Low-tech approaches for sustainability: key principles from the literature and practice

References

• Abrassart, C., F. Jarrige, and D. Bourg. 2020. “Introduction Au Dossier Low-Tech: Low-Tech et Enjeux Écologiques: Quels Potentiels Pour Affronter Les Crises?” [Introduction to the Low-Tech Special Issue: Low-Tech and Ecological Issues: Which Potentials to Face the Crises?] La Pensée Ecologique 5: 1. doi:10.3917/lpe.005.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Agence de la Transition Écologique (ADEME). 2020. Cycle de Conférences 2018: Approche Systémique, Source d’inspiration Des Politiques Publiques? [Conference Series 2018: System Approach as a Source of Inspiration for Public Policy?] Paris: ADEME. https://ile-de-france.ademe.fr/mediatheque/videos/cycle-de-conferences-2018/la-demarche-low-tech-comme-approche-systemique-de-linnovation
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, S., and P. Yacoumis. 2018. “Degrowth, Energy Descent, and ‘Low-Tech’ Living: Potential Pathways for Increased Resilience in Times of Crisis.” Journal of Cleaner Production 197: 1840–1848. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnsperger, C., and D. Bourg. 2016. “Vers Une Économie Authentiquement Circulaire – Réflexions Sur Les Fondements d’un Indicateur de Circularité” [Towards a Genuinely Circular Economy – Reflections on the Foundations of a Circularity Indicator]. Revue de l‘OFCE 145 (1): 91–125. doi:10.3917/reof.145.0091.
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens, T., M. Hekkert, and J. Kirchherr. 2020. “Circular Futures: What Will They Look like?” Ecological Economics 175: 106703. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bihouix, P. 2014. L’âge Des Low Tech: Vers Une Civilisation Techniquement Soutenable [The Low-Tech Era: Towards a Technically Sustainable Civilization.] Paris: Editions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Bocken, N., S. Short, P. Rana, and S. Evans. 2014. “A Literature and Practice Review to Develop Sustainable Business Model Archetypes.” Journal of Cleaner Production 65: 42–56. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calame, M., and C. Mouchet. 2020. “Quelles Techniques Pour l’agriculture Écologique?” [Which Techniques for Ecological Agriculture?] La Pensée Ecologique 5: 2. doi:10.3917/lpe.005.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Calisto Friant, M., W. Vermeulen, and R. Salomone. 2020. “A Typology of Circular Economy Discourses: Navigating the Diverse Visions of a Contested Paradigm.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 161: 104917. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrey, M., and S. Lachaize. 2020. “La Recherche Scientifique En Low-Tech : Définition, Réflexions Sur Les Pistes Possibles, et Illustration Avec Un Projet de Métallurgie Solaire” [Low-Tech Scientific Research: Definition, Reflections on Possible Paths, and Illustration with a Solar Metallurgy Project]. La Pensée Ecologique 5: 7. doi:10.3917/lpe.005.0007.
   Google Scholar
• De Decker, K. 2017. “Comment Bâtir Un Internet Low Tech” [How to Build a Low-Tech Internet]. Techniques & Culture 67: 216–235. doi:10.4000/tc.8489.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, M., S. Joss, D. Schraven, C. Zhan, and M. Weijnen. 2015. “Sustainable–Smart–Resilient–Low Carbon–Eco–Knowledge Cities: Making Sense of a Multitude of Concepts Promoting Sustainable Urbanization.” Journal of Cleaner Production 109: 25–38. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., and L.-E. Gadde. 2002. “Systematic Combining: An Abductive Approach to Case Research.” Journal of Business Research 55 (7): 553–560. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, M., J. Cavé, and A. Pierrat. 2019. “Quand Le Low-Tech Fait Ses Preuves: La Gestion Des Déchets Dans Les Pays Du Sud Technologie Pour Les Pauvres Ou Sobriété Écologique?” [When Low-Tech Proves Its Worth: Waste Management in the South Technology for the Poor or Ecological Sobriety?]. Urbanités 12: 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Florentin, D., and C. Ruggeri. 2019. “Ville (S)Low Tech et Quête d’une Modernité Écologique” [(S)Low Tech City and the Quest for an Ecological Modernity]. Urbanités 12: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaud, E., Y. Philippe, and D. Vidal. 2017. “Low Tech, High Tech, Wild Tech: Réinventer La Technologie?” [Low Tech, High Tech, Wild Tech: Reinventing Technology?]. Techniques & Culture 67: 12–29. doi:10.4000/tc.8464.
