Experimental climate governance as organized irresponsibility? A case for revamping governing (also) through government

References

• Arcidiacono, D., F. Barbera, and A. Bowman. 2022. Foundational Economy. The Infrastructure of Everyday Life. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1992. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, edited by R. Beiner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bärnthaler, R., A. Novy, and B. Stadelmann. 2020. “A Polanyi-Inspired Perspective on Social-Ecological Transformations of Cities.” Journal of Urban Affairs 4 (2): 1–25. doi:10.1080/07352166.2020.1834404.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1988. Gegengifte: Die organisierte Unverantwortlichkeit [Antidotes: Organized Irresponsibility]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, M. 2010. All That Is Solid Melts into Air. The Experience of Modernity. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. 2016. “Governance and Modernist Social Science: A Genealogy.” In Rethinking Governance: Ruling, Rationalities and Resistance, edited by M. Bevir and R. Rhodes, 25–33. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, W. [1765] 1979. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. 2023. “Recreational Experimentalism at ‘the Abyss’: Rethinking the Sustainability Crisis and Experimental Policies.” Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 19: 2155439. doi:10.1080/15487733.2022.2155439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I., F. Butzlaff, and M. Haderer. 2022. “Emancipatory Politics at Its Limits? An Introduction.” European Journal of Social Theory 25 (1): 3–25. doi:10.1177/13684310211048116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandtner, C., M. Höllerer, R. Meyer, and M. Kornberger. 2017. “Enacting Governance Through Strategy: A Comparative Study of Governance Configurations in Sydney and Vienna.” Urban Studies 54 (5): 1075–1091. doi:10.1177/0042098015624871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley H., L. Mai, S. Marvin, K. McCormick, and Y. Palgan, eds. 2018. Urban Living Labs. Experimenting With City Futures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. 2016. Accomplishing Climate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. 2021. “Climate Changed Urban Futures: Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene City.” Environmental Politics 30 (1–2): 266–284. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1880713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., and V. Castán Broto. 2013. “Government by Experiment? Global Cities and the Governing of Climate Change.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38 (3): 361–375. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., V. Castán Broto, and E. Gareth. 2015. An Urban Politics of Climate Change: Experimentation and the Governing of Socio-Technical Transitions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., S. Marvin, Y. Palgan, K. McCormick, M. Breitfuss-Loidl, L. Mai, T. von Wirth, and N. Frantzeskaki. 2019. “Urban Living Laboratories: Conducting the Experimental City?” European Urban and Regional Studies 26 (4): 317–335. doi:10.1177/0969776418787222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., and H. Schroeder. 2012. “Beyond State/Non-state Divides: Global Cities and the Governing of Climate Change.” European Journal of International Relations 18 (4): 743–766. doi:10.1177/1354066111413308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. “The Condition of Urban Experimentation.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butzlaff, F. 2019. “Smart Cities.” In Handbuch Digitalisierung in Staat und Verwaltung [Handbook of Digitization in State and Administration], edited by T. Klenk, F. Nullmeier, and G. Wewer, 1–10. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, A., and R. Duvall. 2014. “Sovereignty and Sovereign Power.” International Theory 6 (2): 191–223. doi:10.1017/S1752971914000049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., and K. Morgan. 2020. “Evolving Geographies of Innovation: Existing Paradigms, Critiques and Possible Alternatives.” Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography 74 (1): 13–24. doi:10.1080/00291951.2019.1692065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, B., R. Snell, and S. McGuire. 2016. Concepts of Nature: Ancient and Modern. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Covenant of Mayors – Europe. 2021. “Commitment Statements for Signatories.” European Commisson. https://eu-mayors.ec.europa.eu/en/node/379
   Google Scholar
• Critchley, S. 2012. “Is There a Normative Deficit in the Theory of Hegemony?” In Laclau: A Critical Reader, edited by S. Critchley and O. Marchart, 113–122. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, K., L. Coenen, M. Acuto, and B. Gleeson. 2019. “Reconfiguring Urban Governance in an Age of Rising City Networks: A Research Agenda.” Urban Studies 56 (16): 3540–3555. doi:10.1177/0042098018816010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1990. “Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority.” Cardozo Law Review 11 (5–6): 920–1046.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 2016. “The Public and Its Problems.” In An Essay in Political Inquiry, edited by. M. Rogers. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. 2021. “Greening States and Societies: From Transitions to Great Transformations.” Environmental Politics 30 (1–2): 245–265. doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1810890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. 2016. “Trials and Tribulations: Problematizing the City Through/as Urban Experimentation.” Geography Compass 10 (10): 429–443. doi:10.1111/gec3.12280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., and A. Karvonen. 2014. “Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Lower Your Carbon Footprint!’ – Urban Laboratories and the Governance of Low-Carbon Futures.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (2): 413–430. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., A. Karvonen, and R. Raven. 2016. The Experimental City. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flatscher, M., and F. Pistrol. 2021. “Aporien demokratischer Urteilskraft: Ein Streitgespräch zwischen Arendt und Derrida [Aporias of Democratic Judgment: A Dispute between Arendt and Derrida].” Unpublished Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2019. “Socio-Technical Transitions to Sustainability: A Review of Criticisms and Elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 39: 187–201. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernert, M., H. El Bilali, and C. Strassner. 2018. “Grassroots Initiatives as Sustainability Transition Pioneers: Implications and Lessons for Urban Food Systems.” Urban Science 2 (1): 23. doi:10.3390/urbansci2010023.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. 2003. “The Twilight of Vanguardism.” Keynote Address at “History Matters: Social Movements Past, Present, and Future,” New School for Social Research, May 3. https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/david-graeber-the-twilight-of-vanguardism.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. 2010. Ignorance and Surprise: Science, Society, and Ecological Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groß, M., and W. Krohn. 2005. “Society as Experiment: Sociological Foundations for a Self-Experimental Society.” History of the Human Sciences 18 (2): 63–86. doi:10.1177/0952695105054182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberl, H.,. D. Wiedenhofer, D. Virág, G. Kalt, B. Plank, P. Brockway, et al. 2020. “A Systematic Review of the Evidence on Decoupling of GDP, Resource Use and GHG Emissions, Part II: Synthesizing the Insights.” Environmental Research Letters 15 (6): 065003. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haderer, M. 2022. “Does Emancipation Devour Its Children? Beyond a Stalled Dialectic of Emancipation.” European Journal of Social Theory 25 (1): 172–188. doi:10.1177/13684310211028382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haderer, M. 2023. Rebuilding Cities and Citizens: Mass Housing in Red Vienna and Cold War Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.5117/9789463724944.
   Google Scholar
• Haggart, B., N. Tusikov, and J. Scholte. 2021. Power and Authority in Internet Governance: Return of the State? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2003. “Policy without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void.” Policy Sciences 36 (2): 175–195. doi:10.1023/A:1024834510939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., M. Nilsson, K. Raworth, P. Bakker, F. Berkhout, Y. De Boer, J. Rockström, et al. 2015. “Beyond Cockpit-ism: Four Insights to Enhance the Transformative Potential of the Sustainable Development Goals.” Sustainability 7 (2): 1651–1660. doi:10.3390/su7021651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson, I. 2018. “The Socio-Spatial Politics of Urban Sustainability Transitions: Grassroots Initiatives in Gentrifying Peckham.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 29: 34–46. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausknost, D. 2014. “Decision, Choice, Solution: ‘Agentic Deadlock’ in Environmental Politics.” Environmental Politics 23 (3): 357–375. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.874138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., K. Hyvönen, S. Laakso, L. Päivi, K. Matschoss, and I. Mikkonen. 2017. “Adoption and Use of Low-Carbon Technologies: Lessons from 100 Finnish Pilot Studies, Field Experiments and Demonstrations.” Sustainability 9 (5): 847. doi:10.3390/su9050847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickel, J., and G. Kallis. 2020. “Is Green Growth Possible?” New Political Economy 25 (4): 469–486. doi:10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T. [1651] 2012. Leviathan, edited by R. Tuck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M. 2011. Climate Governance at the Crossroads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, B. 2017. Public Things: Democracy in Disrepair. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, M., and I. Farías. 2017. “Sourcing Newness: Ways of Inducing Indeterminacy.” Journal of Cultural Economy 10 (5): 434–449. doi:10.1080/17530350.2017.1326969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2018. “Summary for Policymakers of IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C Approved by Governments.” IPCC Press Release, October. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/11/pr_181008_P48_spm_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G., and H. March. 2015. “Imaginaries of Hope: The Utopianism of Degrowth.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (2): 360–368. doi:10.1080/00045608.2014.973803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A. 2018. The City of Permanent Experiments? Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, L. 2015. “James Scott, Seeing Like a State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Contemporary Political Theory, edited by Jacob T. Levy (online edn, 10 Dec 2015). Oxford Academic. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.013.35.
   Google Scholar
• Küppers, A. 2022. “‘Climate-Soviets,’ ‘Alarmism,’ and ‘Eco-Dictatorship’: The Framing of Climate Change Skepticism by the Populist Radical Right Alternative for Germany.” German Politics, Published online March 29. doi:10.1080/09644008.2022.2056596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, M., and T. Brunila. 2021. “A Political Ontology of the Pandemic: Sovereign Power and the Management of Affects Through the Political Ontology of War.” Frontiers in Political Science 3. doi:10.3389/fpos.2021.674076.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levitas, R. 2011. The Concept of Utopia. Oxford: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F. 2018. “Republicanism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/republicanism.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, A. 2019. “Changing the Story? The Discourse of Ecological Modernisation in the European Union.” Environmental Politics 28 (2): 208–227. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1549780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magistrat der Stadt Wien [Magistrate of the City of Vienna], Ed. 2022. Smart Klima City Strategie Wien: Der Weg zur Klimamusterstadt [Smart Climate City Strategy Vienna: The Way to the Climate Model City]. Vienna: City of Vienna. https://www.wien.gv.at/spezial/smartklimacitystrategie.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. 2015. Engaging the Everyday: Environmental Social Criticism and the Resonance Dilemma. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. 2023. “Experimentalism and its Alternatives: Toward Viable Strategies for Transformative Change and Sustainability.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 19 (1). doi:10.1080/15487733.2023.2166217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A., and G. Spaargaren. 2000. “Ecological Modernisation Theory in Debate: A Review.” Environmental Politics 9 (1): 17–49. doi:10.1080/09644010008414511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P., P. Pattberg, and H. Schroeder. 2012. “Multiactor Governance and the Environment.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37 (1): 365–387. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-094659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overdevest, C., A. Bleicher, and M. Gross. 2010. “The Experimental Turn in Environmental Sociology: Pragmatism and New Forms of Governance.” In Environmental Sociology: European Perspectives and Interdisciplinary Challenges, edited by M. Gross and H. Heinrichs, 279–294. Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, A. 2021. The Return of the State: Restructuring Britain for the Common Good. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Agenda Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. 2003a. “Republican Freedom and Contestatory Democratization.” In Democracy’s Value, edited by I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cordón, 163–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. 2003b. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philpott, D. 2020. “Sovereignty.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/sovereignty/
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. 2009. “Introduction: Cases of 'What is a Case?” In What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, edited by C. Ragin and H. Becker, 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J. [1762] 2019. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, edited by V. Gourevitch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryghaug, O., and T. Skjølsvold. 2019. “The Role of Experiments and Demonstration Projects in Efforts of Upscaling: An Analysis of Two Projects Attempting to Reconfigure Production and Consumption in Energy and Mobility.” Sustainability 11 (20): 5771. doi:10.3390/su11205771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, F., and L. Bertolini. 2019. “Urban Experimentation as a Politics of Niches.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51 (4): 831–848. doi:10.1177/0308518X19826085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäpke, N., F. Stelzer, G. Caniglia, M. Bergmann, M. Wanner, M. Singer-Brodowski, D. Loorbach et al. 2018. “Jointly Experimenting for Transformation? Shaping Real-World Laboratories by Comparing Them.” GAIA 27 (1): 85–96. doi:10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D. 2019. “From Postmaterialism to Sustainable Materialism: The Environmental Politics of Practice-Based Movements.” Environmental Politics 2019: 1–21. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1587215.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, F. 2020. “Vienna’s GHG Emissions from a Production vs. Consumption-Based Accounting Perspective: A Comparative Analysis.” Social Ecology Working Paper, #183. Vienna: Institute of Social Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G. 2009. The New Economics of Sustainable Consumption: Seeds of Change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G. 2011. The New Economics of Sustainable Consumption: Seeds of Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Strüver, A., R. Saltiel, N. Schlitz, B. Hohmann, T. Höflehner, and B. Grabher. 2021. “A Smart Right to the City Grounding – Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism.” Sustainability 13 (17): 9590. doi:10.3390/su13179590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. 1999. Modernities: A Geohistorical Interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, J. and T. von Wirth. 2021. “Experimentation or Projectification of Urban Change? A Critical Appraisal and Three Steps Forward.” Urban Transformations 3 (1): 8. doi:10.1186/s42854-021-00025-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Urban Innovation Vienna (UIV). n.d. Smart City. Vienna: Urban Innovation Vienna. https://smartcity.wien.gv.at/projekte.
   Google Scholar
• Virág, D., D. Wiedenhofer, W. Haas, H. Haberl, G. Kalt, and F. Krausmann. 2022. “The Stock-Flow-Service Nexus of Personal Mobility in an Urban Context: Vienna, Austria.” Environmental Development 41: 100628. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2021.100628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Wirth, T., L. Fuenfschilling, N. Frantzeskaki, and L. Coenen. 2019. “Impacts of Urban Living Labs on Sustainability Transitions: Mechanisms and Strategies for Systemic Change Through Experimentation.” European Planning Studies 27 (2): 229–257. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voytenko, Y., K. McCormick, J. Evans, and G. Schliwa. 2016. “Urban Living Labs for Sustainability and Low Carbon Cities in Europe: Towards a Research Agenda.” Journal of Cleaner Production 123: 45–54. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainwright, J., and G. Mann. 2020. Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Weibust, I. 2016. Green Leviathan: The Case for a Federal Role in Environmental Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wieviorka, M. 2009. “Case Studies: History or Sociology?” In What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, edited by C. Ragin, 159–172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2014. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar