Developing policies for green buildings: what can the United States learn from the Netherlands?

References

• Ang, G., Groosman, M., & Scholten, N. 2005. Dutch performance-based approach to building regulations and public procurement. Building Research and Information 33(2):107–119.
   Google Scholar
• Arentsen, M., Bressers, H., & O’Toole, L. 2000. Institutional and policy responses to uncertainty in environmental policy: a comparison of Dutch and U.S. styles. Policy Studies Journal 28(3):597–611.
   Google Scholar
• Bontje, M. 2003. A “planner’s paradise” lost? Past, present and future of Dutch national urbanization policy. European Urban and Regional Studies 10(2):135–151.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, M. 2000. Knowledge infrastructure for sustainable building in the Netherlands. Construction Management and Economics 18(8):885–892.
   Google Scholar
• Bossink, B. 2002. A Dutch public-private strategy for innovation in sustainable construction. Construction Management and Economics 20(7):633–632.
   Google Scholar
• Bossink, B. 2007. The interorganizational innovation processes of sustainable building: a Dutch case of joint building innovation in sustainability. Building and Environment 42(12):4086–4092.
   Google Scholar
• Brochner, J., Ang, G., & Fredriksson, G. 1999. Sustainability and the performance concept: encouraging innovative environmental technology in construction. Building Research and Information 27(6):367–372.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, J., Colliver, R., & Jacobs, J. 2008. Tax and financial incentives for green building. Los Angeles Lawyer January:15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Circo, C. 2008. Using mandates and incentives to promote sustainable construction and green building projects in the private sector: a call for more state land use policy initiatives. Pennsylvania State Law Review 112(3):731–782.
   Google Scholar
• Codiga, D. 2008. Hawaii’s climate change law. Hawaii Bar Journal 12(5):4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R. 1997. Prioritizing environmental criteria in building design and assessment. In P. Branson, P. Lombardi, & V. Bentivegna (Eds.), Evaluation of the Built Environment for Sustainability. pp. 183–199. London: Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R. 1998. Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods. Building Research and Information 26(1):3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R. 2006. Shared markets: coexisting building environmental assessment methods. Building Research and Information 34(4):357–371.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H. & Nutley, S. 1999. The rise and rise of evidence in health care. Public Money & Management 19(1):9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Del Percio, S. 2004. The skyscraper, green design, and the LEED green building rating system: the creation of uniform sustainable standards for the 21st century or the perpetuation of an architectural fiction? Environ: Environmental Law and Policy Journal 28(1):117–154.
   Google Scholar
• Denyer, D. & Tranfield, D. 2006. Using qualitative research synthesis to build an actionable knowledge base. Management Decision 44(2):213–227.
   Google Scholar
• Gaber, J., & Gaber, S. 2007. Qualitative Analysis for Planning and Policy: Beyond the Numbers. Chicago: Planners Press. Garde, A. 2009. Sustainable by design? Insights from U.S. LEED-ND pilot projects. Journal of the American Planning Association 75(4):424–440.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D. & Elbourne, D. 2002. Systematic research synthesis to inform policy, practice, and democratic debate. Social Policy and Society 1(3):225–236.
   Google Scholar
• Gouldson, A. & Murphy, J. 1998. Regulatory Realities: The Implementation and Impact of Industrial Environmental Regulation. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Gruder, S. (Ed.). 2009. Government Green Building Programs Inventory. Milwaukee, WI: Solid and Hazardous Waste Education Center, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, C., Fouad Laroui, N., & van Leeuwen, M. 1998. Comparative energy and environmental policy for the residential sector: applying Dutch standards to the UK housing stock. Energy Economics 20(2):173–202.
   Google Scholar
• Howland, M. 2007. Employment effects of brownfield redevelopment: what do we know from the literature? Journal of Planning Literature 22(2):91–107.
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, T., Appel, P., McEntire, J., & Rabon, J. 2008. Kyoto comes to Georgia: how international environmental initiatives foster sustainable commerce in small town America. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 36(3):559–613.
   Google Scholar
• Itard, L. 2007. Comparing environmental impacts of renovated housing stock with new construction. Building Research and Information 35(3):252–267.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, L. & Allen, M. 1996. Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research 6(4):553–560.
   Google Scholar
• Keijzers, G. 2000. The evolution of Dutch environmental policy: the changing ecological arena from 1970–2000 and beyond. Journal of Cleaner Production 8(3):179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Kibert, C. 2002. Policy instruments for a sustainable built environment. Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law 17(2):379–394.
   Google Scholar
• King, N. & King, B. 2005. Creating incentives for sustainable buildings: a comparative law approach featuring the United States and the European Union. Virginia Environmental Law Journal 23(3):397–459.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, N. & Cole, R. 2001. Green building challenge: the development of an idea. Building Research and Information 29(5):336–345.
   Google Scholar
• Lauria, M. & Wagner, J. 2006. What can we learn from empirical studies of planning theory? A comparative case analysis of extant literature. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25(4):364–381.
   Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D. & Mol, A. 1998. Voluntary agreements as a form of deregulation? The Dutch experience. In U. Collier (Ed.), Deregulation in the European Union: Environmental Perspectives. pp. 191–198. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Maclennan, D. & More, A. 1999. Evidence, what evidence? The foundations for housing policy. Public Money & Management 19(1):17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, S. & Spaargaren, G. 2005. The politics of sustainable consumption: the case of the Netherlands. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 1(1):29–42. http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol1iss1/0410-009.martens.html.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. & Helge, J. 2000. Strategic environmental planning and uncertainty: a cross-national comparison of green plans in industrialized countries. Policy Studies Journal 28(3):612–632.
   Google Scholar
• McKinstry, R. 2004. Laboratories for local solutions for global problems: state, local, and private leadership in developing strategies to mitigate the causes and effects of climate change. Pennsylvania State Environmental Law Review 12(1):15–82.
   Google Scholar
• Melchert, L. 2007. The Dutch sustainable building policy: a model for developing countries. Building and Environment 42(2):893–901.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer (VROM). 1989. To Choose or to Lose: National Environmental Policy Plan, 1990–1994. The Hague: SDU Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer (VROM). 1993. Second National Environmental Policy Plan. The Hague: VROM.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer (VROM). 1998. The National Environmental Policy Plan 3. The Hague: VROM.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer (VROM). 2001. Where There’s a Will There’s a World: 4th National Environmental Policy Plan. The Hague: VROM.
   Google Scholar
• Noblit, G. & Hare, R. 1988. Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Northrup, M. 2004. Leading by example: profitable corporate strategies and successful public policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Widener Law Journal 14(1):21–59. http://www.epa.gov/oaintrnt/documents/sustainable_mou_508.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Federal Environmental Executive (OFEE). 2006. Federal Leadership in High Performance and Sustainable Buildings Memorandum of Understanding. http://www.epa.gov/oaintrnt/documents/sustainable_mou_508.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oostrom, M. 2001. What people want, where people live: new housing policy in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16(3–4):307–318.
   Google Scholar
• Osofsky, H. & Levit, J. 2008. The scale of networks: local climate change coalitions. Chicago Journal of International Law 8(2):409–436.
   Google Scholar
• Priemus, H. 1999. Sustainable cities: how to realize an ecological breakthrough: the Dutch approach. International Planning Studies 4(2):213–236.
   Google Scholar
• Rainwater, B. 2007. Local Leaders in Sustainability: A Study of Green Building Programs in Our Nation’s Communities. Washington, DC: American Institute of Architects.
   Google Scholar
• Retzlaff, R. 2005. Building green: onus or bonus? Zoning Practice April:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Retzlaff, R. 2008. Green building assessment systems: a framework and comparison for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association 74(4):505–509.
   Google Scholar
• Retzlaff, R. 2009. The use of LEED in planning and development regulation: an exploratory analysis. Journal of Planning Education and Research 29(1):67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S. 2001. House Bill 8: income tax credit for green buildings. University of Baltimore Journal of Environmental Law 9(1):53–54.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. & Barroso, J. 2003. Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research 13(7):905– 923.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. & Barroso, J. 2007. Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwood, G. 1997. Meta-synthesis of qualitative analysis of caring: defining a therapeutic model of nursing. Advanced Practical Nursing 3(1):32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sunikka, M. (Ed.). 2001. Policies and Regulations for Sustainable Building: A Comparative Study of Five European Countries. Delft: DUP Science.
   Google Scholar
• Sunikka, M. 2003. Fiscal instruments in sustainable housing policies in the EU and the accession countries. European Environment 13(4):227–239.
   Google Scholar
• Sunikka, M. 2006. Energy efficiency and low-carbon technologies in urban renewal. Building Research and Information 34(6):521–533.
   Google Scholar
• Sunikka, M. & Boon, C. 2003. Environmental policies and efforts in social housing: The Netherlands. Building Research and Information 31(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, E. 2007. Building stock offers opportunities to foster sustainability and provides tools for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Sustainable Development Law and Policy 7(3):17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, E. 2008. Reshaping municipal and county laws to foster green building, energy efficiency, and renewable energy. New York University Environmental Law Journal 16(1):1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Theaker, I. & Cole, R. 2001. The role of local governments in fostering “green” buildings: a case study. Building Research and Information 29(5):394–408.
   Google Scholar
• van Bueren, E. & ten Heuvelhof, E.2005. Improving governance arrangements in support of sustainable cities. Environment and Planning B(Planning and Design) 32(1):47–66.
   Google Scholar
• van Bueren, E. 2007. Establishing sustainability: policy successes and failures. Building Research and Information 35(5):543– 556.
   Google Scholar
• van Hal, J. 2007. A labeling system as stepping stone for incentives related to the profitability of sustainable housing. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 22(4):393–408.
   Google Scholar
• Weed, M. 2005. “Meta interpretation”: a method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6(1):Art. 37.
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). 1987. Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. & Lipsey, M. 2000. Wilderness challenge programs for delinquent youth: a meta-analysis of outcome evaluations. Evaluation and Program Planning 23(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, L. 2006. Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of Advanced Nursing 53(3):311– 318.
   Google Scholar