A Concept for Predicting Occupants’ Long-Term Visual Comfort within Daylit Spaces

REFERENCES

• American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers. 2012. ANSI/ASHRAE 55:2010 Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta, GA, ASHRAE Standard 2004:30.
   Google Scholar
• Fan D, Painter B, Mardaljevic J. 2009. A data collection method for long-term field studies of visual comfort in real-world daylit office environments. In: Proceedings of PLEA PLEA 2009–26th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Quebec City, Canada, 22–24 June 2009; p. 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hirning MB, Isoardi GL, Cowling I. 2014. Discomfort glare in open plan green buildings. Energ Buildings. 70:427–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirning MB, Isoardi GL, Coyne S, Garcia Hansen VR, Cowling I. 2013. Post occupancy evaluations relating to discomfort glare: a study of green buildings in Brisbane. Build Environ. 59:349–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IESNA] Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 2012. IES spatial daylight autonomy (sDA) and annual sunlight exposure (ASE). New York (NY): IESNA Lighting Measurement. Publication No. IES LM-83-12.
   Google Scholar
• [ISO] International Standards Organization. 1992. Ergonomic requirements for office work with display terminals (VDTs), Part 3: visual display requirements. Geneva, Switzerland: The International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Publication No. ISO 9241–3.
   Google Scholar
• [ISO] International Standards Organization. 2008. Ergonomics of human–system interaction Part 303: requirements for electronic visual displays. Geneva, Switzerland: The International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Publication No. ISO 9241–303.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubiec JA. 2014. The use of visual comfort metrics in the design of daylit spaces. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubiec JA, Reinhart C. 2012. The “adaptive zone”—a concept for assessing discomfort glare throughout daylit spaces. Lighting Res Technol. 44:149–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubiec JA, Reinhart C. 2013. Predicting visual comfort conditions in a large daylit space based based on long-term occupant evaluations: a field study. In: 13th International IBPSA Conference, Building Simulation, Proceedings of BS2013: 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Chambéry, France, August 26–28; p. 3408–3415.
   Google Scholar
• Keneli.org. 2012. Cambridge, Massachusetts weather. <http://weather.keneli.org/index.html> Accessed 2012 Jul 21.
   Google Scholar
• Konis K. 2014. Predicting visual comfort in side-lit open-plan core zones: results of a field study pairing high dynamic range images with subjective responses. Energ Buildings. 77:67–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic J. 1995. Validation of a lighting simulation program under real sky conditions. Lighting Res Technol. 27:181–188.
   Google Scholar
• Moghbell N. 2012. New model for VDT associated visual comfort in office spaces. Karlsruhe, Germany: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ochoa CE, Capeluto IG. 2006. Evaluating visual comfort and performance of three natural lighting systems for deep office buildings in highly luminous climates. Build Environ. 41:1128–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter B, Fan D, Mardaljevic J. 2009. Evidence-based daylight research: development of a new visual comfort monitoring method. In: Proceedings of Lux Europa; Proceedings of Lux Europa. 2009. 11th International Lighting Conference; Istanbul, 9–11 September 2009..
   Google Scholar
• Perez R, Seals R, Michalsky J. 1993. All weather model for sky luminance distribution—preliminary configuration and validation (Erratum). Sol Energy. 5:1993.
   Google Scholar
• Reindl D, Beckman W, Duffie J. 1990. Diffuse fraction correlations. Sol Energy. 45:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart C. 2004. Lightswitch-2002: a model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Sol Energy. 77:15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart C, Rakha T, Weissman D. 2015. Predicting the daylight area—a comparison of students assessments and simulations at eleven schools of architecture. LEUKOS. 10:193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart C, Walkenhorst O. 2001. Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energ Buildings. 33: 683–697.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg KG. 2015. Visual comfort, discomfort glare, and occupant fenestration control: developing a research agenda. LEUKOS. 10:207–221.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg KG, Inanici MN. 2014. A critical investigation of common lighting design metrics for predicting human visual comfort in offices with daylight. LEUKOS. 10:145–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg KG, Inanici MN, Johnson P. 2010. The effect of luminance distribution patterns on occupant preference in a daylit office environment. LEUKOS. 7:103–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voit P, White D, Bummele A. 2007. Gund Hall: analysis of envelope performance and thermal comfort Stuttgart, Germany: Transsolar, unpublished report.
   Google Scholar
• Ward GL. 1994. The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system. Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 459–472.
   Google Scholar
• Wasilowski HA, Reinhart CF. 2009. Modelling an existing building in Designbuilder/EnergyPlus custom versus default inputs. Building Simulation 2009: The Eleventh International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference. Glasgow, Scotland. July 27–30, 2009. p. 1252–1259.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold J. 2009. Dynamic daylight glare evaluation. Building Simulation 2009: The Eleventh International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference. Glasgow, Scotland. July 27–30, 2009. 944–951.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold J, Christoffersen J. 2006. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energ Buildings. 38:743–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar