Recreational experientialism at ‘the abyss’: rethinking the sustainability crisis and experimental politics

References

• Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2001. Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Toward a New Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1997. The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., A. Giddens, and S. Lash. 1994. “Reflexive Modernization.” In Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gernsheim. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., W. Bonss, and C. Lau. 2003. “The Theory of Reflexive Modernization: Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme.” Theory, Culture & Society 20 (2): 1–33. doi:10.1177/0263276403020002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biden, J. 2022. “Remarks by President Biden on the United Efforts of the Free World to Support the People of Ukraine.” The White House, March 26. http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2022/03/26/remarks-by-president-biden-on-the-united-efforts-of-the-free-world-to-support-the-people-of-ukraine
   Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. 2006. “Self-Experience in the Theme Park of Radical Action? Social Movements and Political Articulation in the Late-Modern Condition.” European Journal of Social Theory 9 (1): 23–42. doi:10.1177/1368431006060461.
   Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. 2007. “Self-Description, Self-Deception, Simulation: A Systems-Theoretical Perspective on Contemporary Discourses of Radical Change.” Social Movement Studies 6 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/14742830701251229.
   Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. 2017. “Post-Capitalism, Post-Growth, Post-Consumerism? Eco-Political Hopes Beyond Sustainability.” Global Discourse 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415.
   Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. 2020a. “The Legitimation Crisis of Democracy: Emancipatory Politics, the Environmental State and the Glass Ceiling to Socio-Ecological Transformation.” Environmental Politics 29 (1): 38–57. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1681867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. 2020b. “The Dialectic of Democracy: Modernization, Emancipation and the Great Regression.” Democratization 27 (3): 389–407. doi:10.1080/13510347.2019.1648436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. 2022a. “Sustainability: Buying Time for Consumer Capitalism – and European Modernity.” In Handbook of Critical Environmental Politics, edited by L. Pellizzoni, E. Leonardi, and V. Asara, 141–155. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. 2022b. “Liberation and Limitation: The Emancipatory Project and the Grammar of the Autocratic-Authoritarian Turn.” European Journal of Social Theory 25 (1): 26–52. doi:10.1177/13684310211027088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. 2022c. “Planetary Boundaries, Societal Boundaries, and Collective Self-Limitation: Moving Beyond the Post-Marxist Comfort Zone.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 18 (1): 576–589. doi:10.1080/15487733.2022.2099124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and È. Chiapello. 2017. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, U., and M. Wissen. 2018. Limits to Capitalist Nature: Theorizing and Overcoming the Imperial Mode of Living. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, U., B. Muraca, E. Pineault, M. Sahakian, A. Schaffartzik, A. Novy, C. Streissler, et al. 2021. “From Planetary to Societal Boundaries: An Argument for Collectively Defined Self-Limitation.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 17 (1): 264–291. doi:10.1080/15487733.2021.1940754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröckling, U. 2015. The Entrepreneurial Self: Fabricating a New Type of Subject. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. 2021. “Climate Changed Urban Futures: Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene City.” Environmental Politics 30 (1–2): 266–284. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1880713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassegård, C., and H. Thörn. 2018. “Toward a Postapocalyptic Environmentalism? Responses to Loss and Visions of the Future in Climate Activism.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 1 (4): 561–578. doi:10.1177/2514848618793331.
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. 2002. “Geology of Mankind.” Nature 415 (6867): 23. doi:10.1038/415023a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Moor, J. 2022. “Postapocalyptic Narratives in Climate Activism: Their Place and Impact in Five European Cities.” Environmental Politics 31 (6): 927–948. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1959123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deflorian, M. 2021. “Refigurative Politics: Understanding the Volatile Participation of Critical Creatives in Community Gardens, Repair Cafés and Clothing Swaps.” Social Movement Studies 20 (3): 346–363. doi:10.1080/14742837.2020.1773250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. 2015. “Facing Up to the Democratic Recession.” Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 141–155. doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, A. 2022. Rising Fascism in America. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. 2013. “Political Theory in a Closed World: Reflections on William Ophuls, Liberalism and Abundance.” Environmental Values 22 (2): 241–259. doi:10.3197/096327113X13581561725275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., A. Karvonen, and R. Raven, eds. 2016. The Experimental City. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 2021. Truth and Post-Truth in Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. 2009. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Winchester: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2015. “Legitimation Crisis? On the Political Contradictions of Financialized Capitalism.” Critical Historical Studies 2 (2): 157–189. doi:10.1086/683054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2017. “Progressive Neoliberalism Versus Reactionary Populism: A Hobson’s Choice.” In The Great Regression, edited by H. Geiselberger, 40–48. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2019. The Old Is Dying and the New Cannot Be Born: From Progressive Neoliberalism to Trump and Beyond. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., and L. Monticelli. 2021. “Progressive Neoliberalism Isn’t the Solution: We Need a Radical Counter-Hegemonic and Anti-capitalist Alliance: A Conversation With Nancy Fraser.” Emancipations 1 (1): Art. 2, 18 pages. doi:10.54718/QFGQ4498.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, E. 1972. “A Blueprint for Survival.” The Ecologist 2 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. 2007. Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion, and Desire. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, L. 2000. “Ecological Resilience – In Theory and Application.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31 (1): 425–439. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425.
   Google Scholar
• Guterres, A. 2021. Secretary-General’s Address to the General Assembly. New York: United Nations. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2021-09-21/secretary-general%E2%80%99s-address-the-general-assembly
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1987. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausknost, D. 2020. “The Environmental State and the Glass Ceiling of Transformation.” Environmental Politics 29 (1): 17–37. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1680062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinberg, R. 2007. Peak Everything: Waking up to the Century of Declines. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2012. “Brutalization of the Social Conflict: Struggles for Recognition in the Early 21st Century.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 13 (1): 5–19. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2012.648736.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2018. Summary for Policymakers of IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C Approved by Governments. Geneva: IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/11/pr_181008_P48_spm_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2022. “Summary for Policymakers.” In Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, edited by H.-O. Pörtner, 3–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. 2021. Post Growth: Life After Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G. 2019. Limits: Why Malthus Was Wrong and Why Environmentalists Should Care. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G., and H. March. 2015. “Imaginaries of Hope: The Utopianism of Degrowth.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (2): 360–368. doi:10.1080/00045608.2014.973803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, P. 1984. Fighting for Hope. London: Chatto and Windus.
   Google Scholar
• Kousis, M., and M. Paschou. 2017. “Alternative Forms of Resilience. A Typology of Approaches for the Study of Citizen Collective Responses in Hard Economic Times.” Partecipazione e Conflitto 10: 136–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regine. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lauermann, J. 2018. “Municipal Statecraft: Revisiting the Geographies of the Entrepreneurial City.” Progress in Human Geography 42 (2): 205–224. doi:10.1177/0309132516673240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessenich, S. 2019. Living Well at Others’ Expense: The Hidden Cost of Western Prosperity. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lilla, M. 2017. The Once and Future Liberal: After Identity Politics. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1989. Ecological Communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1996. Protest: Systemtheorie und soziale Bewegungen (Protest: System Theory and Social Movements). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp
   Google Scholar
• Lührmann, A., and S. Lindberg. 2019. “A Third Wave of Autocratization Is Here: What Is New About It?” Democratization 26 (7): 1095–1113. doi:10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lütjen, T. 2022. “The Anti-Authoritarian Revolt: Right-Wing Populism as Self-Empowerment?” European Journal of Social Theory 25 (1): 75–93. doi:10.1177/13684310211027113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, S. 2021. “Finding Transformative Potential in the Cracks? The Ambiguities of Urban Environmental Activism in a Neoliberal City.” Social Movement Studies 20 (3): 329–345. doi:10.1080/14742837.2019.1677224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchart, O. 2007. Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, P. 2015. Post-Capitalism: A Guide to Our Future. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, J., T. Rahman, and M. Somer. 2018. “Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities.” American Behavioral Scientist 62 (1): 16–42. doi:10.1177/0002764218759576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. 1989. Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. 2015. Engaging the Everyday: Environmental Social Criticism and the Resonance Dilemma. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., and J. Kersten, eds. 2016. The Greening of Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Rommel, F., and T. Poguntke. 1990. New Politics in Europe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, D. 2019. The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity. London: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, D. 2022. The War on the West: How to Prevail in the Age of Unreason. London: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, D., N. Adger, and K. Brown. 2007. “Adaptation to Environmental Change: Contributions of a Resilience Framework.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32 (1): 395–419. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ophuls, W., and S. Boyan. 1992. Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity Revisited: The Unravelling of the American Dream. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Paech, N. 2012. Liberation from Excess: The Road to a Post-Growth Economy. Munich: Oekom.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. [1944] 2001. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2020. The Society of Singularities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2021. The End of Illusions: Politics, Economy, and Culture in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F. Chapin, E. Lambin, T. Lenton, et al. 2009. “Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Ecology and Society 14 (2): 32. doi:10.5751/ES-03180-140232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. 2015. Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S. 2001. “Sustainable Development: Rescue Operation for a Dying Illusion.” In There Is an Alternative: Subsistence and Worldwide Resistance to Corporate Globalization, edited by V. Bennholdt-Thomsen, N. Faraclas, and C. von Werlhof, 41–54. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D., and L. Craven. 2019. Sustainable Materialism: Environmental Movements and the Politics of Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1999. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Shearman, D., and J. Smith. 2007. The Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, B., and I. Wandel. 2006. “Adaptation, Adaptive Capacity, and Vulnerability.” Global Environmental Change 16 (3): 282–292. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spengler, O. (1922) 1991. The Decline of the West. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., J. Rockström, K. Richardson, T. Lenton, C. Folke, D. Liverman, C. Summerhayes, et al. 2018. “Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (33): 8252–8259. doi:10.1073/pnas.1810141115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. 2014. Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. 2016. How Will Capitalism End? London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Touraine, A. 1981. The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Reybrouck, D. 2016. Against Elections: The Case for Democracy. London: The Bodley Head.
   Google Scholar
• Wainwright, J., and G. Mann. 2013. “Climate Leviathan.” Antipode 45 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01018.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westman, L., and V. Castán Broto. 2022. “Urban Transformations to Keep All the Same: The Power of Ivy Discourses.” Antipode 54 (4): 1320–1343. doi:10.1111/anti.12820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (WBGU). 2011. World in Transition: A Social Contract for Sustainability. Berlin: WBGU.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. 2010. Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar