Toward a caring and (re)productive bioeconomy? A feminist analysis of socio-technical innovations and sustainability shortcomings

References

• Adam, B. 2013. “Sustainability through a Temporal Lens: Time, Future, Process.” In Netzwerk Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften (Network of Caring Economy), Edited by Wege Vorsorgenden Wirtschaftens (Ways of Caring Economy), 115–132. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, M. 2021. “Global Inequalities and Extractive Knowledge Production in the Bioeconomy.” In Bioeconomy and Global Inequalities: Socio-Ecological Perspectives on Biomass Sourcing and Production, edited by M. Backhouse, R. Lehmann, K. Lorenzen, M. Lühmann, J. Puder, F. Rodríguez, and A. Tittor, 25–44. London: Palgrave Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, M., R. Lehmann, K. Lorenzen, M. Lühmann, J. Puder, F. Rodríguez, and A. Tittor, Eds. 2021. Bioeconomy and Global Inequalities: Socio-Ecological Perspectives on Biomass Sourcing and Production. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68944-5.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, S. 2020. Forces of Reproduction: Notes for a Counter-Hegemonic Anthropocene. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biesecker, A, and S. Hofmeister, Eds. 2006. Die Neuerfindung Des Ökonomischen: Ein (Re)Produktions­theoretischer Beitrag Zur Sozial-Ökologischen Forschung (The Reinvention of the Economic: A (Re)Production-Theoretical Contribution to Socio- Ecological Research). München: Oekom-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Biesecker, A., and S. Hofmeister. 2010. “Focus: (Re)Productivity. Sustainable Relations Both between Society and Nature and between the Genders.” Ecological Economics 69 (8): 1703–1711. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesecker, A., and S. Hofmeister. 2013. “(Re)Produktivität Als Kategorie Vorsorgenden Wirtschaftens ((Re)Productivity as a Category of Caring Economy).” In Netzwerk Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften (Network of Caring Economy), Edited by Wege Vorsorgenden Wirtschaftens  (Ways of Caring Economy), 137–158. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), and Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft (BMEL). 2020. Nationale Bioökonomi­estrategie: Bundesministerium Für Bildung Und Forschung (BMBF) Und Bundesministerium Für Ernährung Und Landwirtschaft (National Bioeconomy Strategy: Federal Ministry of Education and Research and Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture). Berlin: BMBF and BMEL.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, M., F. Kusche, S. Hackfort, L. Prause, and F. Engelbrecht-Bock. 2022. “The Making of Sustainability: Ideological Strategies, the Materiality of Nature, and Biomass Use in the Bioeconomy.” Sustainability Science 18 (2): 675–688. doi:10.1007/s11625-022-01254-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronson, K, Ed. 2022. The Immaculate Conception of Data: Agribusiness, Activists, and Their Shared Politics of the Future. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brüll, A. 2020. “Die Zwei Naturen Der Biomasse–Eine Komplementäre Perspektive Für (Re) Generative Landschaften (The Two Natures of Biomass – A Complementary Perspective for (Re)Generative Landscapes).” In Nachhaltigkeit (Re)Produktiv Denken: Pfade Kritischer Sozial-Ökologischer Wissenschaft (Thinking Sustainability (Re)Productively: Paths of Critical Socio-Ecological Science), edited by T. Mölders, A. Thiem, C. Katz, 92–102. Leverkusen: Verlag Babara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, N. 2009. “Reconstructing Science and Technology Studies: Views from Feminist Standpoint Theory.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 30 (1): 1–29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40388704. doi:10.1353/fro.0.0033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J., and S. Ruder. 2020. “Precision Technologies for Agriculture: Digital Farming, Gene-Edited Crops, and the Politics of Sustainability.” Global Environmental Politics 20 (3): 49–69. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J. 2021. “Explaining Growing Glyphosate Use: The Political Economy of Herbicide-Dependent Agriculture.” Global Environmental Change 67: 102239. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comi, M. 2020. “The Distributed Farmer: Rethinking US Midwestern Precision Agriculture Techniques.” Environmental Sociology 6 (4): 403–415. doi:10.1080/23251042.2020.1794426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission 2018. A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection between Economy, Society and the Environment. Brussels: Publications Office. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0673.
