Evaluating a New Suite of Luminance-Based Design Metrics for Predicting Human Visual Comfort in Offices with Daylight

REFERENCES

• Boubekri M, Boyer LL. 1992. Effect of window size and sunlight presence on glare. Lighting Res Technol. 24(2):69 ‐74.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR, Veitch JA, Newsham GR, Jones CC, Heerwagen J, Myer M, Hunter CM. 2006. Occupant use of switching and dimming controls in offices. Lighting Res Technol. 38(4):358 ‐376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvel P, Collins JB, Dogniaux R, Longmore J. 1982. Glare from windows: current views of the problem. Lighting Res Technol. 14(1):31 ‐46.
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ. 1988. Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. J Am Stat Assoc. 83(403):596 ‐610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiLaura DL, Houser KW, Mistrick RG, Steffy GR. 2011. The lighting handbook. 10th ed. New York (NY): Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 1328 p.
   Google Scholar
• DIVA for Rhino. (n.d.). DIVA. Solemma LLC. <http://diva4rhino.com/ > Accessed 2014 Apr 9.
   Google Scholar
• Fraunhofer. (n.d.). evalglare-en.tar.gz. <http://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/areas-of-business-and-market-areas/applied-optics-and-functional-surfaces/downloads-englisch/software/evalglare-en.tar.gz> Accessed 2014 Apr 9.
   Google Scholar
• Heschong L, Van Den Wymelenberg KG. 2012. Annual daylight performance metrics. In: Building synapses: connections in lighting. Minneapolis (MN); 2012 November 11–13; New York (NY): IESNA. p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett O, Heschong L, McHugh J. 2007. Scoping study for daylight metrics from luminance maps. LEUKOS. 3(3):201 ‐215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IESNA-Daylight Metrics Committee. 2012. Lighting measurement #83, spatial daylight autonomy (sDA) and annual sunlight exposure (ASE). Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. <https://www.ies.org/store/product/approved-method-iesspatial-daylight-autonomy-sda-and-annual-sunlight-exposurease-1287.cfm > Accessed Aug 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaragurubaran V, Inanici M. 2013. hdrscope: high dynamic range image processing toolkit for lighting simulations and analysis. In: International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA) 2013 Conference; Chambery, France; 2013 Aug 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Laurentin C, Bermtto V, Fontoynont M. 2000. Effect of thermal conditions and light source type on visual comfort appraisal. Lighting Res Technol. 32(4):223 ‐233.
   Google Scholar
• Lee ES, Clear RD, Ward G, Fernandes L. 2007. Commissioning and verification procedures for the automated roller shade system at the New York Times headquarters, New York, New York. Berkeley (CA): Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. <http://windows.lbl.gov/comm_perf/nyt_pubs.html > Accessed July 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Loe DL, Mansfield KP, Rowlands E. 1994. Appearance of lit environment and its relevance in lighting design: experimental study. Lighting Res Technol. 26(3):119 ‐133.
   Google Scholar
• Newsham GR, Aries MBC, Mancini S, Faye G. 2008. Individual control of electric lighting in a daylit space. Lighting Res Technol. 40(1):25 ‐41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsham GR, Veitch JA. 2001. Lighting quality recommendations for VDT offices: a new method of derivation. Lighting Res Technol. 33(2):97 ‐113.
   Google Scholar
• Sutter Y, Dumortier D, Fontoynont M. 2006. The use of shading systems in VDU task offices: a pilot study. Energ Buildings. 38(7):780 ‐789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuaycharoen N. 2011. Windows are less glaring when there is a preferred view. Built Environment Sri Lanka. 9-10(1–2):45 ‐55.
   Google Scholar
• Tuaycharoen N, Tregenza PR. 2007. View and discomfort glare from windows. Lighting Res Technol. 39(2):185 ‐200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg KG. 2012. Evaluating human visual preference and performance in an office environment using luminance-based metrics [Dissertation]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington. <http://www.idlboise.com/papers/KevinVanDenWymelenberg-phd > Accessed Aug 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg KG. 2014. Visual comfort, discomfort glare, and occupant fenestration control: developing a research agenda, LEUKOS. 10(4):207 ‐221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg KG, Inanici M. 2014. A critical investigation of common lighting design metrics for predicting human visual comfort in offices with daylight. LEUKOS. 10(3):145 ‐164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg KG, Inanici MN, Johnson PW. 2010. The effect of luminance distribution patterns on occupant preference in a daylit office environment. LEUKOS. 7(2):103 ‐122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Newsham GR. 2000. Preferred luminous conditions in open-plan offices: research and practice recommendations. Lighting Res Technol. 32(4):199 ‐212.
   Google Scholar
• Ward G. 2011. The RADIANCE 4.0 synthetic imaging system. Version 4.0. <http://www.radiance-online.org/ > Accessed June 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold J, Christoffersen J. 2006. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energ Buildings. 38(7):743 ‐757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaikina V, Matusiak BS, Klöckner CA. 2014a. Luminance-based measures of contour distinctness of 3D objects as a component of light modeling. LEUKOS. 11(1):31 ‐45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaikina V, Matusiak BS, Klöckner CA. 2014b. Luminance-based measures of shape and detail distinctness of 3D objects as important predictors of light modeling concept. Results of a full-scale study pairing proposed measures with subjective responses. LEUKOS. 11(4):193 ‐207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar