Visual Comfort, Discomfort Glare, and Occupant Fenestration Control: Developing a Research Agenda

REFERENCES

• Acker B, Van Den Wymelenberg KG. 2010. Measurement and verification of daylighting photocontrols. Boise (ID): University of Idaho–Integrated Design Lab. <http://www.idlboise.com/node/5?q=node/132> Accessed 2012 Jan 23.
   Google Scholar
• Berman SM, Bullmore MA, Jacobs RJ, Bailey IL, Gandhi N. 1994. An objective measure of discomfort glare. J Illum Eng Soc. 1994:40 ‐49.
   Google Scholar
• Changizi MA. 2009. The vision revolution: how the latest research overturns everything we thought we knew about human vision. 1st ed. Dallas (TX): BenBella Books. 240 p.
   Google Scholar
• Changizi MA. 2010. Why does light make headaches worse? Changizi blog. <http://changizi.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/why-does-light-make-headaches-worse/> Accessed 2013 June 7.
   Google Scholar
• Changizi MA, Rio K. 2010. Harnessing color vision for visual oximetry in central cyanosis. Med Hypotheses. 74(1):87 ‐91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Changizi MA, Shimojo S. 2008. “X-ray vision” and the evolution of forward-facing eyes. J Theor Biol. 254(4):756 ‐767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Changizi MA, Zhang Q, Shimojo S. 2006. Bare skin, blood and the evolution of primate colour vision. Biol Lett. 2(2):217 ‐221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvel P, Collins JB, Dogniaux R, Longmore J. 1982. Glare from windows: current views of the problem. Lighting Res Technol. 14(1):31 ‐46.
   Google Scholar
• Clear R. 2012. Discomfort glare: what do we actually know? Lighting Res Technol. 45(2):141 ‐158.
   Google Scholar
• Clear RD, Inkarojrit V, Lee ES. 2006. Subject responses to electrochromic windows. Energ Buildings. 38(7):758 ‐779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čongradac V, Prica M, Paspalj M, Bojanić D, Čapko D. 2012. Algorithm for blinds control based on the optimization of blind tilt angle using a genetic algorithm and fuzzy logic. Sol Energy. 86(9):2762 ‐2770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuttle C. 2004. Brightness, lightness, and providing a preconceived appearance to the interior. Lighting Res Technol. 36(3):201 ‐214.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva PC, Leal V, Andersen M. 2012. Influence of shading control patterns on the energy assessment of office spaces. Energ Buildings. 50:35 ‐48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daum D, Morel N. 2010. Identifying important state variables for a blind controller. Build Environ. 45(4):887 ‐900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyke C. 2013. A comparision of manual blind control algorithms using two methods of daylight harvesting simulation. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. 131 p.
   Google Scholar
• Dyke C, Djunaedy E, Steciak J, Van Den Wymelenberg KG. 2013. A contrast of manual blind control algorithms with whole-building energy implications. In Proceedings of the 2013 IES Annual Conference; Huntington Beach, CA. p. 38-64.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes LL, Lee ES, DiBartolomeo DL, McNeil A. 2014. Monitored lighting energy savings from dimmable lighting controls in The New York Times Headquarters Building. Energ Buildings. 68(Part A):498 ‐514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galasiu AD, Newsham GR, Suvagau C, Sander DM. 2007. Energy saving lighting control systems for open-plan offices: a field study. LEUKOS. 4(1):7 ‐29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glennie WL, Thukrai I, Rea MS. 1992. Lighting control: feasibility demonstration of a new type of system. Lighting Res Technol. 24(4):235 ‐242.
   Google Scholar
• Guth SK, Luckiesh M. 1949. Brightnesses in visual field at borderline between comfort and discomfort. Illum Eng. 44:650 ‐670.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hackel S, Schuetter S. 2013. Commissioning for optimal savings from daylight controls, Madison (WI): Energy Center of Wisconsin. <http://www.ecw.org/project.php?workid=1&resultid=494> Accessed 2013 Nov 18.
   Google Scholar
• Heerwagen J. 1998. Of light, time and space: lighting quality and green building design. InProccedings of the First CIE Symposium on Lighting Quality; 1998 May 9-10; Ottawa, ON. p 211 ‐218.
   Google Scholar
• Heerwagen JH, Heerwagen DR. 1986. Lighting and psychological comfort. Light Design Appl. 16(4):47 ‐51.
   Google Scholar
• Heerwagen JH, Orians G. 1986. Adaptations to windowlessness: a study of the use of visual decor in windowed and windowless offices. Environ Beha. 18(5):623 ‐639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heschong L, Howlett O, McHugh J, Pande A. 2005. Sidelighting photocontrols field study. Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance, Portland, OR; Pacific Gas and Electric company, San Francisco, CA; Southern California Edison, Rosemead, CA. p 176.
   Google Scholar
• Heschong L, Van Den Wymelenberg KG. 2012. Annual daylight performance metrics. In Building Synapses: Connections in Lighting; Minneapolis, MN. p 1-13. [IESNA NY, NY]
   Google Scholar
• Heschong Mahone Group, Inc. 2003. Windows and classrooms: a study of student performance and the indoor environment. Fair Oaks (CA): Heschong-Mahone Group Inc. 131 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Heschong Mahone Group, Inc. 2012. Daylight metrics—PIER Daylighting Plus Research Program, California Energy Commission. <http://www.h-m-g.com/DaylightPlus/Daylight_Metrics.htm> Accessed 2012 May 22.
   Google Scholar
• Hirning MB, Isoardi GL, Coyne S, Garcia Hansen VR, Cowling I. 2013. Post occupancy evaluations relating to discomfort glare: a study of green buildings in Brisbane. Build Environ. 59:349 ‐357.
   Google Scholar
• IESNA-Daylight Metrics Committee. 2012. Lighting measurement #83, spatial daylight autonomy (sDA) and annual sunlight exposure (ASE). Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New York, NY, LM-83-12. 14 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Inanici MN. 2006. Evaluation of high dynamic range photography as a luminance data acquisition system. Lighting Res Technol. 38(2):123 ‐134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkarojrit V. 2005. Balancing comfort: occupants’ control of window blinds in private offices. <http://pioneer.netserv.chula.ac.th/˜ivorapat/download.htm> Accessed 2008 Sep 15.
   Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation. 2011. ISO 9241-303:2011—ergonomics of human-system interaction—part 303: requirements for electronic visual displays. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. 43 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Iwata T, Tokura M. 1997. Position index for a glare source located below the line of vision. Lighting Res Technol. 29(3):172 ‐178.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubiec JA. 2014. The Use of Visual Comfort Metrics in the Design of Daylit Spaces [dissertation]. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubiec JA, Reinhart CF. 2012. The “adaptive zone”—a concept for assessing discomfort glare throughout daylit spaces. Lighting Res Technol. 44(2):149 ‐170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubiec JA, Reinhart CF. 2013. Predicting visual comfort conditions in a large daylit space based on long-term occupant evaluations: a field study. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association; Aix-les-Bains, France. International Building Performance Simulation Association, UK. p 3408-3415.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings J, Rubinstein FM, DiBartolomeo D, Blanc S. 1999. Comparison of control options in private offices in an advanced lighting control testbed. In Proceedings of the IESNA 1999 Annual Conference; 1999 Aug 10-12; New Orleans, LA. New York (NY): IESNA.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn PH Jr, Friedman B, Gill B, Hagman J, Severson RL, Freier NG, Feldman EN, Carrere S, Stolyar A. 2008. A plasma display window?—the shifting baseline problem in a technologically mediated natural world. J Environ Psychol. 28(2):192 ‐199.
   Google Scholar
• Kambich DG, Rea MS. 1987. New Canadian lighting analysis system. Light Mag. 1(3):16-17..
   Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Park YJ, Yeo MS, Kim KW. 2009. An experimental study on the environmental performance of the automated blind in summer. Build Environ. 44(7):1517 ‐1527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim W, Kim JT. 2010. A distribution chart of glare sensation over the whole visual field. Build Environ. 45(4):922 ‐928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konis K, Lee ES, Clear RD. 2011. Visual comfort analysis of innovative interior and exterior shading systems for commercial buildings using high resolution luminance images. LEUKOS. 7(3):167 ‐188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee ES, Clear RD, Ward G, Fernandes L. 2007. Commissioning and verification procedures for the automated roller shade system at The New York Times Headquarters, New York, New York. Berkeley (CA): Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. <http://windows.lbl.gov/comm_perf/nyt_pubs.html> Accessed 2009 July 9.
   Google Scholar
• Lee ES, DiBartolomeo DL, Selkowitz SE. 1998. Thermal and daylighting performance of an automated venetian blind and lighting system in a full-scale private office. Energ Buildings. 29(1):47 ‐63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee ES, Selkowitz SE. 2006. The New York Times Headquarters daylighting mockup: Monitored performance of the daylighting control system. Energ Buildings. 38(7):914 ‐929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie RP. 2003. Capturing the daylight dividend in buildings: why and how? Build Environ. 38(2):381 ‐385.
   Google Scholar
• Littlefair PJ. 2001. Photoelectric control: the effectiveness of techniques to reduce switching frequency. Lighting Res Technol. 33(1):43 ‐55.
   Google Scholar
• Manudhane R, Reinhart CF. 2010. Daylighting nomographs revisited—rules of thumb to predict energy savings from photocell controlled dimming systems. In Proceedings of SimBuild 2010; New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh J, Pande A, Ander GD, Melnyk J. 2004. Effectiveness of photocontrols with skylighting. IESNA Annual Conference Proceedings. 13:1 ‐18.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil A. 2013. Five phase method. <http://www.radiance-online.org/community/workshops/2013-golden-co/McNeil-5phase.pdf> Accessed 2013 Nov 18.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil A, Lee ES. 2012. A validation of the radiance three-phase simulation method for modelling annual daylight performance of optically complex fenestration systems. J Build Perf Sim. 4:1 ‐14.
   Google Scholar
• Moore T, Carter DJ, Slater AI. 2003. Long-term patterns of use of occupant controlled office lighting. Lighting Res Technol. 35(1):43 ‐57.
   Google Scholar
• Murray IJ, Plainis S, Carden D. 2002. The ocular stress monitor: a new device for measuring discomfort glare. Lighting Res Technol. 34(3):231 ‐239.
   Google Scholar
• Newsham GR. 1994. Manual control of window blinds and electric lighting: implications for comfort and energy consumption. Indoor Built Environ. 3(3):135 ‐144.
   Google Scholar
• Newsham GR, Aries MBC, Mancini S, Faye G. 2008. Individual control of electric lighting in a daylit space. Lighting Res Technol. 40(1):25 ‐41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsham GR, Arsenault C. 2009. A camera as a sensor for lighting and shading control. Lighting Res Technol. 41:143 ‐163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien W, Kapsis K, Athienitis AK. 2013. Manually-operated window shade patterns in office buildings: a critical review. Build Environ. 60:319 ‐338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhaus WKE. 2005. Discomfort glare assessment and prevention for daylight applications in office environments. Sol Energ. 79(2):140 ‐158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhaus WKE, Davies M, Raynham P, Curtis S. 2005. A different toolbox for glare studies. In Proceedings of LUX Europa; 2005 Sep 19-21; Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Osterhaus WKE, Curtis S, Piel A. 2008. Analysis of luminance histograms for the assessment of discomfort glare in daylit offices. In Proceedings of Balkan Light 2008; 2008; Ljubljana, Slovenija. Light Engineering Society of Slovenia. p 155-164.
   Google Scholar
• Painter B, Mardaljevic J, Fan D. 2010. Monitoring daylight provision and glare perception in office environments. In Proceedings of CIB World Congress; 2010 May 11-13; Salford, UK. paper # 1179.
   Google Scholar
• Pigg S, Eilers M, Reed J. 1996. Behavioral aspects of lighting and occupancy sensors in private offices: a case study of a university office building. In Proceedings of the ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings; 1996; Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, CA. Washington DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy Human Dimensions of Energy Consumption. p 8.161-8.171.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF. 2004. Lightswitch-2002: a model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Sol Energy. 77(1):15 ‐28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF, Breton PF. 2009. Experimental Validation of Autodesk® 3ds Max® Design 2009 and Daysim3.0. Leukos 6:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF, Voss K. 2003. Monitoring manual control of electric lighting and blinds. Lighting Res Technol. 35(3):243 ‐258.
   Google Scholar
• Roche L. 2002. Summertime performance of an automated lighting and blinds control system. Lighting Res Technol. 34(1):11 ‐25.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin AI, Collins BL, Tibbot RL. 1978. Window blinds as a potential energy saver—a case study. Washington (DC): National Bureau of Standards. 81 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sanati L, Utzinger M. 2013. The effect of window shading design on occupant use of blinds and electric lighting. Build Environ. 64:67 ‐76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarey Khanie M, Anderson M, Hart BM, Stoll J, Einhäuser W. 2011. Integration of eye-tracking methods in visual comfort assessments. In CISBAT 11; Proceedings of CISBAT 11: CleanTech for Sustainable Buildings—From Nano to Urban Scale; 2001 Sep 14-15; Lausanne, Switzerland. Lausanne, Switzerland: Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Sarey Khanie M, Stoll J, Mende S, Weinold J, Einhäuser W, Andersen M. 2013. Investigation of gaze patterns in daylit workplaces: using eye-tracking methods to objectify view direction as a function of lighting conditions. In Proceedings of CIE Centenary Conference “Towards a New Century of Light”; 2013 April 15-16; Paris, France. Vienna, Austria: Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. p 250 ‐259.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar A, Fairchild M, Salvaggio C. 2008. Integrated daylight harvesting and occupancy detection using digital imaging. In Proceedings of Sensors, Cameras, and Systems for Industrial/Scientific Applications IX; 2008 Feb 14; San Jose, CA. <http://link.aip.org/link/?PSI/6816/68160F/1> Accessed 2009 Jan 20.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar A, Mistrick RG. 2006. A novel lighting control system integrating high dynamic range imaging and DALI. LEUKOS. 2(4):307 ‐322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena M, Ward G, Perry T, Heschong L, Higa R. 2010. Dynamic radiance—predicting annual daylighting with variable fenestration optics using BSDFs. In SimBuild 2010; Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference of IBPSA-USA; 2010 Aug 11-13; New York, NY. USA: IBPSA. p 402 ‐409.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena M, and the Heschong Mahone Group. 2011. Office daylighting potential. California Energy Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena M, Perry T, Bonneville C, Heschong L. 2001. Office Daylighting Potential, California Energy Commission, CEC-500-2013-002.
   Google Scholar
• Selkowitz SE, Gabel M. 1984. LBL daylighting nomographs. Berkeley (CA): Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 71 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Shen H, Tzempelikos A. 2013. Sensitivity analysis on daylighting and energy performance of perimeter offices with automated shading. Build Environ. 59:303 ‐314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin JY, Yun GY, Kim JT. 2012. View types and luminance effects on discomfort glare assessment from windows. Energ. Buildings. 46:139 ‐145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanachareonkit A, Lee ES, McNeil A. 2013. Empirical assessment of a prismatic daylight-redirecting window film in a full-scale office testbed. LEUKOS. 10(1):19 ‐45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuaycharoen N. 2011. Windows are less glaring when there is a preferred view. Built Environ Sri Lanka. 9-10(1–2):45 ‐55.
   Google Scholar
• Tuaycharoen N, Tregenza PR. 2005. Discomfort glare from interesting images. Lighting Res Technol. 37(4):329-341.
   Google Scholar
• Tuaycharoen N, Tregenza PR. 2007. View and discomfort glare from windows. Lighting Res Technol. 39(2):185 ‐200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Energy. 2006. 2003 Commercial buildings energy consumption survey. <http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/> Accessed 2008 Feb 9.
   Google Scholar
• US Energy Information Administration. 2008. Official energy statistics from the U.S. government. <http://www.eia.gov> Accessed 2008 Feb 9.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg KG. 2008. Daylight dialect. Archit Light. 2008:28 ‐29.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg KG. 2012a. Evaluating human visual preference and performance in an office environment using luminance-based metrics [dissertation]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington. <http://www.idlboise.com/papers/KevinVanDenWymelenberg-phd> Accessed 2012 Aug 2.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg KG. 2012b. Patterns of occupant interaction with window blinds: a literature review. Energ Buildings. 51:165 ‐176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg KG. 2013. Toward resolving discomfort glare from vertical fenestration. In Proceedings of IES 2013 Annual Conference; 2013 Oct 27-29; Huntington Beach, CA. New York (NY): IESNA. p 1-13.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg KG, Inanici MN. 2013. A critical investigation of common lighting design metrics for predicting human visual comfort in offices with daylight. LEUKOS. 10(3):145 ‐164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg KG, Inanici MN, Johnson PW. 2010. The effect of luminance distribution patterns on occupant preference in a daylit office environment. LEUKOS. 7(2):103 ‐122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkenhorst O, Luther J, Reinhart CF, Timmer J. 2002. Dynamic annual daylight simulations based on one-hour and one-minute means of irradiance data. Sol Energy. 72(5):385 ‐395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward G. 1993. Radiance findglare program. <http://radsite.lbl.gov/radiance/man_html/findglare.1.html> Accessed 2006 Nov 30.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold J. 2008. Evalglare software Version 0.9f. <http://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/areas-of-business-and-market-areas/applied-optics-and-functional-surfaces/lighting-technology/lighting-simulations/radiance> Accessed 2009 Jan 20.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold J. 2009. Dynamic daylight glare evaluation. In Building Simulation 2009; Proceedings of the Eleventh International IBPSA Conference; 2009 July 27-30; Glasgow, Scotland. UK: IBPSA. p 944 ‐951.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold J, Christoffersen J. 2006. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energ Buildings. 38(7):743 ‐757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar