J. 2007 Restructuring the postindustrial landscape: a multifunctional approach. Landscape Research 32(3):285–309.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, S. & Johnston, D. 2009a. Designing landscapes for performance based on emerging principles in landscape ecology. Ecology and Society 14(1):44.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, S. & Johnston, D. 2009b. Creating multifunctional landscapes: how can the field of ecology inform the design of landscape? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(4): 212–220.
   Google Scholar
• Luz, F. 2000. Participatory landscape ecology: a basis for acceptance and implementation. Landscape and Urban Planning 50(1–3):157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Macinnes, L. 2004. Historic Landscape Characterisation. In K. Bishop & A. Phillips (Eds.), Countryside Planning: New Approaches to Management and Conservation. pp. 155–169. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, U., Helming, K., & Wiggering, H. 2007. Multifunctional Land Use: Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, R. & Selman, P. 2006. Landscape as a focus for integrating human and environmental processes. Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(2):199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Health Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D., Oreszczyn, S., Blackmore, C., Ison, R., & Martin, S. 2006. A systemic approach to scoping of factors influencing more sustainable land use in Herefordshire. Local Environment 11(6):683–699.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. & Urry, J. 2006. Growing Places: A Study of Social Change in the National Forest. Farnham: Forest Research.
   Google Scholar
• Natural England, 2008. Environmental Stewardship: Higher Level Stewardship Part A—Application Handbook, 2nd Ed. Newcastle: Natural England Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Naveh, Z. 2001. Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 57(3–4):269–284.
   Google Scholar
• Newson, M. & Chalk, L. 2004. Environmental capital: an information core to public participation in strategic and operational decisions–the example of river “Best Practice” projects. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47(6):899–920.
   Google Scholar
• North West Green Infrastructure Think Tank. 2008. North West Green Infrastructure Guide, Version 1.1. http://www.greeninfrastructurenw.co.uk/html/index.php?page=resources&NorthWestRegion=true. October 30, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ove Arup & Partners. 2004. Countryside Agency Initiatives Operating in the Urban Fringe. Final Report. Cheltenham: Countryside Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Palang, H., Alumäe, H., Printsman, A., & Sepp, K. 2004. Multi-functionality, landscape values and planning. In J. Brandt & H. Vejre (Eds.), Multifunctional Landscapes Volume 1: Theory, Values and History. pp. 219–234. Southampton, MA: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parris, K. 2004. Measuring changes in agricultural landscapes as a tool for policy makers. In J. Brandt & H. Vejre (Eds.), Multifunctional Landscapes Volume 1: Theory, Values and History. pp. 193–218. Southampton, MA: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J., Selman, P., & Wragg, A. 2002. Protected areas: reinforcing the virtuous circle. Planning Practice and Research. 17(3):279–295.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, G. 2006. Canada’s environmental farm plans: transatlantic perspectives on agri-environmental schemes. The Geographical Journal 172(3):206–218.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, A. & Moss, C. 2005. Multifunctionality in agriculture: externalities and non-traded goods. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 6(3–4):327–343.
   Google Scholar
• Schneeberger, N., Bürgi, M., Hersperger, A., & Ewald, K. 2007. Driving forces and rates of landscape change as a promising combination for landscape change research: an application on the northern fringe of the Swiss Alps. Land Use Policy 24(2):349–361.
   Google Scholar
• Scotland & Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental Research (SNIFFER). 2008. Urban Networks for People and Biodiversity–Form and Function. Edinburgh: SNIFFER.
   Google Scholar
• Selman, P. 2006. Planning at the Landscape Scale. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Selman, P. 2008. What do we mean by “sustainable landscape”? Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 4(2):23–28. http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol4iss2/communityessay.selman.html.
   Google Scholar
• Selman, P. & Knight, M. 2006. On the nature of virtuous change in cultural landscapes: exploring sustainability through qualitative models. Landscape Research 31(3):305–317.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma A. & Maltby, E. 2008. Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDS): an integrated and joined-up approach to urban drainage. Environmental Scientist 17(1):8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Soini K. 2001. Exploring human dimensions of multifunctional landscapes through mapping and map making. Landscape and Urban Planning 57(3–4):225–239.
   Google Scholar
• Stockdale, A. & Barker, A. 2009. Sustainability and the multifunctional landscape: an assessment of approaches to planning and management in the Cairngorms National Park. Land Use Policy 26(2):479–492.
   Google Scholar
• Swanwick, C. 2004. The assessment of countryside and landscape character in England: an overview. In K. Bishop & A. Phillips (Eds.), Countryside Planning: New Approaches to Management and Conservation. pp. 109–124. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Terkenli, T. 2001. Towards a theory of the landscape: the Aegean landscape as a cultural image. Landscape and Urban Planning 57(3–4):197–208.
   Google Scholar
• Tress, B. & Tress, G. 2001. Capitalising on multiplicity: a trans-disciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning 57(3–4):143–157.
   Google Scholar
• van Huylenbroeck, G. & Durand, D. 2004. Multifunctional Agriculture: A New Paradigm for European Agriculture. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• van Mansvelt J., Stobbelaar D., & Hendriks K. 1998. Comparison of landscape features in organic and conventional farming systems. Landscape and Urban Planning 41(3):209–227.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B., Holling, C., Carpenter, S., & Kinzig, A. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9(2):5.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B. & Meyers, J. 2004. Thresholds in ecological and social-ecological systems: a developing database. Ecology and Society 9(2):3.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, I. 2009. Facilitating Stakeholder Participation in Development of a Forest Habitat Network within the Edinburgh and South-East Scotland Strategic Development Plan Area. UK International Association for Landscape Ecology Conference. September 1–3, Edinburgh University. UK: IALE-UK.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggering, H., Müller, K., Werner, A., & Helming, K. 2003. The concept of multifunctionality in sustainable land development. In K. Helming & H. Wiggering (Eds.), Sustainable Development of Multifunctional Landscapes. pp. 3–18. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar