Structure, action and change: a Bourdieusian perspective on the preconditions for a degrowth transition

References

• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of Judgement and Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Homo Academicus. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990a. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990b. “The Intellectual Field: A World Apart.” In In Other Words. Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology, edited by P. Bourdieu, 140–149. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1991. “Genesis and Structure of the Religious Field.” Comparative Social Research 13: 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1993. Sociology in Question. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2005. The Social Structures of the Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. 2008. “Pierre Bourdieu, a Theoretician of Change? the View from Regulation Theory.” In The Institutions of the Market: Organizations, Social Systems, and Governance, edited by A. Ebner and N. Beck, 348–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R., and Y. Saillard, eds. 2002. Regulation Theory: The State of the Art. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buch-Hansen, H. 2018. “The Prerequisites for a Degrowth Paradigm Shift: Insights from Critical Political Economy.” Ecological Economics 146: 157–163. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.021.
   Google Scholar
• Buch-Hansen, H., and M. Koch. 2019. “Degrowth through Income and Wealth Caps?” Ecological Economics 160: 264–271. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Büchs, M., and M. Koch. 2017. Postgrowth and Wellbeing: Challenges to Sustainable Welfare. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Büchs, M., and M. Koch. 2019. “Challenges to the Degrowth Transition: The Debate about Wellbeing.” Futures 105: 155–165. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2018.09.002.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 2012. “The Roots of Domination: Beyond Bourdieu and Gramsci.” Sociology 46 (2): 187–206. doi:10.1177/0038038511422725.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. 2004. Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A., D. Hirsch, M. Padley, and C. Shepherd. 2018. A Minimum Income Standard for the UK, 2008–2018: Continuity and Change. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Di Giulio, A., and D. Fuchs. 2014. “Sustainable Consumption Corridors: Concept, Objections, and Responses.” GAIA 23 (3): 184–192. doi:10.14512/gaia.23.S1.6.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1977. The Evolution of Educational Thought. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 2013. The Division of Labour in Society. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, M., and M. Koch. 2016. “Economic Development and Prosperity Patterns around the World: Structural Challenges for a Global Steady-State Economy.” Global Environmental Change 38: 41–48. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.007.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Stucturation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goedemé, T., B. Storms, S. Stockman, T. Penne, and K. van den Bosch. 2015. “Towards Cross-Country Comparable Reference Budgets in Europe: First Results of a Concerted Effort.” European Journal of Social Security 17 (1): 3–31. doi:10.1177/138826271501700101.
   Google Scholar
• Göpel, M. 2016. The Great Mindshift: How a New Economic Paradigm and Sustainability Transformations Go Hand in Hand. London: Springer Open.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. 2012. “Is US Economic Growth Over? Faltering Innovation Confronts the Six Headwinds.” Working Paper 18315. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, I. 2017. Heat, Greed and Human Need: Climate Change, Capitalism and Sustainable Wellbeing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Guillén-Royo, M. 2015. Sustainability and Wellbeing: Human-Scale Development in Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, M., and G. Smith. 2017. “Sustainable Prosperity and Democracy: A Research Agenda.” CUSP Working Paper No. 8. Guildford: University of Surrey. https://www.cusp.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/WP08-Sustainable-Prosperity-and-Democracy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Heras, M., and D. Tàbara. 2014. “Let’s Play Transformations! Performative Methods for Sustainability.” Sustainability Science 9 (3): 379–398. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0245-9.
   Google Scholar
• Hickel, J., and G. Kallis. 2019. “Is Green Growth Possible?” New Political Economy: 1–18. doi:10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964.
   Google Scholar
• Hirvilammi, T. 2020. “The Virtuous Circle of Sustainable Welfare as a Transformative Policy Idea.” Sustainability 12 (1): 391. doi:10.3390/su12010391.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2018. Global Warming of 1.5 °C: Summary for Policymakers. Geneva: IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). 2019. “Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.” Bonn: IPBES. https://www.ipbes.net/news/ipbes-global-assessment-summary-policymakers-pdf.
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2016. Fiscal Monitor. Washington, DC: IMF.
   Google Scholar
• Joutsenvirta, M. 2016. “A Practice Approach to the Institutionalization of Economic Growth.” Ecological Economics 128: 23–32. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.006.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, M. 2012. Capitalism and Climate Change: Theoretical Discussion, Historical Development and Policy Responses. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, M. 2018. “The Naturalisation of Growth: Marx, the Regulation Approach and Bourdieu.” Environmental Values 27(1): 9–27. doi:10.3197/096327118X15144698637504.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, M. 2019. “Elements of a Political Economy of the Postgrowth Era.” Real-World Economics Review 87: 90–105.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, M. 2020. “The State in the Transformation to a Sustainable Postgrowth Economy.” Environmental Politics 29 (1): 115–133. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1684738.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, M., H. Buch-Hansen, and M. Fritz. 2017. “Shifting Priorities in Degrowth Research: An Argument for the Centrality of Human Needs.” Ecological Economics 138: 74–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, B. 1989. Der Kurze Traum Immerwährender Prosperität [The Short Dream of Everlasting Prosperity]. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., and K. Thelen. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1978. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1990. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1. London: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 2006. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 3. London: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Max-Neef, M. 2014. “The World on a Collision Course and the Need for a New Economy.” In Co-Operatives in a Post-Growth Era, edited by S. Novkovic and T. Webb, 83–100. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. 1938. “Social Structure and Anomie.” American Sociological Review 3 (5): 672–682. doi:10.2307/2084686.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. and F. Schneider, eds. 2018. Housing for Degrowth: Principles, Models, Challenges and Opportunities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2015. In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Overbeek, H. and B. Apeldoorn, eds. 2012. Neoliberalism in Crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Research and Degrowth. 2010. “Degrowth Declaration of the Paris 2008 Conference.” Journal of Cleaner Production 18: 523–524.
   Google Scholar
• Røpke, I. 2009. “Theories of Practice: New Inspiration for Ecological Economic Studies on Consumption.” Ecological Economics 68 (10): 2490–2497. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.015.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, W., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice. Everyday Live and How It Changes. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., J. Rockström, K. Richardson, T. M. Lenton, C. Folke, D. Liverman, C. P. Summerhayes, et al. 2018. “Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (33): 8252–8259. doi:10.1073/pnas.1810141115.
   Google Scholar
• Svenfelt, Å, E. C. Alfredsson, K. Bradley, E. Fauré, G. Finnveden, P. Fuehrer, U. Gunnarsson-Östling, et al. 2019. “Scenarios for Sustainable Futures beyond GDP Growth 2050.” Futures 111: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Parrique, T. 2019. “The Political Economy of Degrowth.” PhD Thesis in Economics and Finance at University Clermont Auvergne and Stockholm University. Available online at https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02499463/document
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1958. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Welzer, H. 2011. Mentale Infrastrukturen: Wie Das Wachstum in Die Welt Und in Die Seelen Kam [Mental Infrastuctures: How Growth Came into the World and into Souls]. Berlin: Heinrich-Böll Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. and C. Cattaneo. 2017. “Degrowth – Taking Stock and Reviewing an Emerging Academic Paradigm.” Ecological Economics 137: 220–230.
   Google Scholar