Exploring sufficiency in energy policy: insights from Sweden

References

• Alcott, B. 2008. “The Sufficiency Strategy: Would Rich-world Frugality Lower Environmental Impact.” Ecological Economics 64 (4): 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, J. 2019. “Carbon Taxes and CO2 Emissions: Sweden as a Case Study.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 11 (4): 1–30. doi:10.1257/pol.20170144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoldi, P. 2022. “Policies for Energy Conservation and Sufficiency: Review of Existing Policies and Recommendations for New and Effective Policies in OECD Countries.” Energy and Buildings 264: 112075. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112075.
   Google Scholar
• British Petroleum (BP). 2022. Statistical Review of World Energy. London: BP.
   Google Scholar
• Brischke, L., L. Leuser, C. Baedeker, F. Lehmann, and S. Thomas. 2015. “Energy Sufficiency in Private Households Enabled by Adequate Appliances.” Proceedings of the European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy Summer Study 2015: 1571–1582.
   Google Scholar
• Brockway, P., S. Sorrell, G. Semieniuk, M. Kuperus Heun, and V. Court. 2021. “Energy Efficiency and Economy-wide Rebound Effects: A Review of the Evidence and Its Implications.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 141: 110781. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, W. 2020. “Energy-sufficiency for a Just Transition: A Systematic Review.” Energies 13 (10): 2444. doi:10.3390/en13102444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callmer, Å., and K. Bradley. 2021. “In Search of Sufficiency Politics: The Case of Sweden.” Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 17 (1): 194–208. doi:10.1080/15487733.2021.1926684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross-Party Committee on Environmental Objectives (CPCEO). 2016a. Ett Klimatpolitiskt Ramverk För Sverige [A Climate Policy Framework for Sweden]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Cross-Party Committee on Environmental Objectives (CPCEO). 2016b. En Klimat- Och Luftvårdsstrategi För Sverige [A Climate and Air-protection Strategy for Sweden]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Creutzig, F., J. Roy, W. Lamb, I. Azevedo, W. Bruine de Bruin, H. Dalmann, O. Edelenbosch, et al. 2018. “Towards Demand-side Solutions for Mitigating Climate Change.” Nature Climate Change 8 (4): 260–263. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creutzig, F., L. Niamir, X. Bai, M. Callaghan, J. Cullen, J. Díaz-José, M. Figueroa, et al. 2022. “Demand-side Solutions to Climate Change Mitigation Consistent with High Levels of Well-being.” Nature Climate Change 12 (1): 36–46. doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01219-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Small Energy Players (CSEP). 2018. Mindre Aktörer i Energilandskapet [Smaller Players in the Energy Landscape]. Stockholm: CSEP.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, H. 1977. Steady State Economics: The Economics of Biophysical and Moral Growth. San Francisco, CA: W.F. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Darby, S. 2007. Enough Is as Good as a Feast—Sufficiency as Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Centre for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Darby, S., and T. Fawcett. 2018. Energy Sufficiency: An Introduction. Stockholm: European Council for Energy Efficient Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Della Valle, N., and P. Bertoldi. 2022. “Promoting Energy Efficiency: Barriers, Societal Needs and Policies.” Frontiers in Energy Research 9: 804091. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2021.804091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Gulio, A., and D. Fuchs. 2014. “Sustainable Consumption Corridors: Concept, Objections, and Responses.” GAIA 23 (3): 184–192. doi:10.14512/gaia.23.S1.6.
   Google Scholar
• Economidou, M., M. Ringel, M. Valentova, L. Castellazzi, P. Zancanella, P. Zangheri, T. Serrenho, D. Paci, and P. Bertoldi. 2022. “Strategic Energy and Climate Policy Planning: Lessons Learned from European Energy Efficiency Policies.” Energy Policy 171: 113225. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). 2003. Directive 200396/EC Restructuring the Community Framework for the Taxation of Energy Products and Electricity. Brussels: EU.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). 2006. Directive 2006/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Energy End-use Efficiency and Energy Services. Brussels: EU.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). 2009. Directive 2009/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources. Brussels: EU.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). 2012. Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on Energy Efficiency. Brussels: EU.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). 2018a. Directive 2018/2002/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 2012/27/EU on Energy Efficiency. Brussels: EU.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). 2018b. Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action. Brussels: EU.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). 2021. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Energy Efficiency (Recast). Brussels: EU.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). 2022a. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: EU: “Save Energy .” Brussels: EU.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). 2022b. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions REPowerEU Plan. Brussels: EU.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). 2023. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Energy Efficiency (Recast) – Analysis of the Final Compromise Text with a View to Agreement. Brussels: EU.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2020. Environmental Tax Statistics. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
   Google Scholar
• Explanatory Memorandum. 2013. Plan for Implementation of Article 7 of the Energy Efficiency Directive, N2013/5035/E. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Explanatory Memorandum. 2021. Direktivet om Energieffektivitet [Directive on Energy Efficiency], 2020/21:FPM:134. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Figge, F., W. Young, and R. Barkemeyer. 2014. “Sufficiency or Efficiency to Achieve Lower Resource Consumption and Emissions? The Role of the Rebound Effect.” Journal of Cleaner Production 69: 216–224. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossil Free Transport Committee (FFTC). 2013. Fossilfrihet på Väg [Fossil Freedom on the Way], SOU 2013:84. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, O., and P. Brockway. 2023. “Much Broader than Health: Surveying the Diverse Co-benefits of Energy Demand Reduction in Europe.” Energy Research & Social Science 95: 102890. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire-González, J. 2020. “Energy Taxation Policies Can Counteract the Rebound Effect: Analysis within a General Equilibrium Framework.” Energy Efficiency 13 (1): 69–78. doi:10.1007/s12053-019-09830-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzsche, K., S. Niehoff, and G. Beier. 2018. “Industry 4.0 and Climate Change–Exploring the Science-policy Gap.” Sustainability 10 (12): 4511. doi:10.3390/su10124511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossen, M., F. Ziesemer, and U. Schrader. 2019. “Why and How Commercial Marketing Should Promote Sufficient Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Macromarketing 39 (3): 252–269. doi:10.1177/0276146719866238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubler, A., C. Wilson, N. Bento, B. Boza-Kiss, V. Krev, D. McCollum, N. Rao, et al. 2018. “A Low Energy Demand Scenario for Meeting the 1.5 °C Target and Sustainable Development Goals without Negative Emission Technologies.” Nature Energy 3 (6): 515–527. doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 2016. “The Swedish Administrative Model.” In The Oxford Handbook of Swedish Politics, edited by J. Pierre, 299–314. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickel, J., P. Brockway, G. Kallis, L. Keyßer, M. Lenzen, A. Slameršak, J. Steinberger, and D. Ürge-Vorsatz. 2021. “Urgent Need for Post-growth Climate Mitigation Scenarios.” Nature Energy 6 (8): 766–768. doi:10.1038/s41560-021-00884-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotta, Y., T. Tasaki, and R. Koide. 2021. “Expansion of Policy Domain of Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP): Challenges and Opportunities for Policy Design.” Sustainability 13 (12): 6763. doi:10.3390/su13126763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)). 2019. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn: IPBES.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2022. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C., G. Goggins, I. Røpke, and F. Fahy. 2019. “Achieving Sustainability Transitions in Residential Energy Use across Europe: The Importance of Problem Framings.” Energy Policy 133: 110927. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110927.
   Google Scholar
• Jungell-Michelsson, J., and P. Heikkurinen. 2022. “Sufficiency: A Systematic Literature Review.” Ecological Economics 195: 107380. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M. 2021. “Sweden’s Climate Act.” Climate Policy 21 (9): 1132–1145. doi:10.1080/14693062.2021.1922339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M., E. Alfredsson, and N. Westling. 2020. “Climate Policy Co-benefits: A Review.” Climate Policy 20 (3): 292–316. doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1724070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorek, S., and D. Fuchs. 2013. “Strong Sustainable Consumption Governance: A Precondition for a Degrowth Path?” Journal of Cleaner Production 38: 36–43. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D., D. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. Behrens. 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• Millward-Hopkins, J., J. Steinberger, N. Rao, and Y. Oswald. 2020. “Providing Decent Living with Minimum Energy: A Global Scenario.” Global Environmental Change 65: 102168. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP). 2020. Sweden’s Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan. Stockholm: NECP.
   Google Scholar
• National Energy Efficiency Action Plan (NEEAP). 2006. Sweden’s First National Energy Efficiency Action Plan. Stockholm: NEEAP.
   Google Scholar
• National Energy Efficiency Action Plan (NEEAP). 2011. Sweden’s Second National Energy Efficiency Action Plan. Stockholm: NEEAP.
   Google Scholar
• National Energy Efficiency Action Plan (NEEAP). 2014. Sweden’s Third National Energy Efficiency Action Plan. Stockholm: NEEAP.
   Google Scholar
• National Energy Efficiency Action Plan (NEEAP). 2017. Sweden’s Fourth National Energy Efficiency Action Plan. Stockholm: NEEAP.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, D., A. Fanning, W. Lamb, and J. Steinberger. 2018. “A Good Life for All within Planetary Boundaries.” Nature Sustainability 1 (2): 88–95. doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen, T. 2005. The Logic of Sufficiency. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, N., and J. Min. 2018. “Decent Living Standards: Material Prerequisites for Human Wellbeing.” Social Indicators Research 138 (1): 225–244. doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1650-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijnhout, L., and R. Mastini. 2018. Sufficiency: Moving beyond the Gospel of Eco-Efficiency. Brussels: Friends of the Earth Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Samadi, S., M.-C. Gröne, U. Schneidewind, H.-J. Luhmann, J. Venjakob, and B. Best. 2017. “Sufficiency in Energy Scenario Studies: Taking the Potential Benefits of Lifestyle Changes into Account.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 124: 126–134. doi:10.1016/j.​techfore.2016.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, M. 2021. “Sufficiency Transitions: A Review of Consumption Changes for Environmental Sustainability.” Journal of Cleaner Production 293: 126097. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santarius, T., H. Walnum, and C. Aall. 2016. “Introduction: Rebound Research in a Warming World.” In Rethinking Climate and Energy Policies, edited by T. Santarius and H. Walnum, 1–14. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sarasini, S. 2009. “Constituting Leadership via Policy: Sweden as a Pioneer of Climate Change Mitigation.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 14 (7): 635–653. doi:10.1007/s11027-009-9188-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Energy Agency (SEA). 2022. Energiindikatorer 2022 [Energy Indicators 2022]. Stockholm: SEA.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government (SEGOV). 1975. Proposition (1975:30) om Energihushållningen [Governmental Bill (1975:30) on Energy Management]. Stockholm: SEGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government (SEGOV). 2008/2009a. Proposition (2008/09:162). En Sammanhållen Klimat- Och Energipolitik: Klimat [Coherent Climate and Energy Politics: Climate]. Stockholm: SEGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government (SEGOV). 2008/2009b. Proposition (2008/09:163). En Sammanhållen Klimat- Och Energipolitik: Energi [Coherent Climate and Energy Politics: Energy]. Stockholm: SEGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government (SEGOV). 2012/2013. Proposition (2012/13:21). Forskning Och Innovation För Ett Långsiktigt Hållbart Energisystem [Research and Innovation for a Long-term and Sustainable Energy System]. Stockholm: SEGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government (SEGOV). 2013/2014. Proposition (2013/14:174). Genomförande av Energieffektiviseringsdirektivet [Realization of the Energy-efficiency Directive]. Stockholm: SEGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government (SEGOV). 2016/2017b. Proposition (2016/17:66). Forskning Och Innovation på Energiområdet För Ekologisk Hållbarhet, Konkurrenskraft Och Försörjningstrygghet [Research and Innovation in the Energy Field for Ecological Sustainability,Competitiveness and Security of Supply]. Stockholm: SEGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government (SEGOV). 2016/2017a. Proposition (2016/17:146). Ett Klimatpolitiskt Ramverk För Sverige [A Climate Policy Framework for Sweden]. Stockholm: SEGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government SEGOV) 2017/2018. Proposition (2017/18:228). Energipolitikens Inriktning [The Orientation of Energy Politics]. Stockholm: SEGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government (SEGOV). 2018. Swedish Legislation – How Laws Are Made. Stockholm: SEGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government (SEGOV). 2019/2020. Proposition (2019/20:65). En Samlad Politik För Klimatet – Klimatpolitisk Handlingsplan[A Unified Policy for the Climate – Climate Policy Action Plan]. Stockholm: SEGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government (SEGOV). 2020/2021a. Proposition (2020/21:65). Tillfällig Utvidgning av Statligt Stöd Genom Nedsatt Energiskatt [Temporary Extension of State Support through Energy-tax Deduction]. Stockholm: SEGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government (SEGOV). 2020/2021b. Proposition (2020/21:97). Slopad Nedsättning av Energiskatt på Bränslen i Vissa Sektorer [Abolition of Energy-tax Deductions on Fuel in Certain Sectors]. Stockholm: SEGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government (SEGOV). 2021/2022. Proposition (2021/22:84) Sänkt Energiskatt på Bensin Och Diesel [Reduced Energy Tax on Petrol and Diesel]. Stockholm: SEGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA). 2022. Fördjupad Analys av Den Svenska Klimatomställningen 2021 [In-Depth Analysis of the Swedish Climate Transformation 2021]. Stockholm: SEPA.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Code of Statues (SFS). 1990. Lagen (1990:582) om Koldioxidskatt [Law on Carbon Taxation]. Stockholm: Swedish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Code of Statues (SFS). 1994. Lag (1994:1776) om Skatt på Energi [Law on Energy Taxation]. Stockholm: Swedish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Code of Statues (SFS). 2021. Förordning (2021:1078) om Fastställande av Omräknat Belopp För Energiskatt på Elektrisk Kraft För år 2022 [Ordinance on Determining the Recalculated Value of Energy Taxation on Electric Power for the Year 2022]. Stockhom: Swedish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrell, S. 2018. Energy Sufficiency and Rebound Effects. Brussels: European Council for an Energy Efficiency Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Spangenberg, J., and S. Lorek. 2019. “Sufficiency and Consumer Behavior: From Theory to Policy.” Energy Policy 129: 1070–1079. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2021a. Totala Miljöskatter i Sverige 1993–2020 [Total Environmental Taxes in Sweden 1993–2020]. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2021b. Totala Utsläpp av Växthusgaser Efter Växthusgas, Sektor Och år [Total Emissions of Greenhouse Gases according to Greenhouse Gas, Sector and Year]. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Energy Commission (SWEC). 2017. Kraftsamling För Framtidens Energi [Power Pool for Future Energy]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government Communication. 2015/2016. Kontrollstation För de Klimat Och Energipolitiska Målen till 2020 Samt Klimatanpassning [Control Station of the Climate and Energy Policy Targets for 2020 and Climate Adaptation]. Stockholm: Swedish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government Communication. 2018/2019. Första Kontrollstationen För Energiöverenskommelsen [First Control Station of the Energy Agreement]. Stockholm: Swedish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., L.-A. Brischke, J. Thema, and M. Kopatz. 2015. “Energy Sufficiency Policy: An Evolution of Energy Efficiency Policy or Radically New Approaches?” Proceedings of the European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy Summer Study 2015: 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Toulouse, E., M Le Du, H. Gorge, and L. Semal. 2017. “Stimulating Energy Sufficiency: Barriers and Opportunities.” Proceedings of the European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy Summer Study 2017: 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Tröger, J., and G. Reese. 2021. “Talkin’ Bout a Revolution: An Expert Interview Study Exploring Barriers and Keys to Engender Change towards Societal Sufficiency Orientation.” Sustainability Science 16 (3): 827–840. doi:10.1007/s11625-020-00871-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tvinnereim, E., and M. Mehling. 2018. “Carbon Pricing and Deep Decarbonisation.” Energy Policy 121: 185–189. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadovics, E., and L. Živčič. 2019. “Energy Sufficiency: Are We Ready for It? An Analysis of Sustainable Energy Initiatives and Citizen Visions.” Proceedings of European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy Summer Study 2019: 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• van den Bergh, J. 2011. “Energy Conservation More Effective with Rebound Policy.” Environmental and Resource Economics 48 (1): 43–58. doi:10.1007/s10640-010-9396-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, D., and D. Southerton. 2019. “After Paris: Transitions for Sustainable Consumption.” Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 15 (1): 31–44. doi:10.1080/15487733.2018.1560861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T., H. Schandl, M. Lenzen, and K. Kanemoto. 2015. “The Material Footprint of Nations.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (20): 6271–6276. doi:10.1073/pnas.1220362110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank, n.d. “Population Data Services.” Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Zell-Ziegler, C., J. Thema, B. Best, F. Wiese, J. Lage, A. Schmidt, E. Toulouse, and S. Stagl. 2021. “Enough? The Role of Sufficiency in European Energy and Climate Plans.” Energy Policy 157: 112483. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar