Coupled field formulation of exactly integrated membrane finite elements insensitive to distortion

References

• N. S. Lee and K. J. Bathe, “Effects of element distortion on the performance of isoparametric elements,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 36, no. 20, pp. 3553–3576, 1993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. A. Stricklin, W. S. Ho, E. Q. Richardson and W. E. Haisler, “On isoparametric vs. linear strain triangular elements,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1041–1043, 1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Backlund, “On isoparametric elements,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 12, pp. 731–732, 1978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. N. Gifford, “More on distorted isoparametric elements,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 290–291, 1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. M. Irons, “Engineering applications of numerical integration in stiffness methods,” AIAA J., vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 2035–2037, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• R. L. Taylor, J. C. Simo, O. C. Zienkiewicz and A. H. C. Chan, “The patch test—a condition for asserting term convergence,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 39–62, 1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Razzaque, “The patch test for elements,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 63–71, 1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Hua, “An inverse transformation for quadrilateral isoparametric elements: analysis and application,” Finite Elements Anal. Design, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 159–166, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• E. L. Wilson, R. L. Taylor, W. P. Doherty, T. Ghabussi, et al., “Incompatible displacement models,” in Numerical and Computer Methods in Structural Mechanics, S. T. Fenven, Eds. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, 1973, pp. 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• R. L. Taylor, P. J. Beresford and E. L. Wilson, “A non-conforming element for stress analysis,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1211–1219, 1976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. H. MacNeal and R. L. Harder, “A proposed standard set of problems to test finite element accuracy,” Finite Elements Anal. Design, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–20, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• K. M. Rao and U. Shrinivasa, “A set of pathological tests to validate new finite elements,” Sadhana, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 549–590, 2001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. H. MacNeal, “A theorem regarding the locking of tapered four noded membrane elements,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1793–1799, 1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. H. H. Pian and K. Sumihara, “Rational approach for assumed stress finite elements,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1685–1695, 1984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Y. Sze, “On immunizing five-beta hybrid stress element models from ‘trapezoidal locking in practical analyses,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 907–920, 2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. H. MacNeal, “Derivation of element stiffness matrices by assumed strain distributions,” Nucl. Eng. Design, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 1982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. S. Chun and S. K. Kassegne, “A new, efficient 8-node serendipity element with explicit and assumed strains formulations,” Int. J. Comput. Methods Eng. Sci. Mech., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 285–292, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• M. Iura and S. N. Atluri, “Formulation of a membrane finite element with drilling degrees of freedom,” Comput. Mech., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 417–428, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• K. Y. Sze, W. Chen and Y. K. Cheung, “An efficient quadrilateral plane element with drilling degrees of freedom using orthogonal stress modes,” Comput. Struct., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 695–705, 1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Rajendran and K. M. Liew, “A novel unsymmetric 8-node plane element immune to mesh distortion under a quadratic field,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 58, pp. 1718–1748, 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. S. Wang, X. K. Zhang and P. Hu, “New formulation of quasi-conforming method: a simple membrane element for analysis of planar problems,” Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, vol. 60, pp. 122–133, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Q. Long and M. F. Huang, “A generalized conforming isoparametric element,” Appl. Math. Mech. (English Ed.), vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 929–936, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• R. D. Cook, D. S. Malkus and M. E. Plesha, Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Q. Long, J. X. Li, Z. F. Long and S. Cen, “Area coordinates used in quadrilateral elements,” Commun. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 533–545, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Z. F. Long, J. X. Li, S. Cen and Y. Q. Long, “Some basic formulae for area co-ordinates used in quadrilateral elements,” Commun. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 841–852, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• X. M. Chen, S. Cen, Y. Q. Long and Z. H. Yao, “Membrane elements insensitive to distortion using the quadrilateral area coordinate method,” Comput. Struct., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 35–54, 2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Cen, X. M. Chen and X. R. Fu, “Quadrilateral membrane element family formulated by the quadrilateral area coordinate method,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 196, no. 41-44, pp. 4337–4353, 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Prathap and V. Senthilkumar, “Making sense of the quadrilateral area coordinate membrane elements,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 197, no. 49-50, pp. 4379–4382, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures, New Delhi, India: Prentice-Hall (India), 1996.
   Google Scholar
• G. Prathap, “Finite element analysis and the stress correspondence paradigm,” Sadhana, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 525–546, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• G. Singh and G. V. Rao, “A lock-free material finite element for non-linear oscillations of laminated plates,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 230, no. 2, pp. 221–240, 2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mitra, S. Gopalakrishnan and M. Seetharama Bhat, “A new super convergent thin walled composite beam element for analysis of box beam structures,” Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 41, no. 5-6, pp. 1491–1518, 2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ramaprasad, “Exact solution of shear flexible laminated curved beams using a coupled field formulation,” Int. J. Comput. Methods Eng. Sci. Mech., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• S. Ramaprasad, B. Dattaguru and G. Singh, “Exact solutions for laminated composite beams using a unified state space formulation,” Int. J. Comput. Methods Eng. Sci. Mech., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 319–334, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Samaniego, et al., “An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: concepts, implementations and applications,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 362, pp. 112790, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. N. Reddy, Finite Element Method, 2nd ed. Hightstown, NJ, USA: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993.
   Google Scholar
• D. Chapelle and K. J. Bathe, “The inf-sup test,” Comp. Struct., vol. 47, no. 4-5, pp. 537–545, 1993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. J. Bathe, “The inf–sup condition and its evaluation for mixed finite element methods,” Comput. Struct., vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 243–252, 2001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Gilewski and M. Sitek, “The inf-sup condition tests for shell/plate finite elements,” Arch. Civil Eng. LVII, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 425–448, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• C. C. Wu, M. G. Huang and T. H. H. Pian, “Consistency condition and convergence criteria of incompatible elements: general formulation of incompatible functions and its application,” Comput. Struct., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 639–644, 1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Piltner and R. L. Taylor, “A systematic constructions of B-bar functions for linear and nonlinear mixed-enhanced finite elements for plane elasticity problems,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 615–639, 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. H. MacNeal and R. L. Harder, “A refined four-noded membrane element with rotation degrees of freedom,” Comput. Struct., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 1988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. C. Simo and M. S. Rifai, “A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1595–1638, 1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Babuska and M. Suri, “Locking effects in the _finite element approximation of elasticity problems,” Numer. Math., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 439–463, 1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaqus 6.9 HTML documentation. Providence, RI, USA: Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., 2009.
   Google Scholar
• X. M. Chen, S. Cen, R. F. Xiang and Y. Q. Long, “A new quadrilateral area coordinate method (QACM-II) for developing quadrilateral finite element models,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 73, no. 13, pp. 1911–1941, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Cen, X. M. Chen, C. F. Li and X. R. Fu, “Quadrilateral membrane elements with analytical element stiffness matrices formulated by the new quadrilateral area coordinate method (QACM-II),” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 1172–1200, 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. C. Rhee and S. N. Atluri, “On the accuracy of finite element solutions of problems with traction boundary conditions,” Appl. Math. Modell., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 103–108, 1981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. P. Timoshenko and J. N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, International Student edition. New Delhi: McGraw Hill Publications, 1970.
   Google Scholar