Becoming non-commensurable: synthesis, design, and the politics of urban experimentation in post-Superstorm Sandy New York

References

• Anderson, B. 2012. “Affect and Biopower: Towards a Politics of Life.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00441.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angotti, T. 2010. New York for Sale: Community Planning Confronts Global Real Estate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C. 2022. “The Wicked City: Genealogies of Interdisciplinary Hubris in Urban Thought.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 47 (1): 271–284. doi:10.1111/tran.12483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, C., and G. Bridge. 2016. “The Situations of Urban Inquiry: Thinking Problematically about the City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40 (6): 1186–1204. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello. 2018. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B. 2002. The Intemperate Rainforest: Nature, Culture and Power on Canada’s West Coast. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B. 2015. “From Critique to Experiment? Rethinking Political Ecology for the Anthropocene.” In The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology, edited by T. Perrault, G. Bridge, and J. McCarthy, 102–114. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. 1992. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8 (2): 5–21. doi:10.2307/1511637.
   Google Scholar
• Budds, D. 2019. “What a Hurricane Sandy Recovery Program Can Teach Cities About Resiliency.” Curbed, September 27. https://ny.curbed.com/2019/9/27/20875940/rebuild-by-design-resiliency-hurricane-sandy
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. 2021. “Climate Changed Urban Futures: Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene City.” Environmental Politics 30 (1–2): 266–284. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1880713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. 2023. “The Condition of Urban Climate Experimentation.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 19 (1): 2188726. doi:10.1080/15487733.2023.2188726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., and V. Castán Broto. 2013. “Government by Experiment? Global Cities and the Governing of Climate Change.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38 (3): 361–375. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canguilheim, G. 1994. “The Concept of Life.” In A Vital Rationalist: Selected Writings from Georges Canguilheim, edited by F. Delaporte, 303-320. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N., W. Adams, J. Barry, D. Brockington, B. Büscher, E. Corbera, D. Demeritt, et al. 2014. “Changing the Intellectual Climate.” Nature Climate Change 4 (9): 763–768. doi:10.1038/nclimate2339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. 2016. “Interviews with Rebuild by Design’s Working Group of Experts.” Public Culture 28 (2): 317–350. doi:10.1215/08992363-3451339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, S. 2009. “Topologies of Power: Foucault’s Analysis of Political Government beyond ‘Governmentality’.” Theory, Culture & Society 26 (6): 78–108. doi:10.1177/026327640934769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, S. 2011. Post-Soviet Social: Neoliberalism, Modernity, Biopolitics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, S. 2017. “Neoliberalism and Rule by Experts.” In Assembling Neoliberalism: Expertise, Practices, Subjects, edited by V. Higgins and W. Larner, 23–43. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, S., S. Cox, and K. Grove. 2017. “Rebuilding by Design in Post-Sandy New York.” Limn 5 (7): 8–18. https://limn.it/articles/rebuilding-by-design-in-post-sandy-new-york
   Google Scholar
• Collier, S., and A. Gruendel. 2022. “City Planning, Space-Making and Urban Politics.” Political Geography 97: 102644. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102644.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowley, R., C. Barnett, T. Katzschner, N. Tkacz, and F. De Boeck. 2018. “Forum: Resilience & Design.” Resilience 6 (1): 1–34. doi:10.1080/21693293.2017.1348506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, S., K. Grove, and A. Barnett. 2022. “Design-Driven Resilience and the Limits of Geographic Critique.” The Geographical Journal 188 (2): 294–308. doi:10.1111/geoj.12437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 1982. “Designerly Ways of Knowing.” Design Studies 3 (4): 221–227. doi:10.1016/0142-​694X(82)90040-0.
   Google Scholar
• Dalby, S. 2002. Environmental Security. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delina, L., and A. Janetos. 2018. “Cosmopolitan, Dynamic, and Contested Energy Futures: Navigating the Pluralities and Polarities in the Energy Systems of Tomorrow.” Energy Research & Social Science 35: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derickson, K. 2022. “Disrupting Displacements: Making Knowledges for Futures Otherwise in Gullah/Geechee Nation.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 112 (3): 838–846. doi:10.1080/24694452.2021.1996219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, M. 1996. Politics of Security: Towards a Political Philosophy of Continental Thought. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ehnert, F. 2023. “Review of Research into Urban Experimentation in the Fields of Sustainability Transitions and Environmental Governance.” European Planning Studies 31 (1): 76–102. doi:10.1080/09654313.2022.2070424.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy and the Making of Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Exner, A., and A. Strüver. 2023. “Experimenting With Experimental Urbanism: Navigating Between Neoliberal Fix and Urban Glitch.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 19 (1): 2186090. doi:10.1080/15487733.​2023.​2186090
   Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2013. Hurricane Sandy FEMA After-Action Report. Washington, DC: FEMA.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., L. Pritchard, F. Berkes, J. Colding, and U. Svedin. 2007. “The Problem of Fit between Ecosystems and Institutions: Ten Years Later.” Ecology and Society 12 (1): 30. doi:10.5751/ES-02064-120130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkers, A. 2016. “Daring the Truth: Foucault, Parrhesia and the Genealogy of Critique.” Theory, Culture & Society 33 (1): 3–28. doi:10.1177/0263276414558885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1989. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2003. “Society Must Be Defended:” Lectures at the College de France, 1976–1977. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977–1978. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2008. Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Giganti, P., and P. Falcone. 2022. “Strategic Niche Management for Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review.” Sustainability 14 (3): 1680. doi:10.3390/su14031680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, K. 2021. Form and Flow: The Spatial Politics of Urban Resilience and Climate Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, K. 2013. “Biopolitics.” In Critical Environmental Politics, edited by C. Death, 22–30. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, K. 2018. Resilience. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, K., A. Barnett, and S. Cox. 2020. “Designing Justice? Race and the Limits of Recognition in Greater Miami Resilience Planning.” Geoforum 117: 134–143. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, K., S. Cox, and A. Barnett. 2020. “Racializing Resilience: Assemblage, Critique and Contested Futures in Greater Miami Resilience Planning.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (5): 1613–1630. doi:10.1080/24694452.2020.1715778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, K., M. Krivy, L. Rickards, G. Schliwa, S. Collier, S. Cox, and M. Gandy. 2019. “Interventions on Design and Political Geography.” Political Geography 74: 102017. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, K., and L. Rickards. 2022. “Contextualizing Narratives of Geography’s Past, Present, and Future: Synthesis, Difference, and Cybernetic Control.” Environment and Planning F 1 (1): 26–40. doi:10.1177/26349825221082166.
   Google Scholar
• Gruendel, A. 2022. “The Technopolitics of Wicked Problems: Reconstructing Democracy in an Age of Complexity.” Critical Review 34 (2): 202–243. doi:10.1080/08913811.2022.2052597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, O. 2014. Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason Since 1945. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K. 2017. “Rebuild by Design’s Enduring Legacy.” Architect, April 17. https://www.architectmagazine.com/design/rebuild-by-designs-enduring-legacy_o
   Google Scholar
• Jalas, M., S. Hyysalo, E. Heiskanen, R. Lovio, A. Nissinen, M. Mattinen, J. Rinkinen, J. Juntunen, P. Tainio, and H. Nissilä. 2017. “Everyday Experimentation in Energy Transition: A Practice-Theoretical View.” Journal of Cleaner Production 169: 77–84. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R., J. Pykett, and M. Whitehead. 2013. Changing Behviours: On the Rise of the Psychological State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., N. Frantzeskaki, and F. Avelino. 2017. “Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42 (1): 599–626. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mareis, C., and N. Paim, eds. 2021. Design Struggles: Intersecting Histories, Pedagogies and Perspectives. Amsterdam: Valiz.
   Google Scholar
• Mareis, C., M. Greiner-Petter, and M. Renner, eds. 2022. Critical by Design? Genealogies, Practices, Provisions. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, V. 2002. The Politics of the Artificial. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2009. “National Enterprise Emergency: Steps toward an Ecology of Powers.” Theory, Culture & Society 26 (6): 153–185. doi:10.1177/026327640934769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. 2023. “Experimentalism and Its Alternatives: Toward Viable Strategies for Transformative Change and Sustainability.” Sustainability; Science, Practice and Policy 19 (1): 2166217. doi:10.1080/15487733.2023.2166217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Malley, P. 2004. Risk, Uncertainty, and Government. London: Glasshouse.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, P., V. Galaz, and W. Boonstra. 2014. “Sustainability Transformations: A Resilience Perspective.” Ecology and Society 19 (4): 1. doi:10.5751/ES-06799-190401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovink, H. 2014. Design and Politics: Managing Risks and Vulnerabilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Design.
