1,545
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Revisiting the Promises of Eco-Political Experimentation: Achievements, Appropriations, Limits

Experimenting with experimental urbanism: navigating between neoliberal fix and urban glitch

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2186090 | Received 30 Jun 2022, Accepted 26 Feb 2023, Published online: 17 Mar 2023

References

  • Althusser, L. 1971. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. London: Monthly Review Press.
  • Austrian Climate and Energy Funds (ACEF). 2018. “Die Stadt als Labor [The City as Laboratory].” G’scheite G’schichten 11. https://www.klimafonds.gv.at/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/GG-11.18-v1.2.pdf.
  • Bulkeley, H. 2021. “Climate Changed Urban Futures: Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene City.” Environmental Politics 30 (1–2): 266–284. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1880713.
  • Bulkily, H., S. Marvin, Y. Voytenko Palgan, K. McCormick, M. Breitfuss-Loidl, L. Mai, T. von Wirth, and N. Frantzeskaki. 2019. “Urban Living Laboratories: Conducting the Experimental City?” European Urban and Regional Studies 26 (4): 317–335. doi:10.1177/0969776418787222.
  • Bylund, J., J. Riegler, and C. Wrangsten. 2022. “Anticipating Experimentation as the ‘the New Normal’ through Urban Living Labs 2.0: Lessons Learnt by JPI Urban Europe.” Urban Transformations 2022: 4. doi:10.1186/s42854-022-00037-5.
  • Clarke, A. 2005. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Elwood, S. 2021. “Digital Geographies, Feminist Relationality, Black and Queer Code Studies: Thriving Otherwise.” Progress in Human Geography 45 (2): 209–228. doi:10.1177/0309132519899733.
  • Evans, J., A. Karvonen, and R. Raven, Eds. 2016. The Experimental City. London: Routledge.
  • Evans, J., T. Vácha, H. Kok, and K. Watson. 2021. “How Cities Learn: From Experimentation to Transformation.” Urban Planning 6 (1): 171–182. doi:10.17645/up.v6i1.3545.
  • Exner, A., and B. Kratzwald. 2021. Solidarische Ökonomie and Commons: Eine Einführung [Solidarity Economy and Commons: An Introduction]. Vienna: Mandelbaum.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
  • Fraser, N. 2019. The Old is Dying and the New Cannot Be Born. London: Verso.
  • Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press
  • Graw, I., and L. Russell. 2020. Bodies that Glitch: A Conversation between Legacy Russell and Isabelle Graw. https://www.textezurkunst.de/de/articles/graw-russell-bodies-glitch
  • Gruszka, K. 2017. “Framing the Collaborative Economy – Voices of Contestation.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 23: 92–104. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.002.
  • Hay, C. 2002. Political Analysis. London: Red Globe Press.
  • Jessop, B. 1996. “Interpretive Sociology and the Dialectic of Structure and Agency: Reflections on Holmwood and Stewart's explanation and Social Theory.” Theory, Culture & Society 13 (1): 119–128. doi:10.1177/026327696013001006.
  • Jessop, B. 1985. Nicos Poulantzas: Marxist Theory and Political Strategy. London: McMillan.
  • Jessop, B. 2008. State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Lauermann, J. 2018. “Municipal Statecraft: Revisiting the Geographies of the Entrepreneurial City.” Progress in Human Geography 42 (2): 205–224. doi:10.1177/0309132516673240.
  • Lefebvre, H. 1961. “Utopie expérimentale: pour un nouvel urbanisme [Experimental Utopia: For a New Urbanism].” Revue française de sociologie 2–3: 191–198. https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfsoc_0035-2969_1961_num_2_3_5943.
  • Lefebvre, H. 1996. “The Right to the City.” In Writings on Cities, edited by L. Kofman and E. Lebas, 63–181. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Leszczynski, A. 2020. “Glitchy Vignettes of Platform Urbanism.” Environment and Planning D 38 (2): 189–208. doi:10.1177/0263775819878721.
  • Leszczynski, A., and S. Elwood. 2022. “Glitch Epistemologies for Computational Cities.” Dialogues in Human Geography 12 (3): 361–378. doi:10.1177/20438206221129208.
  • Menkman, R. 2010. Glitch Studies Manifesto. http://www.digiart21.org/art/glitch-studies-manifesto.
  • Russell, L. 2013. Prayer? Or Practice? Social Shrines and the Ritualized Performance of Reality in Contemporary Art. https://www.legacyrussell.com/WRITING-RESISTANCE-RESEARCH-LABOR-ATORY
  • Russell, L. 2020. Glitch Feminism: A Manifesto. London: Verso.
  • Sayegh, A., and S. Andreani. 2015. “Embracing the Urban Glitch in Search of the (Extra)Ordinary: A New Paradigm for Smart Cities.” ACADIA 35: 443–450. doi:10.52842/conf.acadia.2015.443.
  • Suitner, J. 2022. “Towards Transformative Change: Die Schlüsselelemente experimenteller Ansätze in der städtischen Klimawandelanpassung erforschen [Toward Transformative Change: Researching the Key Elements of Experimental Approaches in Urban Climate Change Adaptation].” Der Öffentliche Sektor – The Public Sector 47: 53–64. doi:10.34749/oes.2021.4608.
  • Sum, N.-L., and B. Jessop. 2013. Towards a Cultural Political Economy Putting Culture in Its Place in Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Torrens, J., and T. von Wirth. 2021. “Experimentation or Projectification of Urban Change?” Urban Transformations 3. doi:10.1186/s42854-021-00025-1.