   Google Scholar
• Eversberg, D., P. Koch, R. Lehmann, A. Saltelli, S. Ramcilovic-Suominen, and Z. Kovacic. 2023. “The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: Promises of Bioeconomy and the Economy of Promises.” Sustainability Science 18 (2): 557–568. doi:10.1007/s11625-023-01321-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, A. 2021. “‘You Can’t Eat Data’? Moving Beyond the Misconfigured Innovations of Smart Farming.” Journal of Rural Studies 91: 200–207. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, B., S. Hackfort, M. Boyer, and D. Gottschlich. 2019. “Conflicts over GMOs and Their Contribution to Food Democracy.” Politics and Governance 7 (4): 165–177. doi:10.17645/pag.v7i4.2082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschlich, D., S. Roth, U. Röhr, S. Hackfort, D. Segebart, C. König, and A. Härtel. 2014. “Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften im Spannungsfeld von Gender, Care und Green Economy Debatten – Schnittstellen – blinde Flecken (Sustainable Business in Tension between Gender and Care and Green Economy Debates – Interfaces – Blind Spots.” CaGE Texts, No. 1. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. https://www.genanet.de/fileadmin/user_upload/dokumente/Care_Gender_Green_Economy/CaGE-Texte_1-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gottschlich, D., and L. Bellina. 2017. “Environmental Justice and Care: Critical Emancipatory Contributions to Sustainability Discourse.” Agriculture and Human Values 34 (4): 941–953. doi:10.1007/s10460-016-9761-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschlich, D., and C. Katz. 2020. “Caring with Nature/s: Zur Transformativen Bedeutung Von Care in More than Human Worlds (Caring with Nature/s: On the Transformative Meaning of Care in More than Human Worlds).” Gender < ed > Thoughts.” Working Paper Series 1: 1–29. doi:10.3249/2509-8179-GTG-11.
   Google Scholar
• Grzanka, P., J. Brian, and R. Bhatia. 2023. “Intersectionality and Science and Technology Studies.” Science, Technology, & Human Values. doi:10.1177/01622439231201707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, C. 2015. “Logic of Choice or Logic of Care? Uncertainty, Technological Mediation and Responsible Innovation.” NanoEthics 9 (3): 321–333. doi:10.1007/s11569-015-0238-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackfort, S. 2021. “Patterns of Inequalities in Digital Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review.” Sustainability 13 (22): 12345. doi:10.3390/su132212345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackfort, S. 2023. “Unlocking Sustainability? The Power of Corporate Lock-Ins and How They Shape Digital Agriculture in Germany.” Journal of Rural Studies 101: 103065. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackfort, S., S. Marquis, and K. Bronson. 2024. “Harvesting Value: Corporate Strategies of Data Assetization in Agriculture and Their Socio-Ecological Implications.” Big Data & Society 11 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1177/20539517241234279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackfort, S. 2024. “Democratization through Precision Technologies? Unveiling Power, Participation, and Property Rights in the Agricultural Bioeconomy.” Frontiers in Political Science 6: 1363044. doi:10.3389/fpos.2024.1363044.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, W., and I. Nelson, Eds. 2015. Practising Feminist Political Ecologies: Moving Beyond the “Green Economy.” London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R., and I. Nelson. 2022. “Where Are Rooted Networks in Digital Political Ecologies?” Frontiers in Human Dynamics 4 (4): 89387. doi:10.3389/fhumd.2022.989387.
   Google Scholar
• Heimstädt, C. 2023. “Making Plant Pathology Algorithmically Recognizable.” Agriculture and Human Values 40 (3): 865–878. doi:10.1007/s10460-023-10419-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehl, C., R. Meyer, and S. Steiger. 2021. Digitalisierung der Landwirtschaft: gesellschaftliche Voraussetzungen, Rahmenbedingungen und Effekte. Teil II des Endberichts zum TA-Projekt (Digitalization of Agriculture: Societal Prerequisites, Framework Conditions and Effects. Part II of the Final Report on the TA Project.). Berlin: Büro für Technikfolgen – Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag. doi:10.5445/IR/1000142951.
   Google Scholar
• Kliem, L., J. Wagner, C. Olk, L. Keßler, S. Lange, T. Krachunova, and S. Bellingrath-Kimura. 2022. “Digitalisierung Der Landwirtschaft – Chancen Und Risiken Für Den Natur- Und Umweltschutz.” In Schriftenreihe Des IÖW (Digitalization of Agriculture – Opportunities and Risks for Nature Conservation and Environmental Protection). Berlin: IÖW. https://www.ioew.de/fileadmin/user_upload/BILDER_und_Downloaddateien/Publikationen/Schriftenreihen/IOEW_SR_222__Digialisierung_der_Landwirtschaft.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lajoie-O’Malley, A., K. Bronson, S. van der Burg, and L. Klerkx. 2020. “The Future (s) of Digital Agriculture and Sustainable Food Systems: An Analysis of High-Level Policy Documents.” Ecosystem Services 45: 101183. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lühmann, M., and T. Vogelpohl. 2023. “The Bioeconomy in Germany: A Failing Political Project?” Ecological Economics 207: 107783. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A., N. Myers, and A. Viseu. 2015. “The Politics of Care in Technoscience.” Social Studies of Science 45 (5): 625–641. doi:10.1177/0306312715602073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mies, M., V. Bennholdt-Thomsen, and C. von Werlhof. 1988. Women: The Last Colony. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, C. 2019. “The Combine Will Tell the Truth: On Precision Agriculture and Algorithmic Rationality.” Big Data & Society 6 (1): 205395171984944. doi:10.1177/2053951719849444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, M. 2021. “Can Agroecology and CRISPR Mix? The Politics of Complementarity and Moving toward Technology Sovereignty.” Agriculture and Human Values 39 (2): 733–755. doi:10.1007/s10460-021-10284-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, M., and M. Canfield. 2023. “Feeding the World, Byte by Byte’: Emergent Imaginaries of Data Productivism.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 51 (2): 381–420. doi:10.1080/03066150.2023.2232997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mölders, T. 2019. “Rethinking Gender: Feminist Perspectives on Sustainable Development Goals in the Light of (Re)Productivity.” GAIA 28 (2): 95–99. doi:10.14512/gaia.28.2.6.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, I., H. Faxon, and M.-H. Ehlers. 2024. “Feminist Political Ecologies of Agrarian Technologies: Knowing the Digital Differently.” The Journal of Peasant Studies: 1–28. doi:10.1080/03066150.2024.2308637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksala, J. 2018. “Feminism, Capitalism, and Ecology.” Hypatia 33 (2): 216–234. doi:10.1111/hypa.12395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, P. 2007. “Feminist Ecological Economics and Sustainability.” Journal of Bioeconomics 9 (3): 227–244. doi:10.1007/s10818-007-9028-z.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 1991. “Nature, Self, and Gender: Feminism, Environmental Philosophy, and the Critique of Rationalism.” Hypatia 6 (1): 3–27. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00206.x.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, C., and F. Wickson. 2016. “Broadening the Lens for the Governance of Emerging Technologies: Care Ethics and Agricultural Biotechnology.” Technology in Society 45: 48–57. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puder, J., and A. Tittor. 2023. “Bioeconomy as a Promise of Development? The Cases of Argentina and Malaysia.” Sustainability Science 18 (2): 617–631. doi:10.1007/s11625-022-01284-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2011. “Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things.” Social Studies of Science 41 (1): 85–106. doi:10.1177/0306312710380301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2015. “Making Time for Soil: Technoscientific Futurity and the Pace of Care.” Social Studies of Science 45 (5): 691–716. doi:10.1177/0306312715599851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2017. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramcilovic-Suominen, S. 2023. “Envisioning Just Transfor­mations In and Beyond the EU Bioeconomy: Inspirations from Decolonial Environmental Justice and Degrowth.” Sustainability Science 18 (2): 707–722. doi:10.1007/s11625-022-01091-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röhr, U., and I. Weller. 2021. “Zum Umgehen Von Und Umgang Mit Ungleichheiten in Der Klimapolitik Und Der Forschung Für Eine Klimafreundlichere Gestaltung Des Alltags (On Dealing with Inequalities in Climate Policy and Research to Make Everyday Life More Climate-Friendly).” ZDfm – Zeitschrift Für Diversitätsforschung Und -Management 6 (1): 23–38. doi:10.3224/zdfm.v6i1.03.