   Google Scholar
• Ovink, H. 2015. Design and Politics. Los Angeles, CA: SCI-Arc. https://channel.sciarc.edu/browse/henk-ovink-design-and-politics-february-18-2015
   Google Scholar
• Ovink, H., and J. Boeijenga. 2018. Too Big: Rebuild by Design’s Transformative Approach to Climate Change. Rotterdam: nai010 Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Papanek, V. 1971. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, Y., Y. Wei, and X. Bai. 2019. “Scaling Urban Sustainability Experiments: Contextualization as an Innovation.” Journal of Cleaner Production 227: 302–312. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. 2013. “Ontology and Antidisciplinarity.” In Interdisciplinarity Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences, edited by A. Barry and G. Born, 209–225. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Povinelii, E. 2011. Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rebuild by Design (RBD). 2015. Rebuild by Design. New York: Fergus.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, J. 2007. The Biopolitics of the War on Terror: Life Struggles, Liberal Modernity and the Defence of Logistical Societies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rickards, L., K. Grove, and S. Wakefield. 2022. “Innovation at the Limits of Social Change: Uncertainty and Design in the Anthropocene.” In Handbook of Social Change, edited by C. Barnett and R. Ballard, 142–153. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riggio, O. 2021. “Parks For the People.” Indypendent, July 29. https://indypendent.org/2021/07/parks-for-the-people/
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, P. 1987. Design Thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., and A. Stirling. 2020. The Politics of Uncertainty: Challenges of Transformation. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., A. Wieczorek, and R. Raven. 2019. “Experimenting for Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Literature Review.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145: 153–164. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokry, G., I. Anguelovski, and J. Connolly. 2023. “(Mis-)Belonging to the Climate-Resilient City: Making Place in Multi-Risk Communities of Racialized Urban America.” Journal of Urban Affairs 1–21. doi:10.1080/07352166.2022.2160339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2004. “Intensities of Feeling: Towards a Spatial Politics of Affect.” Geografiska Annaler B 86 (1): 57–78. doi:10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2006. “Re-Inventing Invention: New Tendencies in Capitalist Commodification.” Economy and Society 35 (2): 279–306. doi:10.1080/03085140600635755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiqqun 2020. The Cybernetic Hypothesis. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B., and P. Robbins. 2008. “Land-Change Science and Political Ecology: Similarities, Differences, and Implications for Sustainability Science.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33 (1): 295–316. doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.33.022207.104943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban Institute 2014. The Evaluation of the Design Competition of Rebuild by Design New York: Urban Institute for the Rockefeller Foundation. https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Evaluation-of-the-Design-Competition-of-Rebuild-by-Design.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, S. 2019. “Miami Beach Forever? Urbanism in the Back Loop.” Geoforum 107: 34–44. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, S. 2020. “Urban Resilience as Critique: Problematizing Infrastructure in Post-Sandy New York City.” Political Geography 79: 102148. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, S. 2021. “Experimental Government in the Anthropocene.” In International Relations in the Anthropocene: New Agendas, New Agencies and New Approaches, edited by D. Chandler, F. Muller, and D. Rothe, 331–348. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B., and D. Salt. 2012. Resilience Practice: Building Capacity to Absorb Disturbance and Maintain Function. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, K. 2022. “Not Just a Hurricane: What Made Sandy a Superstorm.” Patch, October 25. https://patch.com/new-jersey/tomsriver/not-just-hurricane-what-made-sandy-superstorm
   Google Scholar
• Wijsman, K. 2022. “Assembling Coasts: Climate Change, Resilience, and the Politics of Belonging.” PhD Dissertation, The New School.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, K. 2021. “The East Side Coastal Resiliency Project Breaks Ground, but Opponents Aren’t Backing Down.” The Architect’s Paper, May 28. https://www.archpaper.com/2021/05/east-side-coastal-resiliency-project-​breaks-ground-opponents-arent-backing-down/
   Google Scholar