   Google Scholar
• Haudeville, B., and C. Le Bas. 2016. “L’Innovation Frugale: Une Nouvelle Opportunité Pour Les Économies En Développement?” [Frugal Innovation: A New Opportunity for Developing Economies?]. Mondes En Développement 173 (1): 11–28. doi:10.3917/med.173.0011.
   Google Scholar
• Hector, P., and A. Botero. 2022. “Generative Repair: Everyday Infrastructuring Between DIY Citizen Initiatives and Institutional Arrangements.” CoDesign 18 (4): 399–415. doi:10.1080/15710882.2021.1912778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, M., C. Li, and A. Molina. 2015. “The Emergence and Spread of Ecourban Neighbourhoods Around the World.” Sustainability 7 (9): 11418–11437. doi:10.3390/su70911418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurson, L. 2019. De La Démesure à La Juste Mesure: Le Low-Tech, Entre Confort et Volonté de Changer [From Excess to Appropriate Balance: Low-Tech, Between Comfort and Will to Change]. Grenoble: Dépôt Universitaire de Mémoires Aprés Soutenance. https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01996417.
   Google Scholar
• Illich, I. 1973. Tools for Conviviality. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Jaglin, S. 2019. “Basses Technologies et Services Urbains En Afrique Subsaharienne : Un Low-Tech Loin de l’écologie.” [Low-Tech and Urban Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Low-Tech Far from Ecology]. Urbanités 12: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kerschner, C., and M.-H. Ehlers. 2016. “A Framework of Attitudes Towards Technology in Theory and Practice.” Ecological Economics 126: 139–151. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerschner, C., P. Wächter, L. Nierling, and M.-H. Ehlers. 2018. “Degrowth and Technology: Towards Feasible, Viable, Appropriate and Convivial Imaginaries.” Journal of Cleaner Production 197: 1619–1636. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchherr, J., D. Reike, and M. Hekkert. 2017. “Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 127: 221–232. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepawsky, J. 2020. “Planet of Fixers? Mapping the Middle Grounds of Independent and Do-It-Yourself Information and Communication Technology Maintenance and Repair.” Geo: Geography and Environment 7 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1002/geo2.86.
   Google Scholar
• Low-Tech Lab. 2022. Low-Techs for a Sustainable and Desirable Society! Concarneau: Low-Tech Lab. https://lowtechlab.org/en
   Google Scholar
• Luederitz, C., D. Lang, and H. Von Wehrden. 2013. “A Systematic Review of Guiding Principles for Sustainable Urban Neighborhood Development.” Landscape and Urban Planning 118: 40–52. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. 1943. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review 50 (4): 370–396. doi:10.1037/h0054346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Max-Neef, M. 1991. Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections. New York: Apex Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty, P., and D. Honnery. 2008. “Low-Mobility: The Future of Transport.” Futures 40 (10): 865–872. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2008.07.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit-Boix, A., and S. Leipold. 2018. “Circular Economy in Cities: Reviewing How Environmental Research Aligns with Local Practices.” Journal of Cleaner Production 195: 1270–1281. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radjou, N., and J. Prabhu. 2015. Frugal Innovation: How to Do More with Less. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F. Chapin, E. Lambin, T. Lenton, et al. 2009. “Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Ecology and Society 14 (2): 32. doi:10.5751/ES-03180-140232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussilhe, G. 2020. “Une Erreur de Tech” [A Tech Mistake]. https://gauthierroussilhe.com/articles/une-erreur-de-tech
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, F. 1973. Small is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered. London: Blond & Briggs.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2005. “The Alternative Technology Movement: An Analysis of Its Framing and Negotiation of Technology Development.” Research in Human Ecology 12 (2): 106–119.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., T. Hargreaves, S. Hielscher, M. Martiskainen, and G. Seyfang. 2016. “Making the Most of Community Energies: Three Perspectives on Grassroots Innovation.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (2): 407–432. doi:10.1177/0308518X15597908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., K. Richardson, J. Rockström, S. Cornell, I. Fetzer, M. Elena, R. Biggs, et al. 2015. “Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet.” Science 347 (6223): 1259855. doi:10.1126/science.1259855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwaris, R., K. Kalogerakis, and C. Herstatt. 2014. “Frugal Innovation and Analogies: Some Propositions for Product Development in Emerging Economies.” In Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference, Stuttgart, June 3–6. doi:10.15480/882.1173.
   Google Scholar
• Vetter, A. 2018. “The Matrix of Convivial Technology – Assessing Technologies for Degrowth.” Journal of Cleaner Production 197: 1778–1786. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). 1987. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/139811.
   Google Scholar