   Google Scholar
• Saave, A. 2022. Einverleiben Und Externalisieren: Zur Innen-Außen-Beziehung Der Kapitalistischen Produktionsweise (Incorporating and Externalizing: On the Inside-Outside Relationship of the Capitalist Mode of Production). Bielefeld: transcript-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Saave, A. 2023. “Ecofeminism Now.” In Transform! Yearbook 2022: Left Strategies for the Covid Pandemic and Its Aftermath Left, 335–350. Dublin: Merlin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saave, A., C. Brinckmann, and S. Hackfort. 2024. “Feminist Perspectives on the Bioeconomy.” Economists for Future. https://www.econ4future.org/post/feminist-perspectives-on-the-bioeconomy.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, D. 2018. “Productivism, Agroecology, and the Challenge of Feeding the World.” Gastronomica 18 (4): 41–53. doi:10.1525/gfc.2018.18.4.41.
   Google Scholar
• Salleh, A. 1997. Ecofeminism as Politics: Nature, Marx and the Postmodern. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. 1991. The Violence of the Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology, and Politics. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theoriegruppe Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften (TVW) (Theory Group on Caring Economy) 2000. “Zur Theoretisch-Wissenschaftlichen Fundierung Vorsorgenden Wirtschaftens (On the Theoretical-Scientific Foundation of Caring Economy).” In Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften: Auf Dem Weg Zu Einer Ökonomie Des Guten Lebens (A Caring Economy: Towards an Economy of Good Living), edited by A. Biesecker, M. Mathes, S. Schön, and B. Scurrell, 27–70. Bielefeld: Kleine-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tittor, A. 2021. “The Key Role of the Agribusiness and Biotechnology Sectors in Constructing the Economic Imaginary of the Bioeconomy in Argentina.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 23 (2): 213–226. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2021.1893162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. 2013. Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. 2010. “Feminist Theories of Technology.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1): 143–152. doi:10.1093/cje/ben057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittingham, J., and R. Wynberg. 2021. “Is the Feminist Ethics of Care Framework a Useful Lens for GM Crop Risk Appraisal in the Global South?” Technology in Society 64: 101455. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichterich, C. 2015. “Contesting Green Growth, Connecting Care, Commons and Enough.” In Practising Feminist Political Ecologies: Moving Beyond the “Green Economy, edited by W. Harcourt and I. Nelson, 67–101. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wickson, F., Preston, C., Binimelis, R., Herrero, A., Hartley, S., Wynberg, R., and Wynne, B. 2017. “Addressing Socio-Economic and Ethical Considerations in Biotechnology Governance: The Potential of a New Politics of Care.” Food Ethics 1 (2): 193–199. doi: 10.1007/s41055-017-0014-4
   Google Scholar
• Winner, L. 1980. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus 109: 121–136